I don't know exactly what techniques the site uses, but The White Boxxx presents attractive models as fucking gorgeous creatures.
The lighting, maybe a filter, the white room, everything makes these models more attractive than almost all other sites they appear at.
Just my opinion, but I want to pound on them to end their suffering. These girls moan a lot, like they need to be satisfied, and it makes my heart go pitty-patter watching them perform.
USING CAPS BECAUSE OF POOR EYESIGHT, NOT TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
I ASSUME YOU WENT THROUGH THE EARLY 1970s WHEN MAINSTREAM MOVIE THEATERS WERE FIRST SHOWING SOFTCORE PORN.
BUT THE EXPERIENCE AT THE TIME SEEMED NEW AND EXCITING: WATCHING A MOVIE LIKE EMMANUELLE (WITH SYLVIA KRISTEL) OR STORY OF O. THE IMAGES WERE CRISP, THE COLORS VIBRANT, THE PLOT WAS INTERESTING, AND IT JUST SEEMED LIKE A NEW AGE.
ANYWAY, WATCHING THE LENA REIF VIDEO AT WHITE BOXXX, WHICH WAS THE FIRST VIDEO I SAW AT THE SITE, BROUGHT BACK A LITTLE OF HOW SENSUOUS PORN COULD BE.
"Sexy Shona River and Lena Reif enjoy hot threesome".
I DON'T KNOW WHY THE VIDEO LACKS THE HEAT IT SHOULD HAVE (MAYBE I'M JUST GETTING OLD AND MY BODY DOESN'T RESPOND LIKE IT USED TO WHEN I WAS YOUNGER), BUT THE IMAGES ARE CRISP AND CLEAR AND LENA IS PRESENTED LIKE A GODDESS, AND WHEN HER BREASTS SWAY SO NATURALLY, IT SEEMS LIKE A WET DREAM IN ACTION.
IF YOU STILL HAVE ACCESS TO THE VIDEO (DOWNLOADED, OR STILL A MEMBER OF THE SITE), I RECOMMEND WATCHING THE VIDEO AGAIN.
EXCELLENT GLAM HARDCORE OF A BEAUTIFUL WOMAN.
BUT LIKE YOU SAY, PORN IS AN INDIVIDUAL EXPERIENCE: TASTES DIFFER.
BOTTOM LINE (CONTINUES):
Some PU members obviously think differently, and believe a site deserves its own score, without any reference or change by access to the its network.
But I believe in the idea of what are you getting for what you are paying for:
Am I paying for a single site, or am I paying for a huge amount of high quality porn from a network, that also gives me access to some outstanding sites?
In this case, White Boxxx is an outstanding example of high-concept glam porn.
And the network access is a huge bonus.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the LetsDoeIt network (used to be called the PornDoePremium network). Membership in any one of the network sites gives you access to over 40 network sites.
-Unlimited streaming and downloading.
-Download choices: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-Streaming choices: 240p, 480p, 720p, 1080p.
-This is the first site I've seen where you can select the video speed.
0.25, 0.5, 0.75, Normal, 1.25, 1.5, 2.
Playing a video in slow motion still gives you a clear, crisp visual track, and the sound is slowed down but still sounds good. You would usually watch it at normal speed.
Except some of these models are great to fantastic looking, and you want to watch their lovely breasts swinging and swaying in slow motion. The breasts seem natural, not implants that look like bolted-on boobs.
-PU discount for the first month of $9.95. Recurs at $29.95/month.
-This is the first site I can remember where, if you have cookies enabled, it warns you if you already have a current membership.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
I was trying to check for pre-paid cross-sales and other traps on the join page. Useful for people who can't remember all the sites in the network. There are 44 sites in the network, so it's a useful feature.
-Going with the current trend, login and member pages are secure: https.
-Site (and network) advertises exclusive content.
CONS (START OF):
-Once you understand the site theme, I think the cons are basically minor.
-However, by placing such strong emphasis on hard core glam sex, the videos seem to lose some steam: the models are gorgeous, the sex is hardcore and lovely to watch, but it's not as hot as sex found at Diesel Access, TMW, or Rocco Siffredi, to offer 3 very different versions of hardcore young sex models. You lose the edge, the element of roughness, and the sex seems more slow-motion and elegant and more of a visual treat than a hot erotic experience.
Bottom Line:
The White Box is considered a glamour site, featuring lesbian sex.
I want to amend that description: it's a glamour site, featuring some of the most attractive models on the internet, and the girls are young teens, early twenties models, most of which are presented as lovely women.
Lena Reif is featured in one massage video, with Shona River.
I don't know what techniques the site uses, but they present the models wonderfully: the girls can look gorgeous. It's not that they use a ton of make-up, or glam costumes: the girls can appear in panties and a thin tank top, but they just look gorgeous.
And when you see how Lena Reif's lovely breasts sway as she moves, the one massage video of her at the site is worth the admission price by itself. Lena is just that lovely.
To add to the value of the videos, there are not a lot of fake moans, groans and screams to show fake excitement.
This is not a complete explanation of the White Boxxx style of making the models look glamourous, but it's a start:
-they use a filter, so that the videos are not crystal clear, but more like the Penthouse style of photos from the 1970s where there was a slight mist that seemed to cover the scene.
The costumes are usually simple: mainly white for the models: bikini style briefs, if the model wears a top to cover her breasts, it's white and loose-flowing, and comes off easily, and before it comes off, it often gives glimpses of the woman's breasts.
The action is not slam-bam-thank-you-maam, but slow, erotic buildup to the sex. A lot of stroking and kissing.
Many of the scenes are 2 women stroking each other while they are stroking the guy, but the women are paying as much attention to each other as the are to the guy.
So you could consider it as 2 bi-women pleasuring each other while they are pleasuring the guy.
This is glam sex: they women are presented glam-style. They definitely appear more glamourous than when appearing at other sites. Even though they are performing hardcore sex, it's sex in a glamour setting: the sex is not harsh, rough or demeaning to the models, the models seem to be really enjoy pleasuring their female partners as well as pleasuring the guy.
Also, they women are in control: they guy is their personal sex toy: they using him as a contrast to the sexual attraction between the two lovely women.
It doesn't get much better than this for a guy: two lovely women, giving him their bodies in a slow, sensual massage and fuck.
"Her First Threesome", a threesome video with Shona River, Lena Reif and Lutro.
I don't know what filters and lighting the site uses, but Lena Reif, a stunning looking model, looks like a wet-dream come true. She is a great-looking model in the video. Shona River looks better in this video than any other porn site I've seen her in.
It's not the make-up, because they don't have heavy make-up.
It's not the costumes, because the costumes, while not cheap, are not expensive: panties and a t-shirt for the models.
Lena Reif is a very good-looking model: but in this video, she looks fantastic.
Compare how Stacy Cruz looks in her video at The White Boxxx with her appearance at MetArt, SexArt(one of the MetArt glamour sites), the Teen Mega World network (TMW), and Wow Girls.
In The White Boxx video, she looks fantastic: a wet dream come true. Great face, great body.
The MetArt photo set is poor: a jumbled assortment of poses where Stacy is contorted in different positions: Very little attention paid to her lovely face.
The SexArt photo set is superior.
But where her looks really shine is in the White Boxxx video:
The outstanding strength of the White Boxxx site is the way they present the models at their most lovely.
Quite often, a photo set, because of photoshopping and greater control over the finished picture, can make a model appear more attractive.
But The White Boxxx site often makes the models look better than at any other site, including sites like Blacked, Tushy or Vixen.
You have to join the network to see what I'm talking about.
The Whiteboxx site, by itself, is worth the price of admission to the LetsDoeIt network.
One caveat: the models look fantastic: but this is not the hottest site for hardcore videos.
Some of the videos at Teen Mega World, or Devils Film, or the Diesel Acess network, can be even hotter.
The White Boxxx has some great looking models, in hardcore sex, and the models just look fantastic: lovely face, sexy body. Great photography in the videos and photo sets.
Since the first month of a sub is only $9.95 with a PU discount, I recommend joining the site at least once, to sample some of their wares. The first time you watch some of the White Boxxx videos, you should be blown away by how beautiful they can make these creatures appear.
Giving the site (with network access) a score of 92.
I personally find it difficult to separate the value of a site by itself, if it comes with access to a great network of sites.
That's my thinking.
CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION BELOW
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Multiple choices for downloading a video: High, medium, or low quality.
But the quality of the "high quality" video is not very good.
-Content is dated.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Easy login.
-Very easy switching between network sites (Do not need to re-enter your login information, just click on a hot link).
-Long time before site timeout.
Cons:
-Archive site. Last update was 2009-02-07.
-Small site.
-Models are not named in the videos.
-No model bios.
-Default filename for downloading videos is "high", "medium", or "low",
for high, medium or low quality selection. So have to manually rename videos for sorting or saving.
-But that's not a big problem, because due to low quality of even the "high" quality videos, who wants to save these videos anyway? The models
in the videos are not named, the videos are poor quality (in terms of erotic quality and video technique). I'm watching one video with a guy and
a girl, and it's not until 4 minutes after the video starts that you can easily see the face of the girl. Until then, the heads of both the guy and the girl are mainly cut out of the frame, and it's not until the 4 minute mark, when the girl drops to her knees to give the guy a blow job, that you can clearly see the girl's face.
CONS CONTINUED IN NEXT SECTION
Bottom Line:
CONS CONTINUED:
-The site design has a hot link for each video, named: "Watch Picture Gallery", which is what the site calls the photoset. But every video link that I clicked on to see the "Watch Picture Gallery" led to a Picture Gallery with no pictures. So I do not think this site has any photosets. Which is OK, because I was expecting the photosets to be low quality anyway, based on the rest of the network offerings for photosets.
-Videos are supposed to be viewable in flash stream. But some links to watch the video in flash stream don't work. I kept waiting for minutes for some videos to load and play, but all they did was keep loading, without playing.
Again, this is not a big problem, because I was just testing the site to be able to write this review, and I already decided the site was basically worthless. If I had really wanted to watch these videos, I might have been frustrated.
-Slow download speeds. This is the first site in the network where I did not get my maximum download speed. Instead, I was often getting about one-half of my maximum download speed of 620-630 KB/s.
BOTTOM LINE:
The site theme is voyeur porn. The girls and couples are supposedly unaware they are being captured on film. So if that idea/niche turns you
on, maybe you will get extra satisfaction from the videos. I would prefer videos that are erotic, or well shot.
Because these are supposed to be voyeur videos, many of them show the girl apparently in the distance. She is only a small part of the frame. So you often don't see her close-up, in good detail. I guess this is supposed to add to the voyeur-sexiness of the filming, but I would prefer to see the standard closeup of the girl, where I can clearly see her face and body, instead of seeing some person in the fucking distance.
These are really cheaply made videos. Most of the videos are shot with the model by herself or with a guy, in a car, at a lake or meadow. The choice of shooting the model in a car makes for lousy camera angles, terrible framing of the girl (head or other body parts often cut out of the picture). Or the car seat or roof blocks your view of the girl. The lake and meadow locations are very windy, so there's a lot of microphone noise. Controlling lighting for an outdoor scene is more difficult than for an indoor scene. The girl's face and body goes in and out of shadow constantly, so you don't get a really clear view of the girl.
Video specs:
High quality:
Frame width x height: 1280x720
Total bitrate: 4320 kbps
The bitrate is very high, and would support high definition video. But I would classify these videos as "crap" videos. Pardon the French. Lousy
video technique. Not naming the models in the videos. Minimal erotic appeal.
Number of videos at site: 44
Videos run from 5 minutes to about 17 minutes.
-Bottom line: the site can be considered a bonus site as part of your Teen
Mega World network. But the site itself has little value. It would be better if they just eliminated the site.
Some of these models are so skinny they look like they belong in a hospital. Maybe they don't have an eating disorder, but it's not healthy to be that thin.
People have different standards for rating download speeds.
But 17 kps would be horrible for anyone with broadband.
When I had dial-up for many years, I would get 3-4 KB/s as my normal download speed, sometimes slowing to 1 KB/s.
Upgrading to DSL, I got 120-130 KB/s.
I recently upgraded my DSL to 620-630 KB/s.
But to download a full-length movie in decent quality would take over 24 hours for 17 kbs. (I don't know how long it would take exactly, because it depends on the quality, but many movies are around 700 MB or more). Video clips from porn sites can be 1 GB or more.
Anyway, people have complained about the download speeds at this site before, off and on. Sometimes the speeds are fast, sometimes they are slow. But never this slow before.
You should email the site and ask for a refund or free extension of your membership as compensation for the poor service you have gotten.
That is only reasonable. And right.
If you don't get a free extension of your membership, you should demand a refund, from your billing agent. Or credit card company. Or whoever.
17 kbs is ridiculous (unless you are on dial-up, which I assume you are not).
Edit: You aren't on dial-up, because you mention 200 kbs speed.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Download limits: none.
-DRM: none.
-Currently updates: 1 update about every 10 days recently.
One week you post a post a photoset which is a record of a video shoot, 10 days later you post the video made during the photoshoot.
-To view individual photos in a set, click on the thumbnail, and you get an enlarged picture. This is easy and fast and wonderful compared to the
slow, clunky software viewing system used at most of the other TonyBucks sites. All the sites in this network should use this simple system, and
get rid of the fancy software that makes viewing individual photos a slow and laborious process.
-Easy login. There is a captcha, but it's easily read, not the messy squiggles that make you wonder what the letters or numbers are supposed to be. I dislike the messy squiggles, and even when I guess them right, I feel irritated that I have to pass a test that I believe is unfair and
stupid. And when I fail to guess right, I am even more irritated.
Cons:
-Streaming: Not available.
-Zips for photosets: Not available.
-Photos available in 1 size only.
-Models: less attractive than most of the TonyBucks models. On the plus side, there are few tattoos or body piercings on the girls.
-Thumbnail ads clutter the listing page of site contents. The thumbnail ads are not identified as ads, you have to figure out which thumbnails show you the site contents, and which thumbnails are ads for other sites.
-Very basic search. Can search by name of model. Can search by type of content (video or photoset). Can also search by date the content was posted, which is basically useless.
Bottom Line:
Tinseks is part of the TonyBucks network, a small network of 11 sites that focus on hardcore teen.
The sites have both videos and photosets. The photosets can be from ok to good quality regarding photo size, focus, lighting, skin tone, etc. But the photos have little erotic quality. The photos are mainly a capture of a video shoot.
It's cheaper to have one session where you do both the photoshoot and the videoshoot. But the results, for the photoset, would be better if you had a separate session for the photoshoot. You would get better pictures (more erotic, more interesting, better posed, etc.). That is assuming the photographer was competent.
So the main value of the photos is to give you an idea of what the model looks like, and maybe an idea of what the video action will be.
But the main value of the sites is in the videos. The photos can be of good quality, but the eroticism does not approach the photo sites like Metart. The videos are a different matter: The
TonyBucks videos are mainly well shot, feature a number of ok looking models, and are hardcore. Metart and most major photo sites are
mainly softcore, and their videos are usually more boring than erotic. At TonyBucks it's the other way around: the value is in the videos, the
photos are a minor addition (even though the photosets have a large number of photos per set, and there is usually the same number of photosets and videos). So a lot of effort was put into making the photosets, but the effort was basically wasted.
Unless otherwise noted, what follows refers specifically to the tinseks site:
The tinseks theme is European college students having great sex.
-Site contents:
94 videos
94 photosets
-Videos can be downloaded in different formats:
WMV: low, medium, high resolution
MPG
MOV
The videos are large files, 580-765 MB for a 20-30 minute clip for high quality WMV file:
Frame width x frame height: 720x576
Total bitrate: 4128kbps
The figures shown are as high or higher than what some sites advertise as high definition. There are other TonyBucks sites where the total bitrate
can be as high as 6300kbps for some videos, but even 4128 is extremely good or "high" definition, as far as I can tell from watching the videos.
The videos are very sharp and clear, good lighting, good colors, good skin tone.
The sound is pretty good. A little annoying random background noise, but they usually don't bother with a music soundtrack, which is a plus.
I personally didn't find many pretty models at this site. This site has a lot of hardcore videos. The action is not rough. It's a boy and a girl getting a lot of enjoyment from sex. Or they are certainly trying to. I just find the action slightly boring. I want a connection,
something erotic to stimulate the imagination. Even if the model were pretty, I still want
something beyond her getting banged.
I'm giving the site a score of 78, because access to the bonus sites raises the value of this site.
Thanks for the input, pat. I'll probably wait a while before joining this site/network. Unless I change my mind and find a few more models on this network that look as good as Tiny Becky. :)
If you are a member of Teen Mega World, you don't have access to Tiny Teens 18.
However, my impression is that the videos at Tiny Teens 18 are available in the Teen Mega World network.
For example:
Looking at the "Schoolgirl Fucking" from Tiny Teens 18, you have the same thumbnail, same title "Schoolgirl Fucking", at the Teen Sex Movs site (part of Teen Mega World network).
I'm not going to bother searching for other matching videos, but I suspect that all the videos at Tiny Teens 18 were first posted to Teen Mega World.
The MetArt network has done a similar move. They started a site called "Love Hairy", which features models who have pubic hair. Their sets and videos were and are featured on the MetArt sites, but some of the same content is also featured at the "Love Hairy" site.
So you can call this a marketing move.
So if you are willing to take the time to search, joining Teen Mega World is probably the better choice, since for a few dollars more, you get access to a huge amount of good hardcore teen videos, versus joining Tiny Teens 18.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Joining any site in the TMW network gives access to all the sites in the network.
Join through TMW (Teen Mega World), costs $14.95/month, with PU discount.
Join through TMW VR Net costs $19.95/month, with PU discount.
Join through Beauty 4K costs $29.95/month, with PU discount.
So do yourself a favor, and join through TMW.
-Good download speeds. I get about 4.5-5.0 MB/sec download speeds. My max download speed limit is 6 MB/sec.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Good navigation. The site (and network) is easy to use. This is important, because the network has a huge amount of videos and photosets, and you need to be able to find the models and videos that appeal to you, without a lot of effort.
-I just find the models at the network, in the main, attractive to very attractive. Not a lot of effort is put into making the models appear glamorous or at their best. But they are young, and physically attractive, and in spite of engaging in hardcore sex, they still come across as appealing.
Cons:
-Small site. Started in 2016. Only 15 videos so far (as of 2016-08-28).
-Irregular update rate. One or two or three videos per month.
-Need to have Virtual Reality gear to watch the video in virtual reality.
-File sizes for virtual reality files are huge.
For a video with a runtime of 29 minutes 39 seconds, the sizes are:
Oculus Rift: 6.7GB
Gear VR: 4.5GB
Smartphone: 3.4GB
1080p: 2.1GB
Note: this is not the fault of the codec, but these files will eat up your storage space very fast.
-Video files download with a generic number. So you need to manually re-name the files to know who the model is, and what the title of the video is.
Bottom Line:
The Best Porn review of TMW VR Net states:
"Like with all the other sites on the network, the TMW VR Net collection is exclusive."
This is an error.
Not all the material at TMW is exclusive. Many of the videos at Tricky Masseur (part of TMW) appear at Rub A Teen (part of the Team Skeet network).
Many of the videos at Tricky Masseur also appear at All Fine Girls(part of the Diesel network).
There are other videos at TMW that appear at the Diesel network and at Team Skeet network.
Also, a lot of the videos at TMW appear at 18X Girls (a different site from Team Skeet and Diesel).
This is not a major issue. But don't expect 100% exclusive content at TMW, Diesel, Team Skeet, or 18X Girls. If you're expecting 100% exclusive content, you will be disappointed.
Having said that, the videos at TMW VR Net are 100% exclusive, to the best of my knowledge.
TMW VR Net is the newest site in the TMW network. It features virtual reality videos.
The site is small, and updates slowly. So it will continue to be small in the future.
Note: I do not have the equipment to view videos in virtual reality mode. So my experience does not reflect the intended audience.
If I did have the virtual reality equipment, perhaps I would include a WOW factor in my review, that would change my review score because of the virtual reality experience.
Having said that, I have seen 3D movies in theaters, and was not blown away by the experience so much that I thought the movies were fantastic because of the 3D factor.
If you have the money to buy virtual reality equipment, then this site would have more value than it has for me.
Bottom Line:
This is a small site. It updates slowly. It features the virtual reality gimmick.
The models at the site are attractive. The videos are high quality: good camera-work, good lighting, good colors, clean, attractive sets.
The main value of the site is that it gives access to all the sites in the TMW network. TMW is a huge network, with over 30 sites, over 1,000 models, over 4,000 videos.
TMW focuses on teens (18 to early twenties models) doing hardcore sex. It covers a number of niches.
Most of the sites do not update, or do so in a very infrequent manner.
You get access to a few sites that have much older content (4 to 5 years old or more), in lower quality videos (low quality because of the file definition, cheap sets, poor production values). This would include the latino site, ex-girlfriend site, gay boys site, and a she-male site.
The network should eliminate those sites completely, because they drag down the quality of the network. Especially considering the money and time they are putting into providing a much higher quality product with their newer sites.
Rating the virtual reality site:
Because it's a small site (15 videos currently), and will stay a small site for quite a while, you might consider it a specialty site. Especially with the virtual reality factor in the videos.
But because you get network access to the mega network of TMW, that raises the value of the site, because it gives you access to a huge number of teen hardcore videos in many different niches. You get access to 1,000+ models, 4,000+ videos, and thousands of photosets.
The models can be attractive to outstanding. The videos, especially the more recent years, are offered in high definition, professionally shot (good camera-work, good lighting, clean sets).
The network is easy to use: good download speeds, no DRM, no download limits, easy login (with cookies enabled), good model index with nice-sized thumbnails of each model, and links to the models' videos.
For a price of $14.95/month, you get more than your money's worth.
Giving the site (because of the network access) a score of 92.
Sort of off topic for porn is strange, but not really:
Porn is porn, but good humor is timeless. At a special event in New York City on Monday honoring film star Tom Hanks, film star Julia Roberts gave a speech that was supposed to be funny. Maybe I'm just too old to appreciate the humor of a superstar actor, but back when I was a teenager, or in my twenties, I would have been thrown out of any formal event where I was overheard to use words like Julia Roberts used.
Below is a summary of her speech:
"All right, well, it's late and I'm paying my babysitter overtime and I have to pee," she began.
"So Tom, everybody f---ing likes you. All my bits are gone. Listen, I had lunch today with Rita [Wilson, Hanks' wife], and her t--s were here [motioned high] and her waist was here [motioned small] and her a-- was like that [motioned high], so what can I tell you that's new? Tom Hanks,
what the f---?"
Audience members, including Charlize Theron, busted up with laughter.
She then went on to say she's seen most of Hanks' films except "That Thing (You Do)."
"I love the Coen brothers, but the hair Tom [in 2004's 'Ladykillers'], I didn't even know what the f--- that movie was about!" Of 2004's "The Terminal," she cracked, "You in the airport with the accent? It was a pass for me. Airport? Were you just an immigrant lost? I didn't know. I love you, and I didn't know what to do, really. God, I'm wearing the same f---ing dress tonight as your publicist!"
The audience again laughed.
------------------------------------------
Since you don't speak English as your native language:
f---: stands for fuck
t--s: stands for tits (breasts)
a--: stands for ass
pee: stands for pee, piss, urinate
Reading the replies to the poll submitted by GCode a few days ago, "What, in your opinion, is the oddest fetish in the porn industry?", you realize that yes, porn can be strange. What is the appeal of feces, urine, and other disgusting items? It depends on the viewer. I prefer to not even think about it.
I seem to remember back in the 1970s Penthouse magazine did some short articles on the sexual appeal of men and women who were disfigured by accident and/or disease.
As for Torbe, I don't find him appealing, and I would not join this site.
I'm a fellow photo lover. I don't mind airbrushing, as long as it's not excessive. What's excessive to me is when I have trouble recognizing the model from the picture.
Interesting as a strange/funny fact:
Karolina Kurkova is one of the world's highest paid models.
She models for Victoria's Secret.
When the absence of her belly button became news recently in late November, Kurkova's agent reported that "she's not an alien".
The reason her missing belly button was not noticed in photographs before is that in the past, she has had a belly button airbrushed in.
She is currently 24, and made an estimated £2.3 million last year.
Not my favorite model, but definitely a great-looking chick. With or without a belly button.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
I AM WRITING IN CAPS BECAUSE IT'S EASIER FOR ME TO READ AND WRITE. NOT TRYING TO BE RUDE OR SHOUT.
-$14.95 FOR FIRST MONTH WITH PU DISCOUNT. RECURS AT $29.95/MONTH.
-SECURE LOGIN PAGE.
-SECURE MEMBER SITE PAGES.
-SOME TRANNY MODELS CAN BE SURPRISINGLY ATTRACTIVE, ONCE YOU WRAP YOUR HEAD AROUND THE FACT THEY ARE TRANNYS. THIS IS A NICHE, BUT IT'S BEING INCREASINGLY ACCEPTED BY SOCIETY, AS SHOWN BY THE SAG AND GOLDEN GLOBE AWARDS GIVEN TO THE TRANSPARENT SERIES AND ACTORS. HAVING SAID THAT, I'M STRAIGHT, AND I THINK IT WOULD BE EASIER TO WATCH TWO GAY MEN HAVING SEX INSTEAD OF A TRANNY AND A MALE PARTNER.
-CHOICE OF DOWNLOAD DEFINITION FROM 160p TO 1080p.
-CHOICE OF STREAMING DEFINITION FROM 160p TO 1080p.
-THE VIDEOS ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT: EXCELLENT LIGHTING, GOOD FOCUS, GOOD SOUND CONTROL.
-NO DRM.
-LONG TIME BEFORE SITE TIME-OUT.
-NO DOWNLOAD LIMITS.
-SITE ACCEPTS DOWNLOAD MANAGERS.
Cons:
-UPDATES EVERY FEW DAYS. EXCEPT NO UPDATES IN SEPTEMBER 2017.
-I CAN'T FIND A MODEL LISTING FOR THE TRANNY PROS AT THE SITE (IF YOU WANT TO FIND WHAT VIDEOS A TRANNY APPEARS IN).
-YOU CAN'T EXPECT PORN MODELS TO BE PROFESSIONAL ACTORS, BUT THE MODELS/STUNT COCKS AT TRANNY PROS WOULD BE MORE CONVINCING IF THEY DIDN'T HAVE TO SPEAK. OR YOU COULD JUST MUTE THE SOUND.
-SITE/NETWORK UPDATED THE STRUCTURE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO. MADE THE SITE/NETWORK APPEAR BRIGHTER, MORE MODERN. EXCEPT IT MESSED UP THE NAVIGATION: MAKING IT HARDER TO FIND THE SEPARATE SITES, WHAT THE VIDEOS ARE IN A SITE, HOW TO SWITCH BETWEEN SITES.
ACCESS TO ANY ONE OF THE 5 SITES LISTED ABOVE WOULD NORMALLY BE WORTH THE LOW MEMBERSHIP PRICE OF $14.95 FOR THE FIRST MONTH.
HOWEVER, THE NETWORK DID AN UPDATE A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO, MAKING NAVIGATING THE SITES MORE DIFFICULT. THE OLD STRUCTURE WAS MUCH EASIER TO USE, TO SEE WHAT EACH SITE HAD TO OFFER, TO ACCESS THE SITE VIDEOS. ELIMINATING THE DROP-DOWN-LISTING WAS A MAJOR MISTAKE.
TRANNY PROS SITE HAS 645 VIDEOS. THESE ARE PROFESSIONALLY SHOT VIDEOS, SO IT'S A LARGE SITE, AND THE UPDATES KEEP COMING. SO I ASSUME THERE IS DEMAND FOR THE NICHE.
I'M GIVING THE SITE A SCORE OF 80. THAT IS BASED ON:
-THE LARGE NUMBER OF GOOD QUALITY VIDEOS;
-THE SECURE SITE LOGIN AND SECURE SITE MEMBER PAGES;
-THE ACCESS TO THE FAME DIGITAL NETWORK SITES, WHICH IS A MAJOR HARDCORE NETWORK;
-THE CUSTOMER SUPPORT TEAM IS FIRST-RATE AND IS 24/7. THE CHAT ANSWERS IN A FEW MINUTES, AND CAN BE BOTH HELPFUL AND PATIENT.
-I'M DEDUCTING 10 POINTS FROM THE SCORE, BECAUSE I THINK THE NETWORK UPDATE IMPLEMENTED ABOUT 2 MONTHS AGO MADE NAVIGATING THE SEPARATE SITES HARDER.
I THINK THE TRANNY PROS SITE IS LARGE AND EXCELLENT FOR THE NICHE. THIS SITE/NETWORK HAS PUT A LOT OF TIME AND MONEY AND EFFORT INTO MAKING THE SITE CONTENTS.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Niche: She-males.
-Exclusive content: Yes.
-Watermark: small watermark bottom right corner.
-Delivery:
---download high or low quality WMV files.
---stream high or low quality.
-DRM: No.
-Download restrictions: No.
-Screencaps: Yes.
-Search: by series, movie title, or actor.
-Updates: 1 scene per week.
Cons:
-Only WMV format for download.
-No photosets (except for screencaps).
-Almost all the models have a blank thumbnail in the directory, so you don't have an easy way to see what the models look like.
Bottom Line:
Site Stats:
Clips: 122
Hours: 60
Total Size: 54 Gb
-Stats for videos:
-Bit rate: 2148 kbps (varies slightly)
-Dimensions: 720x480, 720x528
-Average length of scene: about 30 minutes
The style of the video is like a home-made video, the visual quality, focus, color, lighting, etc. are not as good as the standard for most of the video clips on the network, the producers are going for a "real-life, guy meets trannies (guy with one or two trannies) and they have sex almost immediately. No plot or story, just sex, the "production values" are slightly less than the standard videos at the network in a deliberate attempt to make the video seem like a slice of life, a real-life capture of a sexual encounter between the male customer and 1 or 2 tranny prostitutes, instead of a planned movie.
One improvement over many porn clips is there are less fake moans and groans from the models and male performers in these clips.
This site of she-males is for someone who wants a change from the usual boy-girl, girl-girl action. Definitely a different type of attraction. Somewhat confusing at first, there is emotional reaction positive and negative when watching these she-male performers.
The overall attractiveness of the performers at this site is OK to nice.
I've seen photos where some she-males are exceptionally pretty or even lovely, which can do strange things to your mind. You're thinking, is this a man or a woman, and am I strange for thinking this "person" is attractive, whatever it is. Gay is gay, straight is straight, and this is neither. Also makes you start to think you yourself are not exactly what you thought you were either.
There are many she-males at the site that, at first glance, even second glance, you don't know if they are females or not, until they drop their drawers. They can be attractive.
As for the male models in the scenes, you don't know how to classify them either: are the male models bi, or what? I'd guess bi, because they (the male models) are swinging both ways with 1 or more she-males.
The site is a collection of Devils Films videos that were shot for the Devils Films series titled "Transsexual Prostitutes". Those videos were collected and used to make Trannypros.com.
The main benefit of membership in Trannypros.com is that it gives you access to all 19 sites in the netFameSolutions network. That means over 9700 clips, almost 3200 GB, for a broad selection of general and niche content. The network is a good value for the PU/TBP special price of $14.95/month, and there are special offers at times that give you an even lower price.
The general quality of the video clips at the network is good, professional quality. This is a video network, with only limited photosets, but a solid offering for the price.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Note: if you join Teen Mega World (or any of its satellite sites), make sure you join through the Teen Mega World site itself.
The price to join any of the sites is the same.
But if you join through the Teen Mega World site, your navigation is easier.
And the search for a model's contents covers the entire network.
See further details on why joining through the TMW site is better than joining any of its satellite sites.
-Tricky Masseur is part of the Teen Mega World network, a large network of over 30 sites, covering many different niches. Membership in any one of the sites gives you full access to the entire network: there are no premium sites that cost extra.
-Unlimited streaming.
-Unlimited downloads.
-Videos from the last few years go up to 4K (UHD).
Cons:
-Join through the Teen Mega World site, not through any of its satellite sites.
This will make navigation and search easier and less time-consuming.
See bottom line section for a more complete explanation.
-Pre-checked cross-sale. But this is standard for porn sites.
-Vendo is the billing agent. I normally prefer CCBill or Epoch, but I've used Vendo many times, and never had a problem.
-Tricky Masseur is an archive site: the last update was Nov 16, 2018. Before that, they posted videos on an irregular basis of 1 to 5 month intervals.
It's been 4 months since the last new video, they could post a new vid at any time, switching from an archive site to a site that is currently updating.
However, most members probably appreciate a more regular update schedule.
-Non-secure login. Non-secure member pages. Easily hacked. Your ISP has a record of each page you visit, which it turns over to your friendly government agency.
Note: I've seen the site show both site hottps and http pages. Weird.
Bottom Line:
-Many years ago the Teen Mega World network was a low-rent network of hardcore teen videos. But the network has spent a lot of time and money and effort upgrading their content: Most of the sites now feature more expensive sets, improved lighting and sound control, easier navigation. Sometimes, the network updates are mistakes, that make navigation harder, but overall, they are trying to improve the user experience: The current search engine is messed up: unless you join through the Teen Mega World site, your search engine is limited to the site you joined through. That applies even when you switch to a different site in the network. And you can't find the network updates, because you are limited to the updates at the site you joined through. The TMW site shows the recent updates for the network. But you can't access that page if you joined through one of the satellite sites.
And the search engine for a model's content is limited to your join site, unless you join through the Teen Mega World site, where your search engine will return her content at the entire network.
TMW (Teen Mega World) is one of my favorite hardcore teen network.
That, along with the Diesel Access Network (no longer called Diesel Access Network, apparently they don't have a name they use for the 3 sites:
All Fine Girls, Wow Girls, Wow Porn), even though they sometimes market the 3 sites in a single membership offering).
Why do I like the TMW network (and the Diesel Access Network):
-Many of the girls are cute to very attractive.
-The large number of hardcore videos that are good quality. This is bread-and-butter hardcore teen porn, not glamcore, but the quality is very good, the models are young and mainly attractive, and put on a show where they are enthusiastic about the sex.
-On average, the girls at Diesel Access are slightly more attractive than the girls at TMW, but the truth is, I wouldn't kick most of the models out of my bed, if I were lucky enough to find one in my bed.
But at my age (I'm over 70), I couldn't last very long. The spirit is willing, but the body is not.
Bottom line: Tricky Masseur features a simple, yet effective plot: an attractive young teen comes for a massage. The masseur rubs her with oils, then rubs her pussy as part of the massage, then sticks his fingers into the girl's pussy.
The girl is aroused, and starts sucking on the guy's dick (these are Russians babes, who are easily turned on, and they know how to respond when a Russian stud sticks his fingers up her pussy. (Sort of like Trump grabbing women by the pussy, except with more finesse.)
The guy gets naked, and gives the girl a great fuck.
The guy is satisfied. The girl is satisfied. End of story.
A simple plot. But easy to watch. The models need not be great actresses, because the action is basic sex, which is a positive, since a lot of these models, when they try to act in a video, come across as poor actresses.
Tricky Masseur is one of my favorite sites in the Teen Mega World network.
-The plot is simple, yet believable.
-The girls are mainly attractive to very attractive.
-The sex can be hot. These are young girls who suck and fuck with enthusiasm. And the stunt cocks give the girls a good time.
-This is bread-and-butter hardcore sex, with not a lot of extras. But the sex is good, the video quality is good, and unless you demand high quality glamcore, you should enjoy these videos.
Note: this is not glamcore, but the sex is basically friendly: no cruelty, no extreme roughness, maybe some light slapping of the girl's rump, light pulling of the girl's hair, to add to the excitement, but far from the extreme roughness of some hardcore sites.
Note: a lot of the videos from TMW are also found at other websites.
The Team Skeet site, Rub A Teen, is basically a clone of the Tricky Masseur site at TMW.
And many of the Tricky Masseur videos are found at the Diesel Access Network.
Also, 18 Virgin Sex and the Diesel Access Network have many other videos that are duplicates of videos that first appeared at TMW.
So if you have a lot of history with teen porn, many of these videos might be familiar. But TMW and the Diesel Access Network has a large amount of back videos, as well as new updates, that you should find worthwhile.
I'm giving Tricky Masseur a score of 90. If the site started updating more frequently, the score would be higher. But this is still one of the best sites in the TMW network.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The recent update rate is one video per month for the site. However, the network updates daily.
-Beginning in September 2016, the updated videos were offered in Ultra HD (2160p), as well as lower definitions of 405p, 540p, 720p, 1080p) for downloading.
-$14.95/month, recurring with PU discount.
-Can choose your own username and password on joining.
-New files have better file names. Instead of generic file numbers for the name, new files now use the system: SiteName_FileNumber_ModelName_Definition.mp4: TrickyMasseur_241_Lolly_Small_1280x720.mp4.
Cons:
-Non-secure login page.
-I only see one definition for streaming. Many sites offer you a choice to stream videos in different definitions.
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-FX Billing EU Ltd seems to be the default biller. I prefer CCBill or Epoch or Segpay, if possible.
-Captcha required to enter the site. Also, sometimes, you need to select proper images of a captcha to enter the site--and this can be a hassle, because the proper images are hard to detect.
Also, transferring between sites, because of the captcha, is not as easy as it used to be: You sometimes have to re-enter your username and password to switch between sites, which was not required until lately--and if the captca images pop up, you can be blocked from entering, because of the difficulty of guessing the right images.
-The yearly membership price was raised from $89.95 to $119.40.
I've been a yearly member at $89.95 for several times. But a jump to $119.40 will make me hesitate to rejoin.
Bottom Line:
Tricky Masseur started in 2010.
The massage theme was a teen girl getting a sensuous massage that leads to sex.
This theme has been done by several sites, and many of them do a good job with the theme: I think it's a concept that makes sense, and is easy to film. Tricky Masseur is one of the better massage-themed sites:
-Most of the models are young, attractive teens.
-The girls seem to be hot, and appear to enjoy the sex.
-I can't think of anything better than a young, attractive teen who is getting a hot fuck.
Most of the videos at Tricky Masseur are also featured at competing porn sites: Rub A Teen (Team Skeet network), All Fine Girls (Diesel Access network), 18X Girls. So if you've been a member at those porn sites, you've probably seen most of the Tricky Masseur videos.
However, the videos were first posted at Tricky Masseur, before being posted at the competing porn sites (as a matter of historical fact; but what counts is that the Tricky Masseur videos are posted at different websites).
So if you are collector, you probably have most of the Tricky Masseur videos already.
Especially since the update rate is about 1 new video per month.
But if you haven't seen most of the Tricky Masseur videos, I highly recommend the site:
Because, as I said:
-Most of the girls are young teens who are physically attractive;
-The sex can be hot-the girls seem to get into the action and enjoy themselves.
-The slight plot (masseur turning a girl on and having sex with her) is simple, but effective, and makes more sense than most porn plots.
I'm giving the site a score of 88.
That's because, in addition to the site itself, you get access to the rest of the Teen Mega World network, which has 41 sites in different niches.
The network works on improving itself: In recent years, they are spending money on more expensive sets, improved lighting, more professional shoots, better photosets.
They added a VR site to the network in 2016.
They started offering Ultra HD (2160p) definition videos in 2015.
They have one site dedicated to Ultra HD, Beauty 4K, but the network also produces Ultra HD videos for the other sites in their recent offerings.
I'm giving the site and network a score of 88.
If they got rid of the capcha requirement, and lowered the yearly membership fee back to $90, I would give the site/network a few more points.
But most PU members would opt for the $14.95/month membership anyway.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Epoch is the payment processor. A trusted name.
-Can stream or download the scenes.
-A single scene can be downloaded as a single file, or you can select the clips you want to download from that scene.
-Multiple definition choices for download video: 1080p, 720p, 540p, 405p(portable devices).
-A huge amount of attractive teen models doing hardcore sex.
-Very little plastic boobies that I can find, not a lot of tattoos.
-Good download speeds-I average about 3 MB/sec, which seems fast for me.
-Download managers work. I use Down Them All.
-Long time before site timeout from inactivity.
Cons:
-Overall, the cons are basically minor. This is one of the better values on the internet for teen hardcore sex.
I am referring to the Teen Mega World network, which includes access to the Tricky Masseur site.
-The rest of the cons refer specifically to the Tricky Masseur site:
-There is only one definition for streaming. But the choice given is a nice definition, that gives you a clear image to watch for streaming.
-Erratic update schedule. One video in a week, or in two weeks, or in four weeks.
-Content is non-exclusive. Some of the massage content can be seen at the 18 Only Girls site (part of the Diesel network), or at Rub A Teen.
-The teens are mainly attractive, slender white girls (from Eastern Europe). Not a lot of diversity, for members wanting a wider spread in age, race, build.
-Captcha required for login.
-Files download with a generic filename, such as 245sethigh.wmv. Need to rename files with name of model, date posted, etc.
Bottom Line:
If I was 40 or 50 years younger, I might consider moving to Russia to find some of these hot teenage girls that will fuck your brains out.
But at my current age (and physical condition), I wouldn't last even a single session. I certainly couldn't keep it up for more than a few minutes, and these girls are like the Energizer bunny, that just keeps going and going and going.
So I wouldn't be able to satisfy either their lusts, or mine.
Bottom line:
For a low price:($14.95/monthly PU discount, $89.95/yearly PU discount); you get access to a boatload of teen hardcore videos.
Most of the teens are attractive to very attractive.
Not a lot of plastic boobies.
The teens are mainly slender white girls.
Years ago, the situation was slightly different. If you joined Tricky Masseur, or if you joined Teen Mega World, it was unclear on signup what particular sites in the network you would gain access to. But since then, they have simplified the system, so joining any one site in the network gives you access to all the sites in the network.
They have also made improvements over the years to the network: making it easier to use.
Switching from one site to a different site in the network is fairly easy: you no longer have to supply your username and password to re-log-in to the next site.
And to find all the videos (and photo sets) of a particular model is also fairly easy. You look up a model's name, you get a nice-sized thumbnail to show you what she looks like, and there are hot links to all her videos.
Why do I like the Tricky Masseur site (and the Teen Mega World network)?
1. A very low price, gives you access to 1000s of hardcore teen videos (in the Teen Mega World network).
2. Many of the models are attractive to extremely attractive.
3. I think they do a good job with the massage niche at this site. Fucked Hard 18 site is a different site in the massage niche (from a different network) that does a great job with their videos, but Tricky Masseur has a lot of good quality videos that are worth watching. I used to be annoyed with one of their stunt cocks, because of the contempuous way he seemed to treat the girls he was fucking, but he isn't used as much in the newer videos, and to be honest, he did give the the girls a hard-assed fuck that left them moaning and exhausted.
4. Some of the videos are extremely hot. Especially if you haven't seen them before.
5. And the girls: I can't emphasize enought how attractive some of them are. Lovely face, fantastic teen body, and an appetite for sex.
Great review, as usual. Did you notice that I did a review of Tricky Masseur about 5 hours before you posted yours, except I called my review "Rub A Teen"?
If you haven't read my review, I suggest you do so. Because you posted a comment that you were thinking about joining the Rub A Teen site.
I think that would be a serious mistake, a waste of your money for that site.
The oldest video at this site is dated 2010-11-28. So the site was started about one and a half years ago, not over 3 years ago.
Also, the last video posted at this site was 2012-04-03. So instead of saying "Erratic/Unpredictable Update Schedule", I would say there have been no updates in over 2 months.
You state in the Pros section of your review: "Excellent Membership Option - 3M/6M/12M Discounted".
I don't see any 6 month membership option being offered at this site.
Also, the 3 month membership option, although it is offered, gives no advantage, and would be a poor choice. PU gives a discounted membership price of $19.95/month. The 3 month membership price is $59.95. So choosing the 3 month membership, locks you into a 3 month term, without saving you any money over a monthly membership price of $19.95/month.
Actually, if you are going to remain a member for 3 months at $19.95/month, you save $0.10 by choosing the monthly membership option instead of the 3 month option.
In the Cons section of your review, you write: "Older videos not HD & latest not real HD Formats".
I don't believe that is entirely accurate. The first videos posted at this site, which are dated November 2010, all had a HD option offered, in addition to lower definition choices.
Maybe it's a matter of interpretation, but every video I checked at this site offered what the site listed as a HD option. Maybe you mean that in your opinion, or by your definition, those videos aren't truly HD. But the site itself lists what it calls an HD option for every video that I checked, starting with their oldest videos, and continuing with the latest video, which is dated 2012-04-03.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
