| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1101
|
Cum Squad
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Fine review/fine update on this Mad Man Inc.- site.
And what a bummer with that low q-videos - in 2010.
A bit strange that Cum Squad keep it there - in relation to another Mad Man-site, like Mbaya mentions: fullyclothedsex.com. Still got some videos from that site - and they are just ok (not great) in viewing quality...
But the updates (or lack of) here - thanks for the warning!
|
02-17-10 08:50am
|
Reply
1102
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Guys - fellow PUs - what a lot of damn fine inputs here - and I really agree with all those words - summoned down to this:
We've got a great user community! and man, liked messmers:
'This is my second home!'
Cheers!
|
02-17-10 06:47am
|
Reply
1103
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
Rick's Comment
Blue Angel Live - a good point put up by moonbyrd.
First: When ending my latest term of membership of 21st Sextury some two-three weeks ago, I noticed that the site Blue Angel Live is/was a part of the deal (from the start) - BUT not mentioned by Damon - still the site was placed as an instant access at that left-placed column together with the rest - but no access when you tried.
Second: At TBP/PU the site - Blue Angel Live - is stated as a clone.
https://www.pornusers.com/review/blueangellive/
It does not look like that - please check out the 21st Sextury - and it looks like that a lot of the material with Blue Angel is ONLY at that site....
BTW: It's pretty smart - in my opinion - that the great site, Cuties Galore - one of the best with new easteuro models hit the fan after the 2nd recurring - but Damon: Just curious: What other sites do you get instant access to when joining Cuties Galore first?
But another BTW: A damn fine deal now for PU/TBP in joining at $ 19.95!
|
02-17-10 06:24am
|
Reply
1104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
And Oh, BTW: I'd really miss some great fellow PUs here!! - AND the guys at TBP - who can replace Khan, for one?
(Fine poll, badandy)
|
02-16-10 06:18am
|
Reply
1105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
badandy400's Poll
Some 'old timers' here might not admit it - and again some will:
Like Jay G I find this place so great, that it'd be SAD if it was not around.
Do not mind to admit: I'm a total porn-freak - and since my steady job is behind me, I enjoy spending much time at both the search elsewhere and the exchange of views/reviews here at PU.
Of course there are some other review-sites - but any PU who's been surfing them got to agree:
None of them lives up to the value of benefits (and fun) you can gain in your porn-search as PU - and again of course TBP which is an indispensable part of the deal...
But why worry - TBP/PU will be here as long as we are...
|
02-16-10 05:54am
|
Reply
1106
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Reply
Thanks for the update ect., exotics
And totally agree about her eyes, lips and hair - and as a long time fan, too - I've always loved her 'sweet ass'.
Anyway she not the first model to gain and then again loose weight - still I'm a bit surprised about the info on the Zoliboy-clips - that they're from 2004 - did not see that.
As a (no-no-member in relation to TBP/PU of Easynews) I've found quite a few rare clips of Eve - always on the hunt for her material - old and new - she's just a queen of nudes - and hate to admit it - not a great fan of her old hc/bg - even if they are a bit 'collectors item' - except maybe the first at Pixandvideo (the bathroom-scene - here she's both sexy and sweet)
When I get back to 21st Sextury (and I sure will, if it keeps on like today (maybe the best site around, right now)) - I'll look for the scene with her and Sophie Moone........Yup! - Eve is just GREAT.
|
02-16-10 05:43am
|
Comment
1107
|
Big Tits At School
(0)
|
|
02-15-10 07:00am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1108
|
Jerk-Off Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
toynoise's Review
Here we got this site/network send to the grave - at PU, anyway, thanks - good job, toynoise...
They probably only survive because of the name - a name that might appeal to under aged kids doing secret porn-browsing...
|
02-15-10 06:20am
|
Reply
1109
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
atrapat's Reply
I certainly did not know about those aspects - Thanks, atrapat for this fine warning!
|
02-14-10 11:16am
|
Reply
1110
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes...but guess this is the best reason for trust-votes.
Some reviews - not that the short ones are more suspicious than the long ones - but lately we've had some extremely short reviews without any serious arguments - and a lot by the same - new - users - and I think:
Is this a joker or a friend of some owner/webmaster?
STILL: Keep in mind that some very trustworthy PUs make a lot of reviews - and they make some in (sorry, man what du you call it in english: Streams, waves or...?) - a lot in a short time.
Our trusted fellow PU Mbaya did so and does it now and then - makes a lot of reviews - does that create any problem? Does that make Mbaya (Mbaya just as an exampel) less trustworthy? NOT to me.
In the end it's the words/arguments in the review that keeps things straight...
|
02-14-10 10:04am
|
Reply
1111
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
propaGhandi's Reply
well, easy to say - that deal seems quite complicated - and not without risk - as far as former PUs have stated - but I'm a complete novice here...so any fast way around it????
|
02-14-10 09:42am
|
Reply
1112
|
Only Tease
(0)
|
Reply of
wildstar's Comment
Try to mail them - they may have a secondary billing-co....like Epoch, for one - where you get the regular price without the CCBill-scam... (do not remember with this site, though)
AGAIN: To all european users: The most notorious in this currency-problem/scam is CCBill - so if you try to join a site - and it's the same amount in Euros at CCBill - always mail the site and ask for another way to pay - MOST times you get lucky...
|
02-14-10 05:24am
|
Reply
1113
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
'allo, 'allo..Ze Droolah
At least I got a fast answer (In the Crack): They were working on it - that currency deal - but I was welcome to pay in cash or money order!
No way I'll send cash in an envelope - and a money order to Canada would exceed the $47 - a lot, so.... In The Crack is on hold.
|
02-13-10 05:21am
|
Reply
1114
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Well founded review here - but the score?
Still: no matter - what matters is this accurate statement:
'Anal or not, one issue is that they really seem to focus on quantity over quality. Some of the videos are really bad.'
Cannot agree more - VideoBox seems to have this deal in my mind: Give the suckers a LOT - video-QUALITY - what's that?
|
02-11-10 07:05am
|
Comment
1115
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
02-11-10 05:28am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
1116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Not that I'll 'put down' this poll - but this is shallow - do not think you can put up a question like this.
SOME girls/women have had an urge at a times - to - by some chance to get close to another girl/woman - and maybe do sex/or close to once - also by curiosity. Does that make them bi-sexual - do not think so.
Was the many girls from the old hippie-time bisexual in flirting openly with other women - do not think so.
Real lesbians are far from the thought of 'bi-sexual'.
Talking about porn: Oh, yes - some models do NOT do hc/bg - but hc/gg - does that make them lesbians or even bi-sexual? Do not think so.....
So: No.
|
02-10-10 07:15am
|
Reply
1117
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks, mbaya!
|
02-09-10 03:09pm
|
Review
1118
|
Devils Film
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fine price at TBP ($ 9.95) for a month.
Good amount of videos - 850 'DVDs' - about 4500 scenes.
Fine bonus-sites - foremost Silvia Saint.
8 major bonus sites - 10 niche sites
Good variation in models - both euro/easteuro and US - and some british.
Ok download speed - get about 720 kb/sec - and download manager allowed.
Ok variation in catagories.
They started doing HD, by golly....better late than never.
Fine streaming/screen captures for preview before download.
Some euro-models in exclusive and rarely seen hc/bg-scenes. |
| Cons: |
About 90% of the videos are NOT crisp - only mediocre - some from 2006/2007 are even worse.
Not a photo-site - still there are a lot of photosets, especially with Silvia Saint...
BUT NO zip - out of style.
Beware of pre-checked cross sale.
Hopeless model-search - see below.
Navigation: Got to get used to it - but it's not good - way too confusing.
Only wmv for video download.
Updates seem to rare - and updates are with a lot of older material
Too much anal stuff for this user. |
| Bottom Line: |
This could be a site around the 90 - if:
The video-quality was close to what you would expect in 2010.
But at least 90% of the 4500 clips are only 720x400 (or less) and the viewing quality far from crisp - and only wmv for downloads.
Been here before - but the site has not grown much in quality for the past year or so.
Devils Film are the main site and have the motherload from most of the many bonus-sites.
But not from the prime bonus: Silvia Saint.
Alas her old Silvia Saint Club is closed - and you can get a lot of the videos from that site here - but certainly not all (alas).
For Silvia fans this site still has some great content of both videos (solo and hc) and photosets. But NO zip for those photos - crazy - in 2010.
There are still more euro-models - even the new ones like Sasha Rose, Danielka ect. And in videos I have not seen before (great).
But to search for some models are...yes, fucked up. They have - of course different names/alias - but a lot also appears with different names in different scenes - you get lucky sometimes - sometimes not.
Look out: At the site they promote DVD Box and try to make you upgrade. BUT - according to TBP and other reviews - the videos here are NOT great either - only 720x400, too!
There's a lot of fun browsing to do here, though - and suddenly you strike - like finding easteuro-models that normally not (anymore, anyway) do much hc/bg - like Bijou and Suzie Carina.
The main pros here is the hunt for certain models/videos - and if you're hooked on doing that at a site, there are days of good browsing - and you might be lucky to find that special thing - in spite of the cons - it's still worse an 80 - to this user.... |
|
02-08-10 08:33am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
1119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I have this idea - maybe I'm naive - that today there's better medical check/control - or rather a lot of it - of pornmodels - for their own sake and the other model/models.
Especially when doing anal-stuff.
Guess history has shown different in many ways.
Do not mind watching porn with condoms - and actually, I can get a bit upset if I happen to see that anal stuff without....it's plain stupid (The blood-contact is too risky here) - and some of those latin models live a dangerous life.
Anal sex is the main reason for HIV in the gay world...
|
02-08-10 07:34am
|
Reply
1120
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Well spoken - and apart from that - and maybe more for us PUs, I really dig this line:
'.......I think this ends up making porn more generic and also more stupider--think BangBros and you might understand what I'm getting at.'
|
02-05-10 11:51am
|
Reply
1121
|
MPL Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Comment
Disappointed too!
But also because MPL does so many videos/sets outdoor - been a member on and off for years, and it's getting worse.
MPL has a great selection of new and some almost exclusive models - they try to make the sets/videos sexy, but still way too much 'art'. - and that maybe 75 % of those videos/sets are made outdoors does not make it any better.
We've had that outdoor/indoor discussion before, but it's still a major item - most people (PUs anyway according to earlier threads) prefer the indoor with a little more erotica than art, so...
|
02-05-10 09:00am
|
Reply
1122
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
All cleared up - my mistake....
Cheers!
|
02-05-10 08:22am
|
Reply
1123
|
La Zona Modelos
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Guess you are right here, PP - would not bet against it... LOL.
Still it could be 'nice' to get a comment from the webmaster - also because I rather like that site - is this the future or what?
|
02-05-10 08:19am
|
Reply
1124
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
adrenalinrush's Reply
Fine info, adrenalinrush - thanks for heads up, here!
|
02-05-10 08:10am
|
Comment
1125
|
X-Art
(0)
|
|
02-05-10 07:49am
Replies (4)
|
