| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
901
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Reply
Thanks for the tip - I downloaded latest version - but it did not help - but still no problem running those early .mov with Quicktime. Just do NOT like that media player...
|
10-19-08 02:29pm
|
Comment
902
|
Amateur Allure
(0)
|
|
10-17-08 02:09pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
903
|
Amateurs Gone Bad
(0)
84.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Tremendous amount of videos and photosets
Video-quality is still getting better (new ones, of course)
Easy navigation
Access to four more sites, mainly Glamour Models Gone Bad and the great Crissy Moran.
Daily updates for the two main sites AGB and GMGB.
Good mix of both US and Euro models
Zip for photosets
Stream for those who dig that |
| Cons: |
Very slow updates for some bonus-sites like Crissy Moran and Lonnie Waters.
Early videos in poor quality
Only wmv-downloads
Too many models without video
Irregular download speed
Most content non-exclusive |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site that has grown over the years - both in quantity (of course), and in quality.
It's part of a "network" where you get five sites - no matter which you join.
Top pick here is of course Amateurs Gone Bad and Glamour Models Gone Bad.
In the package you also get Crissy Morans official-site (it's called that, anyway), Lonnie Waters and Natalia Cruz.
Joined because of Crissy - here are some tremendous newer videos (most in full files) both solo and hardcore. Those videos are a tresure for Crissy-fans. Crisp quality - between 90 and 270 Mb. Only WMV.
Lonnie has few videos - bad quality.
Natalia Crus: average video quality.
The two main-sites delivers a magnificent amount of material - both videos og photosets. Video-files mostly between 80 and 200 Mb - and again the later are in best quality - early ones just poor.
Photosets today mostly 1500x1000 and with zip.
A bit strange difference in models at Glamour and Amateur:
Amateur has a lot of european models - both video and photosets - whereas the main part of videos at Glamour are US-models, but a lot of euro models for the photosets.
A somewhat 50/50 deal on hc and sologirl.
Fine preview inside: videos in smaller part (and full) or stream in smaller part and full.
This site/sites have been around for a long time and today it has both a lot of content - though most is non-exclusive - and far better quality.
If your're a serious pornbrowser these sites has a lot to offer in hours and hours of videos of both hc, lez and especially solo-girl nature...
It's recommended... |
|
08-26-08 03:47pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
904
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Nookiemonster's Comment
Very difficult to judge age by the looks - remember the somewhat famous Little Lupe-case...
|
03-22-11 02:44pm
|
Review
905
|
Amour Angels
(0)
70.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Photo-section is the best for this site
A lot of exclusive easteuropean teens and a lot known easteuropean teen in exclusive photo-sets.
Some fine videos in fine quality, some in average/poor qiality
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Way too few videos.
The site has promissed more videos and updates for archives videos, but that has not been fullfilled in my period of membership. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was one I had some expectations for. Since the webmaster stated to both jd1961 and myself in a mail, that the amount of videos would increase.
But that has not happened.
In almost a month three, maybe four new videos has appeared - that's a laugh.
Look at the price - almost the same as 1ByDay - which has 2 dayly videos in very high quality.
But ok, for old timers like me on the porn-hunt 1ByDay and alike might get a little boring in the long run. So the alternative COULD be a site like Amour Angels.
But, folks at PU - AA is not an alternative. The pickinŽis much too slim. For a video-freak you do not want to restrict yourself with three or maybe four new videos in a month for $29.95.
The best thing about this site is the amount of exclusive photos - and thats what earns the score. But I no longer care much about photo-sets, so for other video-entusiast at PU: I cannot recommend this site. |
|
11-26-07 07:32am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
906
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
In the fairytale of Amour Angels I now counted 29 videos - as a member. One new since I joined two weeks ago.
And I'm still frustrated about their alleged daily video updates - that are not existing....
It's close to rip-off.
So PUs are hereby warned.
|
11-21-07 11:50am
|
Comment
907
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
|
11-20-07 02:13pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
908
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
silver's Review
Just joined....
Cannot find 300 videos!
It's still the same old 40-45. Not good!
How do you count, silver????????????
|
11-12-07 10:48am
|
Reply
909
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Hey jd1961
Just joined - the message from "silver" is not right!
There're still only about 40 full videos....
Well, either silver is not sure about the amount/the counting or there somethings else wrong here....
Will be back
|
11-12-07 09:30am
|
Reply
910
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
silver's Review
Just got the good news from jd1961.....
And the review from silver looks like the site have earned the 90.
Great review, except your statement, silver, at Cons I don't quite understand: "No hardcore and softcore"??? What's left?
|
11-12-07 09:00am
|
Reply
911
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks for the great update, jd1961...........
And well, you might consider to rejoin with these good news.
Thanks, again.
|
11-12-07 08:56am
|
Reply
912
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Great, jd1961 - that sounds promising - and again thanks for a very good tip about AA in general....
|
11-11-07 08:13am
|
Reply
913
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
That's really good news - because it's a great photosite, agree.
But for a video-fan it's not very good. Way too limited amount, so far.
And the statement of "filling up archives" instead of just updates sounds very good, too.
And jd1961 - did the newsletter say WHEN they start upgrading amounts of videos?
|
11-11-07 06:38am
|
Reply
914
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks, jd1961 - really appreciate that respons!
Denner, the video nerd.
|
10-10-07 09:08am
|
Reply
915
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Hey jd1961
Great with a new review of this site - almost made it, but went to Errotic Archives instead (with Nubiles again and again as the third choise). The reason for choosing alternatives was the low amout of videos at AA according to the latest estimate from TBP (21).
Can you give a hint on the approx amout (of videos) today - saw a couple elsewhere at 400 Mb - soft, but pretty good.
Thanks for this new and fine review.....
|
10-09-07 02:38pm
|
Reply
916
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Hey jd1961
Thanks for the reply - very helpfull....
|
09-01-07 08:31am
|
Comment
917
|
Amour Angels
(0)
|
|
08-23-07 07:14am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
918
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
longbucks's Reply
See reply to your sistersite: 18 Virgin Sex - it covers the same aspect..
|
01-12-09 07:37am
|
Reply
919
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Squirrel, just great to have you here as a fellow PU - and of course great you're another one from the UK/Europe - look forward to some good discussions - and mutual warnings/recommondations - you got to the right place, if you ask this danish user....and of course you've been wished welcome here from some of the "good ol' boys"... and man, you got a fine attitude...
Cheers, mate!!!
|
12-26-08 09:01am
|
Reply
920
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
Exactly, bro....
That's one of the main reasons here (in my book): Good common support and ditto warnings, so none of us - hopefully - do not waste too much money. I've always considered PU as my main place of mutual help/giving help in joining/membership of different sites. And by all means a mutual help when problems come up.......and Squirrel, you got that sence too....(great reply, thanks)
|
12-26-08 08:11am
|
Comment
921
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
|
12-26-08 06:56am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
922
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, bro - besides the everlasting fine hints/tips (here: models alias at MetArt/MetModels - man, how do you keep up so well on these names - it's overwhelming) - it's also great to get the other feedbacks as above.
Checked out the Julia D as Dasha at Teendreams - she something out of the ordenary - man, those eastern teens just keep comming up - one finer than the other....it's is just great/fun to browse for sweets/candy like that......
|
12-23-08 09:11am
|
Reply
923
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
BTW, Ze Droolah (can't forget that one)....
Did you check out Pretty4Ever lately?
Both in photosets and videos there seems to been both great new stuff and some smashing new models: Paris, Pantera, Eva, Alina - just some I'm not so familiar with...
|
12-23-08 07:43am
|
Comment
924
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
|
12-23-08 05:37am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
925
|
Amour Babes
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Apart from the bummer that I'm dealing the login-problems now I would not recommend this site, nor the bonus dittos.
Joined this Amour Babes because there where some videos of a couple of girls not seen (the videos) elsewhere (yet).
But compared to a lot of fine sites at the price of around the famous $29.95 this is pretty much waste of money (to this user, too - even if I got the wanted videos)
|
12-23-08 05:02am
|
