You do get a one less bonus site when you join with the PU/TBP discount. But I did not think it was worth the extra $10.00 to join without the discount.
Joining with the bonus thru teenmegaworld I got:
$19.95/30 days membership
17 "exclusive" sites
16 non-exclusive sites
Checking the join page, non-bonus teenmegaworld, it states:
$29.95/30 days membership
18 "exclusive" sites
16 non-exclusive sites
And like I said, it is difficult to tell exactly what sites you get access to before you sign up. Once your membership is activated, and you enter one of the sites, you can then tell which sites you have access to.
So I was a little disappointed to find I did not get access to fuckstudies. I joined through the teenmegaworld site. Possibly, if I had joined through the teenstarsonly site, I might have gotten access to fuckstudies. Their bonus system is a mystery, and even the webmaster apparently has to check with somebody to be able to know exactly which sites you get access to with each site membership. And that is probably not taking into account the reduction in sites from the PU/TBP membership discount.
So is it worth it to email the webmaster asking for the specific information? When there are so many combinations?
Why can't they just make it easy on the customer, and give all the sites with any membership? Would it really cost them anything, after considering the added good will on the part of the customers, who won't be angry or disappointed because their membership did not include some network site they wanted as part of the membership?
Apparently, they give access to most of the sites in the network with any subscription. So why not give access to all the sites?
Maybe, in the back of their minds, they are considering a bonus loyalty program, where they will add a few more sites to your membership if you stay a member longer than 1 or 2 months. But I don't think they actually have that program in place at this time.
Oops. I just realized that I became interested in fuckstudies because I read your review on the site. So I guess I don't need to tell you about that site. Lol. :)
As you know, there are a number of different sites in the network. And they slice and dice the sites that you get access to, depending on which site you join through, and when you join.
I joined through teenmegaworld a few weeks ago.
I do not have access to 18firstsex.com.
I was hoping to get access to fuckstudies as part of my membership, because I saw some clips from that site that seemed nice. But I did not get access to fuckstudies either.
I've been a member of the network before. But it will a good while before I rejoin, after this membership runs out.
Sorry I can't give you any information on either of those sites (fuckstudies or 18firstsex).
I mentioned elsewhere that it's irritating that you don't know exactly which sites you will get access to before you join. They really should give you access to all the sites in the network. The way it currently works is a little stupid and irritating, because you always want what you don't get (if you know the sites that are available). Just human nature. :)
Thanks for the kind words. This site (and you get many other sites in the network with a membership) has some really attractive teen girls. The videos are all hardcore. But they leave me cold. I wish it was otherwise, because there are some lovely girls, but they are not attractive in the videos, and in the pictures they are even less attractive. That is me. I know there are PU members who find these videos hot, but I find them boring: hardcore fuck and suck, without any erotic or arousing quality. A real shame, considering some of the girls are really attractive.
You discovered my secret shame.
But in spite of my glowing review of Met-art with its high score, and my other posts telling what a great site it is, I've never gotten a free pass to Met-art, or even a thank you from that site.
I like to see the entire female model, with all her body parts. And in videos, I even want to hear her voice, as long as it's not really stupid words coming out of her mouth, or really fake moans and groans. I don't really appreciate photos that cut off the model's head to focus on some other specific part of her body, or because the photographer/video cameraman is an incompetent.
Nice, comprehensive review. I'm still searching for those sites where I could write: "great videos, great pics, great girls, what more can you ask, 100."
The closest I could find was Met-art, which was my first review, and that got a 97 score. No other site ever reached that high a rating. Lol.
The agony and the ecstasy. What a great title for someone bitten by the porn bug. Instead of watching movies about vampires and werewolves, why can't we see movies that explore real human activity, such as people watching porn? There have been academy award winning movies about drunks and drug addicts and other perverts. So why not about porn watchers? Don't we deserve a little respect?
I will sometimes use email to report a problem to technical support. But I don't think I've written to a site webmaster to praise or complain. The response to emails from technical support can be hit or miss. Maybe you get an answer, maybe it's helpful.
Almost all my porn emails/posts are done here at PU. But even after all this time, I'm not sure if PU has a webmaster. Does it? And is he visible to the PU members?
I assume that Rick is the site owner, and Khan is the head honcho for PU submissions/posts, but who is the webmaster? The guy that "runs" the site?
One definition of webmaster: a technician who designs or maintains a website.
A second definition of webmaster: a term used loosely to describe an individual assigned to administering a web site. Typical duties might include updating pages, correcting errors, fixing links or responding to technical inquiries.
Thanks for the confirmation, Sevrin, and also for the added information. I tried to show in an updated edit on my original comment that the met-art update page has been corrected, which is what I found on a later check of the page. The photosets that I checked now have the correct posting dates.
I use the updates page the same way you do, to see if there are any fresh photosets that I might be interested in.
I think Met-art is a very well-run site, that has very few technical glitches. And over time, as you indicate, they are working to improve the site even more.
As you can probably tell, met-art is one of my favorite sites. :)
I found it by looking up porn review sites. And at the time, I thought it was one of the better review sites, because the reviews were written by amateurs like myself, and many of the reviews were intelligent and informative, and sometimes amusing. Over time, I found that the reviews/comments were much more useful than the puff pieces found at many porn review sites. Also found that I enjoyed contributing/interacting with the PU community, which was friendly, polite, and mainly welcoming. The discounts offered thru PU were also helpful and appreciated. And the raffle is like a cherry on top (but not the virginal kind, I'm afraid).
Perhaps I need to clear my browser cache. But what I am seeing is still the mis-sorted/mis-dated thumbnail page. The page itself looks fine, as long as you don't care when the photosets were actually posted. But I usually like to check the daily updates, to see if there are any photosets I might be interested in.
And the page I am looking at has the wrong dates listed for the most recent photosets.
For example:
07.21.2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
07.21.2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
are the dates listed for the two photosets above, which were supposedly posted today, July 21, 2010.
But those photosets were actually posted:
July 15, 2010 MILENA D "GOODNIGHT"
July 04, 2010 LORENA B "GRACIOUS"
Those are just a few of the photosets that are being posted with the wrong date.
If you use the Internet, you can find the actual date each photoset
was originally posted.
But it's not a major problem. I believe Met-art will fix it sometime soon.
But if your computer shows the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, then the problem is with my computer, which is still showing incorrect dates for many of the recent photosets.
If you are seeing the correct dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Or if you are seeing the incorrect dates for the two photosets I listed, I would appreciate your stating this.
Because I am interested to know if I am seeing the current update page, or if I am seeing an older update page, and need to clear my browser cache, or try some other fix.
First time I've noticed the met-art updates page being really messed up. The thumbnails for the most recent updates are out of order, with wrong listing dates for when the photosets/videos were posted. I assume the mix-up will be fixed soon.
Edit01: For what it's worth, the met-art updates page has now been fixed. I didn't have to clear my browser cache to get the corrected page of updates, so the problem was definitely on the met-art site, and not from my PC. :)
It would be very difficult to find any site where the videos are less erotic than Met-art videos. The main value of Met-art is in the massive collection (and massive updating) of their softcore teen photosets. MPL has very fine photosets, as well, but in much smaller numbers, than Met-art. I agree the MPL videos are slightly more erotic than the Met-art videos. But I have not really found any softcore teen site where I thought the videos were truly erotic. For me, it's much easier finding erotic softcore teen photosets, than to find erotic softcore teen videos. There are many fine sites that feature teen glamor photos. But I have not found any site that has, for me, outstandingly erotic softcore teen videos.
Edit01: But X-art, which has become more hardcore lately (not truly hardcore, but definitely not the softcore it used to be), has extremely fine quality videos. Lovely girls, fine lighting, professional camera-work.
Rearadmiral seems to sum it up nicely: If a site has enough good content, it's worth joining once. But without updates, as long as you are able to keep the downloaded material in your collection, there's no sense in joining a second time.
Thanks for the note. I did realize that there was a name change. I have seen a number of videos from the YoungPorn/YoungLegalPorn site, and thought the models were very attractive and the videos were very clear and nice quality. But I never got around to joining the site/network, because I am mainly into softcore photosets. But I am dabbling with video sites more now.
Today video clips can take 1 GB for a 20 minute runtime. So buying more external hard drives seems like the only solution. On some photosets, I've seen single photos that are 4 MB or more. It takes more and more space to store these images and videos.
So how much space does my porn collection take? Too much.
Some of those Teenfuns photosets and videos are classic. As good as anything that is being put out today, in spite of the "lower quality" of the photos and videos. They had some absolutely yummy models.
Who even thinks about such details? I am happy if I can find some porn that is watchable (clips), or viewable (photos). I would like the porn to be cleanly lighted with attractive models. I am not an auteur who is viewing world class art or film, I'm just trying to find some good-looking, erotic porn. Lol.
I was thinking about joining this network, mainly for the Young Legal Porn site. But then I joined the teen mega world network yesterday, because that was cheaper. My mistake, because I've been a member of teen mega world before, and am curious about the Young Legal Porn site. But maybe I will get to Young Legal Porn sometime in the future. :)
Teen mega world has some nice sites, but the grass is always greener on the other side. Just human nature, I guess.
But $40, or even $35, seems very steep for a 1 month membership. I don't like paying more than $30 for a month, and there are nice sites/networks that you can get for $20 or less (thru PU discounts).
I paid $20 for a 1 month membership to Teen Mega World, which gives me access to around 30+ sites. Of those sites, maybe 6 are the main ones for value, and the rest are filler.
On the other hand, the number of sites is really a marketing decision. All the Teen Mega World sites could be combined into a single site, but then the potential subscribers would think they were getting less for their money.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
