New problem:Blocked from downloading for no good reason.
I have been blocked from downloading at sexasian18, supposedly for exceeding the daily download limit.
The message I received was:
"Access blocked: EXCESS BANDWIDTH USE BANNED FOR 15 HOURS
If you have been downloading a lot today, you probably exceeded your daily bandwith usage limit. Come back tomorrow..
If you have not been downloading a lot today, perhaps other people may be accessing our member's area using your password. Sometimes easy to guess passwords are comprimised by hackers. Your password may have been circulated on the Internet. For this reason, your user name may have been blocked."
Block time message issued approximately 09:50 am PST, Wed July 15, 2009.
I downloaded 7 files (2 videos, 5 zip photosets), for a total of 2.98 GB. (I downloaded the files into a single folder, so I could keep track of the total amount of downloads, since I read there was a daily download limit of 12 GB.
My username and pasword were issued by CCBill. I did not choose the username and password myself. The password and username are both security tight, in the sense they are both a mixture of lowercase and uppercase letters, with numerals as well, in an apparently random order.
I was just issued the password today, along with my membership.
It was irritating that I had problems getting into the member area of this site, because the popup page to accept my username and password did not appear on my computer, until I had tried to log-on for about 2 hours.
Now I am getting an Excess Bandwidth notice, and am blocked from site access for 15 hours, when my bandwidth usage was far below the maximum I am allowed. The daily limit is 12 GB, and I downloaded 2.98 GB.
I did not view any of the photoset galleries or the videos at this site (streaming), because I wasn't sure if viewing the photoset galleries or viewing a streaming video would count as part of my total bandwidth usage.
So far, my experience with this site has been frustrating.
I need to specifically check to see whether viewing a photoset or a streaming video will count toward the total daily download limit. But I have not viewed a photoset or any streaming video at the site today, which is my first day of membership.
To be cut off after downloading 2.98 GB, with a supposed daily maximum download of 12 GB, is ridiculous.
Success. Refreshed page, selected "member login", and a popup window appeared, requesting my username and password. I entered the information, and was allowed into the member area. Took me what, a couple of hours to get in?
I used to believe in Japanese efficiency. But there can be problems along the way, I now realize.
That popup window for authentication was evidently not being blocked by my PC hardware/software, but by what? I have no idea.
Easy signup, but problems follow.
Signup was easy for sexasian18 thru CCBill today.
Was assigned a username and password thru CCBill.
But 40 minutes after signup, have not received any confirmation email from CCBill about my subscription. Over the past several months there have been a few times I did not get any CCBill email confirmation about a subscription signup (or a subscription cancellation). I don't know if this is some problem with my email account, or if this is because of CCBill changing policy. I do check both my regular email and my spam accounts for these confirmations, but do not see them.
Separately, 40+ minutes after signup, still not able to log-on to members area of sexasian18. I click on the "members login" link on the entry page, and nothing appears to happen. What I want is a new page that will accept my username and password so I can get into the members area.
Close the browser page for sexasian18, and try again a few more times, by opening a new browser page, loading the sexasian18 preview page, and selecting the "members login" link. Still no luck. Stuck at the preview page, can't get into the members area.
When I place the mouse pointer over the "members login" hot link, my pointer changes to the finger-hand symbol, showing the link is active. Then I select the "members login" hot link (by clicking on it), and nothing happens. The page does not change in any way, and I can not go on to the next step where I would enter my username and password.
Restart my PC. Open new browser page. Go to sexasian18 and try to login.
Same routine, where I select the "members login" hot link, and apparently nothing happens (except that the "members login" is no longer a hot link, because the mouse pointer no longer changes to the finger-hand symbol when I place the pointer over the words "members login".
Close browser page (because there are no active hot links on the page) of sexasian18, and the page appears dead, can't use the page to change to any other page at the site.
Open new browser window. Clear cookies, cache, browsing history.
Cookies were cleared, because I am now forced to re-log-in to my Yahoo home page, and to re-log-in to Porn Users home page.
Open a page for sexasian18, select the "members login" hot link, same as before: page turns dead, with no hot links.
I will give this a day or so, then cancel my membership if I can't get into the members area.
It's possible the problem is in my computer software/hardware, that is preventing some popup page from appearing and that I am not aware of it. But so far, this is the first paysite that is blocking my access BEFORE I can enter the username and password. And I have joined a number of paysites, and never had this problem before.
Sorry, I don't have any additional details on the new pricing. The only information is that it is a "special" offer, whatever that means. I plan on joining tomorrow, and downloading for 1 month solid.
This is one of the biggest and best JAV sites that I know of.
Sex Asian 18 definitely worth a look. Great review, and great find.
Wish I had the time and money to look at these great sites.
My take on erotic:
Eroticism is a state of mind. Sure, there's a large physical element, but if the mind is not engaged, the body won't react on its own. Erotic versus porn? That's mainly a distinction in the mind as well. Personal tastes, don't you know. Playboy back in the 1960s and 1970s fought a lot of legal battles because the magazine was classified as porn. The magazine is still considered porn by many people. How many people at PU would consider Playboy as porn? My guess is few to none, they would consider Playboy as softcore erotic, if they had to classify it. Or more likely, as softcore dull.
In Los Angeles, I only use Spectrum for internet service.
Which is why I'm paying $45 for a 100 Mbps connection.
If I bundled internet, phone, and cable, I would be paying about $29 for each service, with a 100 Mbps connection speed.
What's nice about Spectrum, and Time Warner before that, was there were no data caps.
So I never had to worry about using too much.
But since I don't belong to Netflix, I don't think I use all that much bandwidth, anyway.
I'm much more selective about the porn I download today.
Back in the day, I used to stream the videos or slide show the photo sets, then download almost everything. Now I rarely download anything except what I feel is very good to great.
I was born in Los Angeles. Spent most of my life here.
But I lived in Augusta, GA for almost 18 years.
Nice town, but the summer weather was hot and humid.
Winters were mild, though.
But the insects: you had large cockroaches running over the streets at night.
You step out in the yard in the summer without a shirt, and in a few minutes, you're covered in mosquito bites.
You take a shower, and 10 minutes later, you're ready for another shower, in the summer.
I know people are supposed to get acclimated to the hot and humid weather, but I never did.
I live in Los Angeles County.
I've been a member of Time Warner for internet for a few years.
I started with their slowest speed.
Paid around $30/month for 30 Mbps.
After 1 year, they raised the price to about $54/month.
While offering new subscribers 30 Mbps for $30.
I called the office, and they said that $54/month for 30 Mbps was the price for current subscribers, and that I didn't qualify for the new subscriber rate.
So I talked some more, and they finally offered me 50 Mbps for $40/month.
Which was faster and cheaper than the 30 Mbps for $54/month.
After one year, they said I no longer qualified for the $40/month introductory rate.
So I asked if I could have a cheaper plan, and they told me even if I dropped my internet speed, I would not qualify for a cheaper plan.
So I told them to end my service at the end of the current month.
And I paid T-Mobile for a one-month plan, with a slow internet connection.
Then I went into the Time Warner office, told them I was ending my service.
The sales clerk I spoke with, offered me a new plan at $45/month for 100 Mbps.
I was pissed, because I had already paid T-Mobile for a slower plan for 1 month.
But I told Time Warner to switch me to the $45/month for 100 Mbps plan. Then Time Warner changed to Spectrum.
Anyway, I now believe that 100 Mbps is the slowest speed that Spectrum offers in my area.
Which might explain why you got an upgrade to 100 Mbps, because that might be the slowest speed they offer in your area, as well.
The only surprising thing is that they did not charge you a higher price.
Unless you are on a contract that specifies the lower price.
I'm on month to month service, with the price locked in for 12 months.
That's the system they use in my area.
One question on your review:
You write: "One day, I'm downloading at near max of 15Mbps, the next I'm barely getting 2Mbps."
Do you mean to write MBps, instead of Mbps?
B, with a capital letter, stands for Byte.
b, with a lowercase letter, stands for bit.
8 bits in a Byte.
2 Mbps, or even 15 Mbps, is very slow.
I'm with Spectrum (formerly called Time Warner), and I have a 100 Mbps connection.
There are slower and faster connections offered.
But 15 Mbps would be very slow, and Spectrum does not offer that slow a speed.
Whereas 15 MBps would be slightly faster than the connection I have.
Excellent review, as usual.
You cover the network sites in a comprehensive manner that clearly explains what each site does.
And you mention your own preferences, but try not to let them color your site review over much.
I don't remember when I was a member of most of these sites, but what I do remember is that I thought: many of the Dane Jones videos were high quality, with attractive young women in some hot scenes.
Dane Jones was a good site, with attractive young women in some hot scenes. Massage Rooms was also an very good site. Lesbea was a good lesbian site.
My vague impression is that the videos are excellent in technical quality: sharp focus, well lighted, good sound control, etc.
And like I said, some of the videos were hot (or that I really enjoyed watching them).
One reason for that is I like watching pretty girls and women. Doing sexy things.
I don't remember Girlfriends or Mom XXX or Fitness Rooms.
Mom XXX and Fitness Rooms don't fit into my preferred tastes.
Back in the early 1970s, before the internet, it was rare to see pretty girls in porn.
But since at least the 1990s, the floodgates have opened.
And it's hard to keep up with all these lovely girls.
The bottom line: an excellent, comprehensive review of a network.
You put a lot of time and energy and thought in writing this review.
Very impressive.
I use Firefox exclusively, and DownThemAll is also my exclusive download manager.
So your comment holds extra meaning for me.
If a site has streaming problems, that obviously makes it less attractive for me.
I'm not a member of Sexy Hub or Dane Jones.
Lately, I seem to have playback issues with smooth streaming at some paysites I do belong to. I suspect it's because I have too many programs running on my PC, or because I've overloaded my drive too much, and it needs more free space to run streaming smoothly.
Site appears to be off-line. When you click on link at PU, you get a 404 error (page cannot be found). Also get a 404 error when you try to access site by entering site name as URL for browser.
There is a site called Asia Nude 4 U that has a mix of softcore/hardcore with models much like the 88 Square site. Some of the models at Asia Nude 4 U are extremely pretty. Asia Nude 4 U is not extremely hardcore, but much more hardcore than Met-art, which is strictly softcore.
But 88 Square and Asia Nude 4 U are not really the site I was thinking of when I said there was a Met-art clone of Asian models. This is a site (or was, I don't know if it's still around) with high-quality softcore photosets of Asian models.
I'll try to remember the name of the site, but my memory is terrible, and the exact name might take a few weeks or longer.
Do you personally enjoy Met-art? If not, then you wouldn't enjoy the site I am thinking of, unless you get an extra special kick from Asian models. I think some Asian models are just gorgeous, and there are plenty of pretty ones as well, but tastes are personal.
If you like the Met-art site, I will try to keep digging for the name. The models were Asian, not Asian-American, I think. There are a very few Asian models at Met-art, but hardly more than a handful out of the 100s of models they have.
I put more weight on the comments and reviews by PU members that I trust and understand than on the scores or reviews of TBP. TBP scores are harder for me to relate to or understand. Drooler and other PU members are paying customers like me, while the TBP reviewers are professional reviewers with a different point of view that has less relevance for me. That's my personal opinion.
I usually agree with and understand the reviews of sites that Drooler reviews or comments on that I have been a member of. Our tastes are somewhat similar. Not exactly the same, but close enough that if Drooler finds a site to be excellent and well worth the money, chances are the site might be worth joining for me. (He does not find a lot of those excellent and well worth joining sites, because he has a lot of contrary opinion and orneriness. Maybe old age is biting him in the ass, or maybe he was ornery at birth. But you can depend on him (and some others) to give a somewhat clear and understandable review/opinion of different sites. I don't get the same sense of understanding from the TBP scores or reviews. TBP scores and reviews have value, but it's easier for me to relate to the PU scores and reviews of members I trust and agree with because I have read their reviews and comments and understand more clearly what they are saying.
If this site has some special attributes that definitely appeal to you, then maybe it's worth joining, in spite of Drooler's negative comments. He made those comments a little over a year ago, and maybe the site has improved since then.
But unless you have some clear evidence that the site has drastically improved since Drooler made his negative comments, or unless you have a strong impression that there are special elements that will appeal to your personal tastes, then this site is probably a mistake or a waste of your money.
You're probably better off paying for another site, but I don't know of any specializing in softcore Asian. There are some very nice-to-excellent hardcore Asian that PU members have reviewed.
Wait. I recall one softcore Asian site, don't remember the name. I will look around and, if I come up with the name, will offer it as a possibility. The site was like a Met-art Asian clone (but not really associated with Met-art).
Maybe I'm getting old, and trying to be careful with my porn dollars, but I wouldn't join this site unless someone I really trusted (and likes the same kind of pix I do) wrote a glowing review of this site and gave it a high score.
The free tour of the site (with it's lack of nice-sized sample pix) is a turn-off for me.
I want to see if the models inside are really attractive, and the free tour gives very little basis for knowing what the photosets will look like.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT SHOUTING.
-CAN STREAM VIDEOS IN HD OR STANDARD DEFINITION.
-CAN DOWNLOAD VIDEOS IN 480P OR 1080P DEFINITION.
-TRAILER GIVES YOU A PREVIEW FOR EACH VIDE0.
-LARGE-SIZED GALLERY FOR EACH VIDEO.
-GALLERIES HAVE A ZIP FILE.
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIMEOUT DUE TO INACTIVITY.
-SITE MEMBERSHIP GIVES ACCESS TO THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK.
BUT ACCESS TO THE PREMIUM SITES REQUIRES AN UPGRADED MEMBERSHIP.
Cons:
-ARCHIVE SITE. LAST UPDATE NOVEMBER 2013.
-SMALL SITE. 97 SCENES.
-CAPTCHA REQUIRED TO ENTER SITE.
-HAVE TO ACCEPT OR DECLINE OFFER TO UPGRADE TO PREMIUM STATUS TO ENTER MEMBER'S AREA.
-ADDS ON EVERY PAGE.
-SOME VIDEOS STOP STREAMING WITH ERROR MESSAGE: html5: Video not properly encoded.
-SOME VIDEOS DO NOT PLAY, OR ARE VERY SLOW TO LOAD.
(I SELECT A VIDEO: IF IT DOES NOT LOAD ON THE PAGE AFTER A FEW MINUTES, I SELECT A DIFFERENT VIDEO: SO I DON'T KNOW IF I WAITED MORE MINUTES, THE VIDEO WILL LOAD, OR THE VIDEO LINK MIGHT BE BROKEN.)
-MOST VIDEOS AT THE SITE ONLY HAVE 2 DOWNLOAD OPTIONS: 480P AND 1080P. NO 720P AVAILABLE.
-NO SEARCH BOX. WHICH MAKES EXAMINING THE CONTENTS A TIME-CONSUMING CHORE.
Bottom Line:
16 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK. WITH CURRENT NUMBER OF SCENES ON 2017-02-25:
(NETWORK ADVERTISES 24 BASIC SITES, BUT THAT'S NOT ACCURATE: THEY HAVE ELIMINATED A FEW SITES IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS).
SITE THEME: ORIGINALLY, THE THEME WAS A PRIVATE EYE IS VIDEOTAPING WOMEN WHO ARE CHEATING ON THEIR HUSBANDS. EXCEPT THAT THE THEME WAS DROPPED ALONG THE WAY, AND MANY SCENES ARE JUST A GUY HAVING SEX WITH A GIRL. NOT MUCH DIFFERENCE IN THE TWO THEMES, EXCEPT THAT THE PI ELEMENT IS SUPPOSED TO ADD A BIT OF FORBIDDEN SEX TO THE SCENE, ALONG WITH AN ELEMENT OF VOYEURISM BECAUSE THE WOMAN IS NOT SUPPOSED TO KNOW THE SEX IS BEING TAPED.
THIS IS A SMALL, ARCHIVE SITE THAT STOPPED UPDATING IN NOVEMBER 2013. ONLY 97 SCENES.
I WOULD GRADE THE MODELS AS STANDARD PORNSTARS: A LOT OF ENLARGED BREASTS, THE MODELS ARE NOT PARTICULARLY ATTRACTIVE, MOST MODELS ARE IN THEIR MID-TWENTIES OR OLDER.
ALTHOUGH THE MODELS MAKE A LOT OF GROANING AND MOANING NOISES, TO SHOW THE SEX IS HOT, I DID NOT CONSIDER THE SCENES TO BE HOT: JUST NOISY.
GIVING THE SITE ITSELF A SCORE OF 69.
BECAUSE SITE MEMBERSHIP GIVES ACCESS TO THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK, I AM INCREASING THE SCORE TO 80, BECAUSE SOME OF THE OTHER SITES ARE WORTH VISITING. THERE ARE CURRENTLY 16 SITES IN THE BASIC PORN PROS NETWORK.
MY FAVORITE SITE IN THE NETWORK IS MASSAGE CREEP, WHICH HAS A ATTRACTIVE SELECTION OF MODELS, AND THE MASSAGE THEME IS BETTER PLAYED, WITH MORE BUILDUP IN MANY OF THE SCENES, BECAUSE THE MASSEUR SEDUCES THE WOMAN WITH HIS HANDS INTO AN EROTIC ENCOUNTER.
IN MY OPINION, SHADY PI IS A THROWAWAY SITE: YOU PAID FOR NETWORK ACCESS, SO YOU MIGHT AS WELL GLANCE THROUGH THE VIDEOS AT THE SITE TO SEE IF THERE'S ANYTHING OF INTEREST. BUT THE REAL VALUE LIES IN THE NETWORK ACCESS.
SOME OF THE SITES IN THE NETWORK ARE WORTH VISITING. WITH SCENES THAT MIGHT APPEAL TO DIFFERENT NICHES AND PERSONAL TASTES.
BUT OVERALL, I THINK THERE ARE BETTER NETWORKS AND SITES THAT ARE MORE DESERVING OF YOUR MONEY.
Shana Dreams last update was apparently October 04, 2007 (exactly 2 years ago). Any PU member ever join this site who can give an opinion whether the site is worth a 1-month membership? The site is small, very few photos and videos, but has a few cute models.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes is an archive site that stopped updating in February 2017. So most of the review will focus on the New Sensations network, which does update weekly.
-Heavily discounted membership price during holidays. Can get a 12 month membership for as low as $60.
-Network advertises access to 12+ exclusive bonus sites. But actually you get access to over 20+ sites with network access.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloading.
-Clean site design. Not cluttered with lots of ads.
-A lot of attractive models. Not a lot of tattoos. Not overly made up to look like porn stars, but look like really attractive girl-next-door types.
-Secure pages: https login and member pages.
-Videos have a trailer, to give you a preview.
-They upgraded the photosets at the network. A couple of years ago, all the photosets were poor-quality screen caps of each video. They invested in a better software program to make better-quality screencaps of each video.
Cons:
-Shane Diesel's Bangin' Babes is an archive site. It hasn't updated since February 2017.
-I think the cons are basically minor. New Sensations is a fine network.
-The default billing agent is FXBilling / CSHelpCenter. I'm more familiar with CCBill and Epoch, but I've been a member of New Sensations for years, off and on, and never had a billing problem with them.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Standard for porn sites.
-Some PU members might think the videos are too plain vanilla. Although the videos have cute models and are professionally shot in nice settings, the videos often lack the sizzle that some great sites can have.
-Sometimes the download options are strange: a video might have only 4K choices in different kbps choices.
A lot of the videos have a setup storyline to make the sex more meaningful. This is a personal issue, but some viewers might want to skip the setup and move to the sex, while others might enjoy the setup. Depends on personal taste.
The sites cover a wide variety of niches. The search function is just OK, it depends on the criteria you're searching for. I mainly focus on the model, so, since the search examines the entire network, not just the site you're currently logged into, the search is fine for me.
I think the cons are basically minor. New Sensations is a fine network. Navigation is easy, the videos are professionally shot. There are a huge number of attractive models.
The models don't have lots of tattoos, and are not overly made-up, so they look like the good-looking girl who could be your next door neighbor, not like the porn star that lives on the streets of New York City.
Although the site and network are fine, there are so many porn sites competing for your porn dollars, that the New Sensations network kind of gets lost in the shuffle.
That is the main knock against the network.
There are some sites and networks that offer great value for your porn dollars:
The White Boxxx (part of LetsDoeIt), Pure Taboo (part of Adult Time), Teen Fidelity (part of the Teen Fidelity-Teen Porn-Kelly Madison group) have outstanding videos that are erotic and impressive as hell.
Watching some of the videos at those sites is an introduction to how great porn can be.
The New Sensations network is a fine network. But none of the sites in the network blew me away: some PU members might feels the network is too plain vanilla for their tastes.
I'm giving the site a score of 85. This is because site membership gives you access to the complete network. Actually, membership in any of the network sites gives you access to the entire network. If I were scoring the site by itself, the site would deserve a much lower score. But the network gives you complete access to all the sites, without any extra charge for 4K, downloading, or premium site charges.
It's a good network, but there are other networks that you might find give a better bang for your buck.
In spite of the fact that the network offers a $60 annual membership at times.
However, I did sign up for the $60 annual membership, because I do find the network is worth joining.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the basic Team Skeet network.
She's New is one of the larger sites in the network, with 229 videos as of 2018-01-16.
-You have a number of choices to stream and/or download videos.
The definitions available include: low, medium, high, 720p, 1080p for download.
For streaming, the definitions include: low, medium, high, 720p.
-The photo sets can be viewed online in a slide show. Or they can be downloaded in your choice of low, medium or high definition.
-Also, for streaming or downloading, you can choose 1-minute clips of the video, or the entire video.
-There is also a trailer for the video, to give you a fast introduction of the video's content.
-So there has been a large amount of effort put into making the site user-friendly for streaming and downloading options.
Cons:
-A number of PU members have complained that the network is plagued by connection problems, making the network worthless. Slow connections resulting in inability to load pages, to stream or download site contents, etc. If you pay for a membership and are unable to view or download the contents, the money you spent for a membership is wasted.
I've been a member of the network for over 1 year, and have experienced few problems.
Some PU members have accused me of being a shill for Team Skeet, because I've stated on some of the complaints that my personal experience was good.
Anyway, it's worth noting that if you do experience connection problems with Team Skeet, you should ask for a refund of your membership fees.
-To enter the site, you have to pass through an ad-page with ads for different sites.
-Recent updates average 1 per month. But the network updates 1 per day.
-A personal quibble, but I don't like sites that split their offerings into a basic network, and a premium network.
Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):
Make the premium sites into a separate network, would be my solution.
-Most of the recent scenes follow the same basic script of interview, blowjob, fuck, and finish with stunt cock jisming on girl's face and tongue. Which gets repetitious.
When the site started, back in 2011, there was some variety in the sex with different set-ups.
But the current scenes are too repetitious to generate any heat or excitement. There's no tension or build-up.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
Bottom Line (start of):
Site theme: teens who are new to porn, or very early in their porn career.
The scene usually starts off with questions to the model about why she wants a porn career, what were her first sexual experiences, what kinds of sex does she like, etc. Then the girl strips and she gives the stunt cock a blowjob, they fuck, and the guy finishes on her face and tongue.
It's difficult to give a score to the site.
If you experience slow connection problems, and the site and network is not usable, then the score would be in the 50s.
But if you do not experience slow connection problems, the site and network is a worthwhile join, and a more reasonable score would be in the 80s.
The site and network offer a lot of attractive teen models.
The site and network structure gives many options for streaming and downloading the content.
The site gives you access to the basic team skeet network, which includes many different niches.
I'm giving the site a score of 80. That's because I personally have not experienced the slow connection speeds some PU members complain about. If I had experienced the bad connections, I would not have rejoined for a second year.
Although this site is large (229 videos and photo sets), it's not one of my favorites in the Team Skeet network.
Because I find most of the videos lack heat.
Then why give the site a score of 80? Because membership in the site gives you:
-access to the basic Team Skeet network, which currently has 27 sites covering a variety of teen niches.
-1400 models. Many of them attractive teens.
-2896 scenes. Most of the scenes are hardcore.
-A wide variety of options to use the videos and photosets: to stream and/or download.
I'm giving the site a higher score due to network access.
Also, I'm placing more weight on the huge quantity of videos and photo sets in many different niches.
If you prefer quality over quantity, you would give the site and network a lower score.
And if you experience a poor network connection, the site score would be in the 50s.
Bottom line:
I think Team Skeet is a worthwhile join.
As long as you don't experience the poor connection speeds some PU members get.
There's a large amount of teen porn, offered in many different niches.
A huge amount of teen models, many of them attractive.
Some sites should appeal to most people who are into teen porn.
In the first reply section below, I list the current sites available in the basic Team Skeet network.
As I said, it's a matter of personal taste, what appeals to you.
I like Teen Mega World better than Team Skeet.
The newer videos at Teen Mega World feature improved qualities:
They are putting more effort into making the girls more attractive:
And Teen Mega World has a new 4K site (ultra high definition), as well as a Virtual Reality site.
Neither new site at Teen Mega World is that valuable to me:
I don't have Virtual Reality equipment to get the Virtual Reality experience, and my PC/monitor doesn't have Ultra High definition ability.
But it shows that Teen Mega World is trying to upgrade their newer videos.
They are spending more money on the newer videos: upgrading the sets over the cheap old sets and cheap everyday clothes they used before.
There is still a ton of the old videos at Teen Mega World, so most of the network is still what it was before.
But I really enjoy the looks of many of the models at Teen Mega World,
and even though it's not a glamour network by any means, they are making an effort to make the newer videos present the models more attractively (along with better sets and better clothes).
And some of the new photosets at Teen Mega World are worth collecting:
because the models are cute, and screen caps have really improved over what they used to be.
There must be some software program that makes nice quality screen caps from a video shoot, because I really like some of the photosets at Teen Mega World.
And the software to view the photosets at Teen Mega World is very fast and easy to use (if you don't want to download the zip file for the photoset, or want to view the photoset to choose whether you want to get a zipped download file of the photoset).
That's just my opinion, of course.
Some PU members think Team Skeet is one of their favorite networks.
So opinions vary.
Thanks for the positive words.
The Team Skeet network is a favorite of some PU members.
But I like some other sites and networks more.
So it's just a matter of personal taste.
PS: If you like the Team Skeet network, and are considering a long-term join, you can search around, and find a low-priced discounted membership.
Or maybe a low-priced discounted membership for a 1-month membership.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount of $17.87/month.
-Epoch is main biller, a trusted name.
-Accepts Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and some European(?) credit cards for join.
-With site membership, you get access to most of the Team Skeet network. That's over 20 sites.
The Team Skeet network "Unlock" sites require additional payment for each "Unlock" site.
-Update rate for site is 2-4 videos per month. But you get 1 new video per day for the network.
-Large site. Currently 207 videos. Plus matching photoset for each video.
-As a non-member, you can see a nice-sized thumbnail of each video at the site, and at the network, showing you the models at the site. Which is an unusual feature.
-The models are late teens, early twenties. Mainly white.
-A lot of the models are in the early stage of their porn career. Most porn models only last a few years in the business, before retiring, but you get a nice selection of American and European porn models at the site/network.
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
They eliminated the cross-sale a few years back for a short time, but brought it back again.
-The software mechanism for displaying the individual photos of a photoset is slow.
-The photosets have a zip file (one definition only), but the photosets are screencaps, and not worth collecting.
-There is advertising for other sites on each page, but many of the ads link to a full-priced join page that is more expensive than the normal PU discount price.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: Amateurs doing porn.
To believe that, you need to turn your brain off.
Porn is fantasy, but it's easier watching Superman fly and believing he is real (since we've been conditioned from childhood to believe in Superman and other super-heroes), than to believe these girls are amateurs or first time in porn.
Unless you've never joined or viewed any porn sites before. That might help the illusion, because many of the site models are familiar from other porn sites.
The girls are not trying to act like this is the first time for them. There is very little acting involved.
This site is basically hardcore teen sex.
The girls don't act shy or hesitant. They strip and suck cock, then fuck.
The fantasy that these girls are amateurs is hard to believe. They are young, but they are definitely not new to sex. Or maybe I'm not thinking clearly: they could be called amateurs because this is supposed to be the first time they are legally getting paid for sex as porn models. As long as you haven't seen these same girls on a bunch of other porn sites.
The videos start off with a short interview, where a guy asks the model if she is new to porn (she says yes), does she like sex (she says yes), and the girl shows off her body by removing her clothes (which are everyday street wear: not much effort is put into making the girls glamourous or attractive).
Then the girl gives a blowjob, and she fucks.
The interview is nice, because it gives the girl a chance to show some of her personality, to make her more real. She will say she comes from a small town, and is excited to see the big city where TeamSkeet is shooting the video. She gives a bit of her sexual history: What is her favorite sex position; How often does she have sex.
And she's excited to be a Team Skeet girl (porn model/actress).
Site stats:
Videos: 207
Photosets: 207 (1 matching photoset for each video).
The photosets are screen caps of the video. There is a zip file for each photoset, but the girls are not glamorized, and the screencaps have little value. I don't see why most people would want to collect the photosets, even of the models they enjoy.
You might collect the videos of your favorite models, or the videos you think are hot, but the photosets are basically wasted space.
This is in contrast to photosets at X-Art or Diesel (All Fine Girls and Wow Girls and Wow Porn), where the photosets are worth collecting, because the girls are showcased to be attractive, and the photos are close to MetArt or MPL Studios quality.
Even many of the photosets at Teen Mega World are worth collecting. Teen Mega World does not usually make much of an effort to glamorize their models, but some of the models are so attractive, and the photography has improved so much over early screencaps, that I've been collecting some of the Teen Mega World photosets, where the models are attractive and the photosets are really nice.
The site (and network) are basically easy to navigate, and has some nice features:
Videos:
Stream in low, medium or high definition(720p and 1080p).
Download in low, medium, or high definition(720p and 1080p).
You can stream and/or download the entire video, or selected clips from the video.
The videos at She's New are advertised as 100% exclusive. I believe that's basically true.
However, if you are a fan of tube sites, you might have come across some of the She's New videos before, because porn pay sites seem to use tube sites to advertise their wares.
There is a long time before you are timed out of the site for in-activity.
The are no download limits. No DRM. So you "own" the videos you download.
It's easy to switch between sites in the network. No need to re-type your user name or password.
I'm giving the site a score of 88. That's very subjective.
You get access to the site itself, which has 207 videos.
You also get access to over 20 Team Skeet network sites. In many different niches.
These are professionally shot videos.
Not much effort is put into making these models as attractive as possible. They are relying on straight hardcore teen sex as the attraction. Very little plot or story to the sex.
So the site (and network) is worth a join. But there are other sites (and networks) that I enjoy more.
So it's a lukewarm recommendation.
But a nice score for a lukewarm recommendation.
And that explains why I don't pay a lot of attention to the exact score a site receives, on deciding to join a site or not.
My system for joining a site:
-I want a site that has content that I can enjoy.
-is easy to use.
-gives value for the money I pay.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Some very nice, attractive models.
-Choice of streaming or download for videos.
-Streaming offers low, medium and high definition.
-Download offers low, medium, high (720p), and very high (1080p).
-There is also an iPod file type for download.
-Easy login. Once you have logged in to this network, for subsequent logins, just hit the members link and you are inside the site without having to enter your username or password.
-No DRM.
-Fast download speeds. I usually get 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Content appears to be exclusive to this site.
-Many of the models are early in their career in porn.
-PU discount of $17.87/month recurring.
-The network is dropping the pre-checked cross-selling agreements that are found when you join the network sites.
Cons:
-Most cons are basically minor - if you can get past the amateur or homemade flavor of the site contents, or appreciate that approach.
-The names of a few models are not their most common names.
Tiff Love is better known as Tiffany Thompson or Tiffany. Many porn models have multiple names, but a major starlet like Tiffany Thompson should be given the name of Tiffany, or Tiffany Thompson, instead of creating a new name of Tiff Love.
-The video camera operator is amateur quality: he needs to learn
to frame the model better, to move the camera smoothly so the picture doesn't jerk, to move back from the actors so the picture shows more of the model instead of cutting off parts of the model's body from the picture. The overall effect is that you are watching an amateur home video, instead of a professionally shot video. The site is pretending to show you home made videos. But I much prefer to watch professional videos that are shot correctly.
Bottom Line:
Note: I was specifically referring to the poor camera work at the She's New site of the network. The camera work at the Rub A Teen site, of this network, is professional quality.
Bottom Line:
This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to all the sites in the network.
There are currently 14 sites in the network. The network focuses on models in their teens or early twenties.
Number of videos at site: 50+
Rate of updates: 1 video per week.
Video runtime: 11 to 32 minutes. Many are 15 minutes or less.
The options for viewing and downloading the videos at this site (and network) are extensive.
You can stream the videos in low, medium or high definition.
You can download in low, medium, high (720p) and very high (1080p) definitions. There is also an iPod file format for downloading.
The site description states:
"We've got the hottest teens, first timers, and complete amateurs getting nice and nasty. We get submissions everyday from couples, ex's, and horny exhibitionist who want to spice things up!"
You also get a photoset of photos for each video, as well as a gallery of screencaps for each video. But the photosets, like the videos themselves, appear to be taken by a poor amateur
photographer. If the amateur approach turns you on, maybe the photosets are worth keeping. Otherwise, the photos are just poorly framed, poorly lighted, poorly colored pictures that are
not worth keeping.
I much prefer the professional quality photosets at sites like Met-Art, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., versus the amateur approach that She's New tries to emulate. Actually, most amateur photos and videos I've seen (which are non-nude) show much more professional technique than the photos and videos at the She's New site.
I am judging the site by my enjoyment of the videos and photosets. If, instead, I was rating the site on how well the site is emulating that these videos and photosets were submitted by amateurs, who had poor techniques for filming, I would rate the site higher. But like I said, most (non-nude) videos and photosets I have seen, taken by amateurs, show much higher professionalism in the results.
By joining any site in the network, you gain access to all the sites in the network. You get a wide range of hardcore themes for the teen/young twenties models: high school, amateur, latina, black, big tits, blow job.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
