| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Review
576
|
Virginal Visions
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- There are around 20 models on ths site and each one has at least 4 galleries (okay, okay, one of them has only 1 gallery but for the most part they have above 4 with one reaching 86 galleries) and around 8 videos. (No zip for photos which are around 768 x 1,024. And videos are coded as Divx and the site claims they are 640x480) A quick calculation results in around 100 galleries and 150 videos (I tried to approximate based on each models's particular content)
- Interesting idea (girls in white underwear, usually getting wet for some reason or stripping, although you never see a nipple,)
- Some cute models who actually look very innocent, thus fitting the site's description
- A lot of interesting bonus material (Panty Cam- around 80 galleries and 140 videdos of girls caught on hidden camera (there are even some nipples here :Gasp of shock:) College Games- around 60 galleries of random girls in their bra's, Parties- the set-up for a masive lesbian orgy...) |
| Cons: |
- Navigation and site aspect are horrible. The videos are cut into pieces as are the photo shoots so if you want all the photos from a shoot you have to load 3-4 different paegs and manually download each picture.
- Slow downloads (around 40-50kb for one 8 mb videdo)
- Content get's boring really fast. No matter how cute the models when the most hardcore action on the site is a nipple caught by accident or two girls kissing...well it get's boring....Although some wet camel-toes were pretty nice...
- More model info would be nice (we only get the model name, her age and location) |
| Bottom Line: |
I looked at this site becuase it had great potential for a softcore porn site. Imagine a few hot, young girls who slowly reveal what they are capable of doing in front of a camera, all the time looking extremelly inocent and only shedding their white cotton pabnties when they are begged by another girl...hot yes? Well, this site dedspite having a bunch of cute, innocent looking girls who also look like amateurs, manages to mess it up.
They cut the content into small sections (probably as a way of making it look more plentiful than it is) and thus make it hard to navigate and download the content. They don't help users connect with the models (no bio, no interviews, nothing really except a name and age). Finally, they don't harvest the potential of getting young girls wet... They have pool scenes but use bra's that don't become see-through (often the panties do so that's hot...) They don't have two girls undress each other or at least pull at eachother's clothing. Finally, they don't even use the Lolita effect some of the girls could achieve by simly looking into the camera more mischieviously...
The Bonus content is kinda nicee though, the College shots reminded me of Girls Gone Wild but more mild and with less obviously drunk girls...Also the Parties bonus content had potential (it shows many of the site's models together in their underwear...but that's about it...)
Overall, this site had potential, but they stopped half way and thus ended up disapointing. If you really, really love girls in white underwear and you have seen every other site that offers that...maybe you should consider this site...but be warned there will be no nudity, no penises...if that's okay with you great; for me it simply didn't work. |
|
08-13-09 02:30pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
577
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
It really depends. I saw some POV's where the girl talks to the camera like it's her boyfriend (I believe it was on Porn Pros) it was awesome...then again other POV's can get too static too fast...
It really depends on the girl's acting and the way the scenes is thought...
|
08-12-09 01:17pm
|
Reply
578
|
Girls Got Cream
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I agree, the Barely Legal series was best at around 10-20.
The good thing about porn stars that have done everything is that you can see them do everything. I have no trouble finding a gang bang with one of my favorite porn stars which is sometimes a plus. Then again you can be certain their innocence is all long gone...but it's a trade-off I'm sometimes willing to make. As for Sandy Sweet, except for her teeny bopper scenes I had a hard time finding her...but the search continues :)
Anyhow, thank you for the advice, I'll check out Elegant Angel ASAHP (as fast as humanly possible :)
|
08-12-09 01:14pm
|
Reply
579
|
Kim K Superstar
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
As the pages wouldn't load for me I can't confirm the existence or quality of that one video :) However, I will rest easy knowing that it doesn't really matter as no one sane would join this site anyhow.
|
08-12-09 01:11pm
|
Review
580
|
Money Talks
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Since mbaya focused on the network I'll do the site itself
- Really nice preview options for the videos and photo sets. You can choose exactly what you want to do (stream or download the whole movie or just a portion of it, also there is a specially made trailer for each movie)
- About 75 wmv videos at 720 x 480 and about 600 photos per shoot at 720px × 480px (each video has a photo set). However they look like screencaps from within the videos (as a bonus they can be also downloaded as zips)...
-Good download speeds, steady at around 500-600kb, despite multiple videos downloading
- Interesting concept for a porn video: a guy or girl walk around asking "random" people to do sexual stuff for money (go topless, play football without bottoms on, or have anal sex :). The videos are around 1 hour long and about half of it is a bunch of people doing mild-ish stuff for money (the flashing part) then the last half an hour or so they convince the final girl (or girls) to have sex. |
| Cons: |
-Not all girls look like amateurs, especially some of the latest ones (and the ones in the final sex scene) look like professional models. (At one point they manage to find a whole cross country team who is willing to have lesbian sex for 200$ a piece...hmm I guess it's possible but some doubt remains)
- Trailers for movies and streaming player tend to be a bit slow-ish...Maybe it was just my problem but it did get frustrating.
- Almost all of the scenes take a while to get to the actual fucking. Sometimes people do other shit for money (like jump a ramp or a homeless guy makes a 20$ bill disappear) so sometimes it get's boring to see hot girls flash the camera and then leave.
- Many of the scenes are shot in the back of a moving car or in other such unconventional places, making the angles and the lighting be a bit funky at times... |
| Bottom Line: |
This site was a big draw for me but not necessarily as a porn site. Don't get me wrong many of the girls are hot and seeing a busty, blond clerk go from "NO, Get out of here" to having a cum-shot on her face is very hot.
However, the quality of the videos as well as the long first half made them more interesting as social experiments than porn... if that makes any sense. I watched the videos on this site in the same way I watch MTV's reality shows except I was glad to see no blurred out boobs or bleeped out swears.
This doesn't mean that other people won't find the second half especially to be arousing. It's as good if not better than many amateur porn out there, then again the uncertainty of whether the last girls are amateurs or not can ruin the fun...But if that is the case you always have the whole Reality Kings network to fall back on so this isn't such a bad deal after all...
I also believe the 4gb download limit was raised to 10 gb...but don't quote me on that one. I never had a problem downloading content but then again I only took down stuff that really interested me (such as the fat biker jumping over a ramp on a tiny motorcycle for 200 bucks...which isn't something I ever expected to find on a porn site :)
So bottom line?
A different site that might do it for you or maybe not but it's closer to Jackass with less people being hurt and more sex and nudity... |
|
08-12-09 01:09pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
581
|
Little Hell Cat
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Very cute, lolita-looking, teenage girl doing all the shots with one single guy who is presumably her boyfriend. This makes the site feel like Little Lupe but more intimate (there is only one couple so it feels more realistic) As a bonus he is not ugly either :)
- About 15 videos of 960x540 (available for download as wmv in one file between 200 and 550 mb or as segments of about 100 mb each) and 16-17 photo shots (each video has a photo session of anywhere in between 500 and 900 photos, each one 1280px × 853px. Sadly the photos are not available as zip)
- Decent download speeds of about 400kb to 1mb
- The couple does a lot of different things including anal (presumably for the first time although it's doubtful), light bondage, sex in a car and in a clothing booth (at least they claim so) they play with food and have sex in a bathroom on top of the toilet. They even have one scene where he is dressed as a clown if you like clown porn...
- The girl is very flexible and passionate |
| Cons: |
- The navigation can get annoying as it slows down when you're downloading a video or two. Also you can't search for a certain type of video, and you have to rely on the rather poor and similar descriptions of the videos or the screencaps.
- The site is updated but you can't find out when the next update is or how regular the updates are. (About one per month I'd hazard...although the network is updated more often)
- Although the couple tries it's just the two of them so far so the scenes can get a bit boring. Even if they spice it up by starting a video straight with sex or if they have a nice long foreplay it's only so much they can do...then again that's true for porn in general :) |
| Bottom Line: |
The website suffers from the same problems like the other Teen Core Club sites: the navigation is slow at times and more options would be nice, all videos save with the same name so you have to be careful not to overwrite something and you can feel a certain lack of care for details (for example the girls 18th birthday party which ends up in a sex scene is placed in the middle of the website, nothing wrong there but why not make it the first video on the site, sort of like her introduction into the whole porn business? It's a small detail but it's stuff like that which makes you feel the webmasters care).
Overall, the scenes are hot, the girl is passionate and the foreplay is very nice( in the scenes where it's present I found it to be just enough, not too much and not to little). The girl is very adorable (if you like barely legal girls that look almost too young to be in porn) and many scenes are incredibly arousing (her so-called first anal or the sex scene where she starts off in her pajamas and has an orgasm as he gives her head).
Furthermore the camera work while not always lighted the best way is pretty well done with many angles and a certain home-made feel to it that ads atmosphere while still keeping a good detail level.
Finally, the fact that Little Hellcat comes with access to a network packed with similar content (hardcore teenagers) makes this a good deal. However before joining this site one should consider the rest of the network and make sure they like what they see on the bigger websites like Try Teens or Girls Got Cream. The content here is pretty limited and while it's good quality after you see the little hellcat one or five times you might get bored. Other single model websites can offer a wider selection and more variety in the scenes (I'm thinking of Little Lupe or The Milton Twins)
If you do join make sure to watch the anal scene and the pajama one they are in my opinion some of the best the site has to offer.
I hope I was helpful and don't hesitate to send a message if any questions arise. |
|
08-12-09 12:29pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
582
|
JAB Comix
(0)
|
|
08-12-09 07:37am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
583
|
Kim K Superstar
(0)
|
|
08-12-09 07:29am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
584
|
Cozy Toons
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Don't worry, the cancel policy of my membership also gave my money back so nothing lost, a lot of knowledge gained :)
|
08-12-09 07:19am
|
Reply
585
|
Fuck My Skull
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Reply
Aha! That clears things up. Thank you for the very helpful reply.
|
08-12-09 07:17am
|
Reply
586
|
Sexy Miss Lizz
(0)
|
Reply of
seekr34's Reply
Sorry, I wasn't very clear about my meaning. You should add the information you offered in message #4 "Her pics are .jpgs and her videos are .wmvs. (and so on)" Into the actual review. That way people can read the review and don't have to check the replies for information about the site. Also it will make your review look better.
You can always edit a review and improve it.
All the best,
|
08-12-09 07:16am
|
Comment
587
|
Pinup Glam
(0)
|
|
08-11-09 10:12am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
588
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
Thank you for sharing this very important information. This definitely puts buying membership here into perspective.
|
08-11-09 10:01am
|
Reply
589
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thank you very much for the fast and very informative response.
|
08-11-09 09:58am
|
Reply
590
|
Fuck My Skull
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
I'm sorry if this is a completely n00b question but what exactly are pre-sales? Joining another site while joining this one?
Thanks for clearing this up for me...
|
08-11-09 03:50am
|
Comment
591
|
Cum Brushers
(0)
|
|
08-11-09 03:49am
Replies (6)
|
Comment
592
|
Daddy's Babes
(0)
|
|
08-11-09 03:40am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
593
|
Sexy Miss Lizz
(0)
|
Reply of
seekr34's Reply
You should edit your review and add this info. It will make the review look better and it might get you an extra point.
|
08-11-09 02:54am
|
Reply
594
|
1 By Day
(0)
|
Reply of
zzzins's Reply
Interesting info, I do enjoy behind the scenes material... Thanks for sharing.
|
08-11-09 02:53am
|
Reply
595
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Ha ha, good description that cleared all my confusion about this site. I had heard about it a while back and then I thought it disappeared or something. This cleared things up. Thanks for sharing.
|
08-11-09 02:51am
|
Reply
596
|
Naked News
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I've been considering this site fo0r a while now, but hearing that the models don't really strip a lot but rather get naked pretty fast makes it drop lower on my list of places to visit. Are the news at least well presented?
|
08-10-09 03:47am
|
Reply
597
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
While I don't expect the acting to be Oscar worthy a bit of talent makes a huge difference in a scene, in my opinion. If nothing else it makes you forget you're watching a porn star and it makes you think there is a real-ish secretary or nurse or school girl having sex...which makes the fantasy better.
|
08-10-09 03:43am
|
Reply
598
|
Club Crissy
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
Very interesting info. Thanks for sharing. I will have to check this one out in the near future. The Club Crissy website lacked in videos but had some hot photosets, a bit to softcore for my taste, this other website sounds great...
|
08-10-09 03:40am
|
Reply
599
|
Only Silk And Satin
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
Thank you very much for clarifying this. The site sounds great and while I don't really LOVE photos I might consider it. It sounds very good.
Thanks
|
08-09-09 02:56pm
|
Reply
600
|
Sexy Miss Lizz
(0)
|
Reply of
seekr34's Review
A nice start to a review. There is potential but you should add more. I am new here too and I am always striving to improve, read the forum, read other reviews and you can become better as well. There can be much more said about a site than you have...
I hope you stay around and I really hope you will improve.
All the best,
|
08-09-09 02:55pm
|
