| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1401
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
mr smut - yeah, hope you enjoy it - I did for some membership terms. And BTW I think they've grown better lately - earlier their videos were not of great quality - and (earlier too) they seemed to go for to many more boring/common looking models.
They have a rising star with the name of Megane - she's got her own site own (but way too expensive) - does she have newer content now - last time I was a member is maybe five months ago?
|
12-04-08 08:36am
|
Reply
1402
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
Reply of
choosy's Review
choosy ask if he may be too fussy about the models standard.
I don't think he is. Earlier (a year or two ago)this site was almost great.
They recently made new design and new this and that.
But the standard of the models and the standard of the videos are not getting better visa versa....
|
08-15-07 12:06pm
|
Comment
1403
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
|
05-15-07 06:17am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1404
|
Exxxposers
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I noticed the 69 score at TBP - but the preview looks kind of ok/special......but I'd never again get used to what we all know here as "low quality".
Thanks for the warning......
|
06-05-11 10:00am
|
Comment
1405
|
Fantastic Cumshots
(0)
|
|
05-11-08 06:53am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1406
|
Fantasy Female Fights
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Another fine/great/nice review from mbaya....
Not my kind of of fetish - still it looks like this site (finally) do some full body vids - and the UK-deal does not make it worse - and if I had all the money in the world, I might join here - will probably prefer to use my money elsewhere...........but it's certainly not uninteresting...
|
12-23-10 07:54am
|
Comment
1407
|
Fantasy Girl Pass
(0)
|
|
05-05-11 08:09am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1408
|
FC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
George's Review
Just a question:
The preview video seems heavy on air-brushing - does that go for all the videos?
|
04-09-07 03:08pm
|
Reply
1409
|
Fedorov HD
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Thanks, Capn!
Oh yes, take a good look at the previews - so you do not get disappointed.
We all got a little different preferences - that's why a useful preview is so important - I think.
|
03-26-11 08:29am
|
Reply
1410
|
Fedorov HD
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks for the words, Drooler.....somewhere and finally in that: "the pickings are getting slim" - this site does a lot of good ..and new/newish..
|
03-24-11 09:43am
|
Review
1411
|
Fedorov HD
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ Exclusive material - totally, as I see it.
+ Good selection of completely new models!!
+ Mostly beautiful easteuro - and w-euro models
+ A fine sense of the solo erotica
+ Good variation in models and style
+ Very sensual indoor shoots and beautiful outdoor ditto.
+ Ok on updates for a new site, exclusive and somewhat small site.
+ Fine quality in vids and sets (except: see below)
+ Vids in WMV, MP4 and iPhone.
+ Zip for sets (3000 px)
+Good preview
+ Fine feedback from webmaster |
| Cons: |
- Still a little too few videos - now 28 vids.
- ONLY solo girls - but ok, this is what the site is about.
- Music sound mostly in vids - a few with live sound and some mixed.
- Can't blame the price of $ 24.95 much - BUT with this limited amount a bit lower price in the start would have been fine.
- Generally a rather small site till now: 28 vids and aproxx. 138 sets.
- I'b have preferred more indoor shoots - vids and sets. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is the same guy who runs the (in my opinion) very fine EroBerlin site - based in Germany - and who goes all over Europe and even the US to make the shoots for vids and sets.
I think this is a producer/siteowner who at the moment is doing a really good job on the sensual/erotic solo front.
The fact that so many of the models are new/newish and quite a few not seen anywhere else got to give this site a thumb up for the pornuser.
Take a look at the fine preview to see what models you can expect - and see how many of these models you've seen elsewhere.
My praise goes primarily to that fact - in the never ending hunt for new material.
Alas - as a main video-fan - this Fedorov does not have that great specialty as EroBerlin - where girls/models in quite a few of the videos does a nice dirty talk in their charming broken/easteuro accent English.
But then again this site has made a serious revival for this user concerning photosets. This could almost sound like a US commercial:
"Tired of all the wellknown ways to do sets, tired of all the wellknown models - well, then you've come to the right place...."
Seriously - and bottom line: This is somewhat a fresh deal in models and sets - and the quality of generally 3000 px - and zip - no complains.
This site is to recommend - but do not get disappointed - check out the preview for the models... |
|
03-24-11 07:54am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
1412
|
Fembomb.com
(0)
|
|
06-30-13 09:32am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1413
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
You got understandig here, bro......Femjoy is - or now was - a site with generally NO toys - sad it's changed.
|
01-20-13 08:00am
|
Reply
1414
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
Good tip - thanks!
BUT - once again the currency-problems makes it no good - try to join from Europe - you have to pay euro 19.95 - or $ 27 something......
Incredible that those major billing-companies has not made regulations after such a long time and so MANY inputs/complains about this....
|
08-15-09 10:37am
|
Reply
1415
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Ok price - fine tip, thanks PP
|
08-27-08 06:28am
|
Reply
1416
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
Good point.
Please see reply to latest poll.
|
11-25-07 02:38pm
|
Comment
1417
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
|
11-03-10 09:01am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1418
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
Yes: if anything goes wrong - I hate that possibility - can you expect one or more extra bills? Because you cannot rely on these people.
And yes - the site is not that good, so guess I'll skip it in the future...again: a fine warning.
|
08-27-10 07:25am
|
Reply
1419
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
Been a member - twice - some years ago. Always liked that soft style they deal with - as a variation.
It's a little bit like Babespotting.tv, a little bit.
But the deal here now sounds not good.
Thanks for the warning....
|
08-27-10 06:34am
|
Comment
1420
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
|
|
10-05-08 09:31am
Replies (0)
|
Review
1421
|
Flashy Babes
(0)
72.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some swell looking girls you (probably) will not see anywhere else.
Ok amount of sets and videos.
Videos are the top here and good quality- generally.
Mostly canadian girls and most very sexy
If you like softcore solo-girls, you'll find something here that no other site have (it seems)
Easy navigating. |
| Cons: |
No zip for photos (Man, it's 2008 - get your act together)
Some models are very "shy" or whatever. But some models do not even show their tits.
This could be considered as an american/canadian version of Only Tease - but it's even more soft.
Could not get the "Live" part to work, maybe it's my own fault?
Expensive! |
| Bottom Line: |
Browsed this site several times - then forgot all about it, until I saw silvers review.
When browsing the site again some real fine looking teens/girls came up.
The preview is ok, but get you to a point where you think the content is better than it really is.
I first went for the videos - as usual.
The best resolution is 720x480 - not top. But most videos are ok in quality - and then again the earlier videos still seem a bit blurred - even for 720x480.
They should do better in video resolution to make some kind of hit in the softcore-area.
Too bad some of the better looking models are doing videos extremely soft. No nipples, some keep their bra on and MOST do not remove their panties.
But - as mentioned - this is somewhat an answer to the british Only Tease - and if that's ok with you, this site is a fine alternative.
Still, you have to be a sucker for soft, because it's still $ 29.95 - and that's way too expensive for what you get, if you're looking for porn - even softcore.
And this is foremost for video-freaks. The photo-sets are fewer and there's no zip!
The navigation is allright with a lot of choices in browsing.
Do not know about the interaction, did not try, did not care.
Still - the live thing they promised did'nt wotk at all for this user.
Some good soft videos - but will NOT be back. |
|
03-18-08 10:10am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1422
|
Flexi Fetish Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
Great and fun comment/reply......,williamj
Let's hear from the webmasters, if they're not too shy.
|
10-12-07 05:14am
|
Reply
1423
|
Flexi Fetish Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Comment
Well, good question - in this context the word "whore" is simply stupid.
At this site the girls are just flexible and showing off this and that and more. That do not make them "whores". This is erotica. And I think this use of the word is just a way of selling the site - and still stupid.
Second: I would'nt consider this hardcore - I would'nt even consider dildo-masturbation hardcore.
I guess in my european way on regarding any kind of porn hardcore is simply fucking and maybe blowjobs and even handjobs (don't really know about the last, that's maybe just masturbation - even if there are two or more people involved).
In general solo-girls - doing all the stuff you can think of - are erotica.
|
10-11-07 01:30pm
|
Reply
1424
|
Flower Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Again, you said it, messmer....
|
04-24-08 08:05am
|
Reply
1425
|
Flower Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Great review - this is - also - what we need concerning not recommended...
Thanks for the fine warning!!!
You wasted your money - I won't waste mine....
Owe you one....
|
04-24-08 08:02am
|
