Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Feedback History A detailed history of activity from this user in all different categories.
User : lk2fireone (0)  

Feedback:   All (2748)  |   Reviews (194)  |   Comments (351)  |   Replies (2203)

Other:   Replies Received (1609)  |   Trust Ratings (1)

All Activity A summary of all the feedback from this user.
Shown : 2701-2725 of 2840 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Type Site - Score Feedback / Review Date
Comment
2701
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(0)

Stream only versus Stream + Download.

I guess I haven't been paying attention.
But Wow Girls, Wow Porn, and All Fine Girls (Diesel network) now offers the choice of membership:

30 days stream only $19.95/recurring
30 days stream/download $29.95/recurring
180 days stream/download $99.95/recurring

I think this is a more attractive offering than a site that only offers streaming only access.

01-29-17  05:20am

Replies (0)
Reply
2702
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(0)
Reply of host2626's Reply

It's probably better if you make this a new comment.
If you re-post this as a new comment, it will have a better chance of being noticed by more members.

Anyway: 18OnlyGirls changed its name to AllFineGirls some time back.
Recently, 18OnlyGirls is no longer listed at PU.
I'm not sure why.
Sometimes sites are no longer listed because they go out of business.
Or because there is some problem at the connection with PU and PU stops promoting the site (listing the site).

Separately, even though I posted at PU that 18OnlyGirls had changed its name to AllFineGirls, PU never bothered to list AllFineGirls as the new name of 18OnlyGirls (probably because the name change slipped through the cracks).

Anyway, 18OnlyGirls is no longer listed at PU.

I haven't been a member of 18OnlyGirls in a while, so I don't know if the site is still updating.

Wow Porn and Wow Girls still exist.
18 Only Girls still exists (under the name of All Fine Girls).

It's difficult, or unlikely, that you will find current information on 18 Only Girls or All Fine Girls at PU (or at TBP, the sister site of PU), because 18 Only Girls is no longer listed.

Since I'm not a current member of any of the three sites, I don't know what the update rate is.
I like the models at the sites, and the videos are professionally shot.
But the membership fee is too expensive for me, to be a continuing member.

I'm sorry I can't give you the details on the update rate for 18OnlyGirls.
Perhaps a current member of that site will post that information, if they happen to read this comment.


10-28-16  01:47am

Reply
2703
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(0)
Reply of slutty's Reply

I have the "Diamond" membership, but they haven't bothered to tell me what that means, or how I got it.
I do have access to all 11 sites in the Diesel Access network.
I posted at PU, and also at the Diesel Access network forum, asking them to clearly spell out what the rules are for each membership, to gain access to the different sites.

They said they would do that, sometime in the future.

That was months ago.

But $10/month sounds like a great price.


04-27-13  10:31am

Reply
2704
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(0)
Reply of graymane's Reply

Thanks for the kind words, graymane.

If you like glamcore/heartcore, I think you will enjoy the Diesel Acess network. X-Art and the Diesel Access network are two fine example of that niche.

But if you don't like glamcore, you might find those sites disappointing.

Also, both X-Art and Diesel focus on teens. So if you want a broad range of ages, or slow-strip tease, or something else, you could be disappointed.

Having said that, there is plenty of hardcore action at these sites, with some models that are absolutely stunning or even beautiful. They are truly a feast for the eyes, and fingers, and any other body parts you can imagine.


04-25-13  10:24pm

Reply
2705
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(0)
Reply of Buckhead's Reply

I don't think your reply is dense.

The point I was making is that, because the site owners/operators/managers are foreign, they don't understand English that well. (They might disagree, because almost everyone thinks he or she is perfect.)

But the webmaster does not clearly state exactly what the rules are for gaining access to all the sites.

The price for joining any of the sites in the network is currently the same, no matter what site you join through.

On the 18 Onbly Girls signup page, it clearyly states that each memb membership option gives you access to 18 Only Girls plus 11 bonus sites.

Actually, that is a mistake. You get 10 bonus sites, plus the 18 Only Girls site, which makes 11 sites total.

(Like I said, because they are foreign, it's easy for simple mistake to creep in, because they think they know what they are saying. If they advertised in Russian or whatever their native language is, they would probably not make the mistakes, but a lot of members don't understand Russian or whatever their native language is.)

On the Wow sites (Wow Girls, Wow Porn), the membership options are priced the same as for a membership to 18 Only Girls. But the access to the bonus sites is not mentioned on the signup page.

So, to be safe, join through 18 Only Girls, and that way, you are sure (because it's in writing on the signup page) that you get access to all 11 sites in the network, which includes Wow Girls and Wow Porn.

If you join through Wow Girls or Wow Porn, you should still get access to all 11 sites. But it's not spelled out on the signup page. And sometimes, in real life, things don't make sense. So it's possible, although unlikely, that you wouldn't get access to all 11 bonus sites, if you join through one of the Wow sites, even though you are paying the same price as if you signed up through 18 Only Girls.

If you have joined a lot of porn sites, sometimes, you will see that joining a network through one site instead of a different site in the same network, can charge you more money for the membership, and give you access to less sites in the network.

I am frustrated that the webmasters at some sites don't clearly spell out what sites you get access to, depending on what site you join through.

For years, Teen Mega World did not spell out what sites you got when you joined through each individual site in the network. Recently, they did show a simple join page, that clearly showed what access you were getting. But that took them many years, and many request that they ignored.

Maybe I am biased, or prejudiced. But sometimes foreigners think differently. Or they think something is obvious, when it's not really clearly spelled out.


04-25-13  10:09pm

Review
2706
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(0)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -Easy login. No captcha.
-Long time before site timeout.
-High quality videos and photosets. Professionally shot: good lighting, good colors, good sound control, really nice technical control.
-Large number of attractive or gorgeous teen models.
-Easy site navigation.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Streaming options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Download options: 360p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-You can select different parts of a video scene to stream or download.
-Nice mix of solo, boy-girl, girl-girl, or group sex.
-There is usually background music for the videos, but it's kept soft, so less distracting
than many music backgrounds.
-DownThemAll download manager works at this site.
Cons: PROS (CONTINUED):
-Good download speeds. I usually get over 2MB/sec, which is close to my max download
speed.
-Access to live chat shows that feature a few of the models from the Diesel sites. The models are friendly, strip, masturbate, sometimes have a boyfriend that performs with them (fucking, in other words). Those shows are completely free.
-Content has a posting date.
-Files download with the name of the model and the title of the video, so you don't have
to rename the files.

CONS
Cons are basically minor. Wow Porn is a high quality glamcore site.
-Most of the videos are shot indoors. very few videos are shot outdoors, at the beach, in a park or field. Some people might want more variety in the locations, but I thought the locations were very nice, no cheap apartment setting, no cheap clothing, just a really nice look and feel to the videos.
-Sometimes toys are used. Some PU members don't like toys.
-This is a glamcore site. Some PU members might like a more gonzo approach.
Bottom Line: Wow Porn and Wow Girls are the newest sites in the Diesel Access network. Starting in early March of 2013, those two sites, which used to be separate from the Diesel Access network, are now included in the network.

I would consider 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, Wow Girls, and Wow Porn to be glamcore/heartcore porn. Those sites use many of the same models. The video and photo style is basically the same for all 4 sites. You get gorgeous teen models that show off their tight bodies, and many of them engage in hardcore sex, with boys, with other girls, or by themselves (some PU members consider masturbation softcore or midcore, but I think it's hardcore, especially if they are showing close-up views of the vagina, ass, etc.)

The videos and photos are high quality, in terms of definition, focus, lighting, colors, camera-work, etc.

My favorite glamcore/heartcore sites are X-Art and some of the Diesel Access network sites. That's because of the high quality videos and photosets, and the large number of very attractive to really gorgeous models these sites have.

Met-art is my favorite teen softcore glamor site. Again, that is because of the huge number of very attractive to really gorgeous models, and the outstanding quality of their photosets.

If you have access to all the sites in the Diesel Acess network, that means 11 sites in all. They have dropped (eliminated) several of the old sites that stopped updating years ago, and that mainly contained older, lower quality videos and photos (lower definition, lower production values). So they are showcasing the higher quality of their current offerings.

The sites they have eliminated include:
Lay The Kat
Policeman
Sasha Fucks Dasha
The Sperm Lover

Wow Porn is an excellent site by itself. Access to the rest of the sites in the network make this a high quality glamcore offering with lots of very attractive teen models.

It's really hard to give this site a fair score. By itself, I'm giving it a 92. If you include the other sites in the network, I'd give it a 95 or more. This is really a high-end glamcore offering.

04-24-13  08:11pm

Replies (3)
Comment
2707
Visit Wow Porn

Wow Porn
(0)

Diesel Access Network now includes Wow Girls and Wow Porn.

I mentioned before that Diesel Access network now includes Wow Girls and Wow Porn. That started in early March of this year.

I am a member of the network, with access to those two sites, plus 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, and the other sites in the network.

But some PU members have wondered what are the exact details in how you get access to all the sites in the network.

The web master replied that he would post details on how the membership works, to get total access. But that hasn't happened yet, that I could find.

From the sign-up page to 18 Only Girls, you see the following plans:

$0.97/day, 18OnlyGirls.Com Recurring 30 Days Membership & bonus access to 11 sites.

$0.67/day, 18OnlyGirls.Com Recurring 5 Months Membership & bonus access to 11 sites.
This is a 5 month, recurring membership.

$1.33/day 18OnlyGirls.Com Non-Recurring 30 Days Membership & bonus access to 11 sites.


The above choices are slightly different from the way the webmaster explained it before.
He said a while back, that if you join one of the sites, and re-new your membership, you would then have access to all the sites in the network (he didn't specify how long you would have to be a member before you gained access to all the sites).


The Wow Porn sign-up page has the same three plans listed above, but they only mention membership/access to the Wow Porn site. I assume that is because the site has a problem with English, and that they are not specifying the access to the other sites in the network because they don't realize the omission.

04-24-13  01:23pm

Replies (6)
Reply
2708
Visit X Angels

X Angels
(0)
Reply of lk2fireone's Review

REVIEW (CONTINUED):

Site stats:
151 vids
Most vids come with an accompanying photoset.
The photosets are probably made as screencaps from the video, but the quality is good: the model is focused in the photo, the photo is not as crisp as I would like, but it's far better than the screen caps posted from years ago. The colors are OK, not great. I personally would not collect these photosets, even when the models are cute. Because I would want a better set of photos.
There is a zip file for each photoset. But the zip file only comes in one definition. And as I said, the photosets are not worth collecting, even when the model is cute.
The site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month. But the network updates with 1 video per day. So you get a huge amount of teen hardcore videos at the network (over 5,000 videos, over 1,380 teen models).


There is little to distinguish this teen hardcore site from any other teen hardcore site.
It's basically teens fucking and sucking.
The site strengths are the models are mainly cute, and they are enthusiastic about fucking.
But because you get access to the rest of the TMW network, I'm giving the site a score of 90.
Without network access, the score would be much lower.


03-31-19  07:53am

Review
2709
Visit X Angels

X Angels
(0)

90.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: Note: as I keep mentioning in any review of a TMW (Teen Mega World) site, if you join the TMW network, you should join through the main TMW site itself.
Joining through one of the satellite sites makes navigation and searching the network's content much more difficult, because of a design flaw in the last network update done a few years ago.

-X-angels is part of the TMW network. The network is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks, because the level of the model's attractiveness is high, the girls enthusiasm for sex, and the membership price is low.
-PU offers a discounted price of $14.95/month, recurring at $14.95 month. Most other networks offer a lower price for the first month, but then charge a higher price for continuing that membership. Which makes no sense to me: You should reward your loyal customers, instead of charging higher fees for their loyalty.
-Unlimited streaming and unlimited downloading.
Cons: PROS(CONTINUED):
-Videos are offered in the following definitions: 404p, 540p, 720p, 1080, 2160p(Ultra High Definition). That is for both streaming and downloading.
-The site updates with 1 or 2 videos per month. However, the network updates with 1 video per day. Those updates are spread over the entire network, which explains why any one site will have a slow update rate.
-Membership in any one of the TMW sites gives you access to all the sites in the network: there are no premium sites you have to pay extra for to access their contents.
-TMW has 33 sites, which cover a wide variety of teen niches.

CONS(START OF):
-I think the cons are basically minor. Which is why TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
-The biggest con would be if you joined one of the satellite sites, instead of through the main TMW site itself. Because of the network update done a few years ago, if you join through one of the satellite sites, your search is limited to the site you joined through:
Bottom Line: CONS(CONTINUED):
-I think the cons are basically minor. Which is why TMW is one of my favorite teen hardcore networks.
-The biggest con would be if you joined one of the satellite sites, instead of through the main TMW site itself. Because of the network update done a few years ago, if you join through one of the satellite sites, your search is limited to the site you joined through: the only content you can find is the content in your join site: this is true even if you switch to a different site in the network: your search engine is still limited to your join site, and you can't search the site you are currently logged in to. This won't be apparent to you until after you have joined the satellite site, and find the search engine is restricted to your join site. Also, there are problems with switching to different sites, when you join through a satellite site, that are not present when you join through the main TMW site.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page. Which is standard for porn sites.
-Many of the TMW sites stopped updating years ago. TMW has a habit of starting a new site, updating for a while, then stopping the updates. This can be frustrating if you are a fan of the site's contents.
-They keep raising the membership price for an annual subscription: For many years, they kept it as $89.95/year. Then, a few years ago, they raised the yearly fee to $119.40/year. Now they have raised it to $149.88/year.
One of the main attractions to me was the low price. But the price is no longer cheap for a yearly membership. You can join many softcore sites for $100/year (MetArt and its sites, MPL Studios, Femjoy). It's not the same, because I'm comparing a hardcore network to softcore megasites, but the element of a bargain is gone.
-I think the servers at TMW must hate me. I've had to manually replace my site password 4 times in the last week, because the site keeps telling me my login details are not correct. Even though I use cut and paste to enter the login details into the login box. So there is no chance of a typing error. Just a dislike of a paying customer.

BOTTOM LINE(START OF):
In spite of the site title, X-Angels, the contents of the site are young Russian teens who suck and fuck with enthusiasm. So the contents are not much, if any, different from many of the teen porn hardcore sites.
But you have to give the Russians credit for coming up with new titles to describe the same thing. The only possible difference is that the girls are young, attractive, and enthusiastic about the sex. Which are all good things.

X-Angels is part of the TMW (Teen Mega World) network. In recent years the network has spent a lot of time, money, and effort upgrading what used to be a low-rent hardcore teen porn network into a better offering: they spent money on the sets, the video and camera equipment, to give a finer product: in the last few years they have offered video definitions of up to 2160p (Ultra High Definition), as well as a virtual reality site.
They spent money upgrading the network's navigation, making it easier to navigate and search the network, and made the model listing complete (there used to be a lot of blank spaces for the models) and easy to use.
On the last network update a few years ago, they had a software engineer who apparently made the network easier to maintain and update, except that the changes he made made the network harder for the customer to navigate the network and to use the search engine the sites provide.
This is why I keep repeating the instruction, if you are joining the TMW network, to join through the main TMW site itself, instead of through one of the satellite sites:
The price to join is the same for all the sites.
And if you join any one site in the network, you have access to all the sites in the network.
But: in the current network structure:
-If you join through the main TMW site, switching between sites is easier and more effective, than if you join through one of the satellite sites.
-If you join through the main TMW site, the search engine searches the entire network for model's content, and brings up hot links to all her content.

-If you join through one of the satellite sites, switching between sites is only partial, you are still logged in to your join site. So examining the contents of a site you switched to is not easy.
-If you join through one of the satellite sites, the search engine only returns content from the site you joined through, not from the entire network.
That is true even when you switch to a different site in the network.

So do yourself a favor, and, if you join the TMW network, join through the main TMW site. You won't realize how much easier and faster and better your experience is, unless you also have a membership in one of the TMW satellite sites, which would be a waste of money, except it would show you the difference between the main TMW site and one of the satellite sites.
CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW:

03-31-19  07:50am

Replies (2)
Review
2710
Visit X Angels

X Angels
(0)

92.0
Status: Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros: -PU discount of $14.95/month.
-Features teen angels from heaven who came to Earth to show us humans the joys of sex. These are heavenly young girls with lean white bodies that are the answer to every horny male's prayer.
-The models are young teens, without a lot of makeup. But they mainly attractive young teens. Young, fresh, with nice to very attractive
faces and healthy young bodies. They don't look like sluts, but are attractive young teens you might see in a mall or shopping square.

-The site started in early 2013. All the videos have a definition choice of:
405p(for portable devices); 540p; 720p; 1080p.
-The videos and galleries are professionally shot. Good lighting, good sound control, good camera-work. Little or no airbrushing.
-Download managers allowed. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
-Zip file for galleries.
-No download limits.
-Long time before site timeout.
Cons: -The cons are basically minor.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Slow, irregular update rate. You only get 1 site update every 2-4 weeks or less often. However, the network averages 1 update per day.
-Some scenes only have a video or a gallery (a photo gallery), instead of a video plus matching gallery. I suspect they bought the video or gallery, and didn't have the money to buy the matching video or gallery from the producer/owner.
I'm guessing they have maybe 100 videos, maybe 100 galleries. I'm too lazy to click through the entire site to count. Which could easily take 45 minutes or more, and that's assuming all the links are exposed and active.
-Videos download with a generic numeric filename. Instead, the filename should include: NameOfModel-DatePosted-SitePosted-DefinitionChosen.
-Variable download speeds. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, depending on time of day and whatever other factors might be controlling the download speeds.
Bottom Line: -Site theme: My favorite Angels from Heaven, coming to Earth to satisfy our human lusts. Except they landed in Russia, instead of coming to California. Which was a big mistake. But I am willing to overlook God's mistakes, and still give the site (and network) an outstanding score, because I am really an Angel myself. (Joke)

The site (and network) is easy to use.
In spite of the massive amount of content (over 4,000 videos and photosets), it's fairly easy to search through the model listing, which has nice-sized thumbnails that give you a good idea of what the girls look like. The fact that you
have access to over 1,200 models in the network can make the search tiring, but the fact that so many of these girls are attractive to lovely makes the search worthwhile. If the models were sluts, or unattractive, the network would have little value, but these girls are good-looking to really outstanding.

-The cons are basically minor. This is a very nice site, and you get access to the entire Teen Mega World network, which makes this an outstanding value for your money. This is assuming you enjoy watching hardcore teen videos of attractive young girls. This is not a glamcore/heartcore site, it's mainly a bread-and-butter teen hardcore site, but the girls are
very attractive, and the network (Teen Mega World) gives you access to over 4,000 videos and galleries in a variety of teen niches for a very low price.

Some members might complain that the scenes are repetitious, that there should be a plot or story to the video to give the sex added meaning, that the models should be made to appear more attractive (with better costumes, make-up, more expensive settings, etc.). But this is basically, as I keep saying, a bread-and-butter teen hardcore network, that somehow built up
a massive collection of attractive young girls who are having sex. That's human nature: we always want more than what we are getting.

I am giving the site (but mainly the network) a score of 92. If the site were a stand-alone site, the score would be much lower. But it's not a stand-alone site, it's part of a network, and you gain access to the entire network with membership
in any one of its sites, for a very low price.

06-13-16  07:18pm

Replies (0)
Reply
2711
Visit X Movies

X Movies
(0)
Reply of deadelvis's Reply

Main factors for me to join a site:
-how attractive are the models
-how many models are there
-quality of the pictures
-quantity of the pictures
-price

-(not really into DVDs or videos, takes too much bandwidth, too much space to store on hard drive)


I am trying to get value for my porn dollars, but the main factor is how attractive are the models.

Anyway, I wish you would write some site reviews. You seem to have extensive experience with porn.

Even if I don't agree with your personal tastes (which I don't really know yet), I think it would be interesting, sometimes entertaining, to read your thoughts.

I really have enjoyed reading some of the reviews at this site, not just for the information on possible sites I might join, but also for the humor and insight.

As a bonus, if you write reviews and get points, you have a chance to win a few dollars/pounds/euros in the weekly drawing.


11-20-08  09:56pm

Reply
2712
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of skippy's Review

EXCELLENT REVIEW.

I HAVEN'T BEEN A MEMBER OF THIS SITE IN SLIGHTLY OVER A YEAR.
IT USED TO BE MY FAVORITE GLAMCORE SITE.
BASED ON THE MODELS, AND THE EXCELLENT QUALITY OF THE PHOTOS AND VIDEOS.

IT'S A SHAME THE OVER-ALL QUALITY OF THE SITE HAS DECLINED.
SO IT'S NOT QUITE AS GOOD A VALUE AS IT USED TO BE.
BUT THE BACKLOG OF PHOTOSETS AND VIDEOS IS STILL OUTSTANDING.


09-06-17  03:40am

Reply
2713
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of skippy's Reply

skippy, thanks for the replies.

I did not base my comment on duplicated material at X-Art and Colette on what I saw at those sites.
I was repeating what I read at Indexxx.com.
The comments were regarding X-Art and Colette.
Not MetArtX or any of the other sites in the MetArt network.
Also, TMW is primarily Russian/Eastern European models, not US models.

The URL for the X-Art/Colette comments is:
https://www.indexxx.com/websites/293/x-art/

The 2 comments from Indexxx.com are copied below


omg ? - 2017-01-15 + 0 -
They are adding recycled material, video games scene was published on teenmegaworld long time ago. Even in the x-art info you can see that this model is already 28.





[Chile] pardiboy ? - 2016-12-19 + 0 -
Both x-art and colette sites suck! they posted another model called Tini, showing her old material from wtfpass websites from a couple of years ago. They did the same with Angelica. Does anyone knows what happened to colette/x-art? Did they sell those websites? X-art was one of my favorites :(


01-30-17  01:27am

Comment
2714
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

Recycled content at X-Art and Colette?

I haven't been a member of X-Art for about 6 months.
But I've read some comments online that X-Art and Colette have published some material from Teen Mega World
and WTF Pass.
I don't know if the comments are true.
But if they are true, that's a real shame that X-Art and Colette are not publishing 100% exclusive content.
If true, I would guess that X-Art and Colette are having financial problems. Or at least trying to conserve cash publishing recycled content.
I'm not saying Teen Mega World or WTF content is poor. Some of their content is excellent. But X-Art was a superior glamcore site, and I hope it continues to product exclusive, glamcore content.

01-29-17  07:09pm

Replies (4)
Reply
2715
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of TheBrickster's Reply

You seem to have at least some experience in porn.

But what you are looking for "women OTHER than your stereotypical Hot teen/early 20s woman" is more of a niche product. Yes, there might be sites catering to that, but they are, as you implied, in the minority.
Glamcore sites are gaining interest, but the content is limited compared to mainstream teen/early 20s women.

As far as Asian, Asian women are some of the most beautiful in the world.
One problem with Japanese porn is the mosaic effect, which is required by Japan.
There are some Japanese porn sites that have some content without the mosaic.
If the mosaic bothers you, you can do google searches of PornUsers.com to see what the members have said about sites that might or might not offer some mosaic-free content.

But most Asian sites focus on the teen/early 20s models.

Do a google search (I'm not expert on Google searches) for PU members who like and have commented on sites that feature mature models. But I don't recall, off-hand, that they have mentioned sites that are combined mature models + glamcore, or non-white models + glamcore.

But like I said, the internet is big, so hopefully you will find sites that you think are worth the money to join.

When you think about it, a large part of enjoying porn is in the hunt.
When you find content that you really like, that is the payoff. But, hopefully, you will appreciate search, as well.

The Porn Users site can be a resource to check on porn sites
And most members are friendly, and willing to share their knowledge and interests.

But porn is a hobby, not a business, for most of us. LOL.


12-17-15  03:36pm

Reply
2716
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of TheBrickster's Reply

Part 2 of response:


Wow Girls, Wow Porn, and 18 Only Girls are strong in hardcore videos.
Those sites cost about $30, so they are more expensive than Met-Art.
Those site are borderline glamcore.
I think 18 Only Girls is the best value of the three, because it has the most content.
There are different options to join:
You can join any one of the 3 sites by itself, or you can join all 3 sites, but it gets expensive.
Lovely models, professionally shot videos, and the quality of the photo sets has increased in recent years--but not quite to the level of Met-Art or MPL Studios.

There are a bunch of other glamcore sites that were created the last few years.
What is the best value for you is truly personal: what your likes are, what you enjoy.
Do you focus on photos, videos, what type of women do you like (age, body type, race), softcore, hardcore, fetishes, etc.

The internet has a massive selection available.

BabesNetwork.com
Passion HD

The Met-Art network, which might have sites that you would find interesting.

Can you be more specific in what you are looking for? And the truth is, I'm not a real expert on porn or glamcore: other PU members might quibble about what glamcore is, or even what softcore midcore or hardcore is. Everyone seems to have their own opinions.


I'm rambling, but you or I could write book-length replies on what "glamcore" sites you might like. :)


12-17-15  12:29pm

Reply
2717
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of TheBrickster's Reply

There are a number of glamcore sites. Most of them good, but it's a question of how much money do you want to spend.
Unlimited money, a lot to explore.
But for most people, you only join one or two sites, on a limited budget.

First, what are your interests, likes?
Do you want mainly photos, or mainly videos, or a combination of the two?

What type of women are you interested in? All ages, teen, mature, what?

Ethnicity: most sites are mainly white models, but some sites emphasize other races as well.

For teen to early 20s women, photos only, softcore, Met-Art is my favorite site.
The site also has a lot of videos of beautiful naked women, but I find the videos almost all boring, and so do most other members at PU who have commented.
But at $20/month, or $99/year if you really like the site, this is a great value.

MPL Studios is also a good choice. Mostly softcore, but the videos have a slightly harder edge than Met-Art.
$30/month membership.


12-17-15  12:29pm

Review
2718
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

95.0
Status: Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros: -The collection of models rivals any porn site on the Net, as far as attractiveness of the models.
-The videos and photosets are professionally shot: excellent lighting, good camera technique, the models are professionally made-up, the costumes are good quality, as well as the sets.
-Choice of hi, standard, low, and mobile definition for videos;
-Choice of hi, medium and low definition for photo sets.
-No download limits.
-No DRM. Download a video or photo set, it's your to keep.
-Zip files for photo sets in low, medium and high definition.
-Epoch is the biller, a respected name for payment processors.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Can use download managers. I use Down Them All, a free download manager.
-Excellent download speeds. I get up to 4.6-4.9 MB/sec downloading a file.
-All content is exclusive.
Cons: -The cons are basically minor. This is mainly a well-designed site, that is easy to use.
-No search engine. A good search engine would save a lot of time for members who have specific needs.
-The models are 18 to early 20's. Mostly white. Extremely attractive. There's no variety beyond that. So if you want to see mature women, or different ethnic backgrounds, you won't find it here.
-You can sort the models by popularity, newness, name or age, but the listing order is clunky: You have to scroll down the page numerous times, to bring up more models, instead of just being able to scroll smoothly down to see all the models.
-The action might be too soft for some tastes. This is consensual sex: almost no hitting the women, slapping, spitting, forcible sex.
-Updates average one per 2-or-3 days. Would like more updates. But the site emphasizes quality over quantity, which is a good idea.
Bottom Line: Site statistics:
Number of models: 200+
Number of photosets: 800+
Number of videos: 600+

This is one of my favorite glamcore sites. It does an excellent job presenting the models as attractively as possible.
The models are almost all lovely to look at: they range from attractive to stunning to drop-dead gorgeous. Examine the model pages to see what I mean: these girls could be movie stars, based on their physical looks.
Note: The photographer can have a massive effect on how attractive a model appears in a photograph. The X-Art site photographers do a great job in showcasing their models. A model that might appear as just OK or slightly attractive at a different site, can appear to be alluring or beautiful or gorgeous in X-Art photos.

Most of the action is sweet, loving, gentle sex, either solo, twosome (boy-girl, girl-girl), or threesome (mainly 2 girls + 1 boy). The sex is mainly presented as between consenting adults who are giving each other pleasure. There is very
little gonzo sex. Recently, they have introduced a few videos/photosets showing a more forceful, 50-shades-of-grey style, since that seems to be the flavor of the month. But even then, you assume the sex is consensual.

When the site started, it was called "Beauty is Divine", and the content was strictly softcore photos of lovely models, but no videos.
Then the site became "X-Art", and they started adding videos, and the focus changed from softcore photography to glamcore, where they started adding sex, which over time became more and more explicit.

If you haven't tried glamcore, this site is definitely worth at least a 1-month membership, just to see what glamcore is.
The PU discount means $20/month. Considering the quality of the site (exceptionally beautiful models, professionally shot photosets and videos), you get more than your money's worth, if you are into soft, erotic sex. The site has been around since 1999, so there is a large amount of content (photosets and videos) to explore.

12-16-15  05:21pm

Replies (6)
Reply
2719
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Parsnip's Reply

Parsnip, send me a private email through the PU email system, and I will send you a link to join X-Art for $9.95 for the first month, rebilling at $19.95/month.

To send a private email, click on the hotlink of my username, that should bring up my PU data page; then click on the E-mail lk2fireone hot link, and write your message.


12-13-14  08:51am

Comment
2720
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)

X-Art raising prices?

Using the link from PU or TBP, when you hit the join page at X-Art, the prices displayed are:

One week for $9.95.
One month $39.95 single payment.
Three months $59.85.
One year $149.95.
Two years $199.95.


Compare the new prices to the prices listed at PU/TBP:

Monthly: $24.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.95 (non-recurring)
1 Year: $99.95 (non-recurring)



My guess is that new subscriptions/renewals will drop off significantly, if they keep those prices.
That's a shame, because X-Art is my favorite glamcore site.

But I certainly won't be paying the new listed prices.

12-09-14  01:53am

Replies (6)
Reply
2721
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Baboom's Comment

I'm a current member of X-Art. It's probably my favorite glamcore site.

10-08-14  01:51pm

Reply
2722
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Parsnip's Review

Very useful review. I have been a member of this site several times in the past, haven't belonged for about 6 months.
Sad to hear that the quality has dropped so much.
This site used to be one of my favorite glamcore sites.
The models were almost all great looking girls.


11-07-13  07:54am

Reply
2723
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of metem's Review

Very nice review. Agree with all the points you made, I even gave the site the same score you did, in my own review.

X-Art is my favorite glamcore site.


08-20-13  05:42pm

Reply
2724
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Nasos's Reply

I'm not currently a member of x art.
When I was a member, I never encountered any download limits or problems. I have a 2.3 MB/sec download speed, and when I first joined, I downloaded a lot of their content in the first few days, and was never blocked.
At a different site, that had a download limit of 10 GB/day, I was blocked, because their system was faulty, and it blocked me after downloading about 3 GB. That happened a few times, being blocked for 24 hours. But it never happened at x art.


The price for each site (with PU discount):
x art $24.95

passion hd $17.95

fantasy hd $17.95


x art has over 300 videos. The videos are short. Many are only around 10-14 minutes in length.
fantasy is small site. Less than 40 videos. The videos run around 30 minutes.
passion hd has over 200 videos. The videos run around 30 minutes.

All three sites are glamcore style. Very attractive models. No gonzo sex (rough, violent, abusive to the women).

I like the selection of models at x art. And the videos and photos. They models are some of the most attractive teens and early-twenties models in porn, and the photographers and video-makers try to present the models as attractively as possible. X-art is my favorite glamcore site, along with the Diesel Access network.

But passion hd also seems like a good site. Not as nice as X Art, which is top-of-the-line. But worth visiting at least once, if you like glamcore style.

But fantasy hd is too small. You can download the entire site in a few days, and then there's nothing else to get.


08-07-13  05:30pm

Reply
2725
Visit X-Art

X-Art
(0)
Reply of Tree Rodent's Reply

Good to hear from you. There is very little strip-tease or lingerie at this site, but the sex is mainly heartcore/glamcore, and if you check all the videos (and there are a lot), you might find some that are to your liking. You just have to keep looking, and the models are really pretty.

05-07-13  09:45am


Shown : 2701-2725 of 2840 Page :    < Previous Page - Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.54 seconds.