| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
2351
|
Hot Adri
(0)
|
|
12-09-07 09:59am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2352
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
The best.....:)
|
12-09-07 09:18am
|
Review
2353
|
Digital Desire
(0)
74.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Good amount of videos and photosets for the price.
Some HD-videos in very fine quality.
Zip for photos
Ok price |
| Cons: |
Not much new - even some of the updates seems old.
Not all exclusive - quite a few video-sets/photo sets seen elsewhere
Confusing navigation - hard looking for the real updates.
To much content with video-interviews |
| Bottom Line: |
Had a comment resently where I spoke against the quality and non-exclusive updates.
In the "Current Member" and how long - I've cheated. I have not been a steady member for 12 month, but be a member on and off for 12 months and quite a bit more.
Still I get the feeling, that this site has quite a low standard all in all.
The updates and content in general are NOT up-to-date in what you should expect from a site like this - They still live on retro.
The small video-files are sometimes quite sexy, but mostly boring. Nothing new here concerning better filming, better and more sexy scenes and above all: Find some entirely new models - like a lot of the better sites are able to.
Maybe this site was somewhat of a pioneer at one time, but, man - that was a long time ago.
Too bad, 'cause some of the videos are still great - there is just too far between them.
Good that DD has quit DRM, but that's not enough to return a 6th, 7th or 8th time to this site.
And DD, your socalled HD (hardcore extreme) are a laugh - old, non-exclusive and worse - and you can call it "extreme" from here to Kingdom Come - it's still boring and older stuff. |
|
12-09-07 09:07am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
2354
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Back again, sorry.
But we got another one in this genre:
You guys see one of the new sites at TBP, called "Sexy Sweat"?
In the preview some old timer has his nose deep burried in the armpits, ass and old socks of some girl.
Weird, man, weird.....
|
12-09-07 08:32am
|
Reply
2355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Let everybody do what they what they want in their private life - and of course on porn-sites. As long as it does NOT hurt anybody.
To watch a girl pee... well, not my cup of tea, cheers!
It may relate to somethings that Freud could get a whole lot out of - like in the childhood when boys at 7 or 8 years old paid a nickel to watch Lucy pee.
I dig the part about peeing your name in the snow, by the way. THAT was fun.....could you finish your name or not?
One guy on the block - Theophilious - had problems, though.
|
12-09-07 08:21am
|
Reply
2356
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Thanks, jd - now I get the picture.
Still with you all the way about this item....Never again will I join a site with DRM.
|
12-09-07 01:00am
|
Reply
2357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Well, Drooler
No, I have not tested that one - I do the tests on models close to release, so to speak.
And, yeah - while doing an 18 hours drive through the Sahara dessert what is there to think about - in between - but good sex....
And in US: look out for the new Audis - here in Europe they're passing the BMW and Mercedes. But I guess in US the prime stuff is still Lexus?
|
12-08-07 10:30am
|
Reply
2358
|
Euro Babes Fever
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
To Drooler and others...
I felt it almost embarrasing to take over the socalled 6.th place here at PU from Drooler - JUST because of his absence!
I feel better now - to have a fine competitor/fellow user back here.
Let's go for the sites, that do not give the consumer what we pay for!
The pressure from this PU still matters! All we want is good value for our money.
|
12-08-07 09:00am
|
Reply
2359
|
Euro Babes Fever
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Well, well, well..folks.
The Drooler is back with his sharp pen and great reviews/comments, thanks.
And from this user: Welcome again!
Denner
|
12-08-07 08:33am
|
Reply
2360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Good to hear from you again, Drooler...
And yeah, new stuff brings on new problems - but it's still something to debate - and funny you should mention automobiles - as my profession among others - is test-driving for european car-manufactures....
Well, small world.
Come on, my man - get back soon!
A lot of us miss your great inputs.
Denner
|
12-08-07 07:25am
|
Review
2361
|
Pacino's Adventures
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Great - and I repeat GREAT looking real south american teens - again I repeat: TEENS.
Exclusive models in exclusive videos.
Three download-sizes of videos.
Zip for photos
Fair/good preview |
| Cons: |
Even the socalled "Super HQ" videos are mostly in NOT high quality.
The quality is generally too over-exposed - which means too bright videos.
Some photo-sets are the same with hillarious quality, strange!
Low amount of content - but ok, quite new site (set the price after that, folks!) |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, this is a rather new site from Pacino - to some well known - who has had some very soft latin sites for a while.
But Pacinos flair for great looking real latin teens is almost legendary. Except from one serious lack: The low quality of videos at his sites - is just as legendary.
So here come a completly new HARDCORE site "Pacino's Adventures".
The preview caught me on the spot. Very sexy and cute young latinas - the kind you do not see on US-based latina-sites - end not even at the new Argentina-site.
You can download quite a few preview-videos - and the style and the girls turned me on - of course while I expected greater quality as promised in the preview. Even the Rabbit states "good quality" in HQ videos.
But they are NOT high quality!
Ok, no blurred things and quite "sharp". But the colours are weird. It's too much "milky white" - see for yourselves in the previews. It's almost the same in the HQ inside.
Too bad, 'cause the content is great and exclusive, the same goes for the girls. Actually I redirected my player to show them in black and white - pretty "old time sexy".
PS: They have an offer here where you can join Pacinos "Latin Teen Pass" for only $10 more for 7 days. Unless you like the very soft - most no nude - stuff forget it. And the normal price here is $45 - outrageous for some low quality mega-soft videos and lame photosets.
Still the Adventure-site is quite sexy - apart from the peculiar video-solution.
TO Pacino: Get some new cameras. |
|
12-08-07 07:01am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
2362
|
Private.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
VERY interesting comment from jd.
From time to time I've been tempted by this site (they seem to have some exclusive Silvia Saint).
But it has always seemed somewhat "suspect" to me - and I have never checked it out seriously. (Origin states Spain, but that's an old, quite old Swedish company).
And this info from jd about having to install some kind of spyware to be able to download - EVEN - DRM protected videos is simply out of line.
Does that mean you pay 20 and still NOT get allround access to the DRM video-files, less you say yes to the spyware hassle?
If thats so, glad I haven't joined.
|
12-08-07 06:15am
|
Reply
2363
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No, I have never made anonymous trust-ratings, anyway.
|
12-07-07 04:16am
|
Comment
2364
|
Moon Angel
(0)
|
|
12-06-07 01:17pm
Replies (1)
|
Review
2365
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
69.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some very fine looking girls/women - all of US origin. (of course)
Good/average quality of videos. Older ones NOT.
Five different sites in the package.
Both teens (almost) and mature girls/women.
Soft-soft-soft ...all soft.
Zip for photos |
| Cons: |
Not a large amount of content.
Confusing statements of what different sites you get with the package.
Earlier videos NOT good quality.
No info about updates
Few photos in every set
Price-confusion |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site or sites to get some authentic Playboy-stuff.
Ok, some of the content is really like the true Playboy, but the really true Playboy-stuff, like Playboy Plus prommised here, you do not get.
Instead you get 5 small sites in all like Fresh Faces, Try out, Sexy Wives, Busty Babes, College Girls and All Natural.
Sounds like much, but it isn't. It takes you a couple of hours or less to browse through it all.
The videos are mostly very short - 3-4 minuttes and like I hate videos of photoshoots, I also hate all these interviews where girls tell you a lot of (stupid) thing about what they like and do not like - what do I care. I want to watch some sexy videos.
Well, ok. There are SOME really sexy videos here - but it's too few. And the olders ones have some of the best content, but worst quality.
I can only give a low recommendation here - if you like sexy, soft US-girls there's a lot of other sites that gives you better value.
If your into it for the photos, forget it. Small sets and not great quality.
Price: They state $19.87 - when I joined, I was charged 21,46 Euro - that's almost $30. I may complain later....but I'm getting fed up with this kind of problems...
Bottom line: A few - way too few sexy solo-videos - and they are too short.
Has the old Heff outlived himself? - well, according to this/these sites his company has not been able to keep up! |
|
12-06-07 11:54am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2366
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Well, jd - maybe I have the same thing about the site as you do:
"it's OK it seems to be missing something though I can't put my finger on it."
Precisely - I cannot put my finger at anything in particular myself - but it's not fun, great, really sexy or whatever, anymore - things at DD keeps repeating themselves without any real innowation.
Or maybe it's just us veterans in this game - newcommers might be happy?
|
12-06-07 11:26am
|
Comment
2367
|
Digital Desire
(0)
|
|
12-05-07 04:10pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
2368
|
18 Pussy Club
(0)
|
|
12-05-07 03:48pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2369
|
Mystique Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
By the way, I think the whole phrase is:
"There's a sucker born every minute...and two to take 'em."
Great line anyway.....
|
12-05-07 01:14pm
|
Reply
2370
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
It depends (in some/many ways) on the girl/woman.
Some (women) are just great to fuck in missionary, some have the ass to finish - or start in doggiestyle - some takes it all in riding with a view of a pair of fine boobs...and one of my old favorites: - when I was younger I just had a hang to a stand-up from behind - and maybe in front of a mirror...and .... well, now it's getting too personal.
But bottom line:
A little ( or a lot) of everything.
A good fuck is a good living (and with good booze in between)
What else is left?
Guess it's the same all over the world.
Denner, Europe
|
12-05-07 12:09pm
|
Reply
2371
|
Mystique Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Well, jd - for one I'm still on the usenet - from time to time - when things get too boring and nothing comes out of nothing.
But your warning against this site/plague takes all - thanks.
It's probably the best warning I've seen untill now here at PU...
And bottom line: GREAT COMMENT!
|
12-05-07 11:53am
|
Review
2372
|
Third Movies
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
High quality videos - most in different wmv-sizes and some also in avi
Lots of sexy easteuropean models
Bonus-site (ZTOD) in same quality and almost same amount.
A video site with photos as secondary |
| Cons: |
Too much repeating log-in during browsing and download - username/password generated.
Some - or rather too many of the films (with 4-6 sets) have NO download, just stream.
Still some DRM
Not that much content
Expensive. |
| Bottom Line: |
Even if the DRM are ALMOST gone this site or these two sites still have problems.
The worst is, that some of the better videos have no download attached even if they state, that this and this video has been downloaded a certain number of times.
Most or the content is rather great with fine quality videos. But some of it is too disorganized with wrong video downloads attached to the vid-thumbnails.
And some of the older videos still have DRM.
And quite a few of the best videos - among them a couple new ones with Sharka Blue you cannot download- and if you use Netscape to stream instead, you're fucked - it breakes down.
When I tried too use Explorer, I could not log in.
Search-machine inside is a mess: If you search for Latin, for exampel - you get some latin, some euroteens and lots of other stuff with absolutely no latins. Or if you search their genre: One-on-One, you get a whole lot of gangbang.
Bottom Line: Too much annoying trouble with this site - both of them. It's a shame cause some of the content is just great.
Try to fix it, guys.... |
|
12-04-07 11:13am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2373
|
Sweet Peaches
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
Have not checked ALL of these sites - but for the two of the 11: Ira and Vicky-sites the content is just the same as in Teen Dreams.
|
12-04-07 06:20am
|
Reply
2374
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
This seems great.
Look forward to the review.
|
12-01-07 01:31pm
|
Reply
2375
|
Playboy's Fresh Faces
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Hey jd
Thanks for the good info about the spam agents. Where did you find that?
Mostly I don't read all that stuff. This thing is supposed to be fun....
|
12-01-07 01:29pm
|
