| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1901
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Reply
Well, agree - no reason for fast/smart - and yes, lame - remarks without real substance. Just because this user is a bit tired of Brazzers-sites.
Sorry, Brazzers-fans
|
08-22-08 01:07am
|
Reply
1902
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
BTW:
About sunglasses: Cannot agree more - strage new trend - do they get some sponsorship from Gucci or Rayban - still it's just kind of stupid/looks stupid and weird in some way...why, folks, why?
|
08-21-08 09:54am
|
Reply
1903
|
Real Wife Stories
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Another fine review from the Roseman...
Good preview for the site - and no wonder, it's from Brazzers. Still it has got the Brazzers-style - and this user has problems in finding new ways here. Watching the trailers, man, it's just the same Brazzers-way all along. And the same models. Maybe except from what looks like an entire new video with the lengendary Julia Ann...
But again - Brazzers, Brazzers and Brazzers all the way - nothning real new here, after all (it seems) - but then again - nobody can take the quality in videos away from these folks....
|
08-21-08 09:42am
|
Reply
1904
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
First: On the video-deal FTV is both a bit boring and stereotype compared to Nubiles....
FTV is generally not my cup of tea - been a member three times or more - and always regret it - the reason I returned was a hope a newer style and quality for, yes, the videos. But no: they are still a little more boring and too much mainstream compared to Nubiles.
Nubiles has an advantage of both hc, soft and masturbation in great videos - but: not all models in Nubiles does hc.
Still the style, the quality and the VARIATION of models is in my opinion far better at Nubiles.
But that's just one users opinion here in august 2008.....
|
08-21-08 08:10am
|
Reply
1905
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey Drooler
Yes, that upsell is really annoying - man, I curse too many times here trying to let the mouse stay away from the corner, jeeeez....
Thinking about rejoining MyGlamourSite - also becuase of all the extra stuff you get - and that Nikki Case sure looks fine in the preview - good tip there, bro.....
|
08-21-08 03:59am
|
Reply
1906
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hey ace
No hc, and only a very few videos of photoshoots and yes: Music, alas - that goes for both sites - a very few without...
|
08-21-08 03:54am
|
Reply
1907
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Normally I'd hate just to say ditto!
But messmer got another/good point here - which I apart from the technical quality will like to second - on the wife-point-of-view.
Anyway: enjoyed to read all the inputs here at this fine poll.
|
08-20-08 07:05am
|
Reply
1908
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I voted: I would never join......
Reason: Every single live girl webcam-site I've seen has such a lousy "video"-quality that I'd spend a fortune still bying newer and newer glasses - and my eyes will still itch from trying to see what's going on...
|
08-20-08 06:16am
|
Review
1909
|
Just Teen Movie
(0)
68.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Crisp videos - if you want to call anything HD, this may be it.
VMW, DIVX, Ipod and Quicktime.
Some cute/sexy easteuro teens (SOME)
Access to both Just Teen Movie and Just Teen Site |
| Cons: |
Lousy navigation - no idea about updates, unless you've got a very good memory.
Most video-files are way too large (some over 700 MB for 15 minuttes).
Too few videos
High price - even with the co-access.
Lousy video-updates
Repeting log-in |
| Bottom Line: |
As Just Teen Site is among the best in its field when it comes to easteuro-teens (photo-sets and a few videos), why not go for the newer offer from this company:
Just Teen Movie has not had much time (since april 2008), so as you'd suspect a not so large amount of clips.
And you'd be quite right. In april TBP stated 32 (full)videos.
Here in middle august the amount is 42 - call that an honest way of doing updates? I do not think so.
I really liked the idea of Just Teen Site doing a special movie/video-site, but what a bummer.
Do not dream of a great variation of models -like Just Teen Site - it's simply a matter of to few models.
Instead some - not so exiting models (in my humble opinion) are doing three or more videos each - and that does not come to much out of 42.
The videos are crisp, for sure. But using up to more than 700 Mb on a 15-18 minuttes clip is not very professionel in todays standard.
OK: You get DIVX, VMW, iPOD and Quicktime and full scene downloads.Good stream-preview of every clip.
AND: The navigation is worthless - if there is any at all. You're not able to look for either updates, nor models - just go for "more videos" as you taggle along - and you end up comming back to a different start of content (out of line!).
Rediculous price of $34.95.
A comfort here is that you NOW get access to Just Teen Site as well - but where JTS was formerly also a good/medium good video-site - it lacks now. This is not a review of JTS, but I still notice, that this site has not had any video-update since july 16th.
But bottum line:
The score 68 is as mentioned at TBP/PU:
Does more things wrong than right - low recommondation. |
|
08-20-08 06:02am
Replies (12)
|
Reply
1910
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
shooterbo's Comment
Fine tip, shooterbo.....thanks!
|
08-18-08 06:20am
|
Reply
1911
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm just a little carefull here - I know some folks dig the BTS.
But for this user: It's worthless - in a bad mood I might even say it stinks - and I'm with messmer a lot of the way: It detroys the fantasy.
The reasons are obvious: BTS are mostly done in a stupid way: a lot of laughs, weird remarks og especially ridiculous behaviour from the people behind the shootings - even some condescending attitude towards the viewer/costumer......"Now, folks. Let us show you how we have the fun with theese models, you won't have in your little world"........
Ok, I'm not so carefull about this after all, but.... give me a break!
|
08-17-08 09:51am
|
Reply
1912
|
Nikki Benz
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Thanks to roseman for a fine review....
but BTW: when trying to take a look at the site/the preview, the link from TBP do not work...you have to google the site...
|
08-09-08 01:44pm
|
Reply
1913
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's ok as long as it's unchecked. And only unchecked!
Once in a while there's a good deal you do not catch/see anywhere else.
|
08-09-08 01:18pm
|
Reply
1914
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Not sure...
I'm not in this for the money - still this user has had some top winnings here - I keep winning and am a bit embarrased about it - I must be out of luck in love, then....-:)
I use my winning via Amazon - it would be great if I could spend it on new sites - but I guess there's too much trouble with money-winning across the Atlantic.
Anyway I'm still not sure: Still feel the main thing here is reviews and comments - and those two thing should be first in line with raffle-winnings.
The Forum is great too - but maybe not as importend in the never endning search - anyway - still not sure.
BTW: A good poll, Wittyguy. And by all means: Let's use the Forum in the raffle too.....It just will not affect my activities there...
|
08-07-08 05:59am
|
Reply
1915
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Reply
I don't know how things were a couple of months back - just joined agin. But the new design and navigation-style goes for the member-area too.
Hope that helps.
|
08-07-08 12:00am
|
Comment
1916
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
|
08-06-08 07:41am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1917
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Pretty wild - remember once seening a beautifull brunette acting as a falconer - with a real bird and all...just do not remember where (typical)....
|
08-05-08 06:26am
|
Reply
1918
|
Walter Bosque Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
In spite of some serious cons: No zips - no videos, this site has really got the attention of this user.
Main reason: New exclusive stuff! (including a new way of soft latina material)
Tnanks to Drooler for this first/exclusive and fine review - and though the score does not reach for the skies - I'm going for it.
Check out the preview, BTW....
|
08-02-08 02:54pm
|
Reply
1919
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Blond Sandra Shine....Of course - what a lack of memory for my part: Her own site - well, you can't win them all...
|
08-02-08 02:39pm
|
Reply
1920
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
Reply of
Bluey71's Reply
Hi Bluey71
(just seen your reply, so this re-reply a little late):
Glad you like it - the review, but foremost the site, which is the importend part, of course.
I agree with you at one point: the awesome stuff here comes a little too rare! But man, I sure hope these people will keep working on it - because there sure are some fine stuff in a special way not seen anywhere else....
|
08-02-08 11:17am
|
Comment
1921
|
Nu Dolls
(0)
|
|
08-02-08 09:53am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1922
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Yes, Ace....good help about Crissy. Thanks!
I had my suspicion, that there would not be any newer....
|
08-02-08 03:41am
|
Reply
1923
|
Danni.com
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Great review, Ace...
Thought about joining again. Now I think, I'll skip it - for a while at least.
BTW: Do they have any (new) 2008-stuff/videos with Crissy Moran?
|
08-02-08 02:43am
|
Reply
1924
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, sir - judging from the cover-photo Lola is a smashing brunette!!
BTW: Brunettes - have you seen Sandra Shine has turned blond?
Just found a DDF Prod. -clip, don't know from which site, though.
A bit of a shame: she looks older and less elegant/classy...
|
08-01-08 04:11am
|
Reply
1925
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Normally nothing - once in a while (rarely) I might send a reply if it's one of my own favorite sites and I feel the score is way too low and not well founded...
Never if I think it's too high....man, they probably like the site, then.
On the other hand: A low score could be a good warning if you have never been there - and then a "thanks-reply" is fine.
|
08-01-08 03:45am
|
