| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2276
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Hey JD
see Droolers idea of whats going on
BTW thanks for the update on the gold-thing.
|
01-20-08 03:55pm
|
Reply
2277
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey pal
Maybe jd has the answer - anyway he has a sugestion somewhat like yours.......so maybe the guy behind it went down - save his soul....
But guess thay still take your money if you join.
|
01-20-08 03:54pm
|
Reply
2278
|
Mya Diamond
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
Great review.
And you're right about the (non) exclusive.
It's not only Sandy, but also some other sites from 21.Sextury.com. and the GE-company.
(BTW the bed-video with Christina Bella in Mya Diamond is awesome.)
Hope they'll get better - again - at Mya Diamond and Eve Angel.
A pity, though: A wish is that they'd get more high resolution videos. We're in 2008.
|
01-20-08 11:53am
|
Comment
2279
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
|
01-20-08 11:22am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
2280
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Poll
My mistake
Like Johnny Paycheck states:
"Must have been drunk...."
I get the picture now, so JD - do not bother.
|
01-20-08 11:11am
|
Reply
2281
|
Nikki Jackson
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
NOT because roseman just send me an "awesome" on a former review, but:
This Nikki - whom I have not seen before - looks great. I'm more and more into solo-models site - and with hc included. Just ended a membership of hotwiferio.com.
This looks a bit like it - with a different model (wow!) and with a better site in navigation and content, from what I understand in rosemans review.
The quantity is ok by me, but on thing, roseman:
Guess the preview of the one video is NOT what the quality is about?
You state:
"Also their quality needs improvement."
But is it much better than in preview?
|
01-20-08 11:02am
|
Reply
2282
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
I certainly agree...don't think she's into it, but some fine b/g hc or even lez would be fantastic.
|
01-20-08 10:35am
|
Reply
2283
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Review
I forgot an importend issue:
The preview here is lousy!
You have no idea of the content and updates, especially the amount of photosets and videos - not even what quality of the videos og photos.
I'd suggest that Carsed Marketing Inc. (also Twistys) make an efford to do it better.
PUs may consinder that before joining in the future...
|
01-20-08 10:32am
|
Reply
2284
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Thanks!!!
|
01-20-08 10:17am
|
Review
2285
|
Anette Dawn
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Very Good - as the rating goes (82)
25 fine videos of a doll in this field.
And Anette Dawn certainly is a doll.
40 sets of photos.
Zip for photos
OK quality videos
OK quality photos - but just ok |
| Cons: |
Updates are way too slow.
This is only a softcore/mastubation-site with a single model - nothing else. No lez (if thats what you want) and no hc (b/g). |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, friends. You can see this review as some sort of an update of the fine review from exotics4me (no comparison intended).
But it's almost 4 month ago since that review - and what's happened?
Not much!!!
There are 7 more videos updated in those four month. That's NOT good enough for a site that charge 25 bucks.
A little more photo-sets has occured, but no big deal. At this time there are 40 sets of photos - something like 13 more in the same period - alas - nothing to speak of.
Some of the photo-sets are among the best in the softcore glamour-field. But also here there's a bit of stereotype - most look alike.
The resolution are just average: 1280x854.
The same goes for zipped sets.
Here in mid-january 2008 there are 25 videos - not much for a site this price.
And the videos are all 720x404 in WMV. Or quicktime (but who goes for that?)
The quality is alright/good, but not more.
Still it's great to watch AD on her videos - she's just a NATURAL: Sexy, sweet and erotic. Wish there were more models of her kind.
And these videos are exclusive - not even the company-site (Twistys) has those videos.
And that's whats great and that's also the reason that this special solo-model site deserves recommendation.
There's not much else here at anettedawn.com. There are something called "diary", "recommondation" and "wishlist" - but they are not in function.
But, ok - so what?
Foremost this site has one force:
Anette Dawn herself....on video!
She is just beautiful. |
|
01-20-08 08:59am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
2286
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
As usual jd knows whats going on.
Me - ignorant, I guess - still do not know what this is about. What's "digital gold"?
I can turn my gold into cash? I did'nt know I had any gold.
Again if jd would give me a second hint, I'd be glad....
|
01-20-08 08:21am
|
Comment
2287
|
Marina Mendoza
(0)
|
|
01-18-08 10:32am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
2288
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
If a bunch of people collect videos/photos from friends with shoots of ordenary/private people (themselves and the friends) having sex in front of some lousy (or good) camera - will that be considered amateur?
If the same private people think thay might make some money out of it and put it on a paysite - is it still amateur?
My first instinct is: Yes.
But if companies like DDF, Bangbros or 21Sextury start collecting videos/photos from private people, refine them and create a new site called something with the word "amateur"? I'm not so sure about that.
There may be a fine line...
|
01-16-08 07:23am
|
Reply
2289
|
Teen Flood
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Well, once again I agree with JD - apart from your rating.
Too high, brother - but I guess you were influenced by the bonussite Teen Eva.
I would have too, if that site was there when I was a member...
But, man - this site is a dinosaur - never again for this user.
But all in all - a great review from JD
|
01-12-08 08:44am
|
Reply
2290
|
ALS Scan
(0)
|
Reply of
Davit's Review
Quite agree
I may rate this site a bit higher - but not much.
Two things:
The fisting-thing are WAY overdone - if this is NOT your favorite thing. Why don't the call it ALS Fisting - that may cover it better.
The videos are mainly based on photo-shoots - certainly not my favorite either...
BTH - I like Davits review - no beating around the bush..
|
01-12-08 08:09am
|
Reply
2291
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
I go for the first answer.
This is also a matter of acting and maybe most models would be pround of being mentioned as actors instead af "meat" - or whatever.
There is somewhat an unnatural thing about a girl acting mastubation without a word - or in the sex-act for that matter.
We have a problem about a lot of the fine looking easteuropean girls and their knowledge of english - so what? Let them moan and talk in russian, czech and more...
Have you guys been at Nubiles lately?
Here are 3 masturbation scenes with an easteuropean girl (not the best looking, alas) - but she is really doing her thing in dirtytalk - and it's just great - in her strange, but sexy accent. (Her name here is Aicha - just watch and LISTEN)
Sex is for all senses........
|
01-12-08 07:28am
|
Reply
2292
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yeah, jd - I have exactly the same thing with the water vids.....but a lot of the newer soft-girl-sites seems to have an urge for that kinds of shoots...alas.
By the way, our old mate, Drooler had a great line for this site:
Candy Land
|
01-10-08 11:38am
|
Reply
2293
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
congestus's Reply
The newer ones are typical 200-250 mb (give or take) - a good size in my own opinion.
Older ones between aprox. 40 and 70 mb (again, give or take)
Enjoy if you join!
I did.....
|
01-10-08 11:35am
|
Comment
2294
|
Brand New Faces
(0)
|
|
01-10-08 09:05am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
2295
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
That one really made me laugh....
Yeah, back in Candy Land, for certain!
|
01-10-08 08:56am
|
Reply
2296
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey old friend
What a great reply - it's a review in disguise...
I certainly agree about the vids, but man - I'm turning to photos again - and concerning the photos - no argue from this fellow PU. They are great and keep roling in - that's one of the fine things about this site - new stuff - all the time.
Thanks, again
|
01-10-08 08:14am
|
Reply
2297
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Thanks PP
- for a very..........well, I just can't find the right english word for it - but something like: a constructive and helpfull reply......
Great to have folks like you as a fellow PU.
|
01-10-08 08:08am
|
Reply
2298
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I cannot point out one specific post in this poll - I look at all of these matters when I browse a preview of a new site. All are importend - but, ok - should I pick not one, but two it's probably:
1)Video quality
2)Updates
|
01-10-08 06:25am
|
Review
2299
|
MetArt
(0)
96.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Vast amount of photos - softcore only - in various resolution. (over half a million)
Great high-resolution photos
Zip for different resolution.
Ok amount of videos (480 today)
A significant selection of mostly east-european teens.
Easy navigation - fine layout
No limits of any kind
Good on updates
Ok quality live-cam |
| Cons: |
Older videos lacks quality (but that's the same elsewhere)
A little too much outdoor-photos for my taste.
I'm not much into videos of photoshoots, but later videos are getting better. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have not been at Met Art for a couple of years - this site has turn to a far better softporn-deal than earlier.
In contrast to some of the hardcore-sites I've visited lately, this Met Art has what I've been looking for (ok, only in the soft line).
But here is NEW stuff - photos and videos of great (mostly) looking european teens.
As a video-freak, I'm pretty content with the way this site has developed. But, fellow PU's this Met Art has given me back the pleasure of enjoying fine girl softcore photos. And these guys do a lot with fine photo-quality for the comstumers.
They have 3 diffenrent solution for the later sets:
High, medium and low (4368x2912 and 1365x1048 and 1024x683 - in that order)
And they have zip for each solution.
The later videos have 1280x720 - and the formats are several: Divx, WMV, ipod, mp4 (I think it's called) quicktime and mpg.
The earlier videos are not that swell (512x334) they are still a bit blurred - man, would it not be great if they reedited some of these videos and placed them on the site in better resolution!
I've been a bit like a grumpy old man in my latest reviews - but here I found the spirit again.
This site just makes my happy to browse for fine porn.
And above all - the joy of fine photos is back.
It's not perfect or a 100 here, but man, it's close (BUT fellow PU's - this is still entirely softcore)
And sorry, I gave up counting the amount of photosets........but I think, you get value for every penny. |
|
01-10-08 06:17am
Replies (15)
|
Review
2300
|
Brain Pass
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
SORRY, FOLKS!
A different review.
BUT, ok, first:
Hugh amount of content - videos foremost
(nothing else in the pro-section) |
| Cons: |
In spite of many good points elsewhere - TBP included - this site is simply boring - and what is worse:
This is 2008 and the quality of videos are between lousy and average. And most is OLD material.
The content of these socalled "different" sites in this socalled network are replica or maybe more like repetion - you,ll find the same videos in a lot of the sites here: What do you call that?
I call it bait for suckers like us! |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, sorry again - but I'm getting fed up and bored with sites/networks like this - it's the same old thing over and over again. And poor/average quality.
Brainpass has gathered some sites that was on the way to the graveyard - why not let them die in peace.
Next: Ok, it's NOT only that I'm bored with the same old stuff - or the same old wine in new bottles - it's also lack of technical and erotic quality of videos here - which is mostly so blurred and only "wham-bam-thank-you-mam" that it's a travesty of fine erotica and fine porn.
The photos are not worth to mention.
I still give it 65 for some rarely found videos (Bruno), but, man, thay are few.
And 65 for SOME fun browsing, though it was still getting more and more depressing along the line - in search for just the small amout of goodies.
So HELP!
Maybe I'm getting tired of porn - and then again not. I think, I'm just getting tired of all the porn that keeps repeating itself. The porn - like on these site - that do not have a single ambition of offering something new.
Jeeeez, I miss the "old" times when it was possible to find NEW stuff, new stuff with real erotica - hard or soft.
I may also repeat myself when quoting Paul Le Mat in the great movie "American Graffiti" in his search for girls on a cruising night:
"The pickings are sure getting slim".
Hope for a better 2008 in search for good porn. |
|
01-09-08 09:55am
Replies (5)
|
