| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
2251
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
|
03-18-08 08:24am
Replies (12)
|
Reply
2252
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Poll
If I was "living in the USSR" - sorry, USA - I'd use my PU-winnings on porn. But for this scandinavian user I have to go for Amazon.com - got some paperbacks (a lot of Tim Dorsey) and some fine porn-dvds (via Amazon, they can do that also).
|
03-16-08 09:43am
|
Comment
2253
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
03-16-08 09:36am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
2254
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Guess your right about US-porn - and it's too bad, because US-porn was the pioneer - when no one else did the job - the french, the germans - and yes, us danes came around later - but it was only a copy of US-porn.
Things sure have changed since - not that euro-porn in general is so great, but the most US-porn is getting boring and sterotype/static (I may not have the right english words, but anyway)
JD is right, quote:
"I think the quality of American porn is at its lowest point ever."
|
03-13-08 09:45am
|
Reply
2255
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hey brother, like you say - where are the erotic ways, where is the "touch"...???
I want to qoute you again on this one:
No foreplay, no teasing (gradual revealing of the body), no story. Arghh. And thanks for letting me vent! :-)
Totally agree...lets hope for better porn-sites in the future...
BTW - just joined Killergram (british) again - there are some good stuff here - not all, by all means, but some fine hc-porn in between. Too bad it's so expensive. BUT it sure is somewhat of an alternative. If you do not know the site - take a look at the preview - it's alright - and the video-files are not that big - and the quality ok...
|
03-13-08 09:30am
|
Reply
2256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yup, JD - thanks for the reply..We may not be experts, your're right there, but, man - we know what we want and do not want - mostly :-)
I remember a Cheech and Chong-album where this old timer goes to a movie with her old lady and there appeares a black guy fucking a white girl - the wife is turned-on, the husband is disgusted - well, not that this matters here, but crazy stuff anyway, brother, crazy stuff....
|
03-13-08 09:20am
|
Reply
2257
|
Club Sandy
(0)
|
Reply of
jake07621's Review
jake's right about "the worst part".
It's quite strange in more ways: Club Sandy is a part of 21Sextury.com Productions, but the site seems to be neglected from the webmasters at that Co. WHY?
Are they over their head in sites? - 50 in all. I've tried Club Sandy twice and got fed up with the slow working too - downloads (using DM) was ok, but browsing took forever and sometimes the username/password did not work.
And BTW: Their Porn Pass For All is a mess - first: it's not pass for all - if you want "all" the sites, your're lurked into several months of membership and when you join the first time your're in their mercy about what sites you can access...
Another BTW: Take a look at former comments for their prime site: Pix and Video. (Same problem)
|
03-12-08 04:31pm
|
Reply
2258
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Last week I made some comments about this site - a site I've visit/been a member of several times.
And every time I get dissapointed - and still go back, weird.
Fellow PU's replied to my comment about VB - good replys.
Now I just read messmers comment - and, man - he hits the nail on the head.
Great words on VB, messmer!
|
03-12-08 04:11pm
|
Reply
2259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Can't submit vote to this one from the four choices.
I'd say "don't care" - but then again I do not HATE facials...and don't really like them either...
Actually: Why does so many scenes (most, I guess) have to end up with facials? Weird. Maybe it started up in US porn at a time when bj was considered illegal - and since then it has spread (get my drift) to most euro-porn too, 'cause: "that's the thing to do"
Man, who does that in real life?
You make love to your girl/wife or one-night-stand (fucking or blowjob) and then pull out to come in her eyes, hair, ears, nose or whatever...only in the movies, only in the movies...I don't get the turn-on in that.
|
03-12-08 03:59pm
|
Reply
2260
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Sorry, littlejoe - but thanks for the suggestion,anyway
PMT has way too much non-exclusive, lame videos in no so good quality for my taste. Especially compared to Nubiles....Man, just take a look at the latest 8-10 video previews at Nubiles...
Still, the 3-days trial at PTM is somewhat a good deal.
|
03-12-08 03:38pm
|
Reply
2261
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
No problemas - at all, pal.
And no way do I think you have "an atitude"
It's always good to exchange some info and experience.
BTW grapped a japaneese video-file at VB - and that one is just as crisp as can get.
Cheers!
Denner
|
03-10-08 07:22am
|
Comment
2262
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
03-08-08 09:30am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2263
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Thanks, RB
Some of these files in DVD is as close to "crisp" as I've seen at VB... SO: it can be done.
|
03-08-08 08:44am
|
Reply
2264
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey exotics4me
It sure set some things in perspective, thanks...
Still: I have great and crisp clips in 640x480 in much better screen-quality than what I've found untill now at VB...
(Don't know if it's the same kind of line af Pix And Video: The videos at the website are/were not great in quality - I found some of the same clips ripped- I thnik, it's called - from one of their DVDs and put on the "net" - what a difference in quality)
|
03-08-08 03:42am
|
Reply
2265
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Hey RB
My PC works just fine - I have several/hundreds of absolutely crisp fullscreen videos on my HD.
At Videobox I've in this term of membership downloaded some 5-6 clips i both DVD and highresolution (ex. a couple of clips with Alexis Love) There's hardly any difference in quality - and certainly not compared to the file-sizes. The same goes for some older stuff - ok I may find some better quality along the way...
Still I haven't found the upgrade worth the money.
Do you have any examples were there's really a difference, please let me know...
|
03-08-08 12:25am
|
Comment
2266
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
03-07-08 08:17am
Replies (12)
|
Reply
2267
|
Cruising Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey Drooler,
Thanks a lot for the updates on this site - man, I think I'm getting old. Had forgot it was a kind of a bonus-site for the Sandra Shine-site...
And it's always great to be able to rely on GOOD info/update-info from the Drooler....
|
03-07-08 08:10am
|
Reply
2268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
FINE words in this early spring of 2008, brother - FINE words!
Totally agree...
|
03-06-08 02:46pm
|
Reply
2269
|
Cruising Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Wow....great quality of video-trailers, the great well known models - did'nt know about this site - and I just realize that exotics4me did a review in September last year - talk about bad search/browsing from this user.
Know you're not much into videos - but anyway. TBP states 34 in August - are the updates in videos ok for now???
But about watermarks - they are almost gigantic in the video-trailers...
|
03-06-08 02:22pm
|
Reply
2270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Respect!
You know your way with the old and new Testament.
And of course your're right about the harsher ways in the old one.
Still, It's great with the freedom of most of todays christian countries....
|
03-06-08 01:55pm
|
Reply
2271
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Does the bible have "laws"? .
I thought it was some sort of religious guidance - freedom, brother, freedom....the reformation in the 1500th in Europe secured the human-freedom that the whole western world now again fight for.
If I want to watch porn, I can do it without getting my pecker hacked off...
|
03-06-08 01:12pm
|
Reply
2272
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Well, a small butterfly - or whatever- between the thighs or the popo is quite allright.
BUT: Girls with big tattoos on breasts, arms and several and big tattoos (or piercing, jeeeeez) is a turn-off!!!!
Maybe it's a new style for a lot of models, but man, it's ugly....
|
03-06-08 10:31am
|
Reply
2273
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey, pal....
Thanks - a fresh input - something new. That's needed.
You know the feeling - well, I think you do after your former "drop-out" 'cause you were fed up, too.
Well, last night I got a - not new - but a rejoin of the french Explicit Art. Not the cheapest, but ok...
Man, here I found some fine updates of both solo and hc stuff in new quality and in much more erotic line than just "wham-bam-thank-you-mam".
I really enjoyed this renewed membership.
IntheCrack is not new to me, thank you anyway, but, man, haven't been there for a long time, so....
Thanks again - when you're feeling down and out (porn-site-wise, of course) it's great with friends and fellow PU's, like you, Drooler!!!!
|
03-06-08 10:22am
|
Comment
2274
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
|
03-04-08 12:11pm
Replies (5)
|
Reply
2275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Here in Europe, and maybe especially in Scandinavia - and again in danish women magazines the trend has for years been: Men like to watch porn, women/girls like to read about it or watch the more romantic/erotic kind of softer porn.
But of course you cannot generalize.
And BTW.
I think badandy has some kind of a wellfounded sentence that somehow is related to us men in our view of our own women - and sex and porn:
I quote:
"It is just like in high school when a guy got layed he was the envy of his friends and everyone else. But the girl was considered a whore suddenly. There is a clear dual standard."
Well spoken, brother.
|
03-04-08 11:44am
|
