Drooler, thanks for quick response on the pricing of averotica site.
You must live on the East Coast, or else you are a night owl like me. Lol.
I'm thinking of rejoining Just Teen Site for 1 month.
Haven't been a member of Just Teen Site since early 2006, and they've added a lot of pics since that time. Also gives me a chance to see the vids at Just Teen Movie.
I've read your review of Just Teen Site, and looked over the models.
I still have the photosets of Just Teen Site I downloaded back in early 2006, but the site was small back then, and it's definitely worth a second visit for me.
Drooler, did you get a special price at $24.95 for several months' membership to averotica?
If yes, can anyone else get that price, or a discounted price for averotica?
Current prices for membership at the site are listed as:
Monthly: $29.95
3 months: $49.95
6 months: $99.95
Pornusers shows a 1 year membership at $99.95, but the averotica site itself shows a 6-month membership for $99.95.
Mr Fountain, nice to meet a fellow softcore teens fan.
In my opinion, metart is the best in class in softcore teens:
-quality of gorgeous young models
-quantity of gorgeous young models
-quality of photosets
-quantity of photosets
-low annual membership of $99
There are other worthwhile sites that come close, that I've joined.
I've been at 5 out of 13 of the sites you've reviewed. I enjoyed them all.
Metmodels is metart lite, as Hondaman noted:
-Similar quality as metart, but much lower quantity in terms of models and photosets.
-Metart updates with 4 photosets per day.
-Metmodels updates with 1 photoset per day.
-So the difference in quantity will only get even bigger over time.
-(Metmodels is actually a sister site of Metart)
For the same price, Metart wins over Metmodels hands down.
Join Metmodels once a year with a monthly subscription, where you download all the photosets/videos that you haven't seen yet.
I'm more into pics than vids, because of bandwidth and hard drive storage concerns, but I can't help falling in love with the pics of these gorgeous girls.
I took my mother to see "Out of Africa" and "The Color Purple" when they were playing together at a movie theater in 1986.
Out of Africa won 7 Oscars.
The Color Purple was nominated for 11 Oscars.
The movies were supposed to be excellent, but I was bored out of my mind.
I kept going out to the lobby, and smoked half a pack of cigarettes because I was so bored.
Lol.
That was when it was still legal to smoke in theaters.
I've been having problems coming up with a sensible scoring method for a site. But after examining your mathematical model, I realized you deserve a "Professor of Scoring" badge.
If there is no such badge, Pornusers should give it to you anyway.
You hit it exactly when you say, "a 98 (rated) site for one might be the epitome of boredom for another."
That's why I am quibbling about the value of a score.
I've seen pay sites rated 90+ I would not want to watch for free. Either the models don't appeal to me, or the action is a real turnoff. Personal taste (site content) is more important than ease of use (site layout).
I want a site that's easy to use. But more importantly, I want:
-great looking models.
-lots of high-quality pics or vids
-a price that I think reasonable (based on content)
Still looking for the perfect site. In the meantime, I enjoy window shopping.
Main factors for me to join a site:
-how attractive are the models
-how many models are there
-quality of the pictures
-quantity of the pictures
-price
-(not really into DVDs or videos, takes too much bandwidth, too much space to store on hard drive)
I am trying to get value for my porn dollars, but the main factor is how attractive are the models.
Anyway, I wish you would write some site reviews. You seem to have extensive experience with porn.
Even if I don't agree with your personal tastes (which I don't really know yet), I think it would be interesting, sometimes entertaining, to read your thoughts.
I really have enjoyed reading some of the reviews at this site, not just for the information on possible sites I might join, but also for the humor and insight.
As a bonus, if you write reviews and get points, you have a chance to win a few dollars/pounds/euros in the weekly drawing.
I like the review of Old Spunkers. Clean, easy to understand, lots of details.
What I don't understand is the score. I have a hard time figuring out how to score a site. I've only done 3 site reviews. 2 of the sites I scored at 75, and I like the sites, think they are worthwhile joining, even if you only join for a month to download whatever files you want to keep (Domai and Glamdeluxe).
One site I scored 97, because its got massive content, lots of great models, lots of quality photosets, and a low annual price of $99 (Metart). That's the best value I've seen for softcore teen.
But you give a score of 68 to a junk site.
What counts is the overall impression of the site, which you make clear. But I wonder how useful these scores are, even as a general guide. People really need to read the complete review of a site, and not just look at the score as a major factor.
I wish I had a more objective way of scoring a site, because I don't think a score means very much.
On the other hand, I'm also glad we can score any way we want, because I wouldn't like to be bound by some formula that Pornusers developed for scoring.
Patience is a virtue.
One I've never enjoyed.
Try sitting in a chair waiting in the emergency room for 6-8 hours before you see a doctor.
Maybe I will achieve patience once I get to heaven.
But the older you get, the more you wish it was like the old days. You're right about Met-art and the 404 files.
I didn't think that was funny, until I saw your comment. Now I really understand why they say, "Misery loves company." I'm glad other people are just as frustrated as I am. Lol.
It really was a simple pleasure, looking forward to the Met-art updates, and clicking on the photosets to see how good they were. Served fresh and hot off the server. Now it's better to wait until the next day, to avoid the dreaded 404 file syndrome.
www.eurobabeindex.com is a great resource. I hate to think of all the effort that some people used to make it. Would warp my mind to try to cover all those web sites checking out their favorite models.
Seriously, that is one great index, with the model's aliases, a nice photo to identify her, and the web sites she appears at.
There's also the linked forum thread for the model, with pics and links.
Could easily spend weeks or months looking through this site.
Just a side note: If you like the model Ariel: Two of the best photosets I saw of her were posted at Met-art and Metmodels.
The Met-art set was posted 2005.01.04, named "Presenting Gabriela", by Magoo.
The Metmodels set was posted 2006.07.22., named "Fresh", by Magoo.
Ariel was named Gabriela at both Met-art and at Metmodels at that time.
She currently goes under the name of Ariel A. at Met-art.
I don't like the way Magoo colorizes his pictures. I like more lifelike, realistic color tones on the model.
But Ariel really looks like a yummy young girl-next-door in these two photosets, especially the Metmodel photoset. Like you said in the review, the expressions on a girl's face can change a photo from boring to interesting/attractive or vice versa.
She's a sweet, sweet girl, I'd really like to bite into (In my dreams).
More recent photosets of Ariel at either Met-art or Metmodels do not compare to the earliest sets. Glaring hair color, excessive makeup, whatever, she is just not presented as attractively as before. Is there some technical reason why a girl with red hair is more difficult to photograph so that her hair does not look like a dye-job?
I believe the reason met-art removed some "Lolita" sets was for legal reasons.
The main photographer for met-art in its early days was Grigori Galitsin. He also provided pictures to Domai.
Later, Galitsin worked with Petter Hegre to set up an erotic website, and then Galitsin set up his own erotic websites.
Galtsin has had legal problems in recent years. In 2006 Galitsin was put in jail in Russia for his erotic photography.
His wife was also arrested and put in jail in 2006, released, then put in jail again. His wife was the model named Valentina at met-art and named Val at Domai.
Her photosets have all been pulled at met-art and Domai.
As far as I know, Galitsin is still in jail in Russia.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
