| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
101
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
|
12-04-12 06:49pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
102
|
Hot Movies
(0)
|
Reply of
Belthazar's Reply
You know, that's not a bad idea at all.
|
12-04-12 06:44pm
|
Reply
103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
There's definitely some very good porn coming out of Europe, but I don't think anywhere beats the variety of women I can find in American porn.
|
12-02-12 12:08am
|
Reply
104
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I want to say it's a combination of quality of content, amount of content, and frequency of content. And the truth is that I haven't yet found more than 1 site that makes me want to stay a member for more than one month. The sites that have come closest, though, only missed on the frequency part.
|
11-30-12 08:08am
|
Reply
105
|
My Sister's Hot Friend
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I've been a member for about 4 years now (it's my only standing membership to any site), so I've come to know a lot about it. I'm probably a bigger fan of them than anyone that posts here. And I know they have their flaws (and quite a few of them), but I tend to want to correct people when they post things that are flat out not correct.
And if you look, while 1800 are tagged as natural, only 1781 are tagged as fake, so there's obviously a bunch of scenes that aren't tagged as either one. And going by the tags, like I said, it's about 50/50.
|
11-29-12 05:15pm
|
Reply
106
|
My Sister's Hot Friend
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Review
This isn't necessarily in regards to you, but something that bugs me about quite a few people on this site:
You say that "most of the girls have boob jobs". That's not true. It might be true for Naughty America as a whole (I'd argue that for the whole network it's fairly close to 50/50, but I can see how people would construe that as "most" since it's close to the majority). But for this site in particular, the balance shifts much more towards natural than it does fake. Of the last 20 updates, only 4 featured fake breasts. Of the last 100, only 22. That's not most at all.
|
11-28-12 08:32pm
|
Reply
107
|
Clips 4 Sale
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
As far as I know (and I know a couple people that have paid for videos), they are trustworthy with your info.
As for the prices, this is what videos cost if you want something specific that isn't necessarily "mainstream".
|
11-28-12 06:52pm
|
Reply
108
|
Burning Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
As for reasons for segmented downloads even today:
Some people might only want to watch a certain part of the scene (i.e. just the blowjob, or just the popshot, or just one sex position), and if that's all you want to see you can save bandwidth by just downloading one part of the scene.
|
11-25-12 10:36pm
|
Comment
109
|
Tonight's Girlfriend
(0)
|
|
11-22-12 06:08pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
110
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
marcdc1's Reply
I joined this site a few months ago for a month (and even wrote a review on it).
As far as comparing the two sites, I think that Reality Kings has more variety (both ethnically with their Round and Brown site, and in the fact that they shoot in Europe, Florida, and California so they have a wider variety of women). But I generally preferred the navigation at Naughty America (I know some people have trouble with it, but if you know that many of the pages are controlled by JavaScript and that the back button will take you to the last page you loaded, and not the last page in the list you were thumbing through, then I find it really easy to get around), and I don't really like the pseudo-reality setups that many of RKs sites use. So I would say that I prefer Naughty America, but not by that much.
|
11-21-12 06:01pm
|
Reply
111
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
exotics4me's Comment
That would explain why I never hit it the day I downloaded about 20GB. It'd be interesting to see what the actual limit is (70GB per week? 50GB every 5 days?), but not interesting enough to make me pay for a membership to find out.
|
11-19-12 04:50pm
|
Reply
112
|
Diary Of A MILF
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
If I remember the incident you're talking about correctly, they didn't delete your comment. It may not have been showing up for an hour or two, but it's still there to this day.
|
11-17-12 09:24pm
|
Reply
113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
By anywhere, do you just mean here, or anywhere on the internet?
For me, the answer is yes in both cases, as long as I feel I can trust the people that are running the site (usually because I've come in contact with them online before).
|
11-10-12 12:22am
|
Reply
114
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the advice.
|
11-09-12 05:51pm
|
Reply
115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
People steal cough syrup and many other drugs even though they're perfectly legal and everywhere. Whether of not a drug is illegal, legal, or decriminalized has nothing to do with whether or not someone will or won't steal it (and you bringing up cigarettes is a perfect example of that). People will steal anything if they think it's something they want/need and they can't afford it. If anything, this will probably increase the reporting of thefts, since now that it's legal people will actually tell the cops when it gets stolen, but not the amount of actual thefts that occur.
|
11-09-12 05:46pm
|
Reply
116
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Because people don't drive while high already?
And there's a reason the official crime is "driving under the influence" or "driving while intoxicated" instead of "drunk driving". Whether weed is legal or not, it's just as much of a crime to drive high as it is to drive drunk.
|
11-09-12 02:54pm
|
Reply
117
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm not worried as to whether or not it'll be a positive experience since I've never been a member here before. So without a doubt, there will be enough content there to keep me entertained for at least a month, but probably 2 or 3. That, and I tend not to care as much about things like breast size (or implants), age, or the type of scene it is (anal, vaginal, DP, etc). I just want to see a woman I find attractive having orgasms, which makes me pretty easy to please. I don't even mind lower quality (640x480 or so) if it's from a scene old enough that I know that there isn't any better quality of it out there/possible. I'm much more worried about the multiple comments about crappy navigation than I am about not liking the content. Because what good is having good content if it takes me forever to find it?
|
11-08-12 06:35pm
|
Comment
118
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
|
11-08-12 06:01pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
bestimmt's Reply
Then your issue is with the director, not the act. It is possible to film a DP without making it a constant close-up of the penetration.
|
11-06-12 01:12am
|
Reply
120
|
My First Sex Teacher
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Comment
Yes, they are.
|
11-06-12 01:11am
|
Reply
121
|
Emily Addison.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I would think so. They already technically have 2 solo girl subsites (Nicole Graves and Anette Dawn), with the Annette one looking like it's not updating at all anymore. So I would think they would/could just open up a site for her like those two.
|
11-05-12 03:34pm
|
Reply
122
|
Emily Addison.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
I do know that Emily signed some sort of exclusive contract with Twistys in June of this year. So there's a chance that that exclusive contract prevented her from updating this site, even though it bears her name specifically. Or that she abandoned this site because part of her contract is to have her own official site under the Manwin/Twistys brand.
Twistys-Names-Trio-of-Exclusive-Contract-Stars-480515.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
Twistys-Names-Trio-of-Exclusive-Contract-Stars-480515.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://business.avn.com/articles/technol...ct-Stars-480515.html
|
11-05-12 02:40pm
|
Reply
123
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Once I actually called them, cancelling took no more than 2-3 minutes (I just gave some info, they quickly offered me a discounted rate which I turned down, and it was done), but the fact that I couldn't complete it with their web form or online chat was slightly troubling. And this wasn't just a one-time thing, either, as I tried both the form and the chat on two separate days and it didn't work either time.
|
11-05-12 02:33pm
|
Reply
124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Word does a good job with basic spelling and grammar typos, but I always find at least a couple times where I type in a word that may be grammatically correct, but was not the word I meant to say in that place at all. Which is why even with that I have to read my reviews three or four times, and at least once a day or two after I originally wrote it.
|
11-05-12 10:16am
|
Reply
125
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I doubt there's much of a benefit to being headquartered in Southern California, but when it comes to them as a corporation, I don't really see much of a benefit to them being headquartered in Europe, either. This site seems like the people that run the site from a business perspective are completely removed from the people that run the site from a content perspective, so I don't think having the headquarters closer to where they get their talent from would make any difference.
|
11-05-12 10:14am
|
