| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1701
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Did I win yet? My gosh, why can't I have a sneak peak to see beforehand? Like, this is Tuesday, and I should have already known since last Tuesday who the next week's winners were. The suspense is killing me.
|
06-21-11 08:23am
|
Reply
1702
|
ATK Natural & Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
I prefer women with pubic hair versus the shaved look found almost everywhere today. But almost all models from the 1970s and 1980s, when they started showing pubic hair legally in the US, had trimmed pubic hair.
Hairy legs and armpits does not make the model attractive to me. I want a lovely face and figure to be part of the package.
|
06-19-11 01:46pm
|
Reply
1703
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. I'm mainly into softcore photography. But after getting into hardcore videos a few years back, my tastes are still mainly softcore with some hardcore. I don't go for extreme porn. I'm not really clear what extreme porn would be.
|
06-19-11 12:50pm
|
Reply
1704
|
N/A
|
Reply of
indybt30's Reply
Never heard of jelquing before. I guess I've led a sheltered life. Reading about jelquing on Wikipedia, I read that silicone has been injected into the penis and scrotum for penis enlargement. Ugh. Maybe silicone breast implants aren't so bad after all. Could that be a poll question: which would you prefer, having silicone injected into your breasts, or into your penis and scrotum? Possible answers would measure the intensity of your outraged screams. Lol.
|
06-18-11 05:10pm
|
Reply
1705
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Ditto for other meaning no.
|
06-17-11 01:26am
|
Reply
1706
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've used email in the past. The response is hit or miss. Most sites have never replied. A few have replied in a timely manner. But I don't try to contact customer support unless I'm having a major problem. And because I usually get such a lousy response, I don't have a lot of faith in customer support, which many sites advertise as 24/7.
|
06-15-11 07:33am
|
Reply
1707
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
slutty, in your review, you say there is no HD downloading yet. Was there any notice of when, or if, HD downloading would be available for the network sites?
On 04-21-11 (12:00pm) Veev (the webmaster for FameDigital) posted a reply to a comment at PU (the comment was by RustyJ posted 04-21-11 08:55am and titled "Any changes to HD downloading?").
RustyJ was asking if and when HD clips could be downloaded.
Veev (the webmaster) replied: I was told that it's on the 26th of April and it's gonna start in EvilAngel.com. If all goes well, it will be all over our other sites as well..all 44 of them :-).
---------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
I don't remember EvilAngel being available as part of the bonus sites when I was a member of DevilsFilm before.
Were you able to access EvilAngel. And if so, what site did you join through?
|
06-10-11 08:31pm
|
Reply
1708
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
What can I say in my defense of a foggy brain? Well, the network used to be called netFameSolutions. So because of the name change from netFameSolutions to famedigital, I didn't recognize that this was the network for DevilsFilm and RoccoSiffredi.
Edit: The company is still listed as netFameSolutions at TBP. It's confusing to me how to refer to some of these networks. What is the proper name to use? Why can't they make it simple?
I joined through DevilsFilm. That's why I think of this as the DevilsFilm network.
|
06-10-11 02:07am
|
Reply
1709
|
Fame Digital
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Review
Excellent review, as usual.
I've never been a member. I don't like most DVD sites because there's usually too much material to look through before I find something that I like (personal taste).
Your review makes that point very clear, that it's not easy searching the contents to find the good stuff. So in spite of the low price, I'm too lazy to join this site.
Oops. I just looked at the site. I've been a member of this network before. I've got a foggy brain. I've been a member before, and will almost certainly be again. I like a number of models at this site, and will return when I have the time.
I need a new brain. I didn't realize this is the Devil's Film network. Lol.
|
06-10-11 01:34am
|
Reply
1710
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
Did you see Creature from the Black Lagoon and House of Wax in the original runs back in the 1950s?
I dimly recall seeing Creature from the Black Lagoon at the movies back in the 1950s, but I didn't remember it was in 3D.
I think I only saw House of Wax on TV, so that wasn't in 3D when I saw it.
I remember 3D glasses back then were made of paper with plastic to see through. The glasses seemed different from today's 3D glasses. I don't remember any eye-strain effect back in the 1950s. They even had 3D comic books. I had a 3D comic book of the 3 Stooges back then.
|
06-09-11 09:36am
|
Comment
1711
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
|
06-08-11 10:26am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
1712
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
I'm guessing this is a temporary thing. I previously joined through Spunky Bee, because, like you say, it offered access to all the sites at Tony Bucks. The other sites cost the same amount, but all offered access to fewer sites in the network.
If Spunky Bee has truly become a stand-alone site, with no access to other sites in the network, then few people will join this site, I believe.
|
06-07-11 07:09pm
|
Comment
1713
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
|
06-07-11 05:51pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1714
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't remember any yoga porn. But maybe I'm like slutty, and wasn't paying attention.
|
06-07-11 05:35pm
|
Reply
1715
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No. Over time I've seen content that I thought was disgusting or unpleasant. But I haven't found myself actively enjoying acts that I initially thought were unpleasant. I'm more into softcore than hardcore. And for hardcore, I usually like the simple, straight sex, with, hopefully, some class or buildup or plot to make it mean something beyond two bodies pounding away. To keep it simple, I much prefer a guy and a girl over larger groups. Though I don't mind two girls.
Is two girls a new fetish? If the girls are attractive, and enjoying each other, I think it's great. But I don't know if that qualifies as a fetish.
|
06-07-11 05:31pm
|
Reply
1716
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Thanks for the reply. I was thinking the bonus sites were probably worthless.
The quote from the sign-up page is: "23 BONUS SITES - FREE!".
So I was thinking that just possibly it might be worth joining, because there are some cute-looking girls at this site.
But I will save my money for a site/network that looks more promising.
|
06-06-11 07:38pm
|
Comment
1717
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
|
06-06-11 01:28pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
1718
|
VF Academy
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Very thorough review with a nice personal flavor. Agree that cheesy music can be annoying. I like if a model gets off, as long as it looks real or believable. The fake moans and groans are a turn-off.
|
06-04-11 05:15am
|
Reply
1719
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
If nothing else, you can value Twistys as an archive site because of the huge amount of past content.
But it will be interesting to see how the new content changes. I never liked Brazzers. What I'm hoping to see is a new Twistys with a slightly harder edge. But still keeping the glamor-style. With good-looking models.
Is that too much to hope for?
|
06-04-11 04:58am
|
Reply
1720
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Site contents (quality and quantity), ease of use, and price are the main factors in scoring a site, or judging value. Ease of use is mainly based on site design (which includes not just appearance but search features, hot links for accessing material, distracting ads, etc.).
|
06-03-11 09:15am
|
Reply
1721
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Twisty's is a very nice site in terms of amount of content, and in the quality of the content. A lot of very beautiful models.
|
06-02-11 08:33pm
|
Reply
1722
|
N/A
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Reply
I don't remember if I've ever been in a sex shop. I've seen them in the movies. Maybe I need to broaden my horizons before it's too late and I get planted. Lol.
Also, I never bought any sex toys online. But I did buy some "sleaze" books and magazines (Playboy and Penthouse) on ebay.
|
06-01-11 08:40am
|
Review
1723
|
AT Movs
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Easy login.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Streaming option.
-Multiple download options: High, medium, low quality WMV file. A low quality MP4 file for portable devices.
-Simple navigation. Could be improved, but fairly easy to examine site contents.
-Nice integration into rest of network. A search on model's name returns all her content at the network, instead of just the single site's content. |
| Cons: |
-No model bios.
-Some plot or buildup to the sex would add value to the videos.
-The action becomes predictable after watching a number of videos. These are mainly attractive girls getting fucked, but you need some variety or freshness to give the video meaning.
-The videos and photosets are true to the site theme of amateur teen action. That is both a plus and a minus. I wish the videos had higher production value, because these are attractive young girls. Their freshness and physical attractiveness is not emphasized in the videos and photos.
-Archive site. No updates since 2010-06-15. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is part of the Teen Mega World (Royal Cash) network. The site used to be called Amateur Teen Movs, was renamed ATMovs. The site structure was also reformatted to the more easily usable form
found at most of the Teen Mega World sites.
Many models at the nework used to have multiple names. Which made searching for their content harder. Someone put in some good effort and
gave most of the models a single name. Also, a search was added that
searches throughout the network sites for content under a model's name, instead of a search specific to a single site. And the search returns not just the videos for a model, but hot links to those videos.
Not all the models' content has been renamed. Jelena has a video at ATMOVS. She is also the same model named Willa found at Teen Sex Movs,
Teen Sex Mania, Beauty Angels and other sites in this network. But most of the models I checked did have a single name, which makes searching so much easier.
Site content is hardcore teen sex. Mainly boy-girl, with a few 2 boys-1 girl or 1 boy-2 girls or 2 boys 2-girls. This is straight hardcore sex,with no buildup or tease factor or plot. The girls are real teens, Eastern European, many are attractive. There are very few tattoos or piercings.
The site style is a good representation of the site's original name: amateur teen movs. The models are fresh young teens who are captured
fucking on video. The camera-style and setting is amateur, home style.
Site statistics:
Number of videos: 159.
Video runtime: around 25 minutes.
Number of photosets: 159 (Photoset is a photo record of a video shoot).
Number of photos per photoset: 87-200.
Individual photo: 45-70 KB.
Photo width x height: 720 x 576 pixels.
Note: the photos are nice-quality screencaps, but not worth saving.
Multiple download options for video:
High quality WMV, medium quality WMV, low quality WMV, low quality MP4 (for portable devices).
File size for high quality 15 minute clip: 372 MB = 24.8MB/minute.
File size for high quality 21 minute clip: 509 MB = 24.2MB/minute.
File size for high quality 26 minute clip: 631 MB = 24.3MB/minute.
High quality video:
Frame width x height: 720x576.
Total bitrate: 3168kbps.
You can join this site directly or through Teen Mega World. Using the PU/TBP discount link a membership costs $19.95/month. A membership through this site or through Teen Mega World gives you access to most of the network sites.
Most of the network sites are no longer updating. But there are several sites in the network that are updating. So you get access to a large amount of teen content, with a nice update schedule from the sites that are updating.
The network access raises this site's score to 85. |
|
05-31-11 09:39am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
1724
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Guess that phrase, "Do your own thing" applies here. Or whatever it takes. But footjob is more for other people than my own interests. I don't mind looking at the feet of a good-looking model, as long as I can spend more time looking at the rest of her. But footjob?
|
05-30-11 02:15am
|
Reply
1725
|
Devils Film
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Comment
As for value, the special PU/TBP $9.95/monthly price for network access is a great deal.
But I also think that the Teen Mega World (Royal Cash) network at $19.95/month for network access is also a great deal.
And Metart, even though a single site, at $19.95/month, is also a bargain. Metart is so large that it could be split into many decent-sized solo sites (which I am glad they did not do-even though they have Metmodels, which is a smaller, sister site of Metart).
|
05-29-11 08:38pm
|
