Review
1
|
Overdeveloped Amateurs
(0)
60.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Some of their women are unique to them and quite interesting (e.g., Doreena and Ingrid). |
| Cons: |
Site is outdated, has patently laughable web design that reeks of 'my first Microsoft Frontpage attempt', has videos split into small files (~3MB) as though most Internet users are still using 56k lines, and has very poor video quality (320x240) because the videographer is apparently too cheap or impecunious to purchase a better recording device.
Its "picture archive" is based on technology from 2001 and has a small number of pictures from 2002. Quite pathetic. |
| Bottom Line: |
The site is a borderline fraud. There is no indication prior to spending ~$20USD that there is *no* video archive.
That is, unless you check the site (and pay) every month, you will *never* have access to previous videos. For example, there is a mesmerizing amateur named Christy from 2007 who made two videos. One I have, one I wanted. Only after signing up was it apparent I would never find the other video.
As another reviewer noted, the only reasons for having no archive are to 1) bleed patrons for money each month 2) lower overall bandwidth costs 3) invest no money in allocating more hard drive storage.
It is a site run by a lazy, aesthetically-challenged, niggardly, dishonest pornographer. And that's being generous. He may have access to some interesting girls but he has no idea of how to run a website that keeps patrons returning--instead he leaves them with a decidedly foul taste of being ripped off. |
|
06-28-09 10:47am
Replies (0)
|
