| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1976
|
Killergram
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Review
Man, I think Margulis (from the fine state of Arizona) takes the prize concerning a thorough review...
Been a member of Killergram three times and am still both thrilled and frustrated by this site.
The navigation and download-options are a mess - but some of the models and some of the videos are just top (and I do not go for photosets at all, here).
The updates are great - new videos daily.
But two other serious cons I agree with: Slow downloads and a slack of getting new models in the same "good looking" standard as when the site started up.....
|
08-26-08 01:38pm
|
Reply
1977
|
Tera Patrick
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Another serious/fine review from mbaya.
This Tera Patrick-site is a part of - among others - a "joint venture" with Devils Film. So all along the deal is good when you take the other sites in consideration - maybe even in the middle/high 80th...
But concerning this quite new site at the co-join, Tera Patrick is lower - score-wise - in my opinion.
Too much older stuff, but worse: In most of the new videos she gets fucked by a weird looking dude with more tattoes than your average biker and even meaner looking.
Well, like Willie Nelson says: "Ladies love outlaws..." - but it sure aint pretty....(to watch, anyway).
|
08-26-08 01:15pm
|
Reply
1978
|
Curry Creampie
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
Pretty weird stuff, here...
Absolutely agree with mbaya - when browsing through models, it's clear to see, that this is very close to fake. Models of many other origin - but not India - just marked with the forehead decoration.
Think mbaya has discovered a cheat here.
|
08-26-08 12:21pm
|
Reply
1979
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Just joined - and you're absolutely right.
Those MP4-files are crisp - or very close to it.
A bit amazing have good viewing it is compared to the rather small - and user/download friendly file-sizes...
And they got some pretty good new stuff, too - generally the site has improved quite a lot...
|
08-25-08 05:45am
|
Reply
1980
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks a lot for this update/info, bro...
Since they now got kind of a deal to join both Pix and Video and Club Sandy, things seems even more attractive.
BTW: I allready use VLC- player now, so great...
Thanks again...
Denner
|
08-24-08 11:36am
|
Reply
1981
|
Throat Fuck Next Door
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Fine review,mbaya - thanks for a good tip, too.
Just went through the preview - that and your review makes me tempted to join....
good words here:
"The sex was forceful oral sex. Strong theme but not degrading such as slapping, choking, puking etc. Definitely not simple blow job sucking with the girl in control."
|
08-24-08 09:19am
|
Comment
1982
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
|
08-24-08 09:13am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1983
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I notice you good americans use the term/short of: LOL - a lot. Guess it means "lots of laughs"
So to this, Drooler: LOL!
And agree, buddy: Let's keep out of each others hair and go on for more serious bussiness: like finding good porn...
|
08-23-08 10:10am
|
Reply
1984
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Man, do you ever read what other people here at PU writes? Or do you make replies in the dark. Why would I want to ban you? Never implied that. And your reviews: For that Real Wife Stories, I stated: "Another fine review from roseman"!
Finally: I'm not the person with english/american as first language, but what does this mean:
"You can always check my profile to see if what you are saying is true."
Sorry, don't get the point...
Even if you do not want to reply anymore: Best to you, roseman...
|
08-23-08 10:01am
|
Reply
1985
|
Nikky Blond
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
As somewhat of a fan of Nikky Blond - now and in the "old days" - thanks for that warning, ace.
The $ 4.95 looked good, but....
|
08-23-08 09:38am
|
Reply
1986
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
As PU is a serious place for a lot of pornusers - of course: Yes.
Just watch some of the many sites being reviewed.
And should webmasters not listen to PU-reviews? - it would be foolish not to - we're a big potentionel of costumers.
Think we all have had our amount of site-owners who want to know about our opinions....
Good poll, Wittyguy.
|
08-23-08 09:31am
|
Reply
1987
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
First a great thanks to you, Drooler - an honorable friend, pal and buddy - with whom I'd had some of the finest discussions - and help - about the essential thing here: our search for good porn-sites for a long time....
So on second thoughts: Why should some inferior debate and insults "run me out of town" - no way.
I've read some of Droolers inputs after my - maybe a little premature - goodbye. It states, that I'm not the first who had to deal with personal insults, though that should be banned here...
Man, how can a common interests in different porn-sites result in personal dispute?
This is supposed to be a place for help, a good way of porn-search - I thought.
Drooler, you have a way of doing a debate with top-arguments, that I'm glad your're my buddy - and not the opposite.....keep it on, bro...
And thanks to both the Drooler and Kahn, I do not see any reasen to leave.....
|
08-23-08 08:34am
|
Reply
1988
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Reply
Well, excuse me for not having english as native language...
But it's always easy to ridicule
|
08-22-08 01:56pm
|
Reply
1989
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
Marianna's Reply
I find the content/specification of the cons maybe more importend than the amount...
|
08-22-08 12:34pm
|
Reply
1990
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
A bit confused about the last reply (which I also find kind of hostile).
It's signed "Tony"
Is Tony alias for roseman - or viceversa.
Second: How can thoughts be false - I stated an opinion - and if it's not to some PUs liking does not make it false either.
Furthermore I never questioned rosemans review - on the conterary.
Finally I've been a member of Brazzers twice in the last year, so that earned me a right to an opinion about that network...
|
08-22-08 12:10pm
|
Reply
1991
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Well, agree - no reason for fast/smart - and yes, lame - remarks without real substance. Just because this user is a bit tired of Brazzers-sites.
Sorry, Brazzers-fans
|
08-22-08 01:07am
|
Reply
1992
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
BTW:
About sunglasses: Cannot agree more - strage new trend - do they get some sponsorship from Gucci or Rayban - still it's just kind of stupid/looks stupid and weird in some way...why, folks, why?
|
08-21-08 09:54am
|
Reply
1993
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Another fine review from the Roseman...
Good preview for the site - and no wonder, it's from Brazzers. Still it has got the Brazzers-style - and this user has problems in finding new ways here. Watching the trailers, man, it's just the same Brazzers-way all along. And the same models. Maybe except from what looks like an entire new video with the lengendary Julia Ann...
But again - Brazzers, Brazzers and Brazzers all the way - nothning real new here, after all (it seems) - but then again - nobody can take the quality in videos away from these folks....
|
08-21-08 09:42am
|
Reply
1994
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
First: On the video-deal FTV is both a bit boring and stereotype compared to Nubiles....
FTV is generally not my cup of tea - been a member three times or more - and always regret it - the reason I returned was a hope a newer style and quality for, yes, the videos. But no: they are still a little more boring and too much mainstream compared to Nubiles.
Nubiles has an advantage of both hc, soft and masturbation in great videos - but: not all models in Nubiles does hc.
Still the style, the quality and the VARIATION of models is in my opinion far better at Nubiles.
But that's just one users opinion here in august 2008.....
|
08-21-08 08:10am
|
Reply
1995
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey Drooler
Yes, that upsell is really annoying - man, I curse too many times here trying to let the mouse stay away from the corner, jeeeez....
Thinking about rejoining MyGlamourSite - also becuase of all the extra stuff you get - and that Nikki Case sure looks fine in the preview - good tip there, bro.....
|
08-21-08 03:59am
|
Reply
1996
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hey ace
No hc, and only a very few videos of photoshoots and yes: Music, alas - that goes for both sites - a very few without...
|
08-21-08 03:54am
|
Reply
1997
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Normally I'd hate just to say ditto!
But messmer got another/good point here - which I apart from the technical quality will like to second - on the wife-point-of-view.
Anyway: enjoyed to read all the inputs here at this fine poll.
|
08-20-08 07:05am
|
Reply
1998
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I voted: I would never join......
Reason: Every single live girl webcam-site I've seen has such a lousy "video"-quality that I'd spend a fortune still bying newer and newer glasses - and my eyes will still itch from trying to see what's going on...
|
08-20-08 06:16am
|
Reply
1999
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
shooterbo's Comment
Fine tip, shooterbo.....thanks!
|
08-18-08 06:20am
|
Reply
2000
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm just a little carefull here - I know some folks dig the BTS.
But for this user: It's worthless - in a bad mood I might even say it stinks - and I'm with messmer a lot of the way: It detroys the fantasy.
The reasons are obvious: BTS are mostly done in a stupid way: a lot of laughs, weird remarks og especially ridiculous behaviour from the people behind the shootings - even some condescending attitude towards the viewer/costumer......"Now, folks. Let us show you how we have the fun with theese models, you won't have in your little world"........
Ok, I'm not so carefull about this after all, but.... give me a break!
|
08-17-08 09:51am
|
