I have a hard time trying to tell the age of a model, in general. And there are some models that, for years, look far younger than their actual age.
But I have deleted vids and pics where I thought the model did look too young. Not recently. But when I had a newsgroup subscription, you could download lots of material, and who knew where most of it came from, and there was very little way of knowing who some of the models were.
With pay porn sites, at least you have the assurance that they are checking on the age of the models for you.
Diesel Access Network now includes Wow Girls and Wow Porn.
I mentioned before that Diesel Access network now includes Wow Girls and Wow Porn. That started in early March of this year.
I am a member of the network, with access to those two sites, plus 18 Only Girls, Young Legal Porn, and the other sites in the network.
But some PU members have wondered what are the exact details in how you get access to all the sites in the network.
The web master replied that he would post details on how the membership works, to get total access. But that hasn't happened yet, that I could find.
From the sign-up page to 18 Only Girls, you see the following plans:
$0.97/day, 18OnlyGirls.Com Recurring 30 Days Membership & bonus access to 11 sites.
$0.67/day, 18OnlyGirls.Com Recurring 5 Months Membership & bonus access to 11 sites.
This is a 5 month, recurring membership.
$1.33/day 18OnlyGirls.Com Non-Recurring 30 Days Membership & bonus access to 11 sites.
The above choices are slightly different from the way the webmaster explained it before.
He said a while back, that if you join one of the sites, and re-new your membership, you would then have access to all the sites in the network (he didn't specify how long you would have to be a member before you gained access to all the sites).
The Wow Porn sign-up page has the same three plans listed above, but they only mention membership/access to the Wow Porn site. I assume that is because the site has a problem with English, and that they are not specifying the access to the other sites in the network because they don't realize the omission.
I had a similar experience when I cancelled my subscription to Fame Digital network.
I called a toll-free number, and got a recorded message all the representatives were busy. I left my telephone number. That was a few days ago, and I don't think they ever called me back.
But I found a link on one of their sites that let me cancel through a webpage, and I got a confirming email soon after.
Thanks for checking on Barbariska, slutty. There are so many models out there, and a few of them look so similar, that it's sometimes hard to tell them apart. But she is a really cute girl, who has appeared in hardcore in many sites, and she sure looked familiar. But like I say, some models can look very similar to other models, and the look on some models can change over time in just a few years.
One way to contact them is to enter the credit card you used to pay for the membership:
You enter the first 6 digits and last 4 digits.
You also enter the credit card expiration date year and month.
This is a non-secure site. There is no s in the http, which means the site is not encrypted.
It seems strange to me that a site would ask for credit card information over a non-secure site.
You can also start a chat, but I would guess that is also a non-secure method of exchanging information.
So the telephone would be the best way of communication, if you are are going to give credit card information, or any other sensitive data.
----------------
Note: If you call the 877 telephone number, you will probably get a recorded message that all representatives are busy, and to leave your telephone # and last 4 digits of your credit card number.
Half an hour later, I am still waiting for a return call.
Much simpler to use the Devils Film website, to cancel the subscription, and ignore the famecare.com site completely.
An hour later, still waiting for the customer rep to call me back. But since I already cancelled through the Devils Film site, it's no big deal.
Excellent review, nice overview of the site. I think the network is a great bargain because of the massive amount of good quality hardcore teen videos.
The Roku 3 model says it's HDTV only.
The other, cheaper models of the Roku say they work with virtually any TV.
I'm surprised that the most expensive model only works with HDTVs.
Am I missing something? Why would they limit the most expensive model to HDTVs only, when the cheaper models work with most TVs?
I don't have a HDTV. So I assume the Roku 3 model would not work with my current TV.
Correct?
Also, since I don't have an HDTV, that means I can't play 720p or 1080p definition on my TV.
But I could watch those videos on my PC monitor, I assume, and get the 720p or 1080p definition effect.
Well designed tours can be useful, especially if they gave nice thumbnails of the site models, some indication of the site content (sample video previews, sample pictures, etc.).
But like Cybertoad stated, a good PU review gives a better idea of what the site is like, it's plus and minus points, etc.
So normally I want a PU review to check, before I join a site. Unless I think the site has some models that I really like, because I am a sucker for a pretty face.
Metart starting to offer sensuality in its videos.
A couple of weeks ago, I mentioned in a comment that Metart was starting to add a bit of eroticism to their videos. The video I cited was posted 2013-04-01, titled "Spera". The model is Christel A.
For many years, the Metart videos, featuring lovely young nude teens, were boring or sterile.
The Spera video definitely has a bit of erotic feeling to it.
Today, I saw a public preview video at Metart, titled "The Girls of Metart", starring Sapphira, that definitely qualifies as erotic art.
If, in the future, the videos at Metart follow this new direction, they will be a strong addition to an already great site.
One word of caution: If you watch this video, don't expect the great mass of videos at Metart to have this erotic quality: This is a new direction, a new sense of erotic exploration in their video library. The older videos, in spite of the lovely models, are basically boring and a waste of time to watch.
But the newest videos, just based on the Spera video, and the newest preview video named "The Girls of Metart", is really an amazing advance in eroticism. In the newest videos, girls are allowed to touch themselves, and each other. This is still softcore, but in the older videos, girls basically did not touch themselves, or each other, in a sensual way.
I grew up on Playboy, so I don't mind some airbrushing. Some flaws can be distracting. And almost all women use cosmetics to increase their appeal. I don't like heavy make-up, but if you are doing a photoshoot or a video, then at least some make-up is needed for the camera, even for a "natural look".
Agree that video quality for the cam shows (the ones I was referring to) is poor. The video quality at their paysites are quite good, in contrast.
I assume that's because the girls shooting the cams are using low-quality, inexpensive cameras, as well as maybe being a function of the feed they are using (low bandwidth?--I am not technically inclined).
But for a free live cam show, that features a lot of nudity, some masturbation, sometimes sex between a model and a stunt cock, it might be worth checking out.
Depends on your tastes.
I have spent very little time watching these shows.
I don't think there is one factor that is the most important. There are several factors that are important, including quality of site contents, amount of content, how easy to site is to use, update rate, price, etc.
Maybe those factors aren't strictly related to the tour pages, but the tour is only part of what decides if I want to join a site or not.
But actually, to enter the PU web site, or to become a member, you also have to "state" or agree that you are of legal age, explicit material does not offend you, etc.
Just the way you have to operate, with the laws you need to be careful.
I went to see a dentist, had to sign an agreement that any disputes would be settled by arbitration (instead of in court), and that each dentist had their own separate practice, that you can't sue or arbitrate against all the dentists in the office or practice, just your own personal dentist.
We need to have are own personal lawyer with us, whenever we see a dentist, go to the hospital, etc., to be sure we are not giving up our legal rights.
Devils Film now has an age verification routine where you have to enter your date of birth before you can preview the public tour pages.
Are they tightening the laws regarding permissible age to view online porn?
Just another obstacle to viewing porn, or porn sites.
Also, I am not a lawyer. So how can I know, for sure, that "Sexually explicit material is not deemed to be obscene or illegal in your community and you wish to view such material".
---------------
---------------
By Entering This Site You Agree That:
You are an adult in your community and are at least 18 years old (21 in some communities);
You will not expose minors to the sexually explicit content you are about to view;
You believe that sexually explicit material is not offensive or obscene;
Sexually explicit material is not deemed to be obscene or illegal in your community and you wish to view such material;
You will use the material available on this website for your own personal use and will not sell, distribute, give or make available the content on this website to anyone. You will take the appropriate steps in order to make sure no minor is able to view the content available on this site;
You have read this agreement, understood it and agree to be bound by it.
If minors have access to your computer, please restrain their access to sexually explicit material by using any of the following products:
Sign up now to receive our special deals newsletter and you'll get
three movies FREE to stream or download from our hottest new site, SexArt.
The newsletter gives special price offers to join different Metart network sites, as well as giving small sample photo sets of random models from Metart.
Note: It's not really "my newsletter", or "my newest site", I was just quoting the material on the Metart site. I am a member of Metart and Erotic Beauty, but I certainly don't own them.
I like to read the reviews at PU to get a sense of whether the site might be worthwhile joining.
But I also like a site to have a useful public tour pages, where they show the site models, and hopefully give some preview shots of the photography and videos the site features.
The preview pages at some sites are just about worthless. No model listings, no information on the site contents, other than saying they have gorgeous models and the most exciting videos.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
