Thanks for the suggestion, but I have the same problem of non-loading thumbs with Opera that I have with Firefox. I rarely use Internet Explorer browser, because I've heard so many complaints about security issues. There are security issues with Firefox and Opera, but I read about them much less often. But that is because Firefox and Opera are used by far less people than Internet Explorer, so the hackers concentrate on the most popular browser (Internet Explorer), and devote less time to hacking the other browsers. But there are security issues with all the major software (browsers, office applications, Adobe software, etc. etc.
If I knew more about PC software, I could probably get my PC to load the thumbnails in Firefox and Opera, but for now, non-loading thumbnails is something I just have to live with at some sites (other sites load the thumbnails with no problem, so it must be related to the server/software at the sites themselves as well as the software settings on my PC.
Apparently it's just my PC (software, hardware?) problem, but the thumbnails for the videos and photosets don't load at this site. That makes navigation more difficult, because you don't get to see what the models look like unless you stream a video or load individual photos. Is it just me, or is anyone else having this problem with this site or other member sites in this network? If other PU members had this problem with this site, I would have thought they would have commented on it before.
I've joined a few other networks, that have multiple site access for each network. At those networks, you can use your username and password to log in at any of the member sites of that network. But if it's easier for your programmer to use the method of a single entrypoint to the network instead of multiple entry points, it's a little less convenient, but no big deal.
What would be nice, as you point out, would be to make the hotlink for member access to Teen Mega World more visible. Just make the script/letters a larger size, so they are more prominent, and put it on a separate line by itself. I would think that would be very simple and easy to do. And the member entrance would then be much easier to see and notice and find.
I joined Teen Mega World, which includes Teen Sex Movs as one of the sites in the membership. But if I try logging in to Teen Sex Movs, my username and password are rejected. Instead, I have to enter through the Teen Mega World site. And the Teen Mega World site entrance is not always visible for members at Teen Mega World (the box where you enter your username and password). Sometimes I have to play around with the URL to try finding the damn username and password popup. The site designer could make entering the damn site easier by prominently listing the member entrance that brings up the username and password popup. This morning I tried a few time to get into the network, and am having no luck.
The teensexmovs site (and its network Teen Mega World) is not a scam. There is a large amount of hardcore teen videos (and photosets based on the videos) at the network. Not all the material is high-grade, but the models are by no means skanks. Some models are ok-looking, some are attractive. The average "attractiveness" of the models is definitely above the level found at many hardcore video sites.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of site contents: About 275 video clips.
-Models listed for each clip.
-Content is dated.
-Updates: Currently 1 video about every 10 days.
-DRM: no.
-Easy login.
-Site timeout: no.
-Models are real teens: a number of attractive teen girls, and the boys are clean-cut teens (few tattoos or piercings).
-Multiple choices for download formats:
--WMV: high, medium, low quality.
--MPEG.
--QuickTime.
Cons:
-No streaming option.
-No photosets.
-Only 4 tiny thumbnails and a larger thumbnail to illustrate each video. And the thumbnails are not enlargeable.
-No bios for models.
-Limited amount of information on video clips: does not show runtime, file size.
-Watermark: Yes, small to medium sized watermark bottom right corner on videos.
-Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites.
-Basic, limited search: can search by name of model, or by date video was posted.
Bottom Line:
The site theme: Hidden cameras capture the hardcore action of real teen sluts.
The idea of spying on teens having sex is supposed to add spice to the sex. What you get is videos that could be improved by better camera work (better lighting, better control of the colors). Some black and white parts of the videos are supposed to suggest real-time video capture, but I would prefer good colors for skintones and background, instead.
You also have portions where the teens are supposed to be videotaping themselves. This is also supposed to add to the "reality" of the
experience. So the teens are kissing, and glancing at the camera, and fucking, and glancing at the camera, and it's distracting. It doesn't add to the realism or excitement. They would be better off dropping the idea of "hidden cameras" and "self video-taping" and just get a good cameraman who can take good videos. Because they are using a cameraman anyway, but the video product is supposed to be showing an amateur real-life capture of teens having sex, and that theme is not really working.
This is a good-sized site for hardcore teen.
Currently 275 video clips.
Clip run about 20 to 30 minutes.
Most of the action is boy-girl.
-Pages listing the site contents are cluttered with adds for other sites.
I click on the thumbnail of "Top Rated Videos", and I get a full page of thumbnails of videos. But when I click on any of the video thumbnails, it turns out these videos are all from Young Libertines, a different site that I would have to join to see any of their videos. So I have to hit the "back button" on my browser twice, to get back to the Teen Sex Reality site. I didn't even realize I had left the Teen Sex Reality site until I saw the signup page for Young Libertines.
There are many ads for other sites on each page, but most ads you can guess are ads, and not videos at the Teen Sex Reality site. But it would make the page far less cluttered if they removed the ads, so you can see (and focus on) what this site has to offer.
This site is one of many hardcore teen video sites. The sex is gentle and not abusive. But it's also not very exciting. Maybe the girls (and guys) that are having sex are having a good time, but it certainly doesn't come through. It's more like they are having sex because it's something to pass the time. No real passion or excitement or enjoyment.
My belief is they are having sex because they are getting paid for it. Which is, unfortunately, not a joke.
The video quality is ok to good. The quality would be improved if they dropped the "hidden cameras" idea and concentrated on making good, sexy videos.
When you join this site, which is part of the TonyBucks network, you currently get access to a number of the other TonyBucks sites. How many
sites you get access to, and which specific sites, depends on which site you join through. Most of the sites you join through have the same
membership fee, but some sites give you a greater number of "bonus" sites.
Are the pics even worth downloading? This seems to be a site that emphasizes vids. The pics would be an afterthought, extremely doubtful the pics would be high quality. So what use would the pics be? As a fast reminder of what the vid was about?
The preview pages for Teen Stars Magazine shows updates/photosets for models dated 2010 and 2009. But the thumbnails for the photosets are old photos that are probably 5 years old or older. You might get the idea that this site is still updating. But my best guess is that this is still an archive site, which has not updated or added new photos or videos in years. I'm basing that on the fact that the site did not update for years, and that the photosets in the preview section, although dated as 2010 and 2009, were probably shot 5 years ago or more.
Also, a lot of these models have suddenly changed citizenship from Eastern Europe to USA. I wonder if immigration is aware of all the models that entered our country by the Internet?
Finally, many of these models have been 18 years old for many years. I thought I was the only one who had discovered the secret of staying young. But this porn site has an amazing number of models that have stayed 18 or 19 for years and years.
Truth in advertising. As consumers of porn, we must be confident our porn sites are diligent in their search for truth and justice and the American way of life. Hi-yo Silver (I ride along with the Lone Ranger).
My theory is that by splitting the contents into 30+ sites, it makes the contents appear much bigger than if the contents were split into 1 or 2 or 3 sites. So it's basically a marketing decision, I think. Also, with the contents spread into many small sites, they can offer access to the sites through each separate site, and through a group offer which is through teenmegaworld, which is not a single site but a mixture of most of the separate sites in the network. Somebody might be drawn/interested in a solo teen site, a boy-girl site, an old-young site, etc. etc. And they could offer a loyalty program that includes more sites in the membership the more months a person stays a member.
So it's basically a marketing strategy, I think.
But the site layout and design for each site is basically the same, from the sites I've seen, as far as navigation and having a video with an accompaning photoset, and the different options for downloading are the same from site to site.
I was a member of teenmegaworld before, and Denner's review is accurate. The navigation has not improved at all: it's very basic, and the search is very poor as well. I agree with Denner's review, except my score is much lower, because my taste in videos is different, and I have a slow ISP download speed (about 160 Kb/s), which makes downloading a single video take about 2 hours (in high quality), and I can't play the videos in flash mode, because my ISP speed isn't fast enough (the flash video stutters and stops, instead of playing). I mentioned the cons in my review, which is why I gave the site a lower score than Denner, who gave it a 90.
If you are into gonzo teen sex, then the network has a lot to offer. I personally want something with a "prettier", more glamorous look, where the models are attractive (they do have attractive young girls, but they are not shown to advantage), and there is more than just a meat factory fuck-suck sex. I would like some tenderness, or some slight story behind the sex to give it some meaning, or where the girls are really excited and enjoying the sex. The girls and the guys could be shovelling snow or mud for all the excitement and heat and enjoyment they are showing in many of the sex clips. I mean, the guys look like the sex is a chore, like they are working for a paycheck, instead of actually enjoying sex with some really cute girls.
You do get a one less bonus site when you join with the PU/TBP discount. But I did not think it was worth the extra $10.00 to join without the discount.
Joining with the bonus thru teenmegaworld I got:
$19.95/30 days membership
17 "exclusive" sites
16 non-exclusive sites
Checking the join page, non-bonus teenmegaworld, it states:
$29.95/30 days membership
18 "exclusive" sites
16 non-exclusive sites
And like I said, it is difficult to tell exactly what sites you get access to before you sign up. Once your membership is activated, and you enter one of the sites, you can then tell which sites you have access to.
So I was a little disappointed to find I did not get access to fuckstudies. I joined through the teenmegaworld site. Possibly, if I had joined through the teenstarsonly site, I might have gotten access to fuckstudies. Their bonus system is a mystery, and even the webmaster apparently has to check with somebody to be able to know exactly which sites you get access to with each site membership. And that is probably not taking into account the reduction in sites from the PU/TBP membership discount.
So is it worth it to email the webmaster asking for the specific information? When there are so many combinations?
Why can't they just make it easy on the customer, and give all the sites with any membership? Would it really cost them anything, after considering the added good will on the part of the customers, who won't be angry or disappointed because their membership did not include some network site they wanted as part of the membership?
Apparently, they give access to most of the sites in the network with any subscription. So why not give access to all the sites?
Maybe, in the back of their minds, they are considering a bonus loyalty program, where they will add a few more sites to your membership if you stay a member longer than 1 or 2 months. But I don't think they actually have that program in place at this time.
Oops. I just realized that I became interested in fuckstudies because I read your review on the site. So I guess I don't need to tell you about that site. Lol. :)
As you know, there are a number of different sites in the network. And they slice and dice the sites that you get access to, depending on which site you join through, and when you join.
I joined through teenmegaworld a few weeks ago.
I do not have access to 18firstsex.com.
I was hoping to get access to fuckstudies as part of my membership, because I saw some clips from that site that seemed nice. But I did not get access to fuckstudies either.
I've been a member of the network before. But it will a good while before I rejoin, after this membership runs out.
Sorry I can't give you any information on either of those sites (fuckstudies or 18firstsex).
I mentioned elsewhere that it's irritating that you don't know exactly which sites you will get access to before you join. They really should give you access to all the sites in the network. The way it currently works is a little stupid and irritating, because you always want what you don't get (if you know the sites that are available). Just human nature. :)
Thanks for the kind words. This site (and you get many other sites in the network with a membership) has some really attractive teen girls. The videos are all hardcore. But they leave me cold. I wish it was otherwise, because there are some lovely girls, but they are not attractive in the videos, and in the pictures they are even less attractive. That is me. I know there are PU members who find these videos hot, but I find them boring: hardcore fuck and suck, without any erotic or arousing quality. A real shame, considering some of the girls are really attractive.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM
-No download limit
-No site timeout
-Exclusive content for about 1/2 of the sites in the network.
-Exclusive content for the teenstarsonly site.
-File download options:
hi, medium, low quality WMV
MP4 ( Portable Devices )
MOV ( Quicktime Video )
-Zip files for the photosets
Cons:
-Limited search options: Can search by name of model, or by date of update. But can't search by description of model, by description of type of sex action.
-Clumsy navigation.
-Going from one of the network sites to another is clumsy.
-Trying to see/search the vid files on a site is clumsy.
-Advertising for other sites on each page.
-Poor file names. Files are named with a number and the suffix "high", "medium", or "low", depending on whether you download the high, medium or low quality file. But if you want to know who the model is, or a short description of the action, you have to manually make up your own file record.
-You need a fast connection to play the flash files. My ISP connection downloads at 150-160 Kb/s, so I could not play the videos by flash. The flash video would stutter and stop, stutter and stop. So to see what the video was like, I had to download the entire video, then play the file.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
-Because I have a slow ISP connection (150-160 Kb/s download speed), it takes almost 2 hours to download a single video in high quality.
-The video files are fairly large size:
One sample movie, 25 minutes runtime:
Full Movie ( High Quality ) - ( 989.56 Mb)
Full Movie ( Medium Quality ) - (500.93 Mb)
Full Movie ( Low Quality ) - (301.81 Mb)
Bottom Line:
Hardcore teen site. Mainly a video site. There is a large photoset for each video, but there is little to no erotic or artistic quality to the
photos, they are more like video captures of the hardcore action. The models can be very attractive: they are young, slender, Eastern European teens, but you can't easily see how attractive they are, it's goddamn hard to see what the faces of these girls are like: the head is often cut out of the picture, the body, even though young, slender and attractive, is not made to look attractive. It's gonzo video and gonzo photography, and there's no erotic value to the photos, little erotic value to the videos, which are hardcore meat factory fuck and suck.
Site is part of a nice-sized network. This site hasn't updated since March 2010, but other sites in the network are updating.
I agree that the site preview is terrible, in that it does not show short clips of at least some of the site videos or photos.
The preview area states you get full access to over 25 bonus sites, but does not name any of the bonus sites.
I would give the preview a rating of "shit" or "shitty", which would have been a failing grade back in the day.
However, if you haven't been a member of this site or any of the Royal Cash sites, and if you are into teens, you might want to join for a 1-month membership. The network is primarily a teen video site. There are photosets, but the photosets are low-quality pictures that are basically screen-caps of the videos.
There are about 4 sites in the Royal Cash group that have hot teen videos that are the main attraction of a membership: fresh young girls, most models you have not seen elsewhere, in straight-fuck videos with little to no storyline. Straight-fuck means no story, but there is bj, anal, vaginal, whatever, mainly boy-girl, but some girl-girl, some threesome, at the different sites.
Looking at the tour pages, last update was December 2006. With small number of models, limited number of photo sets and videos, it's very questionable why anyone would want to join this site. Since the site owners apparently have some other small sites that stopped updating years ago, they should combine the different sites into a single, larger site, or offer the different sites as part of a network, instead of trying to sell the sites on an individual basis or as a 2-for-1 combination.
Thanks for the kind words, Denner. And it would certainly be a lot easier, as well as cheaper, if all networks sold a general admission membership to all their sites (hopefully, for the same price they charge for membership to a single site, or a selected number of "bonus" sites).
But why would they want to make it easy on us paying customers? Their job (as they see it) is to try to grab as many dollars and euros as they can from our outstretched hands. That is the beauty of capitalism: helping people get rid of their filthy lucre. :)
Fuck Studies is part of the TeenMegaWorld network, or maybe it's called the Royal Cash network, or the Royal Cash network.
That network is a solid teen network.
If you do sign up for that network, be sure to look for the pre-checked trial that will sign you for a 3-day trial to some other site. That trial turns into a high-priced subscription to the other site unless you cancel if you are accidentally hooked into a subscription. There's no reason to get the trial, so make sure you uncheck the box.
Only a few of the sites in the TeenMegaWorld network are currently updating. But there is plenty of hardcore teen content to look through.
The navigation is poor, the search is poor. But you can't have everything.
There are some very sharp (good clarity, good definition) videos at this network (TeenMegaWorld). The action is almost all gonzo: 2 or more teens banging away. But you have a lot of good-looking teen girls at this network.
The above is talking about the TeenMegaWorld network, not the TonyBucks network of my review.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Multiple download formats:
--WMV: low, medium, high quality.
--MPG.
--MOV.
-Streaming: low, medium, high quality.
-Videos and photosets are paired.
-Content is dated.
-Screenshots and a photoset to illustrate each video.
-Zip files for photosets.
-No site timeout. Edit: there is a site timeout, but it takes hours of inactivity before you have to re-login.
-Videos are very high definition: Size 1GB+. But you get high clarity.
Cons:
-Last update is dated 05 September, 2010. That's 2 months ago. Before that, they were updating about every 5 days with a video or photoset.
-Only 1 size for photos.
-Slow-loading system for viewing photos.
-The members page listing the site contents is cluttered with advertising for other sites.
-Models not listed for some videos and photosets.
-No model bios.
-Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Other search parameters are fairly useless (date added, title, top rated, most viewed).
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the TonyBucks network, which currently has 11 sites. About a year ago I posted a comment that joining this site made little economic sense because you only gained access to this single site, and not to any of the other sites in this network, for a price of $29.95/month. And the contents of this site, by itself, did not justify a price of $29.95/month. A year later, for the same price, you can get access to up to 10 of the sites in this network, depending on which site you join through.
The TonyBucks network is teen sites. What makes this site different from the other sites in the network? I don't know. Many of the sites are interchangeable. But as a marketing ploy, they put some videos in this site, some in a different site, and each site is supposed to have a different theme. You could put most of the TonyBucks videos into one giant site, but then it would be much harder to search through all the videos. So separating the videos into different sites makes good consumer sense, except when they rename a video clip and put it into more than one site. But the duplicated videos are not very common.
There are around 73 videos and 73 photosets at this site.
Sample data for a high definition video:
runtime: 25 minutes 14 seconds
size: 1.12 GB
frame width x height: 1600 x 900
total bitrate: 6336 kbps
frame rate: 25 frames/sec
Type of content:
Sex in most normal varieties: vaginal, anal, bj, cunnilingus.
Mainly boy-girl. Some scenes where you have "group" sex, but it's not very groupy: you have a boy-girl having sex, and maybe 1 or more other people watching them, or maybe the other people are having boy-girl sex. A limited amount of 2 guys on a single girl. A few scenes of solo female masturbation or 2-girl lesbian action. But the basic theme is one couple (boy-girl) sex.
The sex is not rough or abusive. It's friendly sex between two horny teens.
The site is your basic hardcore teen site, with high definition videos that are professionally shot: good lighting, good focus, good colors.
The photosets are basically a record of the video shoot. But the photos are high quality, not screencaps, and worth viewing for themselves. This site has the best quality photos of the entire network. I don't know who the photographer is, but he should have been hired to do all the photos at this network. The photos are large size (about 400-1,000 KB each).
You are not getting the glamor-style videos of X-art or the glamor photos of Met-Art. But the quality is very good at this site.
On the other hand, the sex action is your basic sex, with less roughness than at many hardcore sites, but it doesn't grab your interest, or impress you.
I'm giving this site a score of 83, for the value of the site contents, and the network contents. The site would be very expensive to join if it didn't include network access.
CCBill is usually an easy billing company to deal with. My suggestion would be to ask for a refund of your membership fee. Explain to CCBill why you are asking for a refund, and you should get one. And then sign up with a site that offers you better service. There are many sites on the Internet that offer you, for the same price as this site, a much greater amount of content (videos) than what this site offers. Look through the sites that have similar content (hardcore teen videos) and a high score at Porn Users, and pick one you might like, after reading the reviews or looking at the previews of the sites.
Teenamite, a new site (started July 2009?), mainly videos, some photos. Still small, but adding 1 video clip per day. A number of good-looking Euro teens. Hardcore boy-girl action. Preview clips look good. Main problem is: cost of this 1 small teen video site is the same or higher ($29.95/month) than network sites or video mega-sites with a huge amount of content.
There are 7 sites listed at TBP for the company running this site, but membership to each site is restricted to that one site, not allowing access to all the company sites.
So why would anyone join this site when, for the same or less money, you get so much more content at other sites or networks?
Even if the company gave access to all 7 sites with one membership price, the total content would still be less than what many network and mega-video sites offer.
The pricing of this site does not make economic sense.
Please believe me, I understand the staff puts a lot of effort into making P-U and The Best-Porn the best it can be.
I was not trying to criticize you or the staff-owners in any way.
I was just commenting-saying that the prices of some of these sites change a lot, and that some kind of active link might be useful to automatically update the current price.
But I don't know programming, so I don't know how easy-difficult that would be to put on The Best-Porn site.
I, and almost all the members of P-U, do appreciate the effort you have put into making PU and The Best-Porn useful and valuable sites for us. (We also like the lottery, even tho I have not won anything yet. But I hope to keep trying until I do win.)
As for regional pricing, until you informed me in a previous post, as I already said, I was not even aware there was such a thing.
I'm not a newbie in porn, but what I do not know is enormous.
Listed price at the site is: $29.95 US for 30 days recurring.
Listed price at the site is: $39.95 US for 30 days non-recurring.
TheBestPorn lists price as $24.94 US for 30 days recurring.
But TheBestPorn price is not a discounted price (at least no indication that price is discounted).
So the price might have changed since it was listed at TBP.
The prices at many of these sites change a lot, and you really need a dynamic link to keep up with the price changes, if you want to stay current (and then you need to list the discounted price from TBP as well, if there is one).
As far as model Stefany, she looks way past her teenage years. But many sites advertise "teens" that are way past that age. These sites sell youth, not truth. We all know that, even if we don't like admitting it to ourselves.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
