I'm not sure about the accuracy of your statement regarding hunger and the 12 cum loads she swallowed. Cum might be like a Chinese meal, where you get hungry again soon after you finish eating. But I'm not really speaking from personal experience, I'm afraid (I'd be even more afraid if I was speaking from personal experience).
But making a 180 degree turn, I'd say that someone could have a relationship with a porn star like Marilyn Chambers, who was was still promoting her older videos at conventions. I only met her once at a glamourcon convention in LA, but she seemed warm, real and friendly. I don't know what she was like as a person (I can't read people that well to know how they will behave), but she seemed to be really nice and down to earth. I think and hope that a woman like she was could have a real marriage or real relationship with someone who cared for her. Maybe I'm a romantic, but she came across as a really nice person.
Everyone's different, which is kind of a useless generalization that has some truth to it. But to date/marry a porn star, you would need a thick skin, which I don't have. You would also need a way of accepting your wife/girlfriend having "professional" sex with other men or women or both, and I just don't think that way. Different strokes for different folks, as they said back in the 1970s.
I am surprised at the results of many poll answers, because I think the PU members are responding with their honest feelings in many cases. You would expect a lot more bullshit or posturing in the replies, but I think, partially because of the anonymity of the usernames, that we are being more honest than I would have expected.
The simple answer is, it's none of their business. People have a right to privacy, and I don't see the sense in broadcasting what would be a controversial fact. That's my position. But some men would enjoy the sensation they create, and that's them, not me.
I thought I was reading a James Bond parody when I read your reply of brutal leg scissors, the dreaded nipple twister, the pussy grind aided face sit and the 3 finger jammer-slammer.
Would even James Bond be able to stand up to female opponents using these dreaded techniques?
Teen sites (at least the mega-sites) feature girls/women that are in their teens to early twenties. I can accept that. What's annoying is when the women who are supposed to be teens look like they are in their thirties or even beyond. Nobody expects 100% truth in advertising in the porn world, but if they advertise a site as teens, then the site should be mainly teens to early 20s.
A great review: detailed, extremely comprehensive, you have a ton of background knowledge of this site.
Hope to see more reviews from you in the future.
Some web sites don't use zip files, to reduce the chance of piracy. But a web site that posts zip files that their subscribers can't open is obviously more intelligent than a non-zip web site. This way, the pirates will waste their time trying to crack the un-usable zip files, instead of trying to steal the individual photos and videos.
Not replying to emails for customer support might also be part of the piracy defense.
Some pay sites I've joined don't answer emails. I can't say what percentage, because I rarely send emails to the pay sites I join, but there have definitely been times, when I had a problem and I emailed support, that I got no reply.
I know you've had similar experiences.
The old expression, "grin and bear it", seems to apply.
Very nice, interesting review.
I read the pros and cons very easily, read the bottom line, and then when I was finished, looked to see where the review was going to continue. It didn't, because it was already over. Wondered if I had read a comment, but no, it was a real review.
A short review, but with good details.
I read it like a snack, and it left me hungry for more. That's not a criticism, just a note that it had a strange effect on me. I don't think it was deliberate, but you have a very interesting style of writing. Something like stream of consciousness.
I give this review a two thumbs up.
I think the economic downturn has really hit the porn industry. Seems like a lot of sites are either dying or no longer updating, much more than what was happening in the past.
Site launched July 2009.
Almost no stats at TBP:
Number of videos: ?
Number of photos: ?
Quality of videos(resolution): ?
Quality of photos(resolution): ?
Exclusivity: ?
The preview pages are basically a few links with 1-minute preview videos for the models.
Number of models inside: ?, but from the preview pages, appear to be 14 models currently, a very tiny number.
From what I could see from 1 minute preview videos, the videos inside are probably exclusive.
The site features young girls (about 18-20 years old) dressed in flashy rock costumes, holding a guitar to prove they are rocker chicks (biker chicks go on a motorcycle, rocker chicks go with a musical instrument).
The site (a wild guess) probably has very few videos inside. The previews are visually clear,
With a fast connection, you could probably download the entire site in 1 day (a guess based on the limited number of models, the very limited number of 1-minute preview videos).
$29.95/month (recurring) seems like a big waste of money, based on the lack of site stats, the probability the site has only a small amount of content.
I prefer natural to fake. But if a woman has had breast surgery for cancer, and she wants to go for implants, that's her choice.
Is bigger really better? Not in my opinion. But there must be a huge number of male fans who like the big, oversized look, judging from the number of porn stars who get implants.
I had a 30-day membership, which I got for $5 on a special offer. I had no problem cancelling, and was not charged any extra fees. I'm not sure why you had a problem with an automatic renewal. If you had a 30-day membership, or a 1-month membership, and you were renewed before the 1-month was finished, you should be able to get the site to reverse the renewal charge. I've been a member of sites belonging to the company that runs this site (they also run the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites), and they've always been very fair and easy about billing.
Unless there is some special reason why you want to belong to this site, I'd suggest cancelling your membership, and using the money for a better site.
Here is a link to a special $5 membership to the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites at PU, that gives you full membership to all 19 sites for 30 days. Some of the sites are very worthwhile, such as Devils Film, SilverstoneDVD, roccosiffredi, and peternorth. There is good quality DVD clips at all these sites (as well as a bunch of junk), but the good stuff is much easier to find there, and there is a lot of good DVD clips. There are also other sites in the network that are less attractive, but that you might find something if you hunt thru the junk. What you might like depends on your personal tastes, but the sites I listed have a lot of what I think is good material, that is good (but not great) video quality.
Click the link above, you get a special offer of $5 for 30 days full membership in the netFameSolutions network of 19 sites, which includes Devils Film.
Remember to uncheck the special offers that are part of the sign-up process, or you will probably be re-subscribed to PornAcess. Lol. You have to specifically uncheck the special offers when signing up for any of the sites run by this company, but they have some very nice offers: a special low price for membership to a bunch of nice sites.
But you have to remember to cancel the 30-day membership before it renews, because the renewal price is much higher than the price you can get thru PU/TBP, or thru some special offer that might be available.
The last photo set update was April 2009. The last video update was June 2009. Drooler was a member last year, and in a reply to a comment, he said the site wasn't worth the $10 membership he paid for it. "The site's a piece of shit, and the positive reviews of it are, too." Very unusual for Drooler to rate a site that low, so be warned.
Regarding site score: You said you "stumbled into some really great stuff", and that's the problem. Either you get lucky, and find some clips you really like, or you stumble around in the poor-quality junk and lose patience to keep looking. My problem (one of them) is that I get frustrated easily. If I see one lousy clip after another, I just stop searching for the good stuff that might be there.
The site has a huge amount of content. If they organized it better, the score (value) of the site could increase dramatically. But they really need to delete the massive number of duplicate links to the same video clips, because that adds to the difficulty of searching thru the clips.
They also need to give the clips some simple descriptive title.
They also need some way to highlight the better quality clips, to make them easier to find.
The current structure of the site is like a garbage dump, where they just toss all the junk (and good stuff) into a common yard, then write up an inventory listing that is almost worthless to try using.
Great review. As good as any I've seen. Lots of details, interesting opinions, wonderful bottom line summation. I'm thinking of hiring you to write my next review!
I also like that trick of using the reply function to extend your allowed word-count. First time I've seen it done.
This review is definitely in the best-in-class level. No joke.
I like softcore, will watch hardcore, but Explicite Art site would be an acquired taste for me. What I like best are lovely girls and women. The artsy porn here is supposed to be candy for the mind and eye, but I find it harder to digest than what met-art and similar glam photo sites offer.
I also don't like the photoflashes from a photographer who is doing a photo-shoot of a video session. That is stupidly intrusive on the action of the scene. Not all videos have the photo-flash effect, but some do. If someone decides to piss in the background, are we supposed to regard that as artistic embellishment of a porn scene?
(Sorry, maybe I woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.)
I'd go along with Drooler that a model's acting ability adds or detracts from the value of the scene.
The idea that the quiz reflects the person's view of acting is nice.
I would add that the quiz also reflects the person's appetite or style of eating: when you watch a porn clip, do you shovel it into your mouth and wait for it to digest, or do you go for gourmet style, and try to appreciate the different elements of the scene?
Most porn is better viewed with your eyes closed and your brain turned off.
Teenamite, a new site (started July 2009?), mainly videos, some photos. Still small, but adding 1 video clip per day. A number of good-looking Euro teens. Hardcore boy-girl action. Preview clips look good. Main problem is: cost of this 1 small teen video site is the same or higher ($29.95/month) than network sites or video mega-sites with a huge amount of content.
There are 7 sites listed at TBP for the company running this site, but membership to each site is restricted to that one site, not allowing access to all the company sites.
So why would anyone join this site when, for the same or less money, you get so much more content at other sites or networks?
Even if the company gave access to all 7 sites with one membership price, the total content would still be less than what many network and mega-video sites offer.
The pricing of this site does not make economic sense.
If the preview is really great, I will sometimes join a site, even if it does not have any comments or reviews. I joined paysites before becoming a member of PU, and the experience could be hit or miss. With PU as a guide, I've done much better. But if the site preview is really enticing, I will join a site that doesn't have any reviews at PU/TBP.
Then again, there are so many enticing sites out there, that I want to join but don't have the time or money for. There's only 24 hours in a day, and I can't spend them all on watching porn (I have to stop and eat sometime).
In honor of the Indian review I wrote, and the interests of accuracy, I went to an Indian restaurant today that I sometimes go to, for lunch, to hear how the waiters talk. The owner was born in the Indian state of Punjab. But there is also a Punjab province of Pakistan with a lot of Punjabi people. Anyway, the owner and the waiter both spoke English with an Indian (not British) accent. I'm calling how they spoke an "Indian accent", just like I'm calling what Americans in the United States speak with as an American accent, even though both terms are probably not correct from a technical standpoint, but I'm not a linguist, just trying to get the idea across that you can sometimes tell where a person is from the way he/she speaks.
The point is, there are some models at this site that are Indian, but there are also some models that are not Indian, based on the way they speak English. The models all dress up like they are Indians from India, but that is part of the fantasy. It's supposed to make the video more exotic and erotic if the model is from India, no matter where the model really is from.
Am I allowed to charge my lunch to PU, because of the research I was doing?
I'm no expert, but I believe at least some of the models are from India or a near-by area, because of their accents. I believe, because England once controlled India, many Indians acquired a British-type accent, and some Indians (the wealthy ones) even went to England for some of their formal education. The accent can be a British-sounding accent, or a different type of accent that is different from the British accent. But there are definitely some models at the site that I believe are native Indians, even if they moved to where-ever it was that they made these porn videos. I doubt they made any of these videos in India, simply because it would have been too dangerous (against the law).
But there are a lot of fake "Indian" models at this site that are just Americans, from the United States, based on their "American accent".
I'm not sure what the difference is between "Maybe" and "Not sure". Both answers seem about the same to me. Anyway, it definitely takes more eroticism in a picture to arouse me than it did when I was a teenager.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
