| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1401
|
N/A
|
Reply of
dracken's Poll
When I vote "Other" - it could as well be all stated in the poll.
But still in this order:
1)Slow downloads is relly a bummer.
2)But the same video-names are also annoying
3)Poor navigation
And agree with Drooler - some newer sites are oversizing their watermarks - really a bad tendency...
|
08-16-09 03:49am
|
Reply
1402
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
Good tip - thanks!
BUT - once again the currency-problems makes it no good - try to join from Europe - you have to pay euro 19.95 - or $ 27 something......
Incredible that those major billing-companies has not made regulations after such a long time and so MANY inputs/complains about this....
|
08-15-09 10:37am
|
Reply
1403
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Review
Turboshaft does an extremely fine review here - and it's needed for this major site.
Have not been a member for some time for one reasen:
The models - in general - have changed. And how can that be?
Well, first: the models, their acting, the repetetive style of performance has changed this "good ol'" site for sure.
It used to be a favorite of mine: damn fine solo/mastubation performance - and some ok hc/bg scenes.
It's gone downhill since a lot of PUs were up there at 88-95 in scores.
The site has - in my opinion - become mediocre in all matters: models, acting, style:
I wish it's was when a buck was still silver, before the Beatles and Yesterday, before Chrysler went down, before Nixon lied to us all on tv, before microwave ovens - when a girl could still cook and still would - and when a Ford and a Chevy would still last ten years like they should...Man, I'm getting old...
Sorry, folks...
|
08-13-09 07:39am
|
Comment
1404
|
All X Danish
(0)
|
|
08-12-09 10:37am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1405
|
Hot Legs and Feet
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Have to repeat what others have said: GOOD FIND!
And I really look forward to a review from the Panther - spend some time browsing - and even the browsing here is very fine.
BUT one thing strikes me (and it's not meant negative) - it looks like a lot of the content at the different sites can be found at the motherload-archives (1ByDay).
But again, I'm not quite sure how much and to which extend (there's just too much, but nobody can talk against that - it looks like a place where you really get your moneys worth) - but having joined a few sites at the moment - I'll wait for a review...
|
08-07-09 08:25am
|
Reply
1406
|
Legally Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Comment
No problems here either - and BTW the content here and at Fritz Ryan is identical, as exotics4me states... but if you join: Look forward to a review - have not been at the site/those sites for a long, long time...
|
08-07-09 08:13am
|
Reply
1407
|
iTeen Video
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
No problems - I use IDM - and it works fine with this site...
|
08-07-09 05:18am
|
Reply
1408
|
Glam Deluxe
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Strange - at a site like this.
Had to try - and oh, yes: my Norton grabbed it right away.
Wonder why - is the site under attack or is it just pure negligence....
|
08-05-09 09:07am
|
Reply
1409
|
Real Peachez
(0)
|
Reply of
james4096's Review
Thanks for a NEW review of this damn pretty girl/model - if you like 'almost' teens with small tits - AND a great sexy charisma. Peachez got that!
It looks like the site and the quality of the content is getting better, according to james4096. It WAS needed. The earlier content was lousy - in video-quality.
Just found one newer video - a Christmas-hc - AND it's just great.
Is that the deal with all the newer videos???
|
08-02-09 10:10am
|
Reply
1410
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey exotics4me
Angel Pink is certainly a rising star - have not yet got her latest videos from 'Pix' or Club Sandy - seen some of her at Footsiebabes - though I'm not really into that feet-stuff. Still she's very cute/sexy there...
Gotta go for the Club Sandy-deal, too.
She has a very fine outdoor-scene at Givemepink, BTW.
BUT bottom line: You mention Viv Thomas - the site you get access to via many other sites - and a site where the video-quality - USED - to lack some.
Is it growing better? (the video-quality, that is)...
Another BTW: You mention Club Sandy now and then - and that site is also in my mind. Even though the site only has updates with video/pix every second day - it looks like the Sandy-site may be worth a hit, again, again...
|
08-02-09 08:38am
|
Reply
1411
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Oh, BTW - I see more and more new stuff with similar types of brunettes, especially: Nataly and Ashley B - great girls.
|
07-30-09 04:18am
|
Reply
1412
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Hey exotics4me
Thanks for this update/info, too. And quite agree: New models is very importend for those major sites - That's what I look for - and of course the favorites.
BTW: Angel Pink IS somewhat of a star....or close, anyway.
|
07-30-09 03:18am
|
Reply
1413
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
What an overwhelming review!
Even if it's only two-three months ago I quit the site, the review from exotics4me make me believe, that this site just keeps getting better and better - after a time of mediocre standard in late 2008.
Just comming to an end of a few other sites, so this looks like IT - again!
|
07-29-09 06:05am
|
Reply
1414
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
The answers could use some closer definitions - but still a fine poll.
This user is a video-freak - started up browsing porn many years ago when for exampel Persian Kitty first started - AND at a time when videos where in a lousy quality. (before that - my former girlsfriend and me liked to watch 8 mm - especially Swedish Erotica - US-made, BTW).
So for years I've had tons of photosets - but when the video-deal got better, I turned to that.
Now - and for the last 3-4 years my main interest is videos - solo and hc/bg - the old style one on one - pretty conservative there.
Still can get exited by some rare/really fine photosets - especially of newer models - and here MetArt is one of the best (but, alas - their videos are not worth much).
|
07-29-09 05:52am
|
Reply
1415
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
My desktop is totally neutral/'clean' - with the old Windows-green as background - the good stuff comes inside.....
|
07-28-09 08:14am
|
Reply
1416
|
Real Sex Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
bacardiancoke's Reply
Well, your're right - about the price.
At the time of my short membership - skipped it after a month - I found some good stuff. But a price like maybe $19.95 would be more fair...
Then again, have you seen Killergram?
Also a british site - very expensive ($39.95) and with a LOT of material - and in many ways great quality. But even if you get a heap of stuff here, it tends to become stereotype - the same style all over. Never saved anything from here - and I was a member twice.
It's not always so simpel, that the price follows the content/quality - but we all got different taste and views - and that's good...
|
07-28-09 07:20am
|
Reply
1417
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Comment
Agree - it's a fine and special site - made a review last week - see it if you like...
|
07-28-09 01:06am
|
Reply
1418
|
N/A
|
Reply of
arnaud's News
Hello
You still got a currency problem.
When joining from Europe you do NOT get the TBP-price offer of $24.95 - but Euro 24.95 - the same as $ 33.77.
Denner
|
07-27-09 12:45pm
|
Reply
1419
|
Real Sex Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
bacardiancoke's Review
I have NOT been at this site for over a year or more - no, sorry - almost two years - see my review.
Still it was then - not THAT bad a site - not bad enough to put is a a ripoff - actually I still have 3-4 of the best damn hc-videos (exclusive) of Michelle Thorne and Veronica Cruz (aka this and this) from that site - and a couple of others.
Especially those hc/bg videos of those two named models are worth a lot for a collector - you'll not find them anywhere else...
But ok, if the site has lived up to 2009 - it's NOT good.
Anyway - guess I'd have to take another look....
|
07-25-09 07:57am
|
Reply
1420
|
Mike's Apartment
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Review
Mike's Apartment has always been my Nomero Uno at the in many other ways rather mediocre network from Reality Kings.
The reason is obvious: That partiucular site at the network has the best content - I very much agree....
My main problem - when last a member for about half a year ago - was still the style of their videos - all the (stupid) cameraman-talk - AND the fact that the video-quality - at that time - still was not really crisp.
So how is it now - in general (the quality and the "talking-thing")
And thanks for the review - that again got my attetion to this network....
|
07-25-09 07:42am
|
Reply
1421
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
1: I dislike tattoos in general - and on girls/women in every way.
2: And Yes, I'm way over 36 - so maybe that's has a lot to do with my dislike.
But ok - if it's small and only one or two - my first wife had a little butterfly next to the pussy - sweet - another girlfriend had a couple - bigger ones on the thighs - and that turned me off in the long run.
Met a girl later on with a couple of tattooos on the arm and the breasts - nada - could not handle that.
Guess this is foremost a matter of age - younger people are getting used to it - and probably liking it - I never will.
|
07-25-09 07:05am
|
Reply
1422
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hey messmer
I think it's only about 45-50 in the large format (formats - I realize that a couple are in 1280x720) - until now.
The 640x480 and even 720x576 are not BAD - and can be viewed (not crisp, though) fullscreen...but generally the formats seems a bit varied - and even in the same formats - so does the viewing quality..
|
07-24-09 12:27am
|
Review
1423
|
Vintage Flash
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Entirely exclusive british softcore "porn" - but with masturbation.
A pretty rare mix of wellknown uk-models and totally amateurs.
Dirty talk in most videos - with british accents, of course.
Ok amount of videos - right now it's: 379
The newer videos and photosets are what most PUs will consider: Fine/ok - even crisp
For Michelle Thorne-fans this is just a great site - she has a LOT of videos and photosets.
One fine bonus-site:
Pantyhosed4u.com
One other bonus site - not worth anything.
Old time lingerie - if you like that. |
| Cons: |
The navigation here is almost a bummer - even if there is a search-machine and a model base.
But no way to search for "only videos" or "only photosets.
Price a bit high.
Updates come only once a week - BUT it now includes both videos and photosets.
Too many of the better looking girls have only photosets.
Very broad variation i model-quality/goodlooking - too many on the ordinary site.
A bit slow download.
Only solo stuff (apart from ONE video with bj) - well, only found one after browsing for weeks. |
| Bottom Line: |
Joined the site because I found some stuff from it with Michelle Thorn and Linda Leigh - great britts - and both damn sexy.
The style here is - like the name indicates: Vintage.
That means that the models are all in lingerie from the 50's, 60's and 70's - and some is really outstanding.
The videos are now up to almost 380 - BUT it's only half of that amout that count to something - in viewing quality.
The newer videos are: 1024x760 - older ones goes down to: 640x480 and even 320x240.
All in WMV only.
The photosets are the same. New ones: 1600x1071 - older ones: not worth it.
But the main deal - apart from the outfit (lingerie) is the style in the videos. They are just dirty - for the solo kinds.
Most models does a fine dirty-talk - in a natural way - and in a way I ALMOST never see in US- solovideos.
If it was not for this dirty-talk, my score here would be quite a bit lower.
But listening to Michelle Thorne or even one video with Lucy Zara telling how horny she is and want to get fucked is worth it all.
Alas there are a little too many of the models that looks quite ordinary (not GOOD looking) - BUT still: even some of these girls end up being very sexy in their performance.
And the fact that they only have photosets of Linda leigh and Misty McCain is a bummer - so even if I'm probably not comming back - I can recommend a months membership - AND it looks like the site is growing - and new models are comming in, so who knows - maybe I'll try it again in six months or a year or so... |
|
07-23-09 06:38am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1424
|
Paul Markham Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
Murray's Comment
85,8 seems way to high at the TBP-score.
Been a - trial and full - member a couple of times - but this sites lacks quality - in both videos and photos.
You almost got to be a nerd for poor quality vintage videos to enjoy this - and a nerd I am about 1990th british models, so I found - some - ok stuff here - but later I found it in much better quality elsewhere...
This site is absolutly only worth the trial at $ 2.95 - browse a bit, have a little fun - and run away...
|
07-23-09 06:07am
|
Reply
1425
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
ThatSwede's Comment
Well, Swede
Like the two other fellow PUs replies: this is the currency-deal we europeans/asians has to endure from a lot of site - US-sites, as well as euro-sites.
The best thing to do, is you come across a site with this billing policy (which is normally placed at the billling-company/companies - is to write the webmaster - and ask for an alternative billing.
It's typical CCBill that keep these currency problems alive.
Whereas Epoch does it better and charge the same amount - no matter what currency.
Sometimes you'll succeed - other times not - Good Luck.
Denner
(another viking from Denmark)
|
07-23-09 05:51am
|
