I think X-Art is a great site. And $9.95 for the first month is a great offer.
But people have different tastes. And not everyone will like this site. This site is softcore erotic (hardcore in sex, but a softcore, sensual style). Very high quality in vids and pix.
But if you want gonzo sex, you won't find it here.
Maybe I should add that not everyone likes their photos. Some respected PU members did not think their photos were high quality. But I do.
I think your reply was the funniest thing I've read all day. You give me hope that there is a silver lining in every cloud. We just have to look for it.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-No DRM.
-No download limits that I found. The first day, I downloaded 12 high-definition photosets and videos with no problem. The TBP review states
there is a download limit, but I didn't find one.
-Outstanding quality in the photosets and videos.
-High percentage of lovely or attractive teen and early-twenty models.
-One month discounted price of $19.95 with PU discount.
-Zip files for the photosets.
-The models are presented attractively.
-Some truly outstanding, lovely girls.
-Can stream or download videos.
-Updates 3 times a week.
-A behind the scenes blog can be interesting.
-Good download speeds. I get 1.3 MB/sec, which is my max download speed.
-DownThemAll download manager works fine at this site.
-Model listing. Single page, with nice sized thumbnails to show each model, makes it easy to search through the models.
Cons:
PROS (CONTINUED):
-There is a model bio. Gives name, country, age, a few personal facts.
-Good sound control. Apart from the unnecessary passages where they have a music background.
-The content is mainly exclusive, as far as I can tell. I did see one video that was also posted at beauty-angels, part of the Teen Mega World network: model Sasha D, video titled "Between the Sheets", is the same video posted at beauty-angels titled "Melika". The model is named Melika
at beauty-angels, and the video is also named "Melika". But the X-Art site offers more download formats than the beauty-angels site, as well as
offering higher definition versions of the video. Teen Mega World gives nice choices for video definitions, but X-Art gives high-end video definitions.
-Easy login.
-Long time before site timeout.
CONS:
-The cons are basically minor. This is an outstanding site for erotic teens.
-If you want gonzo or rough sex, look elsewhere.
Bottom Line:
CONS (CONTINUED):
-The soundtrack could be better. They play a music background on the introduction of the videos, and it would be better to have no music.
-Also, in the introduction of some videos, they try to add artistic touches. So instead of giving you a crystal sharp video image, the image goes in and out of focus, which is annoying. I want to see the girl clearly, not a bunch of out-of-focus images.
-Sometimes, you're in the member's area, you click on a hot link to see a video or photoset, and you are transferred to the preview section for non-members; so you have to log back in to the member's area, and try again to download the video or photoset.
-There are a few errors in labelling their hot links. For example, the site offers 3 hot links to download the photoset of Izabella Carr titled
"Red Velvet Goddess". You are supposed to have 3 choices of 1200 p, 2000 p, and 4000 p. But the 2000 p and 4000 p links both download photos of
2000 p. There is no 4000 p photoset.
BOTTOM LINE
-Sample statistics:
-Video
Runtime for video: 12 minutes 24 seconds
Windows Media
1920x1080 HD (783 MB) bitrate 8658 kbps
1280x720 HD (466 MB) bitrate 5144 kbps
960x540 SD (285 MB) bitrate 3136 kbps
Apple Quicktime
1920x1080 HD (755 MB)
1280x720 SD (447 MB)
960x540 SD (272 MB)
iPad/iPod/Mobile
640x480 SD (65 MB)
-Photoset
Images in this photoset: 84
1200 pixels (16 MB)
2000 pixels (29 MB)
4000 pixels (88 MB)
Number of models: 100+
Number of videos: 180+
Number of photosets: 400+
Theme is erotic softcore and hardcore. Site started out years ago as a softcore photo site of beautiful young models, girls in their teens and
early twenties. The photosets were small, but nicely photographed. No videos, photos only, girls only, no actual sex.
Then, a few years ago, they started adding sex in their photosets. And started adding videos. They now offer high quality photosets and videos of solo female masturbation, girl-girl lesbian sex, boy-girl sex. The sex is sensual or erotic, not gonzo.
The site is well designed, making it easy to navigate.
You don't get the massive quantity of a mega site/network like Nubiles or Teen Mega World, but if you like the sensual, erotic approach, this site is well worth visiting.
Videos can be streaming or downloaded.
Download options include: wmv, mov, and mp4 format.
Download resolutions may include: 960x540, 1280x720, and 1920x1080.
But on a 15 inch laptop monitor, even the lower definition 540p videos look good.
The videos are short, mostly from 6 to 12 minutes. A few videos can hit 18
minutes. The quality is so high, you wish they were longer. You get good professional camera work, good lighting, good colors. The newer videos are being offered in 1080 HD, with bitrates of 8500 kbps or higher.
The photosets are high quality, as well. The number of photos per set varies widely, from 1 to 70 or more. The girls are so gorgeous, you wish there were more photos in each set, especially the sets from 5 years ago or more, because the early photosets had 30 photos or less, of lovely young models.
The girls are young (18 to 21), Caucasian, slender. Very little variety in the models. But they range from attractive, to fucking beautiful.
-The "Behind the Scenes" section gives a glimpse of how the photosets and videos are shot, also gives a little bit of the personality of some models.
The site advertises itself as "Premium Quality HD Erotic Videos and Photography." I think that's an accurate description.
Excellent review. Clearly shows some important facts. The download problems means this would be a site for me to avoid, no matter how appealing the models might be.
Even more diversity in the future, along with improved technology. Just like the internet and 100s of cable TV stations offer increased choices versus the 20 or less TV stations back in the 1950s and 1960s, porn will continue to fragment and evolve as technology improves. 3D and beyond. Simulacrum and sensory stimulation.
I signed up for a Devils Film membership in April, using Mastercard. And the credit card company blocked my account until I spoke with them on the telephone.
The credit card companies are trying to prevent fraud. So if they see a suspicious charge or billing agent, they block the account.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Adding 1 new video about every 5 days.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Videos cab be streamed and also downloaded.
-There are multiple choices for download: high quality, medium quality, and MP4 for portable devices.
-You can use a download manager such as DownThemAll.
-Good download speeds.
-Easy logon.
-Long time before site time-out.
Cons:
-There is a link to live chats. But the free chats that I saw were a waste of time.
-Tiny site. only 14 videos so far.
-The acting is amateur.
-The plot is unbelievable. An older doctor examines a teenager's vagina. Then he sticks his penis in her mouth. Then he fucks her. She is
supposedly so aroused by the examination that the sex follows naturally. But the sex that is shown has all the passion of a soggy French Fry.
-The doctor and the model speak in a foreign language. Possibly Russian.
No subtitles.
Bottom Line:
This is the newest offering from the Royal Cash network. The site is tiny. It only has 14 videos so far.
The site theme is teenage girls visiting a doctor, who examines them. He uses a speculum to examine their vagina. He stimulates the vagina with his finger. Also uses a stethoscope to listen to the vagina. Somehow, the girl is supposedly turned on by the doctor stimulating her vagina with his finger and his tongue. He then puts his penis in her mouth. She then sucks on his penis, and they fuck.
The action is completely unrealistic. The niche where a guy gives a girl a massage and turns her on and they then have sex is a much more believable fantasy. But this theme, of a doctor examining a girl and turning her on, is done in a completely amateur way.
Instead of adding videos to this site, it would be more valuable if they updated the Tricky Masseur or the Squirting Virgin sites. The models they feature at those sites are more attractive. And the plot is more believable. And the models put more passion into their sex.
You have about 14 models at this site, but they are not up to the average attractiveness of the Royal Cash network. The network has a lot of
attractive models, some of which are really good looking. But the models at this site are, so far, just OK looking.
A lot of the models have a backpack. This is supposed to demonstrate the girls are teenagers, in school.
But the girls look like they actually are teens, anyway, and the backpack as a prop is unconvincing. Maybe they could suck on a lollipop, or wear multicolored stockings, which are the normal porn props to show the models
are young.
I'm giving the site a score of 75. That's because you get this site with access to much better sites in the Royal Cash network. But if this was a standalone site, I would give it a score in the 50s.
One last point. If you join this site directly, you pay $29.95/month. Join through Teen Mega World and you pay $19.95/month.
I don't know if access to Dirty Doctor is included with a Teen Mega World membership. But Teen Mega World gives you access to a number of hardcore teen sites: The network has a boatload of good quality hardcore videos, a huge number of very attractive models. And a very low price for all that content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Part of the Fame Digital network. So you get access to most sites in the network.
-Can stream or download movies.
-No DRM.
-No download limits.
-Content is dated.
-Model is listed for each movie.
-Runtime and file size (largest file size) also listed for each movie.
-I like how they identify the female models if there is more than 1 female model in the video. They show one female model in the scene, print her name in subtitles on the screen, then show the second model in the scene, and print her name in subtitles on the screen. So you immediately know the names of each model.
-A large percentage of the videos have high definition options. Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition.
-The high definition movies are clearly marked, with a HD logo.
-All of a model's appearances are listed at her model's page, with hot links to each video and photoset.
Cons:
-PU discount price just increased from $9.95 to $14.95 for the first month.
-Most of the site content was apparently made for Devils Film. A lot of the movies have a Devil's Film watermark.
-Watermark is small to medium sized, at bottom right corner of video.
-Content is not exclusive. You can find some of these vids posted at other sites in the Fame Digital network.
-The photosets from the lower-definition videos are not screen caps. The definition is high. For example, width x height = 1280p x 1984p. But the
colors in the photo are poor, there is little effort to make the model pose artistically or erotically.
-This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s.
-The videos are just OK for DVD quality. The focus could be better, the framing could be better.
-No zip file for the photosets.
-The software for viewing individual photos is slow and clumsy.
Bottom Line:
Site statistics:
Movies: 498
DVDs: 134
Pornstars: 557
Pictures: 75,388
Stream at 240p or 480p. Some have a 540p option.
Download at 240p or 480p, in WMV or MP4.
Some movies have higher definition options of 540p, 720p, and 1080p.
Of the 498 movies, 274 are high definition, which is a large percentage.
-This is supposed to be a teen site. Most of the models are not teens, but in their 20s or 30s. And I assume that a large percent of the videos can be found at other sites in the network, especially Devils Film. You get this site included with membership to most Fame Digital network sites. But I don't think this site, by itself, has a lot of value. In spite of the high percentage of HD videos at this site, I was not impressed by the hardcore teen videos. Most of the models are not presented very attractively. If you want high quality teen hardcore videos, go to Diesel or X-Art. Or go to Teen Mega World for lower quality tnan Diesel or X-Art, but still better quality videos and real teens and more attractive teens than what you get at this site.
What membership at this site will give you is access to better sites in the Fame Digital network, including:
I have a doctor's appointment this coming Wednesday.
But if you visit the doctor at this site, you will need an interpreter. He speaks, and the models speak, in a foreign language, possibly Russian. And there aren't any subtitles to help with the translation.
So if I review this site, I might have to take off 1/2 of one point for the foreign language difficulty.
The doctor also wears a white cap similar to what a baker might wear. The caps worn by U.S. doctors in the operating room look different from this doctor's cap.
I joined the network through Ex GF Box. So I am getting access to most of the sites in the network. I just checked, and I have access to dirty-doctor.
So I would assume that if you join Teen Mega World directly, you will have access to dirty-doctor.
But that is an assumption. In the past, there was very little logic in which sites you got access to, depending on which specific site you joined through.
The oldest video at this site is dated 2010-11-28. So the site was started about one and a half years ago, not over 3 years ago.
Also, the last video posted at this site was 2012-04-03. So instead of saying "Erratic/Unpredictable Update Schedule", I would say there have been no updates in over 2 months.
You state in the Pros section of your review: "Excellent Membership Option - 3M/6M/12M Discounted".
I don't see any 6 month membership option being offered at this site.
Also, the 3 month membership option, although it is offered, gives no advantage, and would be a poor choice. PU gives a discounted membership price of $19.95/month. The 3 month membership price is $59.95. So choosing the 3 month membership, locks you into a 3 month term, without saving you any money over a monthly membership price of $19.95/month.
Actually, if you are going to remain a member for 3 months at $19.95/month, you save $0.10 by choosing the monthly membership option instead of the 3 month option.
In the Cons section of your review, you write: "Older videos not HD & latest not real HD Formats".
I don't believe that is entirely accurate. The first videos posted at this site, which are dated November 2010, all had a HD option offered, in addition to lower definition choices.
Maybe it's a matter of interpretation, but every video I checked at this site offered what the site listed as a HD option. Maybe you mean that in your opinion, or by your definition, those videos aren't truly HD. But the site itself lists what it calls an HD option for every video that I checked, starting with their oldest videos, and continuing with the latest video, which is dated 2012-04-03.
I'm not sure what the poll question is asking. Are you referring to a porn video as a movie? That seems to be the question.
I like theatrical movies, but I don't download. I either rent or buy the DVD.
Regarding porn videos, it really depends on how many videos I find that I might like.
My first preference is for photos over videos. There are many reasons for that, but the easiest to understand is that it's far easier to make excellent or quality photographs versus videos because there are fewer factors to control. So quality photographs are easy to find and collect, while quality videos are less common. As technology improves, the cost and effort of making good videos is going down, and there are plenty of sites with quality videos. But it's still easier and cheaper to make quality photos versus quality videos.
But I think Diesel network and X-Art have high quality videos that appeal to my tastes.
But the number of videos I download per month varies too much for me to give a figure.
slutty, I'm not sure how much those hugs and kisses are worth.
The reply is from brig, who lists himself as Webmaster. Brig stands for Brigham Field, the main photographer for X-Art photosets and videos.
But the reply also is signed "X-Art Webmistress", but without any name attached to the webmistress title.
It's not clear to me who was giving me those XOXOs.
However, I am willing to share them with you, my PU friend. :)
Anyway, I'm in the same boat as you, in getting logged out when I try to access the "Behind the Scenes" content. But I definitely think it's worth viewing, to get a flavor of the personality of some models, and how the photosets and videos are shot.
At one time I tried to keep a list of model names. But I gave that up. Too much work. Thank God for the internet porn model indexes. And thank God that they are free.
The indexes are really helpful. But I don't have the time (or money) to look at every site a model might appear. Thankfully, you join a few networks, like Diesel, Teen Mega World, some nice sites, like Metart or Femjoy, and you're almost buried alive in attractive models.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
