| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
751
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
Totally agree with BadMrFrosty, I also would have voted indifferent, if given the option. Not typically the part of the scene I focus on anyways.
|
11-02-10 10:32pm
|
Reply
752
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
If someone thinks a site is excellent they should have the ability to rate is as such, I'm probably a bit too nitpicky to score a site 100, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to.
|
10-30-10 12:43am
|
Reply
753
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
by sex ed do you mean safe sex and such, or learning "skills" for sex?
if it the former i'd say school as i actually had a decent sex ed class in high school, as for the latter i'd probably say non-porn internet. so i said other...
|
10-27-10 12:36am
|
Reply
754
|
Pix and Video
(0)
|
Reply of
squirrel's Review
squirrel,
this type of annoying navigation is pretty common in porn sites these days, as RustyJ said it is a good idea to open a model page in a new tab, which isn't that much of a nuisance.
i haven't been a member of this network in about a year, but based on the last time i was a member i didn't find the navigation particularly poor (i've seen many that are much much worse).
|
10-22-10 12:37am
|
Reply
755
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
dump her. withholding sex is manipulative as is, doing it out of spite just makes it that much worse (as pat362 pointed out).
its one thing to have sex less frequently with a partner over time (naturaly), this is a whole other animal.
|
10-21-10 12:07am
|
Reply
756
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If someone writes a decent review, I typically trust them right away, if it is an iffy review I will wait and see if they post anything else. I agree with BadMrFrosty that giving newbies trust ratings helps motivate them to post more reviews as it helps them feel appreciated and like they fit in, certainly nothing wrong with that.
|
10-19-10 02:49pm
|
Comment
757
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
|
10-19-10 02:42pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
758
|
Hustler Unlimited, formerly Hustler
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
The site is entirely based on their DVDs with some magazine content as well, and the video content is not HD. The best video bitrate they offer is 1700 kbps, which is decent - but not great (and is only available on stuff released more recently, like the last 6 months or so). The DVDs are split up into scenes, if your preference is single scenes not from DVDs, this probably isn't the place for you.
The subsite set-up is pretty much bullshit, as far as I could tell most of their content could be found on either Hustler or Barely Legal, the subsites are somewhat useful in sorting content I suppose, but it is basically just mirrors of subsets of their content from what I could tell.
They have photos from their magazines on the site as well, however it is a real nuisance to dig through these and the picture qualitiy is generally mediocre anyways (also the sets are typically small - 8 pictures or so).
|
10-19-10 02:41pm
|
Reply
759
|
Young Courtesans
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
yeah, but based on those comments I would be hesitant to join their sites until I hear otherwise! Hopefully someone will take the plunge and update us sometime soon...
|
10-12-10 12:47am
|
Reply
760
|
Young Courtesans
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
based on other user comments from this company's sites, it also seems as though streaming only is common with them...
|
10-11-10 12:08am
|
Reply
761
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
yeah looking back at my review it does seem a bit negative given the score, I was mainly trying to point out all the flaws, as this place certainly has its problems.
I did enjoy the site, there were just many scenes where after it downloaded I looked at it and was like, what the fuck is this? I guess I am just willing to overlook the bad for the good in this case...
|
10-08-10 11:57pm
|
Reply
762
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I agree with pat362, anything but porn - probably just generic bullshit, and perhaps even politics if the conversation was headed a more intellectual route (one can always hope, right?)
|
10-07-10 11:12pm
|
Reply
763
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
Hey man, a site like this is kind of difficult to review. On one hand they have some excellent content, but then there are other scenes that are pretty big "misses". I am personally a fan of castings with interviews and stuff before the model gets naked, so that is probably why I scored the site so high even though the content is pretty variable. He definitely gets some attractive models, it is just too bad that a lot of the hardcore castings are single-camera on a tripod type deals, although that it pretty much what I expected.
|
10-07-10 11:08pm
|
Reply
764
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the info, man!
|
10-05-10 02:10pm
|
Reply
765
|
Reality Kings
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
messmer, is it only the new updates that are realeased as downloadable, or are the letting you download older HD releases from a few months ago as well? Thanks!
|
10-05-10 01:12pm
|
Comment
766
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
|
10-05-10 01:03pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
767
|
Fucked Hard 18
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
she's still cute, the back tattoo isn't that bad (not nearly as bad as belicia's anyway). looked around a bit and didn't see any photos showing her huge feet, so i'll have to take your word for it on that one...
|
10-05-10 12:52pm
|
Reply
768
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Can't say that I've used tech support all that frequently, but the only times I have it has been reasonable enough I suppose.
|
10-04-10 11:22pm
|
Reply
769
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Just trying to help...
|
09-28-10 03:43pm
|
Reply
770
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
Umm, Margaret Thatcher naked?
|
09-28-10 02:30am
|
Reply
771
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Thanks for the info!
|
09-27-10 09:59pm
|
Comment
772
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
|
09-27-10 04:49pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
773
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope, but there are way too many that do! I still hear bozos talk about how nudity in art is too sexual for kids to see - it is the human form jackass!
Edit: the jackass was directed at the bozos I spoke of, not the pollster.
|
09-26-10 12:04am
|
Reply
774
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I agree MetArt definitely gets more attractive models to pose nude, but it is a bit too "artistic" than "erotic" for my tastes. I imagine the artsy nudes are what allow Met to get more attractive models to pose - "hey its art, so don't worry about nudity"
|
09-25-10 11:58pm
|
Reply
775
|
Teen Models
(0)
|
Reply of
TeenModels's Reply
Thanks for clarifying Mike, I wasn't really sure about the bonus content, it seemed like licensed material when I looked through it, but I'll take your word for it.
|
09-25-10 11:55pm
|
