Wasn't it Arnold Schwarzenegger who said, in some movie or other, "That which does not kill us makes us stronger."?
We go to the movies to learn about life, and life's little lessons.
But sometimes those lessons turn out to be fantasy.
So look on the bright side: you were able to take out the garbage while trying to cancel your membership.
I used to be able to do multi-tasking as well, until old age caught up with me. I get stuck watching the working spinner on my laptop like I'm hypnotized or something, until I get the usual message that the connection has timed out.
Your site review was interesting. The site contents don't appeal to me, but I did enjoy reading your review.
And your comment on the problem with cancelling your membership has a nice, readable style, that I have tried for, but rarely achieve, in my own writing.
In my opinion, I would take off more than a few points for this cancellation snafu. The frustration of spending 3 days trying to cancel should drop the site score by 10 points or more. I don't handle frustration well, and this would really be a major downgrade for the site experience, in spite of however nice the contents are. But that's just me.
My understanding is that people use the phrase "I could care less" in the same way as other people use the phrase "I couldn't care less".
Many people are not that careful or precise in the way they use English (or any other language, for that matter). The same for using "damn" instead of "damned". Example: Give me the damn bread. When it should really be: Give me the damned bread.
Or: For Christ sake, when it would be more correct to say: For Christ's sake.
The nice thing is we don't have to be precise, once we have gotten out of English class (English class, meaning a classroom where "proper" English is taught).
As I get older, my tastes do change. But not a huge amount. And a lot of the porn available today has little appeal to me. But that was probably always true. Porn is so much more available today than when I was a teen.
When it was new, it was a nice change from the straight bang-bang. But now it helps if the model and the masseur have a little acting ability, to make it seem more real.
I'm not a member. There are sites where a reply from technical support can take forever, and this might be one of those sites.
I suggest contacting the billing company and reporting your experience. Ask for a refund, since you clearly deserve one. If the billing company is reputable, they should refund your membership fee for the last month.
If you don't get a refund from the billing company, you should contact the credit card company you used to pay for this membership. And the credit card company should give you a refund, based on what you explained in your comment (that you paid for a membership, and then were locked out, and you got no help from technical support).
Like the other responders, it depends on quality of content and the update rate.
Metart is one of the best sites for a longer-term value. Massive amount of high-quality content, amazing amount of update rate. Some of the most beautiful girls in the world.
Teen Mega World and some other video sites are also worth a longer-term membership, or at the least, a 1-month membership every so often.
It's been many, many years since I've been to a topless bar. But it seems like it would be cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private cam show.
I think the model at emas place is very cute. She has a number of sets at glam deluxe from years ago. She also has a number of sets at metart. She's also had a few photosets at other sites (just teen site, etc.).
But I haven't seen anything new from her in over a year, I think.
Any recent members of glam deluxe care to comment on site?
Apparently there are 2 bonus sites included with membership to glam deluxe:
helens planet
emas place
It's been almost 3 years since I was a member of glam deluxe. The photography sets were high quality then, many of the models were gorgeous. But the update rate was slow. And there were no zips for the photosets.
There were only a small number of videos.
Any recent members of that site care to comment on their experience with this site?
The bonus sites are solo model sites. Cute girls. Are those sites still updating?
OK. TBP states last update for emas place was 04-24-10 (as of 05-17-11)'
Also, TBP states content count has not changed for helens planet since 2008, even though the dates for the content supposedly show recent updates. So site probably has not updated in years.
I wear my amateur status proudly. Along with the hard drives I try to string around my neck and arms and waist as the newest status symbol of the porn aficionado.
TBP reviews are useful for the "facts" about a site. But at least some PU reviews are more useful for giving the "flavor" of a site. So both sites can be useful or helpful in deciding whether to join a site or not.
Very important for sites that are primarily photo sites, like metart, femjoy, mplstudios, etc., which do offer videos, but their main value is in the photos.
Less important for sites which are strong in both videos and photos. But who wants the frustration of downloading a photo set photo by photo?
For video sites where the photos are low quality and not worth keeping, zip files are least useful. But maybe the site manager will wake up one day, realize the photos are poor, and try to get a better photographer. Do you believe in miracles?
I think you are right that you are better off looking for a different site to join. That's just my opinion. I've seen the Massage Creep videos. Yes, the setup for each Message Creep video is similar, but there is far more variation in the sex at Message Creep than at Try Teens. And the videos are better quality: the lighting and camera-work at Message Creep is really excellent. The lighting and camera-work at Try Teens is good, but not as good as at Message Creep. And there is what appears to be real heat in at least some of the Massage Creep videos. You don't get the same feeling of heat at Try Teens: it's a boy and girl fucking, on camera, it's real, but it's not hot sex. The sex is scripted, most videos closely follow the same script, and it gets almost boring after watching a few of the similar videos. And the noises the stunt cock makes are truly annoying. The noises are meant to show excitement, satisfaction, show the stunt cock is a "real" man giving it to this cute teen, but I found it really annoying.
The videos at Massage Creep provide a much better experience than the videos at Try Teens. There are many attractive girls at Massage Creep, they are presented looking "natural", not glamorized, but they come across as more attractive than the cute girls at Try Teens, who could look really nice but it just doesn't come across at Try Teens.
I'm not saying the Massage Creep videos are great, but I think they are better quality and more effective than the Try Teens videos.
I believe 100% of the scenes have at least some anal sex in them. The basic plot, as I said, is blow job, vaginal, anal, blowjob with the guy coming on the girl's face or mouth or cheeks. (They follow that script on at least a few of their bonus sites).
Personally, I don't see all that big a difference between vaginal or anal. Maybe for the girl it feels different, but visually, there is little difference in watching the two types of action. Maybe there's a mental kick because of what used to be the "forbidden" element.
Also, with anal, they often pull out, at least briefly, and show the enlarged anus, before putting the penis back inside the anus, before putting the penis into the girl's mouth.
As far as a long period before the site timeout, I haven't really measured it. Sometimes you get good download speeds for videos, sometimes not. My fastest download speed is about 630 KB/s, for my DSL connection. Sometimes I can get that, but sometimes the speed can drop to 20-60 KB/s, which means many hours to download a single video, which can run from 400-800 MB in size. Using DownThemAll download manager does not increase my download speed for this site, in fact, it actually appears to slow down the download speed. Not sure why, this is unusual. And I am talking about downloading a single video, not downloading multiple videos at the same time.
So if you are downloading a video, and then want to download a different one after the first one finished, if the time is over an hour or so, sometimes you have to re-log-in. No big thing, just enter the username, password, and captcha. Or if you saved the username and password, which I recommend, then you just need to enter the captcha.
Each membership comes with a number of bonus sites. To enter any site, you have to enter your username, password, and captcha. Some networks lets you transfer between different bonus sites without having to go through the separate log-in process, but not this one.
There are lot of cute girls at this site, many of which you probably have not seen before. But I find the sex very repetitious, almost boring, and the stunt cocks annoying because of the stupid grunting noises they make. The cute girls are real teens, with firm natural bodies, few tattoos or piercings.
But some PU members apparently don't mind the repetitious sex plot, or the stupid grunting noises of the stunt cocks, and enjoy these sites for the cute girls and the hardcore sex (not rough sex, just bread-and-butter fuck sex).
For those of us less technically inclined, it's helpful when a poll question includes a simple definition of a technical term, or a simple example. What's a plug-in or 3rd party video feed? If that refers to the "free" online chats offered by some porn pay sites, then my response to the poll would be that a "free" online chat (which often is not free, but usually costs extra money to participate in), has not influenced me to join any porn site.
My idea of a plug-in is some type of computer program that can work with another computer program. There are plug-ins for Firefox (my usual browser) that will act as a download manager or do other things that make Firefox easier or more useful.
But like I said, my guess is that the poll question is referring to online chats offered at some porn pay sites.
But maybe the poll question refers to both porn and non-porn sites, and if video feeds are available for those sites.
YouTube has online videos. And there are plug-ins that allow you to download those videos. Would that be included in the poll question? That seems doubtful, but I don't have a clear understanding of what the poll question means.
Thanks for the reply, pat. I was a member of Teen Mega World myself for several months recently. On the signup page for Teen Mega World, it says you get 25+ bonus sites. One of those bonus sites is WMB Girls, which is just a clone or something of Teen Mega World, because it's a gateway to the other sites like Teen Mega World, and neither site (WMB Girls and Teen Mega World) has any content of its own.
But like I said, Teen Mega World signup page states 25+ bonus sites included with membership.
Ex GF Box signup page states 30+ bonus sites included with membership.
So I was just wondering what the specific sites were that are included with the Ex GF Box membership.
But I think you are probably right that the main difference between joining through Teen Mega World and joining through Ex GF Box is that Ex GF Box is not included in Teen Mega World. There is also a higher monthly price if joining through Ex GF Box.
And I think a lot of Ex GF Box is old content from other sites. Because I recognize some of the advertising photos for Ex GF Box as old photos I've seen before (from Nubiles, I think).
Much prefer the desktop: better monitor, better keyboard, less expensive (although notebook prices have dropped way down these last few years). But for the same money, you get much more with the desktop. The advantage of a notebook is portability. If you don't need portability, the desktop is the way to go.
Thanks for the update. The info about a 30 day delay before downloading HD videos is posted at TBP, and was also mentioned in a previous PU review. I'm looking forward to your review. If there are any bonus sites included in a membership, would you please mention their names as well in your review?
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
