| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
826
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Man, am I a novice here.....
That means that it's NOT 21.Sextury who puts up the limit...or what?
|
03-22-11 07:52am
|
Reply
827
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
What's ISP?
But does that mean a general download limit of 1TB pr month of membership?
Not that it matters much - you got to be a busy little bee to download that amount.
And about new models: Willa - oh, yes, she's been at 21. for a year or so - got this great vid: strip at the pole and DP - downloaded it in May 2010..
But bottom line, exotics: thanks for the update/info for this - still - great network.
|
03-22-11 07:21am
|
Reply
828
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Sandstone's Reply
Hello Sandstone
Thank you for coming forward here at PU - which was my intention - just a reaction and some explanation here at PU..
After your reply I realized that this explanation from you was at the former comment - the same day, almost at the same time, so I did not see that, before my input.
I have now - and thanks - hope it'll all work out...
Cheers!
Denner
|
01-18-11 03:56am
|
Comment
829
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
|
01-17-11 06:13am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
830
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Praise RustyJ for this input......and honestly:
"Today was a good day"
We PAY for our deals - and we - of course - expect to get what we pay for....not for sites that miss their obligations towards the customer.
Sure, any site can run into problems - but why do I so much recognize the situation (over and over) stated here by RustyJ?
......and again: "Today was a good day" (at 21Sextury) .......Jeeeeez...
Tomorrow I may expect the worse...
|
01-13-11 07:58am
|
Reply
831
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Lordy, lordy - do they still have that extremely annoying problem? - and I was about to join once more - the previews seems so great, again...
They have had this earlier, btw, quite a lot of times in 2010.
Webmasters at 21Sextury.com: how can you live with this?
An answer to present and future members would be appropriate...
|
01-07-11 07:43am
|
Reply
832
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Reply
nadiencendia, this has been annoying me too - for a long time...so it's good you bring it up again - and thanks to your comment, I could not resist to make a new thread - see that, if you like....
BTW: agree somewhat about Viv Thomas - except that what I've seen the vid quality lacks a lot - in general...
|
12-10-10 07:55am
|
Reply
833
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
I think nadiencendia here says what a lot of us/PUs feel - and not only for this site/network - but for quite a few others:
Instead of being so fond - photographers/video-ditto - of a vast amout/looooong minutes of close-ups - let's get much more full body views...including the face, the legs, the high heels...
Close-ups are part of the deal and it's ok - BUT not 2/3 or even 3/4 of a set/video...
We have been around this many times, so the producers/Webmasters must have an idea what the paying users are looking for - it's still a mystery, that they obviously do not listen...don't you guys care - not to loose the dough from users?
Anyway - thanks for bringing it up again!
|
12-10-10 07:02am
|
Reply
834
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Very fast reply from WM (8 minutes) - thumbs up!
|
12-10-10 06:39am
|
Reply
835
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Good update/info - thanks, RustyJ
|
09-27-10 09:42am
|
Reply
836
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Comment
nadiencendia got a very good point here - I know it's subjective, but this user have that FEELING, too.
Generally this new network has caused problems for the former corporation of Pixandvideo, Club Sandy ect.
21st Sextury STILL has a lot to offer and I'd still name it as a favorite - but as I'm coming along in my membership, THINGS are not like they used to be - still the navigation/search ect. bothers me.
AND when you got problems like that, SOME of the fun at these former great sites is less.
AND those problems with NOT updated video-quality from earlier sites.
Mailed the webmasters, but the answer was a bit like blowing in the wind: We upgrade the early videos first....but how can later videos (2008) now come in a lot worse quality that before the change?
Still waiting for an answer from webmasters about that...
|
03-02-10 06:58am
|
Comment
837
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
|
02-25-10 07:43am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
838
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
As a present member I'll just like to add that in my opnion this review is very accurate about the present situation at this network. And it's a very fine help for other PUs who consider joining.
When I joined again some weeks ago, they had problems - like Wittyguy mentions - the last couple of days SOME of those problems are 'on the way to recovery' - it seems.
It's got to take some work to change a sites design/layout/navigation as here...
BTW, exotics: BlueAngelLive has now 54 scenes - solo, hc/bg, lez, backstage ect. - have not been at photos, but some of videos are just great....
|
02-25-10 06:30am
|
Reply
839
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Well, jd - your're right - when writing that comment the speed had been fine a short period (around 650 kb/sec) - now it's down again to what it was some days ago - and I do not really understand why this is..
|
02-25-10 01:56am
|
Comment
840
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
|
02-23-10 01:00pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
841
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
|
02-18-10 06:10am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
842
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Comment
Blue Angel Live - a good point put up by moonbyrd.
First: When ending my latest term of membership of 21st Sextury some two-three weeks ago, I noticed that the site Blue Angel Live is/was a part of the deal (from the start) - BUT not mentioned by Damon - still the site was placed as an instant access at that left-placed column together with the rest - but no access when you tried.
Second: At TBP/PU the site - Blue Angel Live - is stated as a clone.
https://www.pornusers.com/review/blueangellive/
It does not look like that - please check out the 21st Sextury - and it looks like that a lot of the material with Blue Angel is ONLY at that site....
BTW: It's pretty smart - in my opinion - that the great site, Cuties Galore - one of the best with new easteuro models hit the fan after the 2nd recurring - but Damon: Just curious: What other sites do you get instant access to when joining Cuties Galore first?
But another BTW: A damn fine deal now for PU/TBP in joining at $ 19.95!
|
02-17-10 06:24am
|
Reply
843
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Rick, thanks for this 'join-in'.
Look forward to hear from Damon on this....
|
11-26-09 05:26am
|
Reply
844
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
damon21's Reply
Ok, thanks.
BUT: So what is this - a clone?
Or just a different front?
Anyway: Then it seems like an insurance-policy: remember to read that in small printing:
It states in the headlines when trying to join:
'TOTAL 40 WEBSITES'
... and then smaller about those loyalty-deals...
But again, ok - the best part about this 'new' thing is the preview of videos. Still some do not work - (NOT the ones that goes on to joining-page) but those who start the viewing-screen, but nothing comes up...
And, oh, BTW - where in here can I see which 25 sites is in at the first month (cannot find it anywhere)
|
11-25-09 11:35am
|
Comment
845
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
|
11-25-09 06:07am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
846
|
24 Main Street
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Great you agree....Drooler
BTW: I got some fine stuff (videos most - from Playboy)) with this very sexy and beautifull US-girl, Divini Ray (as mentioned) - any idea where there is more???
|
05-21-08 02:52pm
|
Review
847
|
24 Main Street
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Exclusive photosets and videos
Some fine looking girls/women - mostly US-asians
Cheap full trial
Ok quality for newer photos (1024x685) - but just ok! |
| Cons: |
No zip for photos
Small sized videos (2-5 minuttes)
Weird navigation
A little older videos poor quality
Lousy updates
Number of videos: approx: 100 - but some only 5-6 Mb. - and most NOT good quality |
| Bottom Line: |
I went for this site because it seemed to have some girls/women in the category of Playboy-style.
And some stuff with Divini Ray.
And the full trial at only $3.95.
Well for that small price you get full access, allright.
But the content is pretty slim and in general the quality is less than average:
Even if some of the videos are at 640x480 there's absolutely nothing crisp here - AND way too many videos are old at 320x240 in blurred standard - all wmv and only wmv.
TBP states 95 videos - could not count that many and a lot 3-6 Mb - short and bad quality.
Been here before one and a half year ago or more - and man, do they NOT deal in regular updates..
Most stuff seems to be from 2005 and 2006.
This is primarily a photosite - becuase the video section is simply too bad to make it a serious porn-site.
The navigation is strange, to say the least: Mainly you can search for photosets and videos (that's what most of us are into) - but you have to use some time to get around. Like searching for videos, you have to check out: A place called Drive In - I do not see much drive-in movie here - and for photosets: Curves... but ok, that's their kind of fun.
The worst part is lack of zip for the photos: I hate to download 50-80 photos in a set - manual.
Ok, this review is on a basis of only 3 days membership - but I won't stay...
And bottom line: I do not think this 24 Main Street live up to standards of good sites today - and certainly not sites that gets a score of about 80 at TBP |
|
05-21-08 02:05pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
848
|
3D Stripper
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
Sure, I'll get back after joining.
And I'm still looking for more 3D-sites, but "the picking are slim"".
The japaneese Aime-thing is not it, and some - also - japaneese regular 3D-sites has censored scenes - quite weird...
|
09-23-08 07:10am
|
Reply
849
|
3D Stripper
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
Thanks for a thorough review, asmith...
Has had a thing about this 3D for some time - it's different, too - for sure. Fantasy-like...
But only ONE girl - that's a downer.
Wish there were more sites like this - but with several types of girls - guess there is a lot of work (and expences) in creating stuff like that.
Still, I'll go for it...
|
09-23-08 06:15am
|
Reply
850
|
50Plus MILFs
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
First I'd like to say to messmer: "good luck"!!!!! - and this user, too, hates those kind of deals.
Am I mistaken, or are those entrapments more and more common?
Are we getting to a point where a lot of less serious pay sites use these methods...?
If not at PU - where else should we stand united with good/updated warnings?
Look forward to messmers review.
And thanks for the warning.
|
07-10-10 08:20am
|
