| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1651
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Reply
Just my thought, too - it's a bit strange that most video-quality are "behind" - because it can be done at a lot of sites - 1ByDay, even Nubiles now and a lot others. Therefor it's strange that a somewhat major site/sites from Karup's has such an awerage/rather mediocre quality in the videos - and it's a pitty - the models, style and editing are good...
|
06-23-09 03:10pm
|
Reply
1652
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
Fine review here - have had my eyes on this site...
But one question: quality of videos.
The other Karup's - sites tends to have videos in a standard thats not fit for June 2009. Certainly NOT crisp.
You mention here in cons, james:
- Average video quality on most videos
Does this mean it's the same standard as the other Karup's-sites?
If so, I have to agree. It's a pity with the quality of videos at Karup's PC - because the models are getting better and better - if the videos were crisp - a site like that would be great.
|
06-23-09 02:49pm
|
Reply
1653
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Review
Very fine and helpful review. Been at Karup's PC three or four times - but not lately/almost a year - this gives me an urge to go back - thanks luv lickn clit!
|
01-12-13 06:06am
|
Reply
1654
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
Monty, since I recommended this site on your request let me say this:
Karups PC is like so many major sites with a long background (since 1997):
Newer material is of course much better than what you find from early 2000, before and a little after.
But generally Karup's PC is still getting better and better regarding both vids and pix quality. Though I also get 1500x1000 checking my sets, they're absolutely fine for full screen viewing.
Like vids, like pix you can't only rely on actual size regarding viewing quality....at least in my experience...and this user is considering yet another rejoin.
|
10-26-11 05:58am
|
Reply
1655
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I think Capn got a good point.
Generally most of the content appears exclusive to this user.
But it's a bit hard to say precisely - the similar style of vids/sets seems to be originated by Karups - but who gets access later on (licensed ect.) is...yes, like Capn mentions: an open question...
|
10-14-11 08:16am
|
Reply
1656
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks, messmer....there is quite a good number of sets/vids with lingerie and/or just cute underwear - and scenes where items are removed gradually. Can't put a percentage on, really - but the good thing is this:
Most models have several sets and 3-4 vids (some more) and generally the girls are wearing different things in each set - and among these there is fine lingerie/or sexy bra and thongs....(and not much stripped socks, thanks you)
|
10-31-10 02:29am
|
Reply
1657
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Well, squirrel - that navigation is certainly a matter of opinion, grant you that. But as Karup's PC was one of my earlier sites ever to join and been coming back now and then for some time, I maybe learned to like/relate to that navigation - still think it's rather simple - but ok, it's probably mostly a matter of "being used to"...
BTW: I do not find that KPC has more close-ups than others - maybe the opposite, even.
But anyway thanks for the thumbs-up...and appreciate the ping-pong about reviews. We need that here.....
|
10-26-10 07:37am
|
Review
1658
|
Karup's PC
(0)
88.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ An exorbitant amount of material
+ You can go on for days/weeks/months in your search
+ You'll find a lot of exclusive/licensed material here, that's hard to find anywhere else.
+ Even with the use of licensed material (too!), you'll find stuff here that might take you a lot of time to locate anywhere else (and save you some money)
+ Easy navigation - it's generally fun to browse all this content.
+ A lot of exclusive vids and photosets - even if they generally got external providers.
+ Fine updates - every day. (Except weekends)
+ Much better vid-quality - lately.
+ DM allowed and zip for pix
+ Almost ALL vids in WMV |
| Cons: |
Not so damn much in the cons. - but:
- The new/newer vids quality could still be a bit better!!
- In spite of the enormous amount of material, quite a lot - or at least some of the models are VERY average.
- I like old stuff, by all means - but too much of this are in low quality.
- Most of the vids here are in average quality - only the very new are in HD - wish they would update some of the old vids.
- The navigation is generally fine - but the design is an 'old timer' - they need to renew that - with a touch, though.
- A lot of model-name confusion.
AND - Cons bottomline: Why not get together a Karups network, too! |
| Bottom Line: |
Karup's PC - man, I've been here a LOT of times over the years - it's porn - no: PORN - from when things where a little bit greener/younger.
This site - and the Karup's Hometown Amateurs - and the later Karup's Older Women kind of reminds me of the old days - not so much bullshit - just a lot of fine material in vids and pix-sets - and hours and hours of browsing - and enjoying.
Like the deal where you can find models with pix and vids from long time back:
MAN, dig this - I even found the greatest vids and sets of an hungarian model - Chanel - who's now a 'working girl' (escort-service) here in Denmark/Europe - always wanted to fuck her - and now she has very fine vids and sets here - funny!
You can go on at this Karup's PC - and locate girls/models that you have not seen in a long time - and wow, suddenly, you'll find material - sometimes a little older stuff than you'll find at 21. Sextury or DDF or elsewhere. BUT the same model.... I like that!
Generally the pix/photosets of just a little older material seems/are better than the older vids.
The quality of newer vids - from late 2009 and 2010 has increased a lot. Most now in HD - whatever that means - because even if they're ok in viewing quality - none of the vids - even the latest are in the same league as what you can watch from 21. Sextury/DDF/and alike - and very far from In The Crack - if Karup's PC would ever get there, I'd put another 5 on the score...
But bottomline Karup's PC is a very decent site with a hell of a lot of fine material for the serious pornbrowser - but bare in mind 2/3 of the vids/sets are softcore - only 1/3 hc (aproxx.) - the same goes for the pixsets.
(BTW: That my score is the same as the DUKE's (TBP), says more about the DUKE than this user, but we agree here... LOL) |
|
10-25-10 06:42am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1659
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Guess I agree with you, PP - about their providers and differences....quit ATK about a month ago - and compared the two I like Karups dealing/providers of HC-vids better than ATK - well, of course I just got started at Karups after being away a long time - so it might be the sense of something new - again.....
|
10-13-10 06:21am
|
Comment
1660
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
|
10-12-10 08:34am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1661
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks for that thumb-up...
Agree, Karups - no matter which site - has always been very decent/accurate in costumer-service. And, man - that's what counts too for a good pornsite.
|
01-12-09 07:41am
|
Reply
1662
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
Fine review here!
Agree with TrashMan in pros and cons.
The amount of content is amazing and there's a girl/model for every taste.
And I certainly agree with the cons: The name-"givning" are a mess. If you find a model, you want to search for any place else: no chance - not even with alias..
Newer vids are getting better, but still the older ones are not good - even the ones from summer/fall 2008.
|
01-10-09 03:14pm
|
Reply
1663
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
If you have not tried any of them, I'd say Karups PC as the first choise - (others may think different) - But the PC-site has a bit more euro-girls and a better variation in videos in this users opinion.
Anyway there's pix and videos for days and days of browsing at both sites
|
12-19-08 11:03am
|
Reply
1664
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Hi Jeff
Yes, I've been a member on and off for years. The reason for that is of course quality and a well runned site/sites. And with a fine - or rather GREAT - selection of models - and that's top!. I think the collection of models is your foremost advantage.
This term I've seen some even better HD-videos - times has grown from blurred dittos - we (costumers) want them crisp now, don't we?. So it's my hope, at the Karup-sites in the future will consider doing that - and that would make the sites EVEN better...
Cheers!
Denner
|
12-18-08 07:51am
|
Comment
1665
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
|
12-17-08 10:14am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1666
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Fine to hear from/read this thorough reply from a webmaster...
|
11-14-08 09:30am
|
Reply
1667
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
I don't know how things were a couple of months back - just joined agin. But the new design and navigation-style goes for the member-area too.
Hope that helps.
|
08-07-08 12:00am
|
Comment
1668
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
|
08-06-08 07:41am
Replies (4)
|
Review
1669
|
Karup's PC
(0)
89.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I wonder why Karups PC is on an average scale with BP (82-85) - whereas PU is 90-95. Well, I'm not the one to guess.
Pros: This site has a magnificent amount of photos and videos - the later of both are high/average quality. Photos with zip, videos only in wmv.
Very good updates - both photos and video. A lot better than most sites. |
| Cons: |
The quality in general could be better for the videos - a least a little better - the latest are ok, but not top.
The navigation for photos are irritating to say the least. Every girl has sections of photos. But every section is divided into smaller parts of 8-10 pics. And you have to navigate through it all one-by-one - both for whole photos and for zips. |
| Bottom Line: |
During the last two, three or maby four years Karups PC has given me good and new stuff.
The navigation is very special, but for a video-fan it's not bad at all.
The last year or so Karups deliver 1-2 update series of videos a week. And it's updates that includes 5-6 video-series to download. Hardcore and solo and some lez. Solos are divided into two files, hardcore mostly into four parts. A little strange that a site this large do not go for whole downloads - but ok, a movie joiner is good here.
What pleases me the most is, that a lot of the solo girl and hardcore videos are exclusive - I've found a lot of new girls at this site - and the good and regular updates makes me come back to the site now and then.
There is a mix of US-girls and typical easteuropeans - alas the US-girl videos has embarrasing soundstuff where some yerk try to make a "sexy" conversation with the girl - well, we've seen that in too many US-sites.
But "bottom line" Karups PC has a lot of good videos which I'd hope will still get better in HD-quality.
For the photo section you will have a hard time finding a site with bigger content - so regardless of the stupid dividing of each girl-section, it's still a lot of fun navigating through the hugh amount of photos. |
|
07-29-07 09:15am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1670
|
Katie Fey
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Just want to second ace - curious too!
She's looks great - was a member maybe two years ago - I think - and back then the video quality was NOT good...
|
10-24-08 05:12am
|
Reply
1671
|
Kedra Alliard
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
92 and 97 for this site - with that kind and amount of content - strange.
And ok, we all got different taste, but to name Kedra "one of the most beautiful, sensual and sexy women you will ever see"........?
At first hand I'd like to get pissed and think: friends and/or relatives of siteowers - but then again - just take it with a LOL.
Good point/input here, mbaya!
|
06-16-09 08:37am
|
Reply
1672
|
Kerotic
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I certainly agree - and I still do not understand the rating at TBP for KScan.
Well, our fellow users can se other rating at PU.
|
08-19-07 11:06am
|
Comment
1673
|
Kerotic
(0)
|
|
08-19-07 09:15am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1674
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Reply
I agree that Killergram is probably the best tip for a top british pornsite now...
This user is a fan and a neverending searcher for brit-porn - and it's slim. Got some soft-sites as favorites, but still looking for the british stuff. And oh, yes, Killergram did a lot - maybe this user just got tired of those "same ol' scenes, don't know - would it not be great if some other kind of british hc-site could grap a hold of those models and make new kind of scenes - well, we can all dream...
|
12-26-08 09:40am
|
Reply
1675
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
picdude's Comment
As the first reviewer of this site at PU just a few words in reply to this:
Guess it may be the best british site overall - have not been to all -:)
I gave Killergran an 88 in that first review. Still - "after all these years" - or less - it's not over the famous 90.
Killergram certainly does some good with a lot of fine/decent porn. And with a lot of great models (yes, like Delta White, for one). But Killergram are not getting much better - except from more videos/even with some new models.
The reason seems obvious to this pornuser: The scenes/the editing are too similar - even with new models and with new "stages"...(like more scenes named af "Streetgirls" - just an exampel).
But when it comes down to reality, the "fuckscenes/videos" are too much alike....then again that may be the biggest problem at most sites...
|
12-26-08 09:17am
|
