| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
451
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Nick Spillum's Reply
Thanks - great to get a response so fast from a WM... and: unlike those sets/vids offered at sites like Teendreams - it's good to hear, that the main site itself has much better quality...
BUT: WHY? - at all offer that low down quality vids/sets in license that make users think: That Viv Thomas deal is not worth it???
|
09-21-11 08:39am
|
Reply
452
|
Viv Thomas
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Hope you can clear this up....
There GOT to be a difference between the main Viv Thomas-site - and the one you gain access to via various sites, Teendreams as one.
The vids - via Teendreams - are almost horrible/blurred in quality and 3:4. But seen some trailers from Viv Thomas in 1280x720 (I think it was) - and in great quality...
Guess that's the "Very High Quality"?
And if so....great! And is that only for newer vids?
|
09-21-11 06:10am
|
Reply
453
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
graymane....nothing odd about that poll.....doing some thinking (yes, it's still possible, LOL)..it's very clear - not the answers, but the question......
Like Lee Van Cleef asked Clint Eastwood in "For A Few Dollars More":
- Is the question indiscreet?
And he got this in return:
- No, but the answer might be.
Still, I'd go for:
Religious anathema........and then again "guilt" - but that's probably for the young ones.
Manholelover...The UK may still be suffering from the Victorian times...we remember also stories about the Suffragettes that was not only freedom for women, but freedom from the ultra conservative points of view, the church, that House of Lords, you mentions and the general old fashioned way of "British thinking"...Oh, it's better now - but get closer to the rest of Europe......even if we probably got some of the same amount of hypocrisy in some ways
|
09-19-11 08:54am
|
Reply
454
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Guess it was this:
"Details: content count hasn't changed since March, 2010."
Got to learn to look at that "Content Updates"......
Thanks!
|
09-19-11 06:59am
|
Reply
455
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Not too high - not too low...
Guess the cybertoad 85 is - somewhat - fair. The site is an old timer, for sure - and does/has done a lot of good over the years.
Still my main cons here af a vids fan - and ONLY this as a vids fan: Those moving pictures (vids) are getting more and more repetitive - the same editing/style over and over again - a bit like Digital Desire..
|
09-19-11 06:52am
|
Reply
456
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Review
Thanks for the review and heads up on this one, elephant...
It certainly seems like the site has grown a lot better since I gave it a 65...in January 2010.
The material, the quality seems to have improved a lot since then - the vids quality, too.
Still, I'm not crazy about the Co. - from Holland. The price first and then the fact that some of their site have the same content. They ought to come up with a general network deal - not that it'll make much difference according to the content of their 14 sites listed - but a network price would be fair (it's not cheap):
https://www.thebestporn.com/review_company.html?id=1527
|
09-19-11 06:43am
|
Reply
457
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler, I like that "zombie" site input. That suits it well. Teenrotica is nowhere near "downright lousy" - maybe except for the vids - but I have rally enjoyed quite a few of the pix sets - BUT: with no more updates..."Hasta la vista, baby" - have already canceled rebill.....
|
09-19-11 06:24am
|
Comment
458
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
|
09-17-11 09:35am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
459
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It COULD be fun to watch some of those models we all know from sites...
But again: Not today - if I was 20-25 and go with the buddies - at around 60 - I'd feel strange - an old geezer - porn has become more private at older age.
BTW:
There are a lot of those "conventions" or erotik messe here in Europe - one link, for fun:
http://www.eros-amore.at/
Sorry - not in English
|
09-17-11 07:11am
|
Reply
460
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Within 2 hours I got a reply from the long time webmaster, Andrea with an alternative link...it's Epoch AND the price is the $19.95 in Europe.
Pretty good.. Andrea has alway been fast with a response.
And: Just joined
|
09-16-11 03:10pm
|
Reply
461
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Been a member several times - and each time I wrote the webmaster and got an alternative billing co. to get that $ 19.95 price - and did. But it's quite some time ago.
Think I'm going to try again - that site had and/or has a lot to offer - got to think about that reading yours and messmers inputs here, so...thanks
|
09-16-11 01:06pm
|
Reply
462
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
BTW:
Kudos or not - the site still got regional billing.....
So for Europeans it's not $19.95 - but around $27.
|
09-16-11 12:56pm
|
Reply
463
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nada...first not entirely sure what it really is - apart from some students getting together during college, university ect. ....as seen in some movies.
And guess it's much an American deal...is it like "living in a fraternity house"?
Not much of that in Europe - not now or in my time (centuries ago, LOL)at the University in Copenhagen. But it seems like a fine and fun way to spend time with mates and getting a touch of social life after "leaving home" - is that it???
But in connection with PU, like Monahan asks: Why?
|
09-15-11 06:56am
|
Comment
464
|
Helen's Planet
(0)
|
|
09-13-11 05:54am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
465
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
monty4321's Comment
First - take your time to go through the MANY reviews from other PUs - and the one from TBP - guess you'll find a lot of answers here..
Photos are top-quality in my opinion though not the big pix fan.
BUT: What strikes me as a member here a many times - on and off - are a couple of items concerning vids:
1) By all means: top viewing quality (the larger file, the better quality)
2) A - sad - tendency - to focus too much on close-up - both soft and h/c. I really miss some of the earlier full body/posing/strip.
3) And yes, anal has more and more focus here - too much for my taste (too).
|
09-13-11 05:43am
|
Reply
466
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Well put, graymane:..........."I like'm movin'"
What can I say, just:
Same here!
|
09-12-11 07:54am
|
Reply
467
|
Brutal Dildos
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Review
FINE review, dracken. You really get around the issues here - thumbs up.
Never forget the best vid I've ever seen with Anabella/Anabell:
http://www.pornteengirl.com/model/anabell.html
It came from this site....
|
09-11-11 08:52am
|
Reply
468
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
95% vids in my stash - but still very fond of my pixset stash, too....
My personal reason:
Grew up with pix only (magazines) - in the teens and a little later on - no vids where really available.
Then we got 8 mm and then betamax, then VHS and so on.
But seeing some of the quality vids in todays standard is almost amazing....so...yes, "live pictures", LOL.
|
09-11-11 08:42am
|
Reply
469
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
If they really stopped updating in 2009 this should be verified and informed at TBP...
|
09-10-11 08:09am
|
Reply
470
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
dracken's Reply
I'm not very tech about pix - but the sets (the large size) I've downloaded says:
2000x1338x24b
Guess that 24b is bits?
Hope that helps!
Or maybe Drooler sees this - he's been a member -and has much more knowledge about pix than I have...
|
09-10-11 02:35am
|
Review
471
|
Teenrotica
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
+ An extremely generous amount of models.
+ Not sure but it seems like entirely exclusive material (see below)
+ Generally hot looking models, most of European origin.
+ Mostly a site concentrating in sets so vids fans your're warned.
+ It's like thay say: tons of galleries
+ Zip in 2 sizes for sets
+ Mostly fine viewing quality for pix |
| Cons: |
- Close to miserable quality in the major amount of vids content unbelievable for an almost major site in 2011
- Outdated style, design and navigation
- Regional pricing
- Three formats for vids but none of them gives you any viewing pleasure
- Even some newer vids are a joke in viewing quality
- Too much lez content for my taste
- Even without regional pricing $19.95 it's too expensive for what you get in vids anyway
- No way of knowing about updates no date on those |
| Bottom Line: |
Oh, yes: bottom line: My personal feeling here is clear I wasted my money and that including the fact, that this site deals in regional pricing. But that's only a total secondary issue.
Teenrotica is downright outdated in style, in navigation, design and it's almost a scandal (harsh words, I know) that a site that cost $ 19.95 and for Europeans about $ 29 has such miserable material in videos.
Despite the preview has a so called UPDATE that is missing at the members area Instead you can turn to VIDEOS or GALLERIES for the latest and the first inputs. (or Models without dates)
When browsing for videos you get the new ones first and being a member years back, I thought: Okay, this site started up in 2006 and videos then were generally not good.
But the new ones in 2011 are in a quality I'd would be ashamed of, if I was behind the site.
The size is all in so called 3:4 and the viewing quality is simply low down.
Most vids are around 100 Mb in AVI format and much less in both WMV og MOV. Three formats save it and get better quality instead.
It's a shame. Because Teenrotica has so many fine models and I seriously believe it's exclusive.
We all got favorite models and the material I found of these models (both in pix and vids) I have not seen elsewhere.
This is mostly a site with solo and lez material both vids and sets. A few hc/bg inputs and most of these are only bj.
And for a couple of those bj vids it's lousy editing. No foreplay, no posing but starts with close ups of bj.....it seems like unfinished bussiness.
Then to the little more positive deals here:
The pix/sets are generally in ok/fine viewing quality. You get a choice of 2 zip download sizes (high and low) guess no one will go for the low. And you got a pretty good thumbnail preview for all sets.
And you can use the thumbnails to view directly in Small, Large og XL. Do not really see the point, but some may like it.
If I was a pix fan foremost, this site could get a little better score, in my view. But the design, style, navigation AND first of all: those low/very low quality vids I cannot recommend Teenrotica.
The 65 from this user is entirely due to the sets/models (See PU rating: 60-69 - Does more things wrong than right) |
|
09-09-11 08:05am
Replies (9)
|
Reply
472
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
I've seen what seems like most of the material shown at the preview of
sandysfantasies.com before/elsewhere at DDF.
Some of the vids/sets are dated back to 2006 and earlier. Guess it's partly older stuff from the main Sandy-site (and others from DDF).
So why make this new site: Maybe to attract newcomers at DDF in general...?
|
09-06-11 05:59am
|
Reply
473
|
Justine's Bedroom
(0)
|
Reply of
tomjones's Review
Interesting to see a review of this site.
Was a member a long time ago - even way before joining TBP/PU in April 2007.
But judging from the preview not much have happened sine then - still got that old, old video trailer for preview - could not find any "update" - but again - the vids at "videos" seems the same as in 2005/2006 - AND in a quality somewhere between lousy and almost fairly good. For todays standard it's worse...
tomjones - what is the status today of newer vid-quality?
Again like tomjones conclude the site - or rather the redheaded Justine has quality in her performance and special sexuality - still got some in my stash...
|
09-05-11 05:19am
|
Reply
474
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No interest....
Nothing to do with sex/erotica for me.
It's kids stuff - like this line from an ol' danish comedy song about childhood: "Watching Jenny piss for 5 cents..." (freely translated)
What I really "hate" - or rather get disgusted about is human faeces in porn. When browsing I came upon a whole bunch of short vids with girls delivering, is it called stool in English - on a platter...jeeez, could not get away fast enough. It got to take a serious weird mind to enjoy that...
|
09-05-11 05:01am
|
Reply
475
|
Teen Dreams
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Good to see a new review of this grand ol' site (got some of my old, but top-favorite solo vids from here).
And slutty is right about the "semi-exclusive" or less, but you still get a site with a massive content of some of the best - in solo material, in my opinion.
Have not been here for some time, but remember at several earlier memberships a fine response from webmaster (forgot her name, though).
Thanks to slutty for this fine review/heads up of Teendreams.
|
09-03-11 07:31am
|
