It's been many, many years since I've been to a topless bar. But it seems like it would be cheaper to go to a topless bar than to watch a private cam show.
I think the model at emas place is very cute. She has a number of sets at glam deluxe from years ago. She also has a number of sets at metart. She's also had a few photosets at other sites (just teen site, etc.).
But I haven't seen anything new from her in over a year, I think.
Any recent members of glam deluxe care to comment on site?
Apparently there are 2 bonus sites included with membership to glam deluxe:
helens planet
emas place
It's been almost 3 years since I was a member of glam deluxe. The photography sets were high quality then, many of the models were gorgeous. But the update rate was slow. And there were no zips for the photosets.
There were only a small number of videos.
Any recent members of that site care to comment on their experience with this site?
The bonus sites are solo model sites. Cute girls. Are those sites still updating?
OK. TBP states last update for emas place was 04-24-10 (as of 05-17-11)'
Also, TBP states content count has not changed for helens planet since 2008, even though the dates for the content supposedly show recent updates. So site probably has not updated in years.
I wear my amateur status proudly. Along with the hard drives I try to string around my neck and arms and waist as the newest status symbol of the porn aficionado.
TBP reviews are useful for the "facts" about a site. But at least some PU reviews are more useful for giving the "flavor" of a site. So both sites can be useful or helpful in deciding whether to join a site or not.
Very important for sites that are primarily photo sites, like metart, femjoy, mplstudios, etc., which do offer videos, but their main value is in the photos.
Less important for sites which are strong in both videos and photos. But who wants the frustration of downloading a photo set photo by photo?
For video sites where the photos are low quality and not worth keeping, zip files are least useful. But maybe the site manager will wake up one day, realize the photos are poor, and try to get a better photographer. Do you believe in miracles?
I think you are right that you are better off looking for a different site to join. That's just my opinion. I've seen the Massage Creep videos. Yes, the setup for each Message Creep video is similar, but there is far more variation in the sex at Message Creep than at Try Teens. And the videos are better quality: the lighting and camera-work at Message Creep is really excellent. The lighting and camera-work at Try Teens is good, but not as good as at Message Creep. And there is what appears to be real heat in at least some of the Massage Creep videos. You don't get the same feeling of heat at Try Teens: it's a boy and girl fucking, on camera, it's real, but it's not hot sex. The sex is scripted, most videos closely follow the same script, and it gets almost boring after watching a few of the similar videos. And the noises the stunt cock makes are truly annoying. The noises are meant to show excitement, satisfaction, show the stunt cock is a "real" man giving it to this cute teen, but I found it really annoying.
The videos at Massage Creep provide a much better experience than the videos at Try Teens. There are many attractive girls at Massage Creep, they are presented looking "natural", not glamorized, but they come across as more attractive than the cute girls at Try Teens, who could look really nice but it just doesn't come across at Try Teens.
I'm not saying the Massage Creep videos are great, but I think they are better quality and more effective than the Try Teens videos.
I believe 100% of the scenes have at least some anal sex in them. The basic plot, as I said, is blow job, vaginal, anal, blowjob with the guy coming on the girl's face or mouth or cheeks. (They follow that script on at least a few of their bonus sites).
Personally, I don't see all that big a difference between vaginal or anal. Maybe for the girl it feels different, but visually, there is little difference in watching the two types of action. Maybe there's a mental kick because of what used to be the "forbidden" element.
Also, with anal, they often pull out, at least briefly, and show the enlarged anus, before putting the penis back inside the anus, before putting the penis into the girl's mouth.
As far as a long period before the site timeout, I haven't really measured it. Sometimes you get good download speeds for videos, sometimes not. My fastest download speed is about 630 KB/s, for my DSL connection. Sometimes I can get that, but sometimes the speed can drop to 20-60 KB/s, which means many hours to download a single video, which can run from 400-800 MB in size. Using DownThemAll download manager does not increase my download speed for this site, in fact, it actually appears to slow down the download speed. Not sure why, this is unusual. And I am talking about downloading a single video, not downloading multiple videos at the same time.
So if you are downloading a video, and then want to download a different one after the first one finished, if the time is over an hour or so, sometimes you have to re-log-in. No big thing, just enter the username, password, and captcha. Or if you saved the username and password, which I recommend, then you just need to enter the captcha.
Each membership comes with a number of bonus sites. To enter any site, you have to enter your username, password, and captcha. Some networks lets you transfer between different bonus sites without having to go through the separate log-in process, but not this one.
There are lot of cute girls at this site, many of which you probably have not seen before. But I find the sex very repetitious, almost boring, and the stunt cocks annoying because of the stupid grunting noises they make. The cute girls are real teens, with firm natural bodies, few tattoos or piercings.
But some PU members apparently don't mind the repetitious sex plot, or the stupid grunting noises of the stunt cocks, and enjoy these sites for the cute girls and the hardcore sex (not rough sex, just bread-and-butter fuck sex).
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-A nice number of fresh-faced girls (Eastern European). Many of the girls I have not seen before. Almost all the girls are ok to nice looking.
-No DRM.
-Long time before site timeout.
-Professionally shot videos.
-Choice of streaming, or can download the video.
-Each video has an accompanying photoshoot.
Cons:
-Navigation is clunky and very basic. Each page has 2 videos with thumbnails of the model. That's the layout.
-No zip file for the photosets.
-Slow update rate.
-All videos download with the same name of i01.wmv, so you have to manually rename each video, and keep a manual listing of what each video is (model name + whatever information you want).
-Videos have no title or posting date.
-Videos are straight hardcore sex with same basic script.
-No search.
-Download speed varies widely. On a single file download, using a download manager, not downloading more than 1 file, the speed can slow to 20-50 KB/s, so a 874 MB video file can take 4-10 hours or more, which is absolutely ridiculous.
-Only 1 resolution for video downloads. No choice of hi, medium or low quality.
Bottom Line:
Each video follows the same script:a guy walks into the small bedroom of a cute young girl, she smiles and waves, and strips, the guy makes stupid-sounding noises indicating juvenile enjoyment of what he's going to do to that luscious piece of teen meat, girl gives a blowjob, they fuck vaginal, fuck anal, more blowjob, guy shoots over girl's face and makes more noises expressing satisfaction.
The girl poses with cum over her face, smiles, waves goodbye, and leaves the room. End of video.
The videos are well lit, good lighting means good colors for skin tones, good colors for foreground and background (which is just a bed in a small
bedroom). The video is professionally shot: no jittery jumping around, clear view of the entire action, good close-up action, good shots of the
girl's face and body so you clearly see what the girl looks like. The sex is straight-forward fucking, the stunt cock seems to be enjoying himself (with all the grunts he makes), and the girl usually keeps a happy smile on her
face throughout the entire sex. The video ends with the girl smiling, waving goodbye, and leaving the room, while the guy makes happy grunting noises (which translate better in different languages than if he was speaking Russian).
The videos are high quality, the models are all teens and mainly attractive to very attractive. I wish the stunt cock didn't make all those stupid noises trying to show what a good time he was having. I wish there was more variety to the sex. These are luscious young girls, and they are
putting on a good show, but there is little variety and the sex gets to be boring in spite of the crystal clear videos and teen girls with cute or pretty faces and tight young bodies.
I can't empasize enough how clean and fresh-looking and cute these girls are: They are absolutely adorable, and they are as good as anything you will find on the cute-teen level. The girls look like they are the daughter of your next-door-neighbor, or the girls you can see at the mall or in church.
Number of videos at site: 185
Video runtime between 20-35 minutes.
Video file size about 575-790 MB.
Frame width x height: 960x540.
Total bitrate: 3145 kbps.
Each video has an accompanying photoset.
Number of photos per shoot: 140-450.
Only 1 size for each photo (no hi, medium, low).
Size of individual photos: 290 KB; 853x1280 pixels.
The photos are well-shot, much better than screen caps, but simple style, not glamor style photos.
Bottom line:
There are a large number of really cute girls. But the stupid sounds the stunt cock makes, the by-the-numbers-sex, the same setting of a small
bedroom, make the sex repetitive and less meaningful, almost boring. The videos are professionally shot, but some thought should have been given to what the guy does to the girl instead of following the same script time and
time again.
For those of us less technically inclined, it's helpful when a poll question includes a simple definition of a technical term, or a simple example. What's a plug-in or 3rd party video feed? If that refers to the "free" online chats offered by some porn pay sites, then my response to the poll would be that a "free" online chat (which often is not free, but usually costs extra money to participate in), has not influenced me to join any porn site.
My idea of a plug-in is some type of computer program that can work with another computer program. There are plug-ins for Firefox (my usual browser) that will act as a download manager or do other things that make Firefox easier or more useful.
But like I said, my guess is that the poll question is referring to online chats offered at some porn pay sites.
But maybe the poll question refers to both porn and non-porn sites, and if video feeds are available for those sites.
YouTube has online videos. And there are plug-ins that allow you to download those videos. Would that be included in the poll question? That seems doubtful, but I don't have a clear understanding of what the poll question means.
Thanks for the reply, pat. I was a member of Teen Mega World myself for several months recently. On the signup page for Teen Mega World, it says you get 25+ bonus sites. One of those bonus sites is WMB Girls, which is just a clone or something of Teen Mega World, because it's a gateway to the other sites like Teen Mega World, and neither site (WMB Girls and Teen Mega World) has any content of its own.
But like I said, Teen Mega World signup page states 25+ bonus sites included with membership.
Ex GF Box signup page states 30+ bonus sites included with membership.
So I was just wondering what the specific sites were that are included with the Ex GF Box membership.
But I think you are probably right that the main difference between joining through Teen Mega World and joining through Ex GF Box is that Ex GF Box is not included in Teen Mega World. There is also a higher monthly price if joining through Ex GF Box.
And I think a lot of Ex GF Box is old content from other sites. Because I recognize some of the advertising photos for Ex GF Box as old photos I've seen before (from Nubiles, I think).
Much prefer the desktop: better monitor, better keyboard, less expensive (although notebook prices have dropped way down these last few years). But for the same money, you get much more with the desktop. The advantage of a notebook is portability. If you don't need portability, the desktop is the way to go.
Thanks for the update. The info about a 30 day delay before downloading HD videos is posted at TBP, and was also mentioned in a previous PU review. I'm looking forward to your review. If there are any bonus sites included in a membership, would you please mention their names as well in your review?
Persis Khambatta, was bald (either a shaved head or a wig) in Star Trek The Motion Picture. She was a gorgeous-looking woman.
Bald does not make a woman ugly, but she needs beauty or flair or style to pull it off. Otherwise a hat or wig to cover the baldness is better.
Edit: By "wig" I mean some kind of head covering that made her look bald. I don't know what the right technical term for that head-piece is.
At $30/month for a relatively small site (with no bonus sites included), this seems expensive. Plus, the ridiculous rule of not allowing downloads of HD movies until you've been a member for 30+ days.
I've seen a small amount of anime. I thought it was interesting, but I've never joined any pay porn sites that had anime. Now that I think about it, the small amount of anime that I did see was mainly non-porn: Japanese anime about cartoon characters that were often part of a series. I bought the DVDs off of ebay, which is mainly anti-porn.
I feel the same way when I see a softcore model that I really like doing hardcore. That's her choice, but I like her a little less. It shouldn't make a difference, but the mind is a funny thing.
What Monahan says makes sense. There will be a new technology coming out soon that will be the next "must have" that will replace BluRay. Anyone remember the floppy disk, or VHS or eight track or ...
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
