| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1651
|
Mano Job
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Yes, bro - it's "nice" without all that pseudo-interview-stuff. And sure, forgot that importend issue about the missing zip - was too busy browsing all those fine videos....
|
02-08-09 05:14am
|
Reply
1652
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Guess you're - very - right about the videos. My score is related to me beeing hook on videos - and here ATK lacks some - the amount and girl-quality of photosets alone is probably worth a better score...you can browse forever and forever...
The same goes for Karups, BTW - This user finds that site a bit better, all around..
|
02-06-09 07:43am
|
Review
1653
|
AT Kingdom
(0)
77.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Nothing wrong with the amount of videos and photosets here.
Just have some problems with the quality, the exclusive-thing and a bit more. See below.
Very fine updates - this seems to be one of the best in the field- congrats...
Good variation in models, solo-stuff, hc, bg, lez and more.
Later video-quality has improven...a lot.
Only a few other sites can beat almost 10.000 videos - BUT...the amount is based on parted files, arghh...
Zip for all photosets.
Not too large video-files - full scenes (parted files also at hand.)
Very large photo galleries - cannot count them all.
Average to good navigation. |
| Cons: |
Certainly not sure about exclusives.
Annoying parting of especially video-files where updates of the same scene comes on different dates - a serious bummer.
Too many videos of average and certainly not 2009-quality.
Price too high.
The "search-machine" is far from accurate - you get guided to stuff, you never searched for... |
| Bottom Line: |
Difficult Bottom Line here - but generally this site promiss a heck of a lot - but when you get down to bussiness the results are somehow a disapointment.
This is spoken from the video-review point of view - and here the stuff is overwhelmed by too much older scenes, to much stuff which seems based on licens from elsewhere.
Anyway, I spend hours and hours searching the video-department here, and man, found very little to keep.
And what really pisses me off is the way the video-files are parted - and named. Mostly you have to wait days or weeks to get the whole scene together - a serious bummer.
BUT: It seems ATK has listened to those complaints - but only lately. The latest updates - but only the very latest - has this new input at the previews for the videos: "Full Scenes" - about time.
So let's see if they keep that up - and maybe it'd been worth a better score.
The data is shortly:
Video-files in wmv and mov. Parted - and latest full scenes for a few.
Not too big video-files: full scenes: 100-170 Mb.
Parted: about 40-50 Mb
Photos: Zip for full sets (size about: 1500x1200)
Finally there is a broad variation of solo, hc (b/g) and lez. Too much lez for my taste.
A hope that this site with their newer videosets of full scenes will grow in a way of better/more full scenes in general. |
|
02-05-09 10:31am
Replies (2)
|
Review
1654
|
Mano Job
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This site is for fans of tugjobs, handjobs or whatever. And one of the best in it's field.
The amount of videos here are just great - and what you can expect from a "good" site.
Almost 300 videos of (mostly) fine tugjobs - with very different kinds of girls - some quite plain, though.
Some top-porn models included.
Fine video-producing with the GIRL in the front - no f....... cameraman-yap.
Fine bj-bonus site - and one more - not so exiting - bonus site.
Fine - for most videos - quality.
Download speed ok.
Average updates - what seems to be every third day - not impressive, though.
Fine preview - go for that, first - then you get the idea... |
| Cons: |
Misserable navigation - and ditto socalled "search-engine"
One of those site where you just have to keep on pressing the bottum going through the archives.
Some stereotype-style of filming (but generally it's better than average)
Price a bit high.
Too few euro-models - but ok, this is first and last a US-oriented site, so now you know...
Annoying file-names - all have the same, so you got to alter everything after download. |
| Bottom Line: |
Take a look at TBP and the handjob-sites, tugsites and whatever they're called. No more than a 81,5 for the top-rated one.
As somewhat a fan of those hj-sites, I think I've been through them all - untill now Her Sweet Hand was the best.
But ManoJob got a lot more. You get to know the model without any stupid talk from the cameraman, the girls are well guided/edited in the manner of speaking, teasing og talking directly to the viewer.
And that part is very well done here at ManoJob.
It's a pleasure to watch those US-girls talking to the viewer, only - and if you're into sexy-talk, this could be the site for you.
And here is why this site deserves above the 80: Well produced videos with girls remembering that the thing here is like: POV.
And another pros. is the tremendous amount of videos and ditto different types of girls - AND before you get to the hj-act most girls do fine teasing, masturbating and so on - pretty good, all together.
Very fine dealing with the video-files:
You can download every scene in small parts (wmv) or download the scene in three part - and, of course full scene. Typical size for an entire scene is 180-240 Mb.
And finally you can choose to download cumshots only.
But Man: Name those files better for the user to archive downloads - and not name all the files the same.
Photosets: Download vidcaps or fullsize jpegs (1500x1000) not bad.
Bottom line: This is a fine - at the moment maybe the best - handjob site around - if you can do without euro-models - they have a few at ManoJob - no, very few... |
|
02-05-09 07:54am
Replies (4)
|
Review
1655
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Probably the best site at this moment concerning quality and quantity of easteuropean girl-videos.
More US-girls has been added lately.
Solo-videos (I love them) are both sexier and sweeter than anywhere else (1ByDay included)
A splendid variation of types of girls - if you can't find at least 20 or more here that turns you on, you got a problem..
Fine updates. Three every day changing between videos and photosets.
Fine navigation. Navigation in many ways - see below.
Ok price for PUs.
3-5 videos of each model - with a very few exeptions.
Top preview (video and photosets) that gives you the idea of the deal here. |
| Cons: |
The h/c - b/g-scenes are sometimes a bit stereotype. (with exceptions - see the great fuck-scene with czech Jessica).
US-girls are more frequent - sorry folks, but I think some of the solo-scenes with US-girls has too much giggle and talking - probably because they feel more relaxed, but here it's the old problem with the cameraman/producer.
Some of the old video-stuff lack quality, but where does it not... |
| Bottom Line: |
Never would go for a 100 - but, man - this site keeps turning me on - and after the descent of the good ol' Teendreams, Nubiles rules.
The main pros. here are the fantastic selection of different types of girls - there are one, two and many others for every taste.
This user tends to the euro-teens here for the reason mentioned above. Most girls are both cute and sexy in the same deal.
In comparison with 1ByDay the girls/teens at Nubiles are a bit more on the amateur way, but their acting misses nothing - in sex, looks and general turn-on. Gotta give it to the producers here - so why not skip all the giggle and talk with the US-girls/teens.
For a year or more the quality of videos are just getting better - and still have the fine thing with parts and full-scene.
High-def wmv (typical 250 Mb) are not much better than the avi (typical 130 Mb) - and then you have mpg for viewing/downloading the parts - for a starter.
Also a pretty good sort of "preview" in streaming (Flash).
Photosets: the videos almost add up to the amount of photosets - a little more photosets for each girl in general - photos: 1200x800 - and with zips, of coruse.
Navigation is a pleasure: browse girls, browse updates, browse videos, browse photosets, browse toprated - you name it.
Currency: When joining from Europe via TBP, you'll get a bit higher price. But mail the webmaster, and he'll provide you with a link to get the good price.
And, yes: the feedback from the site/webmaster at Nubiles is fine- what any good ol' PU would expect.
This site is primarily for "lovers" of solo teens - video/photosets - with some hc b/g in between (aprox 1/5 or a little les is hc).
But for soloteen-videos this is the best it gets - right now - I think |
|
02-05-09 06:39am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
1656
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
|
02-04-09 11:07am
Replies (2)
|
Comment
1657
|
Lusted
(0)
|
|
02-04-09 06:43am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1658
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
That one was easy: None.
All that artificial stuff is boring - well, maybe except if you consider a scene where a model talks to her toy exciting. I don't.
|
02-03-09 08:02am
|
Reply
1659
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
mantas's Comment
There are still problems with a few sites in the question of regional pricing. But I never had any of those problems here in Scandinavia with VideoBox - just for the record...
|
02-01-09 10:55am
|
Reply
1660
|
Ero Nata
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Just a hint, elephant: the sweet Nata - aka a lot of names - appears on quite a few sites. But never hc. The best stuff I've found with this doll is still the videos at Nubiles....
|
02-01-09 10:52am
|
Reply
1661
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Yes, bro - plain and simple: don't even waste the dollar and the clicks joining. The photos are also still the same old standard and the quality nothing to speak off....
|
02-01-09 10:46am
|
Reply
1662
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
For quite a lot of years: The only place I never got cheated is CCBill, can you believe it?
Second is Epoch where I do not THINK they did harm to my creditcard. Some of the others I've had troubles.
Anytime it's not CCBill, I take extra care.
Anybody here have any experience with Netcash?
|
01-31-09 08:33am
|
Comment
1663
|
Teen Pink Videos
(0)
|
|
01-31-09 08:16am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1664
|
MC Nudes
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Review
Now, this seems to be an honest and well founded review by a new PU - short, but "modest".
I almost agree with the score - and certainly with the arguments.
Welcome to a new user - read his reviews for MetArt and Femjoy.
Not too many words, but well chosen.
Maybe we all could do things a bit shorter in our reviews - it's not always necesarry to make a novel out of a review - sometimes I get lost along the way. (And by all means: some of my own reviews have been far too long, too).
Instead:
Short news you can use...
PUs interested in the particular sites can always go back and ask fellow PUs for futher details..
Gotta give this new user a thumb-up.
|
01-28-09 10:04am
|
Reply
1665
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Reply
It may be worth to try and check out for TBP...
|
01-28-09 09:49am
|
Reply
1666
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Reply
This is ALSO why it's fun to be here at PU - (quotation from The Squirrel):
" I've been looking at pictures of naked women since I was about 8 and spanked my first girl when I was ten"
Great lines there, bro...
|
01-28-09 08:21am
|
Comment
1667
|
Abby Winters
(0)
|
|
01-28-09 08:15am
Replies (5)
|
Comment
1668
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
|
01-28-09 07:41am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1669
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I plead guilty...been lurkin' here several times and waiting for two thing:
1) The updates
2) The conversion-rates to get straight.
So I look for news about this site, too...
|
01-28-09 07:27am
|
Reply
1670
|
N/A
|
Reply of
picdude's Poll
Addiction is not the word.
A hobby, an interest - and yes: enthusiasm, of course.
To be active here at PU indicates all above, but take a look at the amount of inputs from the ol' timers here (too): It's a bit like on and off. (this user included)
We all have periods where we're more active in the pornsearch/use, comments, replies and reviews - and some times less (active)- it all depends:
Too much for a long time - you might get bored - but
still most keep comming back again and again.
|
01-28-09 07:23am
|
Reply
1671
|
Best DVDz
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
Tnanks for that tip!!
Since it seems like you have some knowledge of Caballero and their "Swedish Erotica" - do you remember a petite brunette by the name of Barbie or Candy - her hair was almost ravenblack and she had this strange, but cute little nose and small tits with rather speciel nipples?
Cannot find her at the site in mention or elsewhere.
She was a knock-out in some of my first encounters with 8mm filmporn in the early 1980s..
|
01-24-09 09:50am
|
Comment
1672
|
Best DVDz
(0)
|
|
01-24-09 08:26am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1673
|
Suze Classics
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Review
Fine tip and fine review.
The review speaks for itself, but the tip about this new Suze-site is great - I tend to some of the classics more and more - and when you get the hole Suze-deal for less than $ 10 - it sure seems worth it.
BTW: Yes, Raquel Darian - still hunting for her stuff..she was just top.
|
01-24-09 07:57am
|
Reply
1674
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
TrashMan's Review
An extremely thorough and fine review by TrashMan - and a usefull update about this site a lot of us get back to often.
Like jd, I'm curious about the future here - and "horrified" if they just skip the older stuff.
BTW: IF DDF plans a "classic site" (instead) I hope they go for a little or much better video-quality in their re-makes than they've done untill now at 1Byday
|
01-24-09 07:45am
|
Reply
1675
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Agree with Jay G: "The fun is the hunt"
And this user too sometimes (or mostly) gets bored after a few weeks of membership of most sites (because after that period you've been through most - maybe except sites like Videobox)....and oh, yes: quite a few of us are spoiled - and then again: they (paysites)want our money and in order to deliver, the sites got to do the same...
BTW: Good pol, Monahan.
|
01-24-09 07:35am
|
