| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
2476
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
|
09-17-11 09:35am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2477
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
If they really stopped updating in 2009 this should be verified and informed at TBP...
|
09-10-11 08:09am
|
Reply
2478
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
I'm not very tech about pix - but the sets (the large size) I've downloaded says:
2000x1338x24b
Guess that 24b is bits?
Hope that helps!
Or maybe Drooler sees this - he's been a member -and has much more knowledge about pix than I have...
|
09-10-11 02:35am
|
Review
2479
|
Teenrotica
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ An extremely generous amount of models.
+ Not sure but it seems like entirely exclusive material (see below)
+ Generally hot looking models, most of European origin.
+ Mostly a site concentrating in sets so vids fans your're warned.
+ It's like thay say: tons of galleries
+ Zip in 2 sizes for sets
+ Mostly fine viewing quality for pix |
| Cons: |
- Close to miserable quality in the major amount of vids content unbelievable for an almost major site in 2011
- Outdated style, design and navigation
- Regional pricing
- Three formats for vids but none of them gives you any viewing pleasure
- Even some newer vids are a joke in viewing quality
- Too much lez content for my taste
- Even without regional pricing $19.95 it's too expensive for what you get in vids anyway
- No way of knowing about updates no date on those |
| Bottom Line: |
Oh, yes: bottom line: My personal feeling here is clear I wasted my money and that including the fact, that this site deals in regional pricing. But that's only a total secondary issue.
Teenrotica is downright outdated in style, in navigation, design and it's almost a scandal (harsh words, I know) that a site that cost $ 19.95 and for Europeans about $ 29 has such miserable material in videos.
Despite the preview has a so called UPDATE that is missing at the members area Instead you can turn to VIDEOS or GALLERIES for the latest and the first inputs. (or Models without dates)
When browsing for videos you get the new ones first and being a member years back, I thought: Okay, this site started up in 2006 and videos then were generally not good.
But the new ones in 2011 are in a quality I'd would be ashamed of, if I was behind the site.
The size is all in so called 3:4 and the viewing quality is simply low down.
Most vids are around 100 Mb in AVI format and much less in both WMV og MOV. Three formats save it and get better quality instead.
It's a shame. Because Teenrotica has so many fine models and I seriously believe it's exclusive.
We all got favorite models and the material I found of these models (both in pix and vids) I have not seen elsewhere.
This is mostly a site with solo and lez material both vids and sets. A few hc/bg inputs and most of these are only bj.
And for a couple of those bj vids it's lousy editing. No foreplay, no posing but starts with close ups of bj.....it seems like unfinished bussiness.
Then to the little more positive deals here:
The pix/sets are generally in ok/fine viewing quality. You get a choice of 2 zip download sizes (high and low) guess no one will go for the low. And you got a pretty good thumbnail preview for all sets.
And you can use the thumbnails to view directly in Small, Large og XL. Do not really see the point, but some may like it.
If I was a pix fan foremost, this site could get a little better score, in my view. But the design, style, navigation AND first of all: those low/very low quality vids I cannot recommend Teenrotica.
The 65 from this user is entirely due to the sets/models (See PU rating: 60-69 - Does more things wrong than right) |
|
09-09-11 08:05am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
2480
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Kalle's Reply
You will, Kalle, You will - spend some quality time here...there is no better place to get fine knowledge - and warnings - of paysites.
Unlike a lot of other "similar" sites this one really has the ups and downs for your search - PU is folks like you and I looking for fine porn and not wanting to get 'burned'........
|
06-22-11 08:29am
|
Reply
2481
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Kalle's Review
Nice review and update
Yes, the site tends to feel somewhat out-dated - even when I was there almost a year ago.
Things has - apparently - not changed much - but good to know this, Kalle and again thanks for the update........and welcome to a Norwegian from a Dane - you'll enjoy this TBP/PU, I bet.....
|
06-22-11 07:45am
|
Reply
2482
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I plead guilty...been lurkin' here several times and waiting for two thing:
1) The updates
2) The conversion-rates to get straight.
So I look for news about this site, too...
|
01-28-09 07:27am
|
Reply
2483
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Looks like Lupes little sister -:)
Not bad...
|
12-04-08 08:49am
|
Reply
2484
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan, please see my reply to messmer...
I will add to that: It's only CCBill that has these "reginal pricings" - as far as I have experienced - and Only for some sites - a growning number of sites with CCBill as the only billing-co. has changed that policy (or is it CCBill?) which means that the price in Euro are now exactly the same as if you paid in Dollars - even down to the smallest decimal..
A few - like the mentioned Teenrotica - has still not changed that.
|
12-03-08 06:33am
|
Reply
2485
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Yeah, I think it stinks.
Strangely enough it's practically only CCBill that keep those high prices regarding difference in currency.
Epoch do not - a couple of times or more I've written to the webmaster about the CCBill-price, and - man, they send me a link to join via Epoch at the price stated at TBP....in US-dollars!
|
12-03-08 06:22am
|
Reply
2486
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Abolutely agree, but jd - some of the girls/models still look awesome - in the previe, anyway.
But again - the words "teens" are a little too much...
|
12-03-08 06:19am
|
Reply
2487
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Yes - something like 90% of the sites I join is paid in US-dollars - typical through CCBill or Epoch.
BTW: Epoch is the best in regarding the dollars-payment...
|
12-03-08 06:18am
|
Reply
2488
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Like mr smut and The Squirrel I've seen this more and more - and like these fellow users I think it's a rip off and a speculation in earnings only - a bit like when some site "pre-mark" another site when joining one.
"Maybe those european do not notice the difference"
But ok, some sites have equalized the cost: $/Euro to the same in the end, Great!
And some sites even offers you a helping hand with a different link to join in US dollars even if your're placed in Europe (after writing to the webmaster) Great too.
|
12-02-08 03:59pm
|
Comment
2489
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
|
12-02-08 03:20pm
Replies (22)
|
Reply
2490
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Weird!
Does that mean, that this site acts as some kind of software checking out your computers memory, RAM ect...?
Never had that with any paysite - was a member of Teenrotica a year ago or so - but nothing like this happened.
I seen some pop-ups at dangerous free sites where this pop-up tells me that my computer need optimizing and their program offers to do a check-up. I run away as fast as I can.....
Here we need a comment from the webmaster at Teenrotica
|
05-09-08 01:30am
|
Reply
2491
|
Teens Love Old Men
(0)
|
Reply of
igolli's Review
Good review from igolli.
This site seems to be worth looking into and according to igolli it looks like it's dutch.
Heavy price, though.
|
09-20-07 06:14am
|
Comment
2492
|
Teens Love Old Men
(0)
|
|
09-20-07 06:06am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2493
|
Teens Magic
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
AGREE!
Been here ealier - the site is worthless - and deserves another warning like this.
And a score of 77,8 at TBP is just far out - Maggie, Maggie, Maggie....I'm disapointed.
|
08-16-09 06:23am
|
Comment
2494
|
Teens VIP Pass
(0)
|
|
04-18-10 08:43am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2495
|
Teens-r.us
(0)
|
Reply of
rayone's Review
Thanks for that review, rayone - I see it mostly as a welcome warning - had my eyes on the site.
But the facts that:
"Image quality is poor and the videos are not of the girls in the image section."
...says a lot.
One thing I really dislike is when models in the preview is not present at videos in the member-area...and, man: non exclusive videos...
|
02-26-09 02:17am
|
Reply
2496
|
Ten.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jthomas's Comment
Absolutely - "rookie" jthomas gets my yes-vote to a fellow trust user for this short and very accurate comment...concerning an overrated site.
|
12-23-07 09:47am
|
Reply
2497
|
Tera Patrick
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Hey mbaya
No - when I wrote "lower" - I meant that Tera Patricks site should be lower than in the mid/high 80th which was meant for the "whole deal" at Devils Film...
Maybe a little clumsy put from me - bottom line: agree with your score for Teras site - and BTW: what I really liked - among others -at Teras site - was some of her solo-videos and especially the interaction/pov or is it virtual (forget the right english term)....
Anyway, no big deal....
About Spyder Jonez: That's were Willie Nelsons words "Ladies love outlaws" really goes - strange...
|
08-26-08 02:38pm
|
Reply
2498
|
Tera Patrick
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Another serious/fine review from mbaya.
This Tera Patrick-site is a part of - among others - a "joint venture" with Devils Film. So all along the deal is good when you take the other sites in consideration - maybe even in the middle/high 80th...
But concerning this quite new site at the co-join, Tera Patrick is lower - score-wise - in my opinion.
Too much older stuff, but worse: In most of the new videos she gets fucked by a weird looking dude with more tattoes than your average biker and even meaner looking.
Well, like Willie Nelson says: "Ladies love outlaws..." - but it sure aint pretty....(to watch, anyway).
|
08-26-08 01:15pm
|
Review
2499
|
Thai Chix
(0)
55.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+Some real thai girls - only some.
+A few somewhat nice - and totally exclusive - vids
+If you are going for quantity and not quality - this is the place.
+ Sorry - not any more Pros.... |
| Cons: |
-The preview is a major cheat - inside the design is completely different and bad - and could not find any of the scenes from the preview...
-Horrible navigation
-Only one item download at a time.
-During one single download, you can't even browse the site.
-NOT a thai-site - except for a few vids/sets
-Most material is US-based asians, and can be found at a lot of other and older sites.
-Most material is non-exclusive
-Most vids in poor - very poor quality.
-Even at the price of 16.95 - it's a waste of money. |
| Bottom Line: |
I did it again - joined one lousy site, that I've joined before- a loooong time ago.
A fan of good/fine thai girl material, but this is (again() a total disappointment.
I know a real thai girl, when I see one - and there are a few here - but the vast majority of vids are non exclusive US-productions with asian girls of different origin.
So what does a thai-girl fan get here: Very little - some/a few special vids with girls filmed ind the right surroundings: A hotel in Bangkok or Pattaya - with some US-dude fucking them - fine, but way too few - and way too lousy vid-quality.
Have not found any over 640x480....and the sound quality is also a bummer.
The site got quite a few older/early thai vids - all from some other and more famous thai-site.
The navigation is the kind most hated from back in the 1990th.....the same goes for the design.
TBP states: 9.530 vids???
Could not find near half of that - maybe some really bad streaming vids are included here?
The same goes for the sets: Average quality and mostly US-asians - and the amount - did not even care to count it.
This site no where near deserves the 79,5 that "Maggie" send their way.....
Did TBP check out the total difference between the preview and what it promises - and what you get inside.. - Maggie should not have given this site such a fine score.
And to other thai-girl-fans: Stay away.
Not recommended. |
|
08-18-12 08:29am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2500
|
Thai Girls Wild
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Hey Rick..
Looks like this guy got a serious problem of his own - strange reaction, anyway. The comments were justified, I think - and, man a lot worse has hit a lot of other sites here at PU...
And it apparently hit me and my access to his site - see thread.
I'll write Epoch to clear up this - do not think he can just take my money and then block me out because of this...
Cheers!
Denner
|
02-23-10 08:46am
|
