| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
2576
|
Babelicious
(0)
|
|
09-16-07 09:59am
Replies (2)
|
Review
2577
|
Fun With Amber
(0)
76.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Not one site - but five.
Call it bonus sites - I call it five sites in one package.
Fine looking teens - four of them in the category "girls next door" - when you were a teenager yourself.
Amber is my favorite - petite blond with great "teen-tits".
Alli's got the best looking naturals. |
| Cons: |
Average to poor video-quality.
No zip for photos.
And again: No info on updates - but does not look good
Price: $29.95 |
| Bottom Line: |
Well, this is not just "Fun with Amber" - there are five sites in all - with five different teens doing some tease, some masturbation, some strip, some lez and one (Lana) some hardcore.
I would not have paid $29.95 for this package if it was'nt for Amber.
I've seen her in different sites - almost all just photos - and she is a doll, this cute, little blond with a great body.
She wears panties with a canadian flag, but not sure if she's canadian or eateuropean.
Her performance is softcore, fine photos, but only average/bad quality of videos (I love them, anyway).
The Busty Alli site is better with video-quality. And this Alli has maybe the most perfect naturals I've seen in a long time.
Little Danni is a cute brunette with some sexy ways in here videos and photos. Also just average quality, alas.
Lana's got the largest content of videos and photos - and she is also a looker - fine build blond. And she is the only one in this package who does g/b-hardcore. But the videos are also and mostly bad/average quality.
But, yeah, bottom line from the PU rating-points: some good, some poor.
Some things to enjoy, but I probably won't be back, unless they get MUCH better video-quality. |
|
09-16-07 09:06am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2578
|
FTV Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler has certainly got a point here:
"join primarily for existing content" rather than "join for existing and future content."
Most sites are of that character - most sites will not satisfy my urge for new stuff during the time of membership - that's probably the main reason I still keep looking for new ones.
There are a few sites though that gives you full house/very good deals - 1ByDay1ByNight is one af them - even Pix and Video is worth to mention. (And I'm not comparing the discount VideoBox here).
|
09-16-07 08:41am
|
Reply
2579
|
Pier 999
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
I'm alomst at the end of my one month term here at Pier 999 - and I'll be back, for sure.
jd1961's 93 is probably more accurate for this site than my own 87 - this is truely a great site.
I also thought the download limit was a hassle - but I have not exeeded it during this (almost) past month.
I'm still taken by the quality of these videos - even the onces that does not have "top-quality" (fulsize:720x400 pixel compared to mediumsize: 420x270 pixel) They're both fine, fine quality even for fullscreen.
A big wish is that more sites with swell looking eateuropean girls get this kind of video-quality!
(Some/a lot are still lousy)
|
09-16-07 08:27am
|
Reply
2580
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Trials for 3-5 days with full access is what I'm looking for most of the time: For a good price, of course.
I hope more and more sites would realize it could also be a good deal for their part - if they got the stuff serious PU-folks are looking for.
If the content is in the upper level, I'd be quite tempted to go for a full membership.
In contrast to sites which are reluctant to show customers what they can offer...
A very importend poll from roseman!!!
|
09-16-07 08:16am
|
Reply
2581
|
Legally Teen
(0)
|
Reply of
fritzryan's Reply
Another reply from a PU - or rather a third - try getting an answer about the navigation problem - again from a users/cumstomers point of view:
As I mentioned in my review, I like the site enough to rate it 89 because of the great content - but what about the navigation-problem in the future?
Does this mean I go from Legally Teen to Fritz Ryan from now?
|
09-15-07 01:17pm
|
Comment
2582
|
Legally Teen
(0)
|
|
09-15-07 04:11am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
2583
|
Alta Heels
(0)
|
Reply of
zuludog's Review
Hey zuludog
Any info about the videos/video-quality??
|
09-14-07 08:48am
|
Comment
2584
|
I Submitted
(0)
|
|
09-13-07 10:55am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2585
|
Suze Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Review
Thanks to jd1961.....
This review shows what I somewhat been expecting from this site lately. As jd1961 puts it: The mighty have fallen.
And deleting Silvia Saint-stuff - that's a disgrace..
I'll save my money on this one.
Great and funny review!
|
09-13-07 08:36am
|
Comment
2586
|
European Porn Babes
(0)
|
|
09-13-07 08:24am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2587
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Thanks, man
I'll take a look again.....
She's worth it, for sure.
|
09-12-07 03:16pm
|
Reply
2588
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Ricks answer put things in perspective - it is great that TBP and PU combined has such a traffic.
And there are two importend factors here:
That we users here at PU can benefit from this in influencing the pornsites (owners and webmasters) to be on their marks concerning both quality of content and price.
It might also be the bridge between sites and comsumers - but in that direction also to rule out or boycutt sites that just try to sell us trash....
Let this PU-thing grow, folks!
|
09-12-07 03:14pm
|
Reply
2589
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Thanks to Monahan for these fine words on behalf of what I'd figure would be the most of us here at PU, I just qoute:
"PU is the Consumers Union of Porn afficionadoes and any site owners that don't pay attention to what is said here do so at their own peril."
It could not have been said more clearly!!!!
|
09-12-07 02:25pm
|
Reply
2590
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Rick's Reply
Well, one of the things for sure Rick is right about is date/time for a review. Let's keep that.
And after all most of us do our reviews whitin the first month ( or am I not right here?)
The second thing is the "Follow-Up"-field, which I think is very good: You do your review, but then get wiser( or whatever) during two or three or four weeks (or more) and fell like you want to give your fellow users an ajustment - and a reason for that ajustment.
I think the Follow-Up-systemt is fine - it gives the other users an idea of changes concerning a site - from the reviewers point of view...
And one question to Rick: Any info to us registred users about how many hits TBP gets dayly/weekly/mothly- it must be a LOT more that what we stand for... or is that a company secret?
The reason I ask is the kind of pressure we can put on prices as mentioned in a LOT of comments/reviews.
And by the way - TBP/PU is the absolutly the best guide for a pornuser - as Cheech and Chong once put it: "I'll recommend it to all my friends out there...."
Thanks, guys!
|
09-12-07 09:44am
|
Reply
2591
|
Arab Street Hookers
(0)
|
Reply of
juanito's Comment
Thanks to TBP you/we can see what company this site and others come from.
It's Increbible Pass- which is noted for 11 different sites.
And, yes - it's not just this site where fellow users have problems with lack of response from webmaster when in trouble.
Just take a look at comments for the main site.... (I did not go any further)
|
09-12-07 09:04am
|
Reply
2592
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hey Drooler
Been to Mindy Vegas site for 1 1/2 or 2 years ago - she's beautiful, but the videos at that time where less than average - most bad quality.
Are they any better today? - though I remember you're not too much into videos...
And again: I hope that we through PU as users/customers can lay pressure on webmasters and owners of pornsites to lower their prices in general - and just as importend: get them to see what average customers like and do not like...
|
09-12-07 08:36am
|
Review
2593
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The most beautiful girls/women are gathered in this quite softcore site.
But not so softcore after all: Masturbation included for most models
Not crisp, but anyway good quality of videos - 640x480 wmv.
Ok price
Easy/good navigation |
| Cons: |
First of all: No zip - please change that!
Muzak-background for videos.
Not sure about updates |
| Bottom Line: |
First thanks to Drooler for getting my attention to this site.
I'm giving it a higher score than he is, here's my reasons:
1: Some great - and I repeat great - videos of Crissy Moran - I thought I've seen them all, but these are both sexy, cute and well performed by the faboulous woman. The muzak is not her fault.
2: There are generally some ekstremely fine women here doing videos at poolsites and typical other outdoor locations: Summer and sun and these girls getting rid of their bikinis is just great.
3: Not only Crissy Moran, but the US-answer to Eve Angel: Mindy Vega (no offense to the devoted Eve-fans here, but admid: there ARE SOME resemblance).
This site gives me a bit like when a kid eating different kinds of desert: Don't want to taste them all at once - or here the first day/week - saving some for a rainy day.
Well, yeah bottom line:
This is softcore with a special flavour that has no really resemblamce to sites like European Glamour Girls or 1ByDay/1ByNight - but has a thing of its own.
But get rid of that muzak-background, please...why can't we listen to Crissy moaning a bit? She moves her lips, but nothing comes out for the viewer. Guys at Bikini Riot: Please think about that. |
|
09-12-07 06:14am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
2594
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
For better rating after some time as a member I'd like to mention Pier 999. I rated that site 84 from the start after just a few days as a member/customer. But after taking my time and enjoying the site, I simply had to raise the points - and now after 2 weeks I even would go a bit higher - great site, but just an example.
At the other end I'm almost through with 1 month at Teen Flood. I never understood the 86 at TBP and I still don't. Have you guys seen their latest videos. We're used to half-blurred and half-lousy videos of older dates. But the five or six latest Teen Flood put on - they are just as bad in quality.
Take a look at the start of theese last one: The Teen Flood logo is almost crisp, but when the video starts it's blurred to say the least - and even the logo in the left corner - it's hard to read.
|
09-12-07 05:41am
|
Reply
2595
|
DVD Tube
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
Yeah, it's guys like this that only seems to care about scoring some bucks. But they will probably not get many customers from PU with that price - and after these good warnings.
Well, there are millions of pornusers out there - too bad there's only 1768 registered users at this PU....
But then again, I guess the hits at TBP are much, much higher, so not registered user get the same warning.........that might teach them....
|
09-12-07 05:30am
|
Reply
2596
|
Bikini Riot
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Review
Just joined.
I like it - and go for faboulous girls like Crissy Moran, Mindy Vega and more.
Well, as I mentioned: just joined - and it looks swell - thanks, m'man...
It's not for a 90 or a 95, but, no matter, man:
Allow me to mention this again: It's from these kinds of rare reviews that others PU's gets the hint of the special stuff!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
09-10-07 08:33am
|
Reply
2597
|
Bubble Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Another good warning from Drooler - thanks!
This site has had warnings before and some of us do not get any wiser (myself includeed, sometimes).
I always try to remember/archive good warnings - and then take a look at the company via TBP. These guys in this company only have one site, so there's not so much to remember, thanks!
I'll not go for it......
|
09-10-07 08:14am
|
Reply
2598
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Reply
Hey jd1961
Guess, you're right. But I still do not regard that a low price is enough for a high score in general. You're one of the "old timers" here and know the value of our money "for what we get". I admit, there's a huge amount of good, average and bad videos at VideoBox, but are you not getting a bit fed up with all the old and bad quality videos at this site?
|
09-10-07 07:55am
|
Reply
2599
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Should a PU who submitted this poll answer too. Yeah, why not?
I guess everybody has an urge, when joining a site. And what a bummer it is when you can't gain access after paying.
So it's a very importend issue, that webmasters or even a billing-company see to it, that paying costumers get their moneys worth - is that the right frase in english?
I've had what I think is more than my share of problems - after paying up.
Some webmasters/billing companies are doing an ok job, but as long as there are sites that don't give a shit about paying customers, it's good we have PU and TBP.
Thanks to the fellow PU's for responding to this little poll.
|
09-10-07 07:46am
|
Reply
2600
|
Barbi's Slutty Adventures
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Right, Jay G
Have the same thing with good bargains - and this is certainly not one of them...
|
09-10-07 03:09am
|
