| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2376
|
Just Teen Site
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
I guess you just have to take the good with the bad.
JTS just posted a photoset of Linda named "Merry Xmas", dated 2009-12-23. This Linda is named Masha F at Met-art. She's one of my favorite models. Gorgeous girl. Linda is wearing a Santa-type hat in many of the "Merry Xmas" photos. There's also a border of fake snow around many of the photos to set her off and to remind us of the Christmas season.
Truth be told, the photos would have been better without the fake snow.
But this is a gorgeous girl, and the photoset is worth keeping.
She also had a recent photoset at Met-art, dated 2009.10.28, named "PREXIOSI", under the model name of Masha F.
|
12-28-09 10:15am
|
Comment
2377
|
Just Teen Site
(0)
|
|
12-28-09 12:48am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2378
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
uscue's Reply
American Vice has "a series with midgets and some deformed guy". That's what I would call a really specialized niche. Personally, I prefer regular boy-girl videos, or even girl-girl videos, to watching a midget or some deformed guy.
|
12-27-09 06:59am
|
Reply
2379
|
Club Seventeen
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
In spite of a number of attractive models, because of the high membership price and other negative factors of this site, it's not worth joining. So what is a reasonable score for a site that's not worth joining? Individual preferences vary wildly, but I think any score of 70 or above is too high for this site. That's just my opinion, of course, but I think that more emphasis should be put on making the score reflect the attractiveness/value of a site, as to whether the site is worth joining or not.
|
12-27-09 06:34am
|
Reply
2380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
If the guy would rather watch a porno rather than focus on the hot babe seated next to him, I'd say he was overly addicted to porn. Lol.
|
12-27-09 12:22am
|
Reply
2381
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I've never owned a laptop yet, so I've never watched porn while travelling. I have seen R-rated movies while staying in a hotel or motel, but that's not considered porn.
|
12-26-09 07:46am
|
Reply
2382
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Costumes can add a bit of color and interest to a photo set. Sometimes the costumes can add, other times the costumes add very little or actually detract. It depends on the model and the photographer.
|
12-24-09 11:48pm
|
Reply
2383
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
If you are looking for more Japanese sites, Sex Asian 18 is one you might consider. Site has a number of very attractive models, photosets and videos. They have a daily download limit which was 12 GB at the time I was a member back in July 2009.
|
12-18-09 11:49am
|
Reply
2384
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
Never visited any adult date sites. Closest I got was maybe a popup for one of the sites, that I closed without visiting the site.
|
12-18-09 11:34am
|
Comment
2385
|
My Lovely Girls
(0)
|
|
12-17-09 04:33pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
2386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I hadn't given it a lot of thought previously, but Turboshaft brings up an interesting idea: "I mean if a hot girl needed to have her appendix taken out, who are we to judge the scar that it left behind?" Should we ban all porn stars with appendix scars, or allow them in as long as the scar has been photoshopped with taste? My honest opinion is that most appendix scars are less distracting than tattoos and piercings.
|
12-16-09 09:21pm
|
Reply
2387
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Some photoshop is acceptable if it improves the picture. But photoshop can be overdone and produce artificial-looking results. Some photographers go way overboard in using photoshop so that the model appears to be an alien instead of a beautiful earthling. My feeling is that photoshop (or a similar process) is being over-used lately at Met-art, and the photosets are less attractive because of it.
|
12-16-09 12:36am
|
Reply
2388
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I try to balance price versus content (quality and quantity of content), to make a rough guess as to whether a site is worth joining. I do read the reviews at PU to get an idea of the site contents (quality + quantity of photosets, frequency of updates, ease of site navigation, and any problems the site might have.
|
12-15-09 03:20pm
|
Comment
2389
|
Teen Sex Mania
(0)
|
|
12-15-09 09:00am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
2390
|
Muse.org
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
There were no updates in all of 2008.
The updates in 2009 just started a few months ago.
That is why the site is offering a free one-year membership to anyone who had a 1-year membership in 2008.
They are also offering a free 6-month membership to anyone who bought a 1-year membership in 2009 during rhe period it was not updating.
I joined for 1 year in March 2009, so I am supposed to get a free 6-month extension of my membership. I sent an email requesting the extension on Dec. 01, but have received no reply yet.
|
12-13-09 03:14pm
|
Comment
2391
|
Muse.org
(0)
|
|
12-13-09 01:40pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
2392
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
RB, feel free to talk back to me anytime, even on a wrong button.
|
12-12-09 05:41pm
|
Reply
2393
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Porn videos are mainly acting, and most porn actors leave a lot to be desired. Nice looking face and body are plusses, but like pat362 and pinkerton state, if the girl looks like she is making out a grocery list while she getting fucked, or her moans, groans and excitement are so obviously fake, it takes away from the value of the scene.
|
12-12-09 12:37pm
|
Reply
2394
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Drooler, have they been using more photoshop or a similar process at metart? I don't mind some photoshop at metart, but lately it seems to be used over-much and the photosets, even of attractive models, are less appealing. The coloring and appearance of the model seems fake instead of real.
|
12-11-09 06:11pm
|
Reply
2395
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I think it's easier to find good quality softcore pics than hardcore material (pics and vids).
But most softcore vids don't really appeal to me that much.
I don't know why softcore pix are so much better than softcore vids. In general, it's easier to produce pix than vids, so that's part of the reason why softcore pix are much higher in quality than softcore vids.
Most hardcore pix that I've seen are much lower in quality than the softcore pix that are available.
But even given that quality pix are easier to make than vids, I don't understand why most softcore vids have very little value for me.
Except that with vids, there are so many more factors that can detract from the enjoyment of the vid compared to a picture. A lovely girl opens her mouth, and her voice or what she says in a vid destroys the illusion of beauty, grace, attractiveness, etc. The lighting and focus and other elements in a vid are much harder to control than for a picture. It's much more expensive shooting a video than a photoset. The detail/definition of a picture can be much higher than what is found in most videos. Etc., etc., etc. High quality softcore pix are found at many sites.
There are not a lot of high-quality softcore vids that appeal to me. There are few high-quality hardcore pix that appeal to me. There are high-quality hardcore vids, but they are much harder to find and collect than high-quality softcore photosets. Sorry if I was rambling, but the ideas I stated are the ones I believe.
|
12-10-09 12:19am
|
Reply
2396
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
pinkerton "The conclusion of porn sex back then in the early 80s was the guy cumming on the girl's body rather than in her mouth/face, usually on her chest or ass."
I think it's a lot classier cumming on the girl's body than on her face. It's degrading to cum on her face, but that's what today's audience seems to expect.
|
12-06-09 11:52am
|
Reply
2397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm thinking it was my first time, but I wasn't really watching myself that closely. I was paying more attention to the girl I was with.
|
12-06-09 09:09am
|
Comment
2398
|
Super Nice Girls
(0)
|
|
12-05-09 09:20pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
2399
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
|
12-05-09 09:55am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
2400
|
Showcase Eufrat
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Eufrat is a lovely model, a long-time favorite of mine. She has my vote (but I've never been a member of this site).
|
12-05-09 09:20am
|
