| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
A few weeks to a few months, not really sure. Its not exactly something I keep track of...
|
05-08-12 12:41am
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I don't know, mary jane?
|
05-06-12 01:52am
|
Reply
378
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Poll
I've always been fond of glasses, almost everyone I have dated wears them...
|
05-04-12 01:09am
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Once or twice, although who knows if the ages are true!
|
05-02-12 07:13pm
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I'd say most of the above, but I do like to read regular old books.
|
04-30-12 10:03am
|
Reply
381
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Yes it is curious why it is listed under a different company, it even says they use the Lioness site thing that Deisel does. I imagine it is either a new site they haven't added to network yet, or someone ripped off their site format (as with orgasms.xxx and x-art).
|
04-30-12 10:02am
|
Reply
382
|
Wow Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Is this a Deisel site? It looks really similar, why isn't it listed with their others?
|
04-29-12 02:33am
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
A couple of times, but like yote, I usually trues they are compliant if they say they are.
|
04-29-12 02:21am
|
Reply
384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually do a site every other month or so, but like Cap'n have a long term membership to a site as well.
|
04-29-12 02:20am
|
Reply
385
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Poll
Sort of an odd question? I'd go with emotional stability I guess. Maiming the concept of love doesn't seem like a benefit, nor does ownership...
|
04-22-12 12:22am
|
Reply
386
|
21Sextury.com
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Comment
This one actually seems particularly sneaky as they start with "I agree to the purchase of adult material" so one might not closely read the rest. Not a way to win over customers I would think...
|
04-21-12 11:16pm
|
Reply
387
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I object to the 'could be better' statement messmer, that implies that it is actually half decent to being with ;). Its fucking terrible, it only seems to work if you are searching for recent and popular stuff. I don't think that I have seen one that is worse anywhere (unless things have changed since last I was a member a few months ago).
Monahan is right, their naming scheme is also bad, my guess is that they have plenty of members and don't really care.
|
04-21-12 11:13pm
|
Reply
388
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Abel Semen's Review
Thanks for the fine review, very informative and I've been wondering about this place...
|
04-21-12 10:33pm
|
Reply
389
|
3D Maxxx
(0)
|
Reply of
shmeagles's Review
That sucks man, but thanks for letting everyone else know!
|
04-21-12 10:10pm
|
Reply
390
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Never really contact them, maybe once or twice that I can recall and they were fine.
|
04-21-12 10:09pm
|
Reply
391
|
New X Positive
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Ha!
I see your point, I think the place just looks odd, but might be good for some folks.
|
04-09-12 07:55pm
|
Reply
392
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Ah, I see, thanks for the info.
|
04-09-12 12:36am
|
Reply
393
|
New X Positive
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I know people sort of harp on this exclusivity thing (and don't like lies), but to me it seems like the majority of euro sites claim exclusivity (Teen Maga World, Deisel, Smackmybitch, etc), and are just partially/mostly so. I sort of think it is just the state of porn (especially euro) these days.
|
04-08-12 11:23pm
|
Reply
394
|
New X Positive
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Nice link Denner, very useful, surprised I never came across it before.
As for the site, it looks good, but sort of odd - some it it looks like a throwback to 80's-90's porn ColorClimax style stuff. Could by good though I suppose.
|
04-08-12 11:13pm
|
Reply
395
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Sounds interesting, although I would hope they can manage to do it a little more erotic than MetArt is, at it has a tendency to be a bit overly 'arty' at times.
|
04-08-12 10:56pm
|
Reply
396
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Nice review RustyJ, I pretty much agree with all your points, although Passion HD wasn't available that I can recall the last I was a member, so can't comment on that. Good to hear they added it though.
|
04-08-12 10:45pm
|
Reply
397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Pretty much agree with RustyJ, I tend to read all reviews that are available regardless of how old they are.
|
04-08-12 10:40pm
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think RA has it right, although I think it is less publicly abhorred these days than it used to be.
|
03-27-12 08:52pm
|
Reply
399
|
Mofos Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
There are a lot of them, this place is definitely amongst the worst offenders in this regard.
|
03-26-12 10:10pm
|
Reply
400
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I suppose, but this is why I would think most folks setup a spam email account just for online orders, because it never seems like unsubscribing from things works well anywhere (and for a while I was convinced unsubscribing from one just led to your address being sent to someone else to use as there would be an odd jump in unknown spam). Perhaps I'm just paranoid.
|
03-25-12 01:14am
|
