Thanks for the information, Drooler. I didn't know you were still a current member.
There are a few models at Rigin that I really like. But I will pass on the site, because I just don't have the patience to manually copy each photo from a set. I did manual copying years ago at some sites with no zips, but no more.
Any comments/opinions on whether the site is worth joining if there are no zips? There are some nice models, but the work of downloading the individual photos is not attractive.
Zip files were removed from the site back in 2008 (mentioned in December 2008 comment by Drooler).
Zip files were still not available Nov 2009 (mentioned in TBP review).
I don't have a lot of patience. And it seems like it would take a lot of work and time and patience to download the photosets as individual photos because there are no zip files available.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE.
-HOME OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, THE ITALIAN STALLION.
I'M NOT GAY. BUT LOOKING AT THE MANLY, MASCULINE FACE AND BODY OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, EVEN I AM TEMPTED TO THINK OF HARD, VIOLENT, SATISFYING SEX.
-NO LIMITS FOR STREAMING OR DOWNLOADING.
-ZIP FILES FOR PHOTO SETS.
-PU DISCOUNT OF $14.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
-MEMBERSHIP IN ROCCO SIFFREDI GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, A MASSIVE COLLECTION OF HARDCORE GONZO PORN.
Cons:
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-AFTER THE FIRST MONTH PRICE OF $14.95, MEMBERSHIP RENEWS AT $29.95/MONTH (RECURRING).
-FAMEAID IS THE DEFAULT BILLING AGENT. I PREFER CCBILL OR EPOCH, WHICH ARE DEPENDABLE, EASY TO USE AGENTS.
-SOME HOT SCENES. BUT A LOT OF SCENES ARE NOT AS GOOD. THE QUALITY OF THE VIDEOS IS JUST OK.
THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT, BUT IT'S DONE IN A LOOSE, ALMOST-AMATEUR STYLE OF SHOOTING:
THE LIGHTING COULD BE BETTER, THE CAMERA-PLACEMENT COULD BE BETTER, THE SETS COULD BE HIGHER QUALITY,
THE ACTION IS GONZO-STYLE, WITH NOT MUCH ATTENTION PAID TO MAKING THE GIRLS ATTRACTIVE OR STUNNING, EVEN THOUGH MANY OF THE GIRLS ARE NATURALLY ATTRACTIVE. THIS IS A FAR CRY FROM THE GLAMCORE STYLE OF X-ART, BLACKED, OR TUSHY, OR THE ALMOST-GLAMCORE STYLE OF DIESEL ACCESS, WHERE THE MODELS ARE CHOSEN FOR THEIR HIGH LEVEL OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS AND THE PHOTOGRAPHY, LIGHTING, AND SETS MAKE THE GIRLS SEEM PRETTY TO LOVELY.
THE CAMERA-WORK IS JUST OK.
Bottom Line:
ROCCO SIFFREDI IS A SEX GOD. HE KNOWS HOW TO TREAT WOMEN: ROUGH AND DIRTY AND BEGGING FOR MORE.
IF THE SONG "BAD TO THE BONE" WAS NOT WRITTEN ABOUT ROCCO SIFFREDI, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN.
-SOME OF THE ROCCO SIFFREDI VIDEOS ARE HOT. THE ROCCO SIFFREDI VIDEOS ARE SHOT GONZO STYLE: FORGET GLAMCORE: THIS IS THE EUROPEAN VERSION OF TREATING ATTRACTIVE WOMEN LIKE PIECES OF MEAT AND HEARING THEM SCREAM WITH PLEASURE.
EVEN THOUGH THE SEX IS ROUGH AND DIRTY, THE WOMEN ARE NOT TREATED CRUELLY: THIS IS LIKE A GLAMORIZED VERSION OF A BAD BOY HAVING DIRTY SEX WITH WOMEN WHO ENJOY BEING TREATED LIKE THE WHORES THEY WANT TO BE.
THE SEX IS NOT AS ROUGH OR VIOLENT AS WOODMAN'S EXTREME HARDCORE, WHERE THE GIRLS SEEM TO SCREAM WITH REAL PAIN, BUT SOMEHOW END UP WORSHIPPING WOODMAN FOR HIS MASTERFUL TREATMENT OF THEM.
ALSO, ROCCO IS GETTING OLDER. SO HIS SEX SCENES ARE NOT AS OVER-THE-TOP AS THEY USED TO BE.
BUT THE SITE CONTENTS COVERS OVER 20 YEARS OF ROCCO SIFFREDI MATERIAL.
IT IS NOT A COMPLETE COLLECTION OF ROCCO SIFFREDI, BUT YOU GET A NICE OVERALL VIEW OF MANY OF HIS VIDEOS AND SERIES.
MEMBERSHIP IN ROCCO SIFFREDI GIVES YOU ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK, WHICH IS OVER 20 SITES COVERING A VARIETY OF NICHES.
THERE ARE ANOTHER 20+ SITES THAT ARE MUCH SMALLER:
(SEE THE COMPLETE SITE LISTING IN THE FIRST REPLY TO THIS REVIEW.)
IF YOU'RE WILLING TO SLOG THROUGH THE LESS-INTERESTING VIDEOS TO FIND THE HOT ONES, THIS SITE DOES FEATURE SOME VIDS THAT ARE REALLY HOT.
AS I WROTE, YOU NOT ONLY GET ACCESS TO ROCCO SIFFREDI, AND 4 OTHER MAJOR HARDCORE GONZO SITES, BUT TO A LARGE COLLECTION OF NICHE SITES, AS WELL.
SO IF YOU ENJOY GONZO SEX, THIS SITE AND NETWORK OFFER A COMPELLING VALUE.
THE SITE IS EASY TO USE. SUPPORT IS SURPRISINGLY AVAILABLE.
AND YOU GET A SECURE LOGIN TO THE SITE, WHICH IS A NICE FEATURE.
You have to be careful when signing up for some sites that have pre-checked boxes that will sign you up to a trial membership to a different site, as well as the site you want to join.
TBP normally points out the sites that have this pre-checked membership issue on their review page.
Once they bill you for the trial membership, it's hard as heck to cancel the trial membership without paying for the trial.
However, you can cancel the trial membership before the trial expires. If you don't, you will pay an inflated price for the new membership to the site you didn't want, because the trial converts to a "full" one month recurring membership. At a higher price than you would normally pay.
I don't know how you can get your money back.
If you signed up with a credit card, you can call the credit card comp;any and say that you were charged in error for a service you did not want. That might get you back the money for the 1st month of the over-priced membership of the site you didn't want to join.
The Rocco Siffredi site is not a rip-off site, but the pre-checked box is a problem.
I got dinged one time when I signed up to this site. So I had to pay the trial membership fee. I don't remember if it was $2 or $3. But I cancelled the trial membership early, and was not charged for the renewal into a 1-month membership.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Can stream or download videos.
-They have links to porn review sites, including TheBestPorn.
-They have a short bio for Rocco Siffredi, the male star of the site. It lists his favorite drink (Vodka Martini, just like James Bond), and other facts that his fans might find interesting.
-There is an online store, where you can buy the latest DVDs featuring Rocco Siffredi, the Italian stallion (he was born in Italy, but now resides in Hungary).
-Easy login. Just need username and password, which can be saved. No captcha required.
-Can easily switch between sites in the network. Do not have to re-enter your username and password.
-PU discounted price of $14.95/month recurring.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Part of the netFameSolutions network. You get over 20 sites included with membership.
Some of the bonus sites are small, niche sites.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
But there are at least 5 major sites with a lot of good content. By good, I mean OK DVD quality videos, that are much lower in quality than videos at X-Art or 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn.
-Good download speeds. I regularly get about 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Can search for a model across all their sites. But the search will return the sites that the model's name appears at, whether that name represents a single model, or different models using that same name.
-The videos and photosets have the date they were posted to the site.
-Get a wide range of videos Rocco Siffredi has appeared in during his career, which spans more than 20 years. You don't get all of his work, but this guy has been in more than 450 porn films.
-Site updates with 1, 2, or 3 videos per week, along with matching photosets.
==================
CONS
-Many times they don't list some or all of the models in a video.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-Many models don't have a thumbnail to show what they look like.
-For many videos, only choice is 240p or 480p. Some videos have a 720p or 1080p option.
-The video lighting and colors and camera work are just OK, but far below what you can get at sites like X-Art.
-The prices for videos at the online store, whether you purchase the DVD, or download to own, are expensive: DVDs cost about $60; a download of the DVD is about $50 (you own the file for your own personal playback).
A much cheaper alternative would be to join a pay site, and download the DVDs at that site.
-Watermark at bottom right corner of videos is large and very visible.
-They appear to rotate content. I've been a member at this site several times before, and there are videos that I used to see here that are no longer posted. They were Rocco videos, so there shouldn't have been any problem with the ownership. I guess they just drop some videos over time. I wish they wouldn't.
-They have a photoset accompanying each video. But the photos in many of the sets are screencaps.
=========================
BOTTOM LINE
Site Stats:
Movies: 1373
DVDs: 266
Pornstars: 1318
Pictures: 8214
HD movies: 413 (out of 1373 total movies)
Videos can be downloaded in 240p and 480p. Choice of MP4 or WMV download. Most videos do not have a higher definition download choice available. Some videos have a 720p and 1080p choice for download.
They have a photoset accompanying each video. But many of the sets are screencaps. I see little value in most photos, because they are not posed or framed by a professional photographer, not lighted by a professional photographer, the colors (skin tones, background sets) are ok to tell what is happening, but nothing to appreciate or respond to in an erotic way.
Some photosets at Rocco Siffredi are better than screen caps. An actual photographer took the photos. The photos are framed, they have good lighting, good colors, etc. They aren't the high quality you would find at a photo site like Met-Art or MPL Studios, but they are definitely better than screencaps. If you are a fan of Rocco
Siffredi, these photosets could have value for you as an addition to the video of the same shoot.
But again, I think the photosets based on videos posted at sites like X-Art, 18 Only Girls, or Young Legal Porn have higher quality, actual eroticism, much greater appeal, than any of the photos posted at Rocco Siffredi. The photosets posted at the other sites could be collected. But only a fan would appreciate or collect even the better photos posted at Rocco Siffredi.
There are tranny/she-male videos at Rocco Siffredi.I don't remember seeing them before at this site.
The WMV file is 30%+ or more larger than the MP4 version of the same video. I can't tell if the increased size gives a better definition or increased clarity. Both versions are supposed to be the same definition. So download the MP4 version, because it takes less space.
As I already mentioned, the videos are just OK in quality. These are taken from DVDs. The lighting and colors and camera work are OK, but far below what you can get at sites like the 18 Only Girls or Young Legal Porn or X-Art. You look at videos from 18 Only Girls from the last few years, and even the 480p videos just look so much better (better camera work, better focus, better lighting, better colors, etc.) than the videos at Rocco Siffredi.
Maybe some of the sloppiness is deliberate: maybe they are trying to create an effect that you are viewing scenes that are unscripted. But I much prefer videos that show they are professionally shot, that look sharp and well-lit with good to excellent skin tones.
Each of those sites contain a massive number of videos. A large portion of those videos are hot. The videos are OK in quality, but below what you will find at sites like X-Art. The videos are more like the quality you will find at Teen Mega World. Except that at Teen Mega World, I believe that camera work (focus, lighting, steadiness of camera, framing, skin tones, etc.) is actually slightly better than the videos at Rocco Siffredi.
In addition to the massive number of videos in many different categories you find at the 5 main sites, you also get access to a large number of videos in niche categories at other sites: including: lesbian, creampie, tranny, hairy, etc.
I'm giving the site a score of 80, because of the massive amount of video content and the wide range of categories you get access to. If they improved the video quality, improved the search to make the site easier to use, and put nice-sized thumbnails of all the models so you know what the models look like, and listed the
models in all their videos so you can tell what models appear in what videos, and did a few other upgrades to make the site easier to use, then the score would improve.
My guess would be that the girls can come and go very fast in these shoots. While the guys might be more of a regular thing. There are far less guys used than girls. So the girls are more disposable, in that sense. So it's easier to keep track of the guys, since there are less of them. I mean, the main guy is Rocco himself, who's used time and time again. Then you get a few other guys who Rocco chooses.
So it's just easier to find the guys' names than the girls. Trying to track the girls you might like from one clip to the next, if you don't know what the girl is named, is annoying.
I don't know who would want to track the appearance of a guy. Except there must be fans of Rocco himself, who look for clips featuring Rocco.
I look for the girls. And I agree (with your implied statement) that when you don't know what the girl is named, it can be frustrating looking for her video appearances.
There's supposed to be software to block spam. But if we could come up with better software that really works to block at least some of this spam, we should make a fortune.
I also get a lot of random spam emails for sex, medications, whatever. Most of that goes into my spam box, but some of it gets into my regular email box. The amount of spam I've been getting recently has increased significantly.
And I'm too lazy to get a new email address, because then I would have to change my email for all the accounts that I really want to get mail and notices from.
Edit01: I did open two email addresses, that I was hoping would get the bulk of my spam. But my regular email address has been put on the list for spammers. And they also use my email address as a "fake" email address of origin when they send out spam, because I sometimes get notices that some messages (that are spam) were not able to be delivered, or that I have gone over the limit of the amount of email I can send. And I did not, obviously, send those spam messages, and I send out very few emails in any one day.
Thanks for the positive vote, TheSquirrel. But my reviews are really far below the outstanding reviews of someone like Toadsith. That guy has the technical knowledge, clear thinking, organization and way with words to write reviews that are informative and a pleasure to read.
There is definitely a hard-pro tone to most of the videos here. A few of the girls appear new to porn, but that is the exception. And even the new girls, if you see them in a second or third video clip, are fast turning into pros.
Personal taste varies widely. I don't know what you like. There were a few videos I found a year ago that I thought were very interesting and colorful, but I can't find them this time. Which is disappointing.
For $10 you get a 1-month membership to 22 different sites. (I don't know what the rate is for Europe). That is a very low price for around 5 sites that are solid hard-core video sites, with the other sites being niche sites (tranny, Indian [the country], etc.).
But it all depends on what turns you on.
There are sites out there that are worth the money. You just have to keep searching, and keep up the strength. Life, and porn, is what you make of it. :)
If you are a serious collector and you want all of the Rocco DVDs, you won't find them here. The guy has been in the business a huge number of years, and his output is tremendous. What you do get is a large number of scenes from his older work, and an even larger number of scenes from his more recent work (recent going back 10 years or more). You also get scenes/vid clips where he does not appear, but he is in a large number of the clips. As I said, he is the star of the site, and he takes a lot of pride in his porn star status.
I do agree with you that the price is very reasonable, because you get access to a large number of sites in the network. There are maybe 5 sites that are the main value, and a bunch of niche sites that might have some content that you might like, or find interesting, or a waste of time. Personal preferences vary widely. :)
For $10 for a 1-month membership, I definitely think the site/network is worth checking out.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Large amount of content.
-Wide variety of content of sexual activity.
-Current Site Stats (2010-09-14):
Movies : 998
DVDs : 212
Actors : 1019
Hours : 440
Total Size : 398 Gb
-Site is currently updating. Updates 1 video clip every 1-4 days (very irregular update schedule).
-No DRM.
-No site timeout.
-No watermark on older style videos.
Cons:
-Navigation is basic and awkward.
-To log on to the network, you have to enter through the site you joined
through. You can't log on directly to any of the sister sites you have access to. Once you log on to the site you joined, only then can you enter
one of the sister sites you have access to.
-Moving around a single site is basic and awkward. To search for files at the site, or to look through the files available, have to look at lists from drop-down menus, or have to click many times to change from different pages. There is a lot of material at this site, and it's cumbersome to try to glance through the different video and photoset files.
-Need a fast ISP connection to play the streaming videos, otherwise the streams will frequently stutter and stop.
-A few good-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like in each video would be very helpful.
-A simple listing of the models appearing in each video would be helpful. Many models in videos are not named.
Bottom Line:
Viewing options:
Download options: high and low resolution.
Streaming options: high and low quality.
Other options: trailer or screen capture.
Frame width by height: 720x480
Total bitrate: 2128 kbps
Quality of the video depends on whether the video is the high quality or the low quality option. Also depends on how long ago the video was shot.
The more recent videos are higher quality.
High quality streaming is not high quality. It is higher quality than the low quality, but it is nowhere near what some sites have as high quality.
These are professionally shot videos, but the overall quality could be much better in many ways.
One example: I am watching a scene where Rocco and a second man are both on a woman. In parts of the scene, you are seeing the action through a large block of clear plastic or glass. You want to see what's happening, without having a block of plastic obscuring the action. Remove the plastic, or shoot from a different angle. This is not the camera-man trying to be artistic, it's just the camera-man being lazy or stupid and
not bothering to shoot from an angle that clearly shows the action.
Site content:
You have a lot of vintage porn (101 videos) and even more straight recent
porn (892 videos). The vintage porn tries to add a little story-line to the sex, maybe even have some costumes. It's basically sex, with a little
story that is a negligible attempt to add some flavor or meaning to the sex.
The more recent porn also has a tiny story-line, but it's really just straight sex. The actors follow a script that is mainly fucking and
sucking, with little conversation (the female models probably don't understand much English, and English is what appears to be used to
communicate in the videos). Minor roughness and humiliation to the sex, but not a lot of hard-core roughness or hard-core humiliation. Most scenes are group-type sex, where you have 3 or more people fucking. Cunnilingus, bj, vaginal and anal sex in almost all scenes. No homo-erotic action of boy+boy. You do get boy+girl, 2 boys+girl, 2 girls+boy, or more than 3 people). Some girl+girl action in some of the scenes, but the main emphasis is on the boy+girl action.
I was a member of this site a year ago. At that time I found some videos that I thought were really good. But I can't find those videos now. If the videos are still at the site, I can't find them because of the poor navigation.
There is a large amount of video content, and the videos are split into series where the type of sexual action is changed from one series to
another. The models are mainly Eastern European females. Rocco Siffredi is the star of the site, he's featured in most videos, and he can become annoying at times with his heavily accented English and overly boyish charm.
The quality of the videos is OK to good, not great. The large amount of content, and the wide variety of content means there is plenty of material to search through.
Thanks, Lionheart. There are people like Drooler and Toadsith who write excellent reviews. I've got a long way to improve before I get to be anywhere close to them as writers.
Thanks. I don't have a lot of experience in porn videos. This was the first time I saw Rocco Siffredi, that I know of. Some of his videos are really interesting and good quality. Of course, you watch a lot of them, especially some of his series, they do get a little repetitive. But there are some videos at his site that I thought were extremely good, better than anything I've seen elsewhere.
If you ever join this network, which has 19 different sites, this site is definitely worth looking over. It's just a question of how much time you want to spend going thru the different videos to find what you think is worthwhile.
But there are several sites in the network that I thought had some really worthwhile videos: peternorth.com
devilsfilm
silverstoneDVD
roccosiffredi
PU/TBP has a special price of $14.95/month for the network. But if you're lucky, you might find an even cheaper offer somewhere.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM
-No download limits
-Advertises exclusive blue ray quality high definition content
-Rocco Siffredi vintage movies are included
-Online store will sell exclusive clothes so you can dress the way Rocco Siffredi dresses (same T-shirts and caps. But this appears to be a product in the planning stage)
-At the Rocco Siffredi online store, you can buy DVDs featuring Rocco, sex toys, herbs for men and women, lingerie for women.
-Movie options:
--Streaming in low and high quality;
--Download in low and high quality.
--Also have screenshots and a trailer to illustrate the clip.
Site stats:
-Movies: 680
-DVDs: 156
-Actors: 788
-Hours: 339
Cons:
PROS (continued):
Site stats (continued):
-Total size: 307 GB
Sample stats from some of the high-definition videos:
length: 8-35 minutes
bit rate: 2147-2212 kbps
dimensions 720x400-720x480
-I would have thought the bit rate and dimensions would be much higher, because of the statement that there was blue ray quality high definition content. However, I did think the visual quality was very good on some videos
CONS:
-Watermark larger than needed, lower right corner
-Large file size of high quality video. A single file can be 500 MB or more, but this is
great video, and if you have to buy another hard drive to store these files, it's worth the money. -Because these are large files, need fast internet connection to watch high-definition streaming or to download.
-Files download as WMV format only.
-Sometimes the videos are slightly out of focus.
Bottom Line:
BOTTOM LINE:
High quality videos of some lovely, yummy models. A real treat. I'm sorry I didn't find this site in the network earlier. This is the best site in the network of 19 sites.
First video I saw at this site, the girl was really cute, the action seemed real, not acted. Video looks high definition, very good lighting, very good colors, model did not speak or understand English that well, especially with Rocco Siffredi's strong accent, but she was a love, not a porn star. It was like looking at a gorgeous high-quality met-art picture come to life, hard-core action, but not dirty, even though what the girl was doing was pure hard-core. This is the best quality hard-core video site I've seen so far, with ok to nice-looking to very attractive models, good acting, few or no fake-sounding moans and groans by the model, often no music soundtrack (which is a real plus, considering the noisy music soundtracks on porno clips).
Quality of videos varies a lot. Some videos are just ok, some are really nice to great (I'm talking about how much I like the videos, which is a subjective reaction, but there are videos here that deserve to be classics).
Some PU members rave about the great quality of the Femjoy photoshoots and videos. That is softcore. This is great quality hardcore video. Rocco could be less intrusive, but you get to watch lovely women having a sexual experience.
Some videos are erotic/artistic. This is hardcore, but with real value that is more than
just crude or dirty sex. There are good-to-very-good looking models, good-to-great quality
video, some interesting storylines/concepts for the sex.
This site deserves a 90 for itself alone, and you get a lot of additional nice material from the other sites on this network. This site is really outstanding, and I don't understand why other PU members haven't been singing its praises. I think Met-art is the best softcore site I've seen for teen glamor photos, and this is the best hardcore site I've seen so far for quality videos.
Thanks, Denner, rearadmiral, my review was honest, but maybe some PU members will enjoy the videos at this site. My tastes are far softer than many PU members, even though I do find some hardcore that I enjoy. I like many Pierre Woodman videos, even though I think he is sometimes abusive to the girls. And I still don't understand how he is able to get them to do what they do, and even apparently enjoy his rough treatment.
But this site was a waste for me.
In spite of that, if you get a membership to this network, and this site happens to be included, you should check it out for yourselves. Because there are some models here who are actually porn stars. So you might easily enjoy the videos more than I do. Or want to view them out of curiosity because of the model in the video.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No site timeout.
-No DRM.
-Exclusive videos.
-Can watch videos in streaming: low, high, high definition quality.
-Can download videos in WMV format in low or high quality.
-The videos are professionally shot: good focus, good lighting.
-The model's name in each video is listed, with a nice sized thumbnail that shows what the model looks like. That is a really nice, simple
feature that more porn sites should have.
-The videos are dated
-There is a page where the models at the site are shown with their name and a nice-size thumbnail of the model. It would be better if the models were shown in alphabetical order, but the simple page layout is really helpful if you are searching through thumbnails of the models, because you can easily get a nice idea of what each model looks like.
-There is also a very basic search where you can enter a model's name, and it will return a list of the different sites at the network the model is featured.
Cons:
-The site uses the same stupid program for displaying photos that is used at other sites in the network. The program will load a thumbnail picture slowly, then it's hard to get an enlarged image of the thumbnail. I try and try, then usually give up trying to see the enlarged photo. And the next photo in the series is also a slow-loading thumbnail.
-The photos are clear and crisp, but the models are not to my taste.
-TBP reports 55 photo shoots. But I could only find 12 photosets at the site (when I look at the page for "pictures"). How to get to the other
photosets is unclear.
-Each photoset is around 25 photos.
-No zip file for the photoset. But who wants to keep these photos anyway?
-Search is very basic. Can search by model's name, but not by description of model, type of sexual activity, or any other factor.
Bottom Line:
I always wanted to be a rock star. I can't play a musical instrument, or sing, but rock stars get the chicks. And now you can get the chicks as well. Just join the rockstarpornstar site and you can dream you are a massively tattooed male rockstar who gets to bang away on pornstars when
he is not banging away on the stage with his favorite instrument.
The female models at this site are past the teeny stage, but if you close your eyes, and listen to the moans and groans, you can reach rocker's
fantasy heaven. The only male model here is one guy, who is playing a rock star, who bangs a bunch of female models. The guy is heavily tattooed.
From the site stats, you can see this is a small site, when the total size is 18 GB. I assume that all the regular PU members here have a personal
porn collection that is many times that size. Most PU members could download the entire site contents in 1-2 days. I personally did not find
anything at this site that was worth keeping. Or even worth viewing, for that matter. But personal tastes vary, so maybe someone might find a
worthwhile video here.
The fake moans and screams from the female models are way overdone and totally unbelievable. The girls act as if the guy is using an electric prod instead of a normal penis. The guy is mildly rough, likes to slap the girl's face and ass, gag her with his penis. The guy is acting like a
really masterful, take-charge sexual stud putting these bitches through the paces. Except that it's phony as hell. Pierre Woodman can give a great
sexual performance with his models, but this guy is just a waste of time to watch.
I do like, quite a lot, the nice-sized, very clear thumbnails with the model's name, for each video/photoset. This gives you an easy way to
search through the videos and photosets you might want to look at more closely. This is a very simple and basic structure, and I wish more porn
sites used it. Because at many porn sites, it's hard to get an idea of what the models look like until you watch the video or look through each
photoset, which can be very time-consuming and a lot of work.
You get access to this site through the netFameSolutions network, which has some nice sites. This site is not one of them.
slutty, the reason I gave the site an extra-low score was because I could not see a lot of the material. I need to download the video file before I can view it. And after downloading a couple of video files, I was not able to download any complete files because the download would stop after downloading about 1 GB (the file would be incomplete). And you can't play a partial file, you need the entire file to unzip it to get a playable file. So my experience with this site was very frustrating.
Obviously, if you did not encounter the problems I did (made worse by my slow DSL download speed of 150 KB/s), then you would score the site higher than I did.
But like I mentioned elsewhere, a site score can depend a lot on the personal experience you (or I) have with that site.
I would be interested in reading your review of this site, or any of the other sites in this network. That would also give PU members further information on the sites, that could be helpful.
There are definitely some good-looking models at this network.
Thanks for the support, Denner. I wanted to download a few videos from the site to see what they were like. But as I said in this review, I can't currently download a complete video file. And a partial file is not playable. That is why I gave the site an extra-low score.
There are other sites in the network that are much better.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Zip file for each photoset.
-Video download formats:
WMV: high, medium, low quality
MPEG
Quicktime
High quality WMV is 1440x810 (6256kbps)
-Updates once a week video/photoset
-Video runtime : 20 minutes to 60 minutes
-Easy login.
-No DRM.
-Very fast response to an email from tech support. But the response was not helpful.
Cons:
-Only 1 size for the photos.
-Photos are a visual record of the video shoot, not an original shoot.
-No streaming option to view the videos.
-Some video files download with no estimate of file size or download time.
-The videos are overly long. A single sex scene should last from 10-20 minutes. There are many sex scenes that last 40-60 minutes, and the action gets boring and repetitious.
-It's strange the female model's face and body are not displayed clearly in the photoshoots.
I want to know what the model looks like, and the screenshots do a lousy job of that.
-Site navigation is poor.
-Search is poor.
-There is no simple listing of the models.
-Videos are large files. The high quality video file can be 1 - 2.3 GB or larger, for a video that runs 20 minutes to 60 minutes.
-Volume on some videos is too low.
-Download problems: on my last 2 video downloads, the download stops after downloading about 1 GB, and won't resume. Currently can't download any videos from this site.
Bottom Line:
This is a site for mild BDSM (Bondage,Discipline, Sado-Masochism).
I do not care for the niche.
But even if I did like the niche, I believe the site is not very good.
You can't get a good idea of what
the models look like until you play the video. The photosets should give an excellent idea of what the model looks like, but they mostly don't.
Instead of giving clear photos of the face and body of the model, the photos focus on the "action", the girl being tied or abused or whatever, but you can't see her face or body very clearly in most photos. It's just lousy photography. And in many cases, you are not able to tell the model in 2 different videos is the same girl, because you don't get a clear idea of her face and body.
The videos are too long. A single sex scene can last 20-60 minutes. Beyond 20 minutes, I think people tend to lose interest, find the action boring, repetitive, dull. This is
not a movie with a plot, where you have brief sex scenes along the way. Instead, it's a single sex scene that loses it's impact after you watch
the scene for 10 or 20 minutes.
This is basically dull spanking porn.
My fantasy, to improve the videos, would be to have some guy in a leather costume and mask, come into the scene, and bash the male model who is
doing the spanking, with a metal baseball bat. The girl could jump up and down, screaming, "My hero, my lord", until the spanker is unconscious or dead. Then the girl could give her hero a bj or whatever to finish the scene.
This would serve to add color to the scene (the red blood), plus serve as a break in the dull sex scene, and lead to renewed interest in the next
sex scene (the bj or whatever), and remove the idiot doing the spanking.
I don't usually appreciate watching this type of female abuse, even if it's supposed to be consensual.
On a more realistic note, I have seen a few BDSM scenes that were colorful or interesting or erotic. But not at this site. These vids are just boring and overly long.
The scenes can be 1 boy-1 girl, 2 boys-1 girl, 2 boys-2 girls, 1 boy-2 girls, 2-girls. Most common scene is 1 boy-1 girl and 2 boys-2 girls.
This is a site with a small amount of content. Site just started around middle of 2010. You probably have less than 40 videos, plus 40 photosets. With that small amount of content, you would think the navigation would be extremely simple. But searching through the content is difficult. Trying to look through each video or associated photoshoot is difficult.
The site design is clumsy. Sometimes you can't easily find the photoshoot or video that is supposed to be the mate of a video/photoshoot.
I give the site a score of 60, because of the poor site design, poor navigation, boring videos, stupidity in making the video runtime too long,
and other problems.
This site is a waste of time. And very frustrating. And irritating.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I'M WRITING IN CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO WRITE AND EDIT. I'M NOT TRYING TO SHOUT OR BE RUDE.
PROS
-PU DISCOUNT OF $17.87/MONTH (RECURRING)
-CAN CHOOSE YOUR OWN USERNAME AND PASSWORD.
-EPOCH IS THE PRIMARY BILLER. A TRUSTED NAME.
-YOU CAN CHOOSE TO EITHER STREAM OR DOWNLOAD THE VIDEOS AND PHOTOSETS.
-YOU HAVE A CHOICE OF STREAMING OF LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, OR HD(720P) DEFINITION.
-YOU HAVE A CHOICE OF DOWNLOAD OF LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, HD(720P), HD(1080P) DEFINITION.
-MOST OF THE MODELS ARE VERY ATTRACTIVE. SOME OF THE VIDEOS CAN BE HOT.
Cons:
-THE USERNAME AND PASSWORD YOU CHOOSE ARE TRANSMITTED ON A NON-SECURE PAGE WHEN JOINING.
-SITE LOGIN PAGE AND MEMBER PAGES ARE NON-SECURE. THAT MEANS THAT YOUR ISP WILL HAVE A RECORD OF YOUR SITE VISITS, WHICH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT CAN ACCESS.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE ON JOIN PAGE.
-SLOW UPDATE RATE. 4 VIDEOS IN LAST 12 MONTHS.
-CONTENT IS NON-EXCLUSIVE. IF YOU'VE BEEN A MEMBER OF TEEN MEGA WORLD OR THE DIESEL NETWORK, YOU'VE PROBABLY SEEN MOST OF THE VIDEOS AT RUB A TEEN BEFORE.
-SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED TERRIBLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS WITH THIS NETWORK.
-THE MODELS ARE EASTERN EUROPEAN. THE LANGUAGE SPOKEN IS PROBABLY RUSSIAN. NO SUBTITLES. BUT WHAT THE MODELS SAY WOULDN'T MEAN MUCH ANYWAY: THE MASSAGE AND SEX IS WHAT COUNTS.
-DEAD LINKS:
WHEN YOU ARE INSIDE THE MEMBER'S AREA:
IF YOU CLICK ON THE FAQ'S HOT LINK, IT BRINGS UP: ERROR 404: PAGE NOT FOUND.
TERMS HOT LINK, BRINGS UP: ERROR 404: PAGE NOT FOUND.
HELP HOT LINK, BRINGS UP: ERROR 404: PAGE NOT FOUND
Bottom Line:
IF YOU HAVEN'T BEEN A MEMBER OF TEEN MEGA WORLD OR THE DIESEL ACCESS NETWORK, THESE MASSAGE VIDEOS WILL PROBABLY BE NEW TO YOU. THE GIRLS ARE ATTRACTIVE. SOME OF THE VIDEOS CAN BE HOT. RUB A TEEN CURRENTLY HAS 102 VIDEOS (AND MATCHING PHOTOSETS).
THE UPDATE RATE IS VERY SLOW: 4 NEW VIDEOS WERE ADDED OVER THE LAST 12 MONTHS.
HOWEVER, TO OFFSET THE SLOW UPDATE RATE, MEMBERSHIP IN RUB A TEEN INCLUDES ACCESS TO MOST OF THE TEAM SKEET SITES: THE NETWORK UPDATES WITH ONE NEW VIDEO DAILY.
THE TEAM SKEET NETWORK IS HIGHLY RATED BY SOME PU MEMBERS.
HOWEVER, AS I MENTIONED, SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE EXPERIENCED TERRIBLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AND NAVIGATION ISSUES. SO THOSE MEMBERS WOULD ADVISE AVOIDING A TEAM SKEET MEMBERSHIP (FOR ANY OF ITS SITES).
I HAVE NO IDEA WHY SOME MEMBERS GET ACCEPTABLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS FROM THE SITE, AND OTHER MEMBERS GET HORRIBLE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS. I WOULD NOT JOIN A SITE/NETWORK THAT SO MANY PU MEMBERS HAVE REPORTED PROBLEMS WITH. BUT THE PROBLEMS SEEM HIT OR MISS, AND THE CONTENTS OF MANY OF THE SITES DO APPEAL TO SOME PU MEMBERS.
YESTERDAY, I TESTED THE DOWNLOAD SPEEDS AT RUB A TEEN.
THE FIRST 4 VIDEOS I TRIED TO DOWNLOAD, THE DOWNLOADS FAILED.
A COUPLE OF HOURS LATER, I TRIED AGAIN.
I GOT 5 MB/s to 10 MB/s DOWNLOAD SPEEDS (THE FASTEST DOWNLOAD SPEEDS I'VE EVER GOTTEN FROM A PAYSITE), AND THE FILES DOWNLOADED COMPLETELY.
I TRIED AGAIN A FEW HOURS LATER, AND GOT BETWEEN 1 MB/s and 2.5 MB/s. THE DOWNLOADS COMPLETED.
BUT I WAS GETTING POOR NAVIGATION SPEEDS, TRYING TO SWITCH BETWEEN SITE PAGES, FOR ALL MY TRIALS.
THERE ARE CURRENTLY 27 SITES IN THE BASIC TEAM SKEET NETWORK YOU HAVE ACCESS TO WITH A MEMBERSHIP IN ANY ONE OF THE BASIC SITES:
THE NAME OF EACH SITE, WITH THE CURRENT NUMBER OF VIDEOS AT THAT SITE, ON 2017-10-21:
(I AM NOT LISTING THE TEAM SKEET SITES THAT REQUIRE AN EXTRA PAYMENT TO ACCESS):
BAD MILFS 21
BRACE FACED 9 CFNM TEENS 30
DYKED 35 EXXXTRA SMALL 193
GINGERPATCH 9 HER FRESHMAN YEAR 20 INNOCENT HIGH 443 LUST HD 95
MY BABYSITTERS CLUB 60 OYE LOCA 225
P.O.V. LIFE 157 RUB A TEEN 102 SELF DESIRE 30
SHE'S NEW 226 SOLO INTERVIEWS 144 STEP SIBLINGS 38 TEAM SKEET EXTRAS 116 TEEN CURVES 69 TEEN PIES 93 TEENS DO PORN 88
TEENS LOVE ANAL 57 TEENS LOVE MONEY 53 TEENY BLACK 81 THE REAL WORKOUT 101 THIS GIRL SUCKS 220 TITTY ATTACK 90
The file name for Tricky Masseur is a generic number: 217.setMP4HD.
The file name for the Rub A Teen video is rubateen_gabi_full_hi_1080hd.
So you need to rename the Tricky Masseur file name.
But the Rub A Teen file name is acceptable. Or you can add the posting date to the file.
Bottom line: If you haven't seen the Tricky Masseur videos, the Rub A Teen Videos are definitely worth watching and keeping.
But if you've been a member of Teen Mega World, you will need to search through the Rub A Teen videos to find the ones you haven't seen before.
Either way, it's worth viewing the videos at Rub A Teen, especially the streaming versions.
And since you also get access to the Team Skeet network, that is a major bonus.
I'm giving Rub A Teen a score of 88. Because of the site contents, and because you get access to the rest of the Team
Skeet network. If they increased the update rate of Rub A Teen, that would increase the site value.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU/TBP shows a discount $14.95/month (recurring) for Rub A Teen. When you hit the site page at PU or TBP, you go to the Rub A Teen site. Then hit the join page link. And the price shown is $17.87/month (recurring).
-CCBILL or Epoch is the payment processor. Both are trusted names, with excellent service for customers.
-You get a confirming email with your site subscription details from the payment processor on signup. This is a nice feature, that some sites no longer follow.
-No download limits. There was some confusion when the site started, because the TOS (Terms of Service) stated a daily 500MB limit. But the webmaster posted at PU that there were no download limits.
-Excellent download speeds. I get over 5+ MB/sec download speeds, which is my maximum limit.
-Choice of definitions for video download: 1080p, 720p, and lower definitions.
-The videos are outstanding, in terms of professionally shot videos, lighting, colors, camera-work, framing.
Cons:
-The site (and TBP) states the content is 100% exclusive. This is not correct. Many of the videos at Rub A Teen are also found at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network).
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Erratic update schedule. You might get 1 update to the site in a month, or in 2 months. To balance this, you get 7 updates a week to the Team Skeet network.
-Overlarge logo on photos.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: masseur gives a rubdown to attractive girl, who is so turned on by the massage that they end up fucking.
Site stats:
Videos: 95 videos (as of 2016-07-07).
Photosets: 95 (1 matching photoset for each video)
Most of the videos are of a boy massaging a girl and then fucking her. However, there are a few videos where it's two girls, one massaging the other girl and then having lesbian sex. Or where the girl is massaging a boy (and then having sex).
Or where two boys are massaging a girl and then having sex. Or where two girls are massaging a boy and then the three having sex.
I last reviewed this site on 2012-12-02. I gave it a score of 73.
The main reason I gave it a low score was because almost every video at Rub A Teen was a duplicate of a video at Tricky Masseur (part of the Teen Mega World network).
What has changed since then?
The most obvious change is the site is bigger. It has grown from 20 videos to 95 videos.
This is both good and bad. You currently get about 1 new video at the site every two months. Since the videos are excellent quality, I wish the update rate was faster. But the Team Skeet network has about 24 sites, it only makes financial sense to spread the new videos around to the different sites. Especially to the newest sites, which are obviously the smallest in content.
So, instead of viewing the Rub A Teen site as a simple consumer, but with an understanding of the business aspect as well,
what are you getting from a membership in the site?
As a member of Rub A Teen site, you get access to all the sites in the Team Skeet network. Which is a major selling point.
The Rub A Teen Site gives you high quality videos of young teens in massage who are getting fucked.
The video quality is excellent.
You get a choice of video definitions of 1080p and lower.
The lighting is excellent. The focus is excellent. The camera-work is professional. The models are attractive young teens.
Most of the sex scenes are hot and erotic.
I've said that many of the massage videos at Rub A Teen are found at Tricky Masseur.
The streaming quality of the videos at Rub A Teen is slightly better than the streaming quality at Tricky Masseur.
The images are more vivid, with better colors, better lighting. I don't mean the quality at Tricky Masseur is poor: it's good quality. But the quality at Rub A Teen is excellent. You get clear, crisp images with good colors and good lighting.
However, when you compare the video quality of the download file for the videos, the difference narrows.
The download version of the same video at 1080p. Mp4 file format.
The download file version of the video from the two sites is not as noticeably different as the streaming version. The Team Skeet version is only slightly better. If you were not comparing the two videos side by side, you probably would not
be aware of the difference between them.
Both download files, from Teen Mega World and Team Skeet, are good to excellent.
But if you study the two videos, the Team Skeet is slightly better.
But I don't know how much value that has.
If you are a member of Team Skeet, then download all the Rub A Teen videos, keep the ones you select, and dump any duplicate files from Tricky Masseur.
Except you have to check the names of the girls in the videos, because the names change from one site to the other.
I am comparing the video titled "Rub Me Right There", with the model named Gabi, posted 2014-11-17 to Rub A Teen.
I am comparing it to the video with the same model named Izi, posted to Tricky Masseur on 2014-10-26.
The Tricky Masseur video has no title.
The two videos are the same, except Team Skeet has added a short intro advertising Team Skeet (and the logo shown on the video changes from Teen Mega World or Team Skeet).
The Tricky Masseur video:
Video
Frame Width: 1920
Frame Height: 1080
Data Rate: 8030 kbps
Total Bitrate: 8183 kbps
Frame Rate: 25 frames/second
PU/TBP shows a discount $14.95/month (recurring) for Rub A Teen. When you hit the site page link at PU or TBP, you go to the Rub A Teen site. Then hit the join page link. And the price shown is $17.87/month (recurring).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
