| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1751
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. I don't find male bodybuilders attractive. Female bodybuilders are even less attractive.
|
06-27-11 02:30am
|
Reply
1752
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't think I have a Wifi connection. I know that some libraries and coffee shops are supposed to have free Wifi, but I've never used those. I have a laptop, but am not really sure if I could use Wifi, or if I need to buy some add-on to use Wifi.
|
06-25-11 12:33am
|
Reply
1753
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
I don't like tattoos. Given how common they are for the models, it shouldn't be a factor, but I just don't like them. So I have no problem if this site (or whoever supplies the photosets) uses a bit of photoshopping to remove tattoos.
I know that different sites use photoshopping to remove birth marks (small colored markings) on some of their models. I think that photoshopping is more common than most people realize.
|
06-24-11 11:00pm
|
Reply
1754
|
Errotica Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
The Collector's Review
Very impressive review. A lot of nice opinions and details that give a clear picture of the site. Welcome to PU.
|
06-24-11 11:50am
|
Reply
1755
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
"What I find most useful though is an alphabetical model list."
Can be a great feature. Especially with a nice, large-sized thumbnail to show what the model looks like. Plus hot links to the videos and photosets of that model.
|
06-23-11 04:17pm
|
Reply
1756
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Somewhat important. It makes navigation/using the site easier. The importance of navigation depends somewhat on the size of the site. The larger the site, the more site contents, the more important it is to be able to search the site contents.
There are some sites that don't bother to name the models. That makes collecting the videos/photosets a real mess.
|
06-23-11 03:20am
|
Reply
1757
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Did I win yet? My gosh, why can't I have a sneak peak to see beforehand? Like, this is Tuesday, and I should have already known since last Tuesday who the next week's winners were. The suspense is killing me.
|
06-21-11 08:23am
|
Reply
1758
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I prefer women with pubic hair versus the shaved look found almost everywhere today. But almost all models from the 1970s and 1980s, when they started showing pubic hair legally in the US, had trimmed pubic hair.
Hairy legs and armpits does not make the model attractive to me. I want a lovely face and figure to be part of the package.
|
06-19-11 01:46pm
|
Reply
1759
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. I'm mainly into softcore photography. But after getting into hardcore videos a few years back, my tastes are still mainly softcore with some hardcore. I don't go for extreme porn. I'm not really clear what extreme porn would be.
|
06-19-11 12:50pm
|
Reply
1760
|
N/A
|
Reply of
indybt30's Reply
Never heard of jelquing before. I guess I've led a sheltered life. Reading about jelquing on Wikipedia, I read that silicone has been injected into the penis and scrotum for penis enlargement. Ugh. Maybe silicone breast implants aren't so bad after all. Could that be a poll question: which would you prefer, having silicone injected into your breasts, or into your penis and scrotum? Possible answers would measure the intensity of your outraged screams. Lol.
|
06-18-11 05:10pm
|
Reply
1761
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Ditto for other meaning no.
|
06-17-11 01:26am
|
Reply
1762
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've used email in the past. The response is hit or miss. Most sites have never replied. A few have replied in a timely manner. But I don't try to contact customer support unless I'm having a major problem. And because I usually get such a lousy response, I don't have a lot of faith in customer support, which many sites advertise as 24/7.
|
06-15-11 07:33am
|
Reply
1763
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
slutty, in your review, you say there is no HD downloading yet. Was there any notice of when, or if, HD downloading would be available for the network sites?
On 04-21-11 (12:00pm) Veev (the webmaster for FameDigital) posted a reply to a comment at PU (the comment was by RustyJ posted 04-21-11 08:55am and titled "Any changes to HD downloading?").
RustyJ was asking if and when HD clips could be downloaded.
Veev (the webmaster) replied: I was told that it's on the 26th of April and it's gonna start in EvilAngel.com. If all goes well, it will be all over our other sites as well..all 44 of them :-).
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
I don't remember EvilAngel being available as part of the bonus sites when I was a member of DevilsFilm before.
Were you able to access EvilAngel. And if so, what site did you join through?
|
06-10-11 08:31pm
|
Reply
1764
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
What can I say in my defense of a foggy brain? Well, the network used to be called netFameSolutions. So because of the name change from netFameSolutions to famedigital, I didn't recognize that this was the network for DevilsFilm and RoccoSiffredi.
Edit: The company is still listed as netFameSolutions at TBP. It's confusing to me how to refer to some of these networks. What is the proper name to use? Why can't they make it simple?
I joined through DevilsFilm. That's why I think of this as the DevilsFilm network.
|
06-10-11 02:07am
|
Reply
1765
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Excellent review, as usual.
I've never been a member. I don't like most DVD sites because there's usually too much material to look through before I find something that I like (personal taste).
Your review makes that point very clear, that it's not easy searching the contents to find the good stuff. So in spite of the low price, I'm too lazy to join this site.
Oops. I just looked at the site. I've been a member of this network before. I've got a foggy brain. I've been a member before, and will almost certainly be again. I like a number of models at this site, and will return when I have the time.
I need a new brain. I didn't realize this is the Devil's Film network. Lol.
|
06-10-11 01:34am
|
Reply
1766
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Did you see Creature from the Black Lagoon and House of Wax in the original runs back in the 1950s?
I dimly recall seeing Creature from the Black Lagoon at the movies back in the 1950s, but I didn't remember it was in 3D.
I think I only saw House of Wax on TV, so that wasn't in 3D when I saw it.
I remember 3D glasses back then were made of paper with plastic to see through. The glasses seemed different from today's 3D glasses. I don't remember any eye-strain effect back in the 1950s. They even had 3D comic books. I had a 3D comic book of the 3 Stooges back then.
|
06-09-11 09:36am
|
Comment
1767
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
|
06-08-11 10:26am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1768
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm guessing this is a temporary thing. I previously joined through Spunky Bee, because, like you say, it offered access to all the sites at Tony Bucks. The other sites cost the same amount, but all offered access to fewer sites in the network.
If Spunky Bee has truly become a stand-alone site, with no access to other sites in the network, then few people will join this site, I believe.
|
06-07-11 07:09pm
|
Comment
1769
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
|
06-07-11 05:51pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1770
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't remember any yoga porn. But maybe I'm like slutty, and wasn't paying attention.
|
06-07-11 05:35pm
|
Reply
1771
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. Over time I've seen content that I thought was disgusting or unpleasant. But I haven't found myself actively enjoying acts that I initially thought were unpleasant. I'm more into softcore than hardcore. And for hardcore, I usually like the simple, straight sex, with, hopefully, some class or buildup or plot to make it mean something beyond two bodies pounding away. To keep it simple, I much prefer a guy and a girl over larger groups. Though I don't mind two girls.
Is two girls a new fetish? If the girls are attractive, and enjoying each other, I think it's great. But I don't know if that qualifies as a fetish.
|
06-07-11 05:31pm
|
Reply
1772
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for the reply. I was thinking the bonus sites were probably worthless.
The quote from the sign-up page is: "23 BONUS SITES - FREE!".
So I was thinking that just possibly it might be worth joining, because there are some cute-looking girls at this site.
But I will save my money for a site/network that looks more promising.
|
06-06-11 07:38pm
|
Comment
1773
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
|
06-06-11 01:28pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1774
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Very thorough review with a nice personal flavor. Agree that cheesy music can be annoying. I like if a model gets off, as long as it looks real or believable. The fake moans and groans are a turn-off.
|
06-04-11 05:15am
|
Reply
1775
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
If nothing else, you can value Twistys as an archive site because of the huge amount of past content.
But it will be interesting to see how the new content changes. I never liked Brazzers. What I'm hoping to see is a new Twistys with a slightly harder edge. But still keeping the glamor-style. With good-looking models.
Is that too much to hope for?
|
06-04-11 04:58am
|
