I like the review of Old Spunkers. Clean, easy to understand, lots of details.
What I don't understand is the score. I have a hard time figuring out how to score a site. I've only done 3 site reviews. 2 of the sites I scored at 75, and I like the sites, think they are worthwhile joining, even if you only join for a month to download whatever files you want to keep (Domai and Glamdeluxe).
One site I scored 97, because its got massive content, lots of great models, lots of quality photosets, and a low annual price of $99 (Metart). That's the best value I've seen for softcore teen.
But you give a score of 68 to a junk site.
What counts is the overall impression of the site, which you make clear. But I wonder how useful these scores are, even as a general guide. People really need to read the complete review of a site, and not just look at the score as a major factor.
I wish I had a more objective way of scoring a site, because I don't think a score means very much.
On the other hand, I'm also glad we can score any way we want, because I wouldn't like to be bound by some formula that Pornusers developed for scoring.
(I'm putting this in a separate reply, because I passed the time limit for editing my first reply.)
I looked at the reply of the webmaster you mentioned in a previous comment. The webmaster is supposed to be from IL. But I still wonder if English is his primary language. The English he uses in his reply is OK, but would not pass in an English class in high school. But that's common in today's internet usage.
He states there is no leased content. But if you downloaded many of these videos from another site, and some PU members mention some of these videos are at other sites, I would assume those videos were legally at the other sites. So the content at this site is definitely not entirely exclusive.
Regarding all the videos have the site logo: I assume it's fairly easy for a site to put its logo on a video or set of photos. That doesn't mean much beyond implying that the video or photos are part of their content or inventory. But that content could also be at other sites as well, with a different logo.
A lot of site webmasters do not have English as their primary language. So when you say the webmaster states the content is exclusively theirs, he might not be understanding clearly what you were asking. That's just a thought.
What logo do the videos you downloaded previously, that are also at this site, have? Do they have this site's logo? A different logo? Or no logo?
There are different types of leases, with different rights to that content. I'm not in the porn business, but I would assume that some leases might give the holder exclusive right to that content for a specified period of time.
Or someone could buy the content outright. Which would give them exclusive rights.
But what the facts are in this specific case, you would need a clear dialog with the webmaster/site owner. And like I said, some of these gentlemen have only a rudimentary understanding of English.
Nice review, covers what seems to be the main points.
Two main strikes against the site for me:
1. Site seems very expensive at around $38/month.
2. I'm not into young-old fetish.
There are other cons you noted, but the high price alone is a deal-breaker for me. Unless there was a lot of really excellent content that was easily accessible, I can't see paying that much money. There are plenty of good sites that cost far less.
You didn't mention bonus sites. With a membership, is this the main or only site? Or do you get access to a bunch of other sites as well?
I know I'm spoiled, but paying $20/month for Met-art, which is a mega-site, makes paying for a smaller site seem very expensive. I like some video network sites, but paying for a limited 1-site membership, unless that site is exceptional, is a poor use of my porn dollars.
Maybe that's part of the tease (when they post a set as nude and it isn't).
More to the point: tease is strongly related to frustration or denial. You want something (nudity, a slow striptease, eroticism, sexuality) and it's slowly revealed or unleashed. Too much too soon and you lose the oomph, the longing, the desire, the slow, languishing buildup.
Tease can be a delight. But I also like to see the whole package (the nudity, or the sex, or whatever the payoff is).
What percentage complete nudity (including photos with lingerie that shows all the good bits) is there in the photoshoots? A wild guess is fine by me.
What is the name of your "real sexy model with tons of picture sets and videos"? Or is she part of your private stash?
Also, why would a recently posted video (August 2010) be of such low quality? Is this a file they dug up from their unused historical trash? Most sites that post updates use files that are their average quality or above average quality. Why would a site post a below average quality file, unless it had some historical or collector interest?
Wild guesses on my part, because I have no knowledge of this site, except for its name. :)
But unless there is a significant amount of nudity, I doubt I would be interested in joining. I like softcore, but I still want to see the "good" bits. (Bits is a British term, you understand. LOL.)
Edit01: I just looked up "bits". I want to see everything interesting, not just the cunny.
There's a lot I don't understand, but what's the sense for blocking a single porn site for users with Czech IP addresses? Is there a Czech crackdown on porn, and the Czech government or the porn provider is placing the block for legal reasons? I've read that some countries make porn illegal. So is that part of the reason the Czech IP addresses are being blocked?
That's what I gave for my answer to a recent poll question on whether a girl with two guys could be considered a gang-bang. My answer was sure, why not? If there can be an Army of one (a recent motto for the US Army), there could be a gangbang of one. But where the girl fits is not always clear. Lol.
Sometimes you have to move with the times, even if it doesn't make sense at first. I'm still trying to accept the bald pussy look. I grew up with the idea that a female's pubic hair was erotic, and the bald look doesn't impress me much.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-$14.95 for first month, with PU discount.
-Secure login-https. Keeps your login details safe from hacking.
-Secure member pages-https. Keeps your internet activity shielded slightly from your ISP.
-Same login details (username and password) works for each site you have access to.
-Membership in any one of the Fame Digital network sites gives you access to over 20 sites.
(This is the Devils Film network, which is separate from the Evil Angel network-although they are both part of Fame Digital or Gamma Entertainment).
-Live chat support is 24\7. Fast to respond, with knowledgeable staff. When I first joined, I could not log in. Live chat quickly solved the problem: The login details from a previous membership were interferring with my current login details, and the login page did not show this clearly. Support suggested clearing cache and cookies, and that solved the problem.
-Each video has a trailer, to give you quick-view of the video.
PROS CONTINUE IN THE NEXT SECTION:
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-The site and network have choices for streaming and/or downloading.
The streaming choices are: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
The download choices are the same: 160p, 240p, 360p, 480p, 540p, 720p, 1080p.
When I watch a video on a 27" monitor, at 540p, the quality of the video is surprisingly good: the video has excellent lighting, professional focus, good sound control.
There is no need to go to a higher definition for streaming or downloading.
Maybe on a larger monitor there might be a difference: but 540p is a fine choice for downloading or streaming on a 27" monitor (or smaller).
CONS(START OF):
-A site/network update in 2014 made navigation harder. They changed the drop-down menu for switching between sites.
-The site/network update also changed the structure of the network: You now enter a gateway site, which gives you partial access to the different sites. But instead of entering any one site completely, you are held at the gateway site.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
The logic for the gateway system, I believe, it that it makes it easier to manage and update the gateway, instead of having to update each of the 20 plus sites separately.
But the gateway system makes exploring each separate site harder.
-The search function could be improved: If you search for a model's name, it returns any matches that contain either the first part of the model's name, or the last part of the model's name. So you have to filter the search results.
However, the search covers the entire network, instead of a single, specific site you are logged in to: which makes it easier to use, instead of having to do a search for each individual site.
Also, a useful feature on the search results: when you click on the thumbnail of the model's video, you open the video: you don't have to manually transfer to the the specific site the content is listed under: for example, the video, Deep Throat This #13, starring Hannah Harper, a Peter North video, opens in the gateway site: You don't have to transfer to the Peter North pseudo-site, to open or play the video.
--The models are girls in their late teens or early twenties, that are OK to good-looking, with not a lot of tattoos
The main negative is that the models are not actors: the plots are silly or stupid, and the dialogue is worthless: this is just show the girl, have her give a blow job, then fuck the girl. Not a lot of thought or lead-up to the sex, which is plain-vanilla fucking.
BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
The site theme is the popular fake incest, where step family members have sex. Since they are not related by blood, but by marriage or adoption, it's not really incest, but fake incest. This is supposed to add an extra thrill of the forbidden to the sex. But the forbidden element seems tame, to me, since it's not incest, but fake incest. I guess that fake incest has fewer legal issues than a real incest porno (except that in a "real incest porno", the actors would not be related by blood, but only playing they were related by blood).
-This site (Out of the Family) is listed as a clone of the Devils Film site.
I believe this is wrong, and does not represent the site and network structure that is current.
The site (Out of the Family) and Devils Film are part of 20 plus sites that are members of a gateway site, that gives access to the videos and photo sets of what used to be 20 plus sites.
But the sites no longer exist as separate sites: instead, you have a gateway site, that you log in to.
And that gateway, gives you access to the videos and photo sets at each of what used to be 20+ separate sites.
But you can't enter any of the separate sites completely: you remain in the gateway site, which, when you select one of the sites, gives you content pages of the videos and photo sets that are categorized as being in that site.
So Out of the Family is not a clone site: it is, instead, one of the sites you access through the gateway site, where each individual site no longer exists as a separate site on a server, but instead is a software program that allows you access to the videos and photo sets that are categorized as different sites.
That's my interpretation: The videos and photo sets are not linked by the Devils Film site into a clone site, where you have the same videos and photo sets.
Instead, you have a completely different listing of videos and photo sets that fall under the Out of my Family site, which is separate from the listing of videos and photo sets that fall under the Devils Film site.
Access to any one of the top sites would justify the membership price of $14.95 for the first month.
If you are new to porn, or haven't joined this site in years, then, assuming you are a fan of hardcore porn, the membership is more than worth the price.
However, if your tastes are more sophisticated, then you might enjoy the heartcore style of porn offered at competing sites like X-Art, Blacked, Tushy or Vixen: Those sites offer models in their late teens and early twenties who are chosen for their physical beauty: The models are presented to be very attractive, with make-up, costumes, lighting, sets done professionally, and with a small storyline and better acting that makes the video like a well-done love scene, with sex.
The membership price is higher, the content is less, but it is comparing highest quality to middle-grade porn.
I would not consider Out of the Family to be low-grade porn, since the videos and photo sets are quite good in production values, even if the plot is stupid.
Giving the site a score of 85, because the site is a worthwhile join, and the network access makes the value even better.
I just wish they returned to the old network structure, since the navigation was faster and easier, but since it's been several years now, that seems unlikely to happen.
I also get a lot of offers from different sites. But I haven't been a member at this network for a while, and for $5, it's worth a join for me. I mean, $5: It costs me $10 to go to a movie theater, and that's with a senior discount. Lol.
So I don't go to movie theaters very much. I'd rather wait for the DVD to come out (usually in a few months after the theatrical releae), and pay $1+ at Redbox.
But some movies I wait to watch on cable.
The Lone Ranger was so bad, I waited to watch it on cable, and only watched a few minutes of it. Couldn't finish the movie, it was so stupid.
As I get older, I have less patience--and enjoyment.
I rented the last Transformers movie, that just came out with Mark Wahlberg. I only made it halfway through, before I stopped watching. I kept hoping the movie would get better, until I realized I was wasting my time on junk. Junk that made over $1 billion in box office.
I'm really glad I didn't spend $10 to see Transformers in a theater. I would have probably walked out long before the end. Something I've almost never done. But the older I get, the less patience I seem to have.
Check your email for offer to join Out of the Family for $5 for 30 days.
This is part of Devils Film/Fame network, which gives you access to about 28 sites with the membership (Devils Film, Rocco Siffredi, and a lot of other sites).
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Most of the videos I saw had models who appear to be real latin teens or early twenties.
-This site is part of the Team Skeet network. Access to any site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login to site. Once you have logged in, you do not have to re-enter your login information, just click the "members" link to re-enter the site.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
-Good download speeds. I got 1.3MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-Can stream or download many videos in multiple definitions.
-$17.87/month recurring discounted price through PU.
Cons:
-Cons are basically minor.
-Content does not have a posting date.
-In many of the videos the guys are wearing condoms. Doesn't bother me, but some viewers might not like it.
-When you log into the site, the first page you see is a cross-sell to some other porn site. If you click the "No thanks" link, you then enter the members area. This is minor, but it's one of
the few porn paysites I've seen where you have to bypass an advertising screen before you can enter the members area.
But then again, I believe that Amazon sells some e-readers or other branded devices, that come with automatic advertising. And if you pay a one-time fee, you get rid of the automatic advertising.
-Most of the videos are in Spanish. But who cares what the models or stunt cocks are saying? It's probably better if you don't understand, because that gives the videos an exotic flavor. Also, you have to admit, these latina models sure speak a lot more, and more naturally, than the Eastern European porn models.
Bottom Line:
This is a teen hardcore site featuring latina models.
The models are late teens or early twenties.
There are a lot of attractive models.
The body types are latin: so you don't get the preponderance of skinny white teens you have at many teen sites. At this site, you get a cross-section of skinny and medium-sized girls. Most of the girls have little or no tattoos. Very little piercing on most girls.
Most of the videos are 1 guy - 1 girl. There are a few 1 guy - 2 girls.
Videos
Number of videos: 168+
Runtime: about 20 to 40 minutes.
They have a number of different ways you can view a video.
For streaming, some have a choice of watching in low, medium, or high definition.
You can also choose to watch the entire video, a preview of the video, or break the video into which segment you want to watch.
For a video that run 29 minutes, you can select your starting point to watch at 0 (the start of the video), at 05.55 which means 5 minutes 55 seconds), at 11:54, 17:51, or 23:48.
Or you can choose to download:
1080p MP4; 720p MP4; HI mpg4; LOW mpg4; low WMV; IPod file.
They have a photo gallery for each video.
They also have a screen cap gallery for each video.
I'm not sure why they have both a photo gallery as well as a screen cap gallery. That seems like overkill.
But this site is geared more for videos than photos.
The photo galleries and the screencap galleries, for me, are a waste of resources and site space. I realize that the operators are trying to provide a complete resource for their members. But I appreciate photos from sites like Metart, Erotic Beauty, MPL Studios, Femjoy, etc., where they try to present the models as attractively as possible.
At this site, they are presenting the models in a "natural" way.
So this approach might have fans, but I'm not one of them. If you can put your mind into a frame that the photo sets and the screen caps are like a stop-motion record of a latin guy getting ready to have sex with a latina, and then having the sex, then maybe you would appreciate the photos and screen caps. But I think it's just a waste of time, since you can watch the video directly.
Models have only 1 video at Oye Loca. But a few models might have a second video at another site in the network, and still fewer could have 3 or 4 videos scattered throughout the network.
They do provide a limited amount of data for each model. For example: for the model Sienna West:
Birthday: November 6
Birth Location: Orange County
Measurements: 34DD-24-34
Height: 160 cm - 5 feet and 3 inches
Weight: 55 kg - 121 lbs
Haircolor: Red
Nationality: Uruguay
Ethicity: Caucasian
Tatoos: Stars on both wrist; back of neck
Piercings: Navel, nose, upper lip
If you are into latina girls, or if you are tired of watching the slender young white teens featured at many other sites, then this site could provide a nice change of pace.
And with the other 13 sites that are included with a membership, you also get a nice variety of teen-early twenty models in a variety of settings and situations.
Giving the site a score of 85. That's highly subjective. Some users might rate it higher. Other users could rate it lower.
"No problems using my download manager (Firefox DTA)"
Is there a new version of Down Them All that works with the current version of Firefox?
My understanding is that DTA has not worked with the newer versions of Firefox for a while.
So:
Are you using the current version of Firefox, or an older version that allows DTA to work?
If DTA has released an updated version that works with the current version of Firefox, I would be glad to know.
When I first wrote reviews, I spent a lot of time trying to figure what score a site deserved.
But over time, I realized that a score is very subjective: even though some people think that a score should be a precise reflection of the value of a site, I think that is fantasy.
So I don't put a lot of faith or weight on the precise score a site receives. I'm much more interested in the overview and details of a review, and whether the reviewer appreciated the site, and the reasons why, for and against.
I looked at your review, and I'm glad I didn't read it before I wrote mine, because I mainly said the same things you did.
But my review was original, in spite of the resemblance to yours.
LOL.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the New Sensations network. You get access to all the sites in the network. No premium sites you have to pay extra for.
-Secure login, secure member pages. HTTPS. So your ISP does not have a record of all the pages you visit, to hand to your friendly government to track your porn usage (Except they do have a record of your visit to the site, itself).
-6,500+ exclusive videos.
-2,500+ porn stars.
-Multiple weekly updates.
-The video quality is professional. Good lighting, good focus, good camera-work, nice sets.
-Fast response from customer service for email help. I was blocked from one of their sites, and customer service helped unblock me within 25 minutes.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
Cons:
-Too many ads on most pages.
-Pre-checked cross sale on join page.
-European members are charged higher prices.
-Navigation could be simpler. It's hard to know how many sites you have access to.
(The sites are listed below in the first reply to this review.)
-Navigation: trying to enter some of the specific sites can be a problem.
-Most sites are not updating. Some sites stopped updating 7 years ago.
-The videos have a long runtime. The TRU: A XXX Parody (a parody of True Blood TV series)
has a runtime of 2 hours 15 minutes 25 seconds. I don't mind expanding the Wham-Bam-Thank-You-Ma'am experience, but 2 hours plus is a lot of time spent watching models who are not actresses.
-The file sizes of the parodies are huge. The TRU: A XXX Parody download file runs from 1.6 GB to 11.6 GB, for 720p and 1080p file definitions.
-Site stopped updating in 2018.
Bottom Line:
The main sites of the New Sensations network include: The Tabu Tales
The Lesbian Experience
HotwifeXXX
Tales From The Edge
The Romance Series
Shane Diesel's Bangin'
Plus there are about 19 other sites covering different niches
Parody Pass features parodies of some of the main shows on TV or movies: X-Files, True Blood, Star Trek, Anchorman, The Flintstones, etc.
A parody of True Blood
TRU: A XXX Parody The simple life is shaken when death comes to the small, quiet Louisiana town of Bon Temps -- where civilians, vampires, shape-shifters, and mind readers clash in an orgy of sex & mystery. When a dead body is found with the heart ripped out, local waitress, Sookie (Ashlynn Brooke), who has a talent for reading minds, her best friend, Tara (Misty Stone), and her Vampire boyfriend, Bill (James Deen), try to unravel the supernatural web and find the murderer. Sookie and her friends find themselves pushing all their limits, both mentally and sexually, in a climax you'll have to see to believe! The mix of sex, horror, and action is so hot, it must be TRU: A XXX Parody
Starring: Ashlynn Brooke, Gracie Glam, Lana Violet, Lindy Lane, Missy Stone, Shay Sights, Vanessa Naughty
Released: 10/10/2018
Average Rating: 4.0
Categories: Anal, Asian, Big Tits, Blonde, Brunette, Cum On Tits, Facial, Full Movie, Group Sex, Latina, Natural Tits, Parody, Teens, Tiny Tits
I have a slow internet connection, so it's easier for me to download the videos and watch them with a player program (usually Windows Media Player or VLC Media Player) rather than wait and watch the video buffering a lot.
Except the downloaded file size is so large (1.6 GB for the smallest version of the file) that, because of my slow download speed and limited amount of hard drive space, make downloading and watching files from this site a problem.
That's just me.
I signed up with AT&T recently for an internet account, supposed to get 75 Mbps connection, but I often get less than 1 Mbps speeds for downloading.
So I need to go back to Time Warner, which I wasn't happy with because I was paying for 100 Mbps connection speed but getting far slower speeds.
Far slower speeds, but everything is relative: Slow at Time Warner is zoomy-zoom compared to AT&T service, in my case.
I'm giving the site a score of 82.
Some of the problems with the site are because of my slow internet connection (which I can fix by moving back to Time Warner). But the files sizes are huge at this site (1.6 GB for the smallest file of one parody, going up to 11.6 GB for a 1080 definition version of the same parody.
So you need a fast internet connection, and plenty of hard drive space if you want to collect these videos.
Plus, the ads can be annoying. On the other hand, some of the ads offer a membership price that is often lower than you will find at most places: Pure Taboo for $9.95 for the first month (renewing at $29.95/month thereafter).
But I get access to Pure Taboo through my Adult Time membership: Adult Time membership is one of the great bargains in porn, giving you access to over 140 channels (Adult Time calls sites "channels").
I like the idea of a porn parody. But the runtime on these files is just too long: 2 hours plus.
Normally, you watch porn to get hot. But 2 hours is too long, and the video needs to be split up into sections that are 1 hour or less. 30 minutes sounds like a good idea. 30 minutes of high grade sex would be the perfect solution.
So cut "TRU: A XXX Parody" into 4 or 5 sections, that can be viewed in order, to make a complete whole. You would need to adjust for pacing and plot, so it would be a lot of work, but the site would be improved.
Giving the site a score of 82, because of network access.
If you don't like the site, there are plenty of other sites in the network that you might find more to your liking.
See the first reply for a listing of all the sites you get access to.
Release Date: 03/08/10
Synopsis:
The simple life is shaken when death comes to the small, quiet Louisiana town of Bon Temps -- where civilians, vampires, shape-shifters, and mind readers clash in an orgy of sex & mystery. When a dead body is found with the heart ripped out, local waitress, Sookie (Ashlynn Brooke), who has a talent for reading minds, her best friend, Tara (Misty Stone), and her Vampire boyfriend, Bill (James Deen), try to unravel the supernatural web and find the murderer. Sookie and her friends find themselves pushing all their limits, both mentally and sexually, in a climax you'll have to see to believe! The mix of sex, horror, and action is so hot, it must be TRU: A XXX Parody.
Featuring: Ashlynn Brooke, Bill Bailey, Gracie Glam, James Deen, Johnny Castle, Lana Violet, Levi Cash, Lindy Lane, Misty Stone, Say Sights, Vanessa Naughty
FOR FANS OF PORN PARODIES, THIS SITE MIGHT BE A GOLD MINE.
FOR ME PERSONALLY, IT'S A WASTE OF SPACE.
PORN REVIEWS ARE SUPPOSED TO BE WRITTEN IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER.
BUT I'M TRYING TO BE HONEST: AND I'M GIVING MY OPINION.
I BELIEVE THAT PROFESSIONAL REVIEWS OFTEN INCLUDE THE BIAS AND THOUGHTS OF THE REVIEWER.
SOME REVIEWERS BELIEVE THAT IN GIVING A PROFESSIONAL REVIEW, THE BIAS OF THE REVIEWER IS ELIMINATED.
I BELIEVE THAT THE THOUGHTS OF THE REVIEWER CAN ADD VALUE TO THE REVIEW. BEYOND THE BARE FACTS.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
NOTE: I AM USING CAP LETTERS, BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE.
-I JOINED THROUGH A MEMBERSHIP IN NEW SENSATIONS, WHICH INCLUDES PARODY PASS AND 24 OTHER SITES IN THE NETWORK.
-WITH 25 SITES, YOU GET COVERAGE OF A WIDE VARIETY OF NICHES.
-MANY OF THE MODELS ARE ATTRACTIVE. MAINLY THEY ARE SLENDER TO MEDIUM WHITE MODELS IN LATE TEENS/EARLY 20'S, BUT YOU ALSO GET A SMATTERING OF OTHER TYPES AS WELL: HEAVY SET GIRLS, LATINAS, MILFS.
-THE SITE STRUCTURE IS EASY TO NAVIGATE:
-NICE-SIZED THUMBNAILS OF THE MODELS, WITH LINKS TO THEIR VIDEOS: THIS APPLIES TO THE PARODY PASS SITE AND THE NETWORK AS WELL.
-ADDS ON EVERY PAGE. NORMALLY THIS IS A NEGATIVE, BUT SOME OF THE AD PRICES ARE VERY LOW, AND WORTH CONSIDERING.
-UNLIMITED STREAMING AND DOWNLOADING.
Cons:
-NON-SECURE LOGIN. PAGE REQUESTING LOGIN DETAILS (USERNAME AND PASSWORD) HAS A BROWSER POPUP THAT STATES THAT LOGIN DETAILS COULD BE HACKED (SINCE THE PAGE IN NOT HTTPS).
-THE FIRST JOIN PAGE (WHERE YOU SELECT A USERNAME AND PASSWORD) IS A NON-SECURE URL. SO, NOT ONLY DO YOU ENTER THE SITE WITH A NON-SECURE LOGIN AFTER YOU GET YOUR MEMBERSHIP, BUT IN APPLYING FOR YOUR MEMBERSHIP, YOU ARE GIVING YOUR LOGIN DETAILS ON A NON-SECURE PAGE.
-NO PU DISCOUNT. REGULAR PRICE IS $29.95/MONTH RECURRING.
-PRE-CHECKED CROSS-SALE.
-EPOCH IS A SECONDARY BILLER. I RECOMMEND TRYING TO SIGN UP THROUGH EPOCH, A TRUSTED NAME.
Bottom Line:
THE NEW SENSATIONS OFFERS ADS WITH LOW PRICES FOR PORN MEMBERSHIPS.
NORMALLY, THIS IS A NEGATIVE, BECAUSE WHO NEEDS MORE ADS WHEN YOU BROWSE A PORN SITE?
BUT SOME OF THE ADS ARE VERY CHEAP:
VIXEN $9.95. REALITY KINGS $9.95. TEAM SKEET $9.87. EVIL ANGEL $7.95. CLUB SEVENTEEN $5.95. SEX ART $7.95.
THIS IS THE LOWEST OFFER I'VE EVER SEEN FOR SEX ART (PART OF THE METART NETWORK).
I DON'T SEE METART LISTED IN THE SPECIAL OFFERS NOW, BUT IN THE PAST, I SAW A METART MEMBERSHIP LISTED FOR ABOUT $7.95/MONTH, WHICH IS THE LOWEST PRICE I'VE EVER SEEN FOR THAT SITE.
THE SEX ART OFFER IS FOR $7.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH, REBILLING AT $19.99/MONTH.
NORMALLY, WHEN YOU SEE A SPECIAL OFFER FOR A LOW PRICE, AND YOU CLICK ON THE OFFER, INSTEAD OF BEING THE FIRST MONTH'S PRICE, IT TURNS OUT TO BE THE PRO-RATED PRICE OF A YEAR-LONG MEMBERSHIP:
FOR EXAMPLE, THEY ADVERTISE $8.95 MONTHLY MEMBERSHIP, BUT THEN YOU FIND IT'S ACTUALLY A $100/YEAR MEMBERSHIP.
AND FOR A SINGLE MONTH'S MEMBERSHIP, THE PRICE IS NORMALLY $29.95/MONTH, AND HIGHER STILL IF YOU SELECT THE ONE MONTH NON-RECURRING OPTION.
SO THE NEW SENSATIONS OFFERS ARE WORTH CONSIDERING.
THE STRUCTURE FOR THE SITE AND NETWORK MAKES IT EASY TO USE.
EACH PARODY HAS 4 DIFFERENT PRESENTATIONS:
ONE THUMBNAIL IS THE COMPLETE VERSION OF THE PARODY.
ONE THUMBNAIL IS THE BLOOPERS REEL.
ONE THUMBNAIL IS THE PARTY REEL, WHICH SEEMS TO BE A HARDCORE VERSION OF THE SEX SCENES.
ONE THUMBNAIL IS THE BEHIND THE SCENES REEL.
AND THE SITE OFFERS THESE CHOICES FOR EACH PORN PARODY.
YOU HAVE MULTIPLE CHOICES FOR STREAMING AND DOWNLOADING.
DOWNLOADING DOES NOT REQUIRE AN UPGRADED MEMBERSHIP, AS SOME SITES ARE STARTING TO DO.
TO STREAM A VIDEO, YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM DIFFERENT BIT RATES, 720p, 1080p.
TO DOWNLOAD A VIDEO, YOU CAN CHOOSE FROM DIFFERENT FORMATS (FLV, MP4, WINDOWS MEDIA), DIFFERENT BIT RATES, DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS (720p, 1080p).
VIDEOS STREAM SMOOTHLY.
I GOT GOOD DOWNLOAD SPEEDS ON DOWNLOADING.
NOTE: SOME PU MEMBERS HAVE MENTIONED DOWNLOADING SPEED PROBLEMS AT DIFFERENT SITES.
EXCEPT FOR A RECENT PROBLEM AT METART, WHICH LASTED A FEW DAYS, I NORMALLY GET OK TO GOOD STREAMING AND DOWNLOADING SPEEDS AT MY PORN PAYSITES.
THE RECENT METART SERVER PROBLEMS AFFECTED THE ENTIRE NETWORK, AND METART OFFERED A FREE EXTENSION TO ANY METART MEMBERSHIP TO COVER THE PROBLEM.
A QUOTE FROM THE METART NETWORK SITE:
I know some of you have experienced issues while browsing our sites over the last several days. As you might have guessed, we are having network issues that we are working to resolve as fast as humanly possible. We know this is causing some of you frustration while trying to surf the sites and see the content. We would like to credit your subscription for any day(s) that you have experienced issues during this period. Please email support@metart.com with the subject line “Network Issue Credit” and tell us how many days you have experienced network issues over the past week. We will immediately extend your membership by that many days, no questions asked. We appreciate your patience and loyalty. Thank you for being the best members an adult entertainment site could ask for.
WHICH SEEMS LIKE A VERY GENEROUS OFFER.
I'M TRYING TO FIGURE A WAY TO ASK FOR A LIFETIME MEMBERSHIP IN ONE OF THE SITES I DON'T BELONG TO, TO COMPENSATE ME FOR THE TROUBLES I HAD FOR LACK OF METART PORN.
ANY LAWYERS CARE TO COMMENT ON HOW I SHOULD WORK MY REQUEST?
(JOKE).
BACK TO THE REVIEW BOTTOM LINE:
THE PARODY PASS SITE FEATURES PORN PARODIES OF POPULAR MOVIES AND TV SHOWS.
THE PARODIES ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: GOOD EDITING, SOUND CONTROL, ETC. THE ACTING IS GOOD (FOR A PORN VIDEO, CONSIDERING THAT THE PARODIES ARE MEANT TO BE COMEDIES, SO THE ACTING IS OVER-THE-TOP), GOOD SCRIPTS, LOTS OF SEX.
I COULDN'T ENJOY THESE VIDEOS PERSONALLY, I JUST WASN'T IN THE MOOD.
BUT FOR FANS OF THE MOVIES OR TV SHOWS (ANCHORMAN, 30 ROCK, SEX AND THE CITY, WHO'S THE BOSS, ETC.), THE PARODIES MIGHT HOLD SOME ENJOYMENT.
THE INCLUSION OF THE REST OF THE NEW SENSATIONS NETWORK, OF 25 SITES, MEANS YOU HAVE A WIDE CHOICE OF NICHES TO EXPLORE, AT LEAST SOME OF WHICH SHOULD APPEAL TO MOST PU MEMBERS.
I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 85. THAT'S BECAUSE THE SITE COMES WITH NETWORK ACCESS.
IF THE SITE WERE SCORED AS A STAND-ALONE, BECAUSE THE NICHE IS MORE SPECIALIZED, I WOULD RATE IT LOWER.
BUT IN SPITE OF MY PERSONAL LACK OF APPRECIATION OF THE VIDEOS, THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT, AND SHOULD APPEAL TO PORN PARODY FANS. THE SCRIPTS ARE WELL WRITTEN (FOR A PORN PARODY).
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
