| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1126
|
The Classic Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
Stag films, when I was growing up, just mean a porn film. Mainly a low-budget production with nudity that was far more revealing than what a commercial movie would show. A sex movie.
The video quality of those days was poor to horrible, compared to whatg is available today on the internet.
So when you say "stag films", what do you mean? I assume you mean low-quality porn films. Correct?
I've bought DVDs of movies that were not stag films, but early erotica fromt the 1970s. And the DVD quality is poor. I am talking about a copy of Emanuelle, and The Story of O. I saw those two movies at a movie theater when they came out. And the quality was vastly superior to the DVD quality of those copies that you can buy at Amazon.
I assume that they didn't bother to keep prisine copies of those movies, even though the movies were both moneymakers, I assume.
That was a real shame.
So finding pristine copies of older movies from the 1970s or 1980s would be a hit or miss situation. They just didn't have the foresight to keep good copies of these types of movies.
|
03-05-13 11:32am
|
Comment
1127
|
David Nudes
(0)
|
|
03-05-13 10:43am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never used it. Didn't even know it existed.
|
03-04-13 07:46am
|
Reply
1129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
Health problems make Viagra unsafe.
|
03-03-13 10:28pm
|
Comment
1130
|
MetArt
(0)
|
|
03-01-13 04:23am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Monitor dimensions are 7.3 x 18.5 x 25.8 inches, so I assume that's a 4x3 standard monitor.
|
02-28-13 01:01am
|
Reply
1132
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Excellent review. Good overview of the site, nice details.
|
02-26-13 08:09am
|
Reply
1133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Can be interesting or attractive.
|
02-26-13 07:59am
|
Comment
1134
|
Daring Sex
(0)
|
|
02-25-13 02:15pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1135
|
X-Art
(0)
|
Reply of
pornstacker's Review
Agree that the fade-outs are annoying. I mentioned the same thing in my review.
|
02-25-13 10:44am
|
Reply
1136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
cjd2004's Poll
Photo metadata is sometimes included on photos, sometimes not. It would be useful to check on the date the photo was actually shot, but that data is often missing. Even a major photo site like Met-art does not automatically include that type of data.
|
02-25-13 06:39am
|
Comment
1137
|
Daring Sex
(0)
|
|
02-22-13 03:14am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
Captcha can be annoying, especially when they make it almost impossible to read the characters you have to duplicate.
Fast timeouts can also be annoying. But most sites I've joined are very generous about site timeouts, giving you a long time before they cut you off.
Log-ins should should be easy and convenient. Why make it a hassle to enter a site you already paid to be a member of?
|
02-20-13 10:24am
|
Reply
1139
|
Nasty Angels
(0)
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
Nice to hear from you.
The videos that I really liked were from years ago. I know that because I saw them before, but I can't recall where from.
I believe this is an archive site, and no new material has been posted recently. That's a guess, because they don't have any dates for when the content is posted.
I'm pretty sure Clubseventeen is still around. It used to be a really nice site, with lots of attractive models. But I haven't been a member of that site in many years.
I would not expect to find any new material at Nasty Angels. Just old content, but I was pleasantly suprised that the quality was still ok. Not really high quality compared to what is being offered today at sites like X-Art or Diesel Access networks or the other high-end video sites. But the quality is certainly better than what I've seen at other sites in the Serious Cash network of sites.
|
02-19-13 12:27pm
|
Reply
1140
|
Young Sex Parties
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Thanks for the kind words.
I wish I had a better command of words, to make my thoughts clear and concise. Instead, I tend to use a lot of words to try to describe what some people can relate in a few well-chosen words.
The site structure is poor, and makes it harder to use the contents of the site.
The site contents (videos) are poor, as well.
I hope I made that clear in my review.
|
02-18-13 03:11pm
|
Reply
1141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Dracula's Poll
Never heard of Roku until recently. I use my PC to stream porn, or to watch it after I download it to my hard drive.
|
02-18-13 02:32am
|
Reply
1142
|
Teens Analyzed
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Review
I just joined this network today, because, like you, I have been interested in a few sites in the network, and this seemed like a cheap way to get access. Since I just joined today, I have to get used to navigation at these sites. I click on a thumbnail, and instead of loading a video I want to see, I am re-directed to a site that I can sign up for. You weren't kidding when you wrote that: -Each page on the site is loaded with third party advertising.
I signed up through the Young Sex Parties site, but it's all part of the same network, I assume.
I think your description of the network/site is very accurate, from what I've seen so far. I've only watched 2 videos, but they both have a very amateur feel to them.
But I do believe there are more professionally shots videos at this network, because I've seen some of them in the past.
Do any of these sites have a simple model listing with nice-sized thumbnails to show what the models look like?
|
02-16-13 04:07pm
|
Reply
1143
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I posted a comment a few weeks back that Wow Orgasms, their newest site, has good videos that I think are new to the network. I can't swear to that, because the network has so many sites, and I certainly haven't seen all their videos. But I think the videos at Wow Porn all are new. That's currently 30 videos at the site. The update rate is irregular, sometimes one video a day, other times they might skip a few days with no updates, and then add a video.
But the videos at Wow Orgasm are worth watching.
|
02-16-13 12:45pm
|
Reply
1144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
I vote for the trantric yoga moaster where life is one long orgasm. Open your third eye, people, and swallow everything in life as it comes rushing by, to savor each moment of bliss. Who needs ejaculation? That is for pussies.
|
02-16-13 01:22am
|
Reply
1145
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
My definition (not an official definition, just my own, because I don't know how the porn industry defines the genre): Glamcore is what some people at PU have called heartcore. It's a romantic approach to hardcore porn, where the emphasis is on "soft", non-gonzo sex. It's become very popular the last few years, with sites like X-Art, SexArt, Babes, Passion HD, Joy Mii featuring attractive models, usually has soft instrumental music background, some storyline (implied) beyond a simple wham-bam-fuck of two or more hard bodies. Trying to inject a bit of eroticism or meaning beyond a simple fuck.
Like the name implies: Glamor + hardcore = glamcore.
|
02-16-13 01:10am
|
Comment
1146
|
Teen Mega World
(0)
|
|
02-15-13 01:43pm
Replies (5)
|
Comment
1147
|
Sex Art
(0)
|
|
02-15-13 10:10am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
1148
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
KET924aab's Reply
I don't know a single PU member that has written they like the Metart videos. I guess it's a mental thing, but the videos at most softcore sites are really boring, no matter how attractive the models might be.
I've joined Metart a couple of times for the 1-year membership. But most of my memberships were for 1 month.
|
02-14-13 03:17pm
|
Reply
1149
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
PU is the only forum I belong to. Well, maybe that's not entirely accurate. I joined some Yahoo groups years ago, but it's been years since I visited any of them. So I don't know if a Yahoo group would be considered a forum, or if I would still be considered a member of any of those groups I did join. I'm not even sure if those groups still exist any more.
|
02-14-13 06:25am
|
Reply
1150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Never. Some people would go nuclear if they found their computer had been used for porn.
|
02-12-13 05:11pm
|
