| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
Orgy World Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
These videos look GREAT. Just my sort of thing. I hate it when they describe two couples having sex with 6 people looking on as "an orgy." I hope they get some more content so it's worth joining. Personally I think the best orgy site I have seen is "Orgy Sex Parties," but you have to put up with all the Pink Visual negatives when you subscribe to that one.
|
01-30-09 08:34am
|
Reply
377
|
Oriental Orgy
(0)
|
Reply of
Jay G's Comment
That is one of the things that has always irritated me. I have never considered two males and two females to be an orgy.
|
05-22-11 04:30pm
|
Reply
378
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
This is part of the WTF newtork, which looks quite good apart from this one. What do you think of the network, Frosty?
|
02-28-12 08:43am
|
Reply
379
|
Panda Fuck
(0)
|
Reply of
BadMrFrosty's Comment
But is it sexy? I've seen this site advertised but it doesn't appeal to me at all. I'm not sure who it will appeal to, but at least they're trying to break out of the porn norm, I suppose.
|
02-28-12 06:00am
|
Reply
380
|
Passion HD
(0)
|
Reply of
metem's Review
Great first review. Welcome to PU.
|
08-12-13 07:53pm
|
Reply
381
|
Penthouse
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Great review Admiral, thanks for the information. I have to admit I wouldn't have thought of touching this site with a bargepole until your review. My expectations were as low as yours. Not many cons, I would have expected many more.
|
03-05-12 04:53pm
|
Reply
382
|
Perfect Gonzo
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another very good review admiral. I seem to be following in your footsteps, this is another site I was thinking about joining.
|
11-27-13 10:06am
|
Reply
383
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Thanks to PU and TBP, I think this sort of thing happens less than it used to, nevertheless it still does happen. It makes people afraid to give their credit card details, so download for free instead. There are a lot of reputable sites out there, but you still sometimes see that old rip off, fleece em once, cheap gangster mentality.
|
02-23-11 02:03pm
|
Reply
384
|
Pigtails Big Tits
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Comment
I have just checked it out for myself. Not only does it say limited trial on the sign up form, there is a cross check for another sign up on the form too. So watch out.
|
01-20-09 09:42am
|
Reply
385
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
I was a subscriber about three years ago, but would never return because of this policy. They will kill themselves (hopefully).
|
07-17-13 11:29am
|
Reply
386
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
MiztaBlu's Review
Sounds like a very accurate review given my experience with the organisation. They have some very good material from a year or two ago, but the rest leaves a lot to be desired.
|
07-07-10 10:09am
|
Reply
387
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Reply
That offer must be for 3 months, or it's the first reverse discount. Congratulations you have a first! Reminds me of Reginald Perrin - "great sale offer at Grot Shop...20 per cent on everything."
|
01-03-09 06:37am
|
Reply
388
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Reply
Yeah that sucks! Ask them for the discount rate. Sometimes a site will go with the TBP rate if you quote it. But as I have said elswhere, it does look as though Pink are practising Regional Discrimination. They did change the name of Teens For Cash to Pure Cherry Girls, and it was exactly the same site in everything except name, so that's why I thought it may be the same thing with the MILF site.
|
01-01-09 01:55pm
|
Reply
389
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
host2626's Comment
It's possible MILFSeeker has become Hottest MILFS Ever. That site is available on the Pass. Also if you use the link from TBP you should get a $10 discount to make it $29.95 instead of $39.95. Beware of the cross check sign ups. I was nearly suckered when I tried to sign up but I noticed. It meant although I liked the site I have not resubscribed.
|
01-01-09 11:53am
|
Reply
390
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
If it's any help I clicked the link from the UK and it showed a price of £23.95 so it does look like they are practising regional discrimination. It also looks like some sort of discount applies using the click, as otherwise the amount would be more in pounds. $39.95 would work out at more than £23.95. But $29.95 should be less than £23.95.
|
12-22-08 06:07am
|
Review
391
|
Pink Visual Pass
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The higher quality downloads are great. There's a lot of content and the performers are mostly attractive, apart from a few too many silicon breasts and tattoos.
"Orgy Sex Parties" really does live up to its name. I don't call two couples having sex, an orgy. This is one of the few orgy sites that delivers. "Pure Cherry Girls" is also very good for young and attractive girls.
The camerawork is excellent. It makes the girls look really good. Good angles with not too many close ups. Beautiful people captured tastefully by the camera, to bring out their best.
The extra discount from TBP makes "Pink" sites much better value for money. It is slighlty more expensive then some equivalent sites, but for me the better quality of the videos is worth it.
A good variety of sites, with most of them containing an acceptable number of episodes.
I have read about slow downloads, but have found a rate of about 100-200 kb/sec. |
| Cons: |
First month's subscription you can only download a limited amount of the available content. Then second month, another selection is released. This is not made clear on sign up.
Really dodgy extra sites subscription con, on the sign up form. You have to untick this box to make sure you are not signing up for extra sites. I took off 5 points for that.
Older material is not downloadable, and quality poor.
Picking out what you want to download is hard, as navigation is not easy. Some of the videos are cut up into many pieces, and it's hard wading through. Too much filler content makes it even harder.
"Teens For Cash" is now "Pure Cherry Girls." It's exactly the same site, but with a changed name. I was told this by the sign up people. This was not made clear anywhere on the sites.
When you try to cancel you are offered a discount, with extra sites. Shame they don't make this material available to loyal cusomers.
Too many tattoos, even on the younger girls. A turn off. |
| Bottom Line: |
I'm new here and not used to subscribing to a ton of sites. But for me, this site offers more than a lot of the equivalent sites. It's the look. I think "Pink" gets the camerawork right, so that they highlight the good looks of the performers, rather than just close ups of groin shots.
There was enough content to make me sign up for a second month. My membership has just elapsed. I may join again in a few months as my hard drive does not have a great deal of storage. I just wish their navigation was easier to follow.
The older streaming material is possible to watch, but is cut up into some very short 5 minute clips at times. This, along with too much filler material, can be very irritating.
It's all personal taste but they seem to get it more right than wrong, and there are a number of sites on this subscription, with quite a variety of content. Maybe a small disappointment was the shortage of episodes specialising in black girls. "She Got Pimped" has fewer episodes than expected. "
There seems much less condomed activity here than on Reality Kings or Bang Bros sites. If you hate watching condomed porn, this is another thing to consider.
All in all, I thought the money was worth it. |
|
11-02-08 08:58am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
392
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
I think most of the regulars read the regulars' reviews, but don't leave replies, so I would imagine quite a few will have read your review, and will have appreciated it, even though they don't comment. I read tons of great reviews, and have to admit I often don't leave a positive reply, when I should.
For me the most annoying thing about doing reviews is taking the trouble to do one, then ten minutes later seeing it replaced on the "front page" by one about ten lines long that took all of five minutes to throw together. No, it shouldn't bother me, and yes I know how PU works, but it does.
Yeah I occasionally now do the Ctrl V thing. It's when I don't that something usually goes wrong. For reviews I simply open a file and over the period of membership, jot down any pros, cons, and bottom lines, whenever I think of one, then begin to put it all together after a few weeks.
|
10-14-12 04:31pm
|
Reply
393
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
Cheers graymane, it's obvious you take the trouble to put together a really good review (which applies to most of the regulars here).
I have to admit to mostly reading reviews by regulars. Some newbies take to it like a duck to water, others take time to get used to it, but the best reviews for me are the ones with the required facts along with a unique slant that only that particular taste and personality can bring.
I have more than once had an hour's plus hard work wiped out by pressing the wrong button (NOOOO!!!) or my computer having a mind of its own. That can't happen with pen and paper - unles you do a Richard Pryor while writing.
|
10-14-12 06:18am
|
Reply
394
|
Playboy Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Review
Excellent, well written and informative review. I shall take note of your warnings. Some may be expecting more, given the name behind the site, but it looks like one to avoid.
|
10-10-12 01:14pm
|
Reply
395
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
One day later and I did actually receive a reply. The strange thing is, did anyone know analteenangels wasn't open? The reply is below.
"the site analteenangels is not open, it is not updated. the pornpassforall bonuses are listed on the first freetour page, there are two lists: the sites in the first will you get immediately, and the sites in the second list are the loyalty bonuses."
|
01-20-09 06:05am
|
Reply
396
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
Reply of
Tree Rodent's Comment
In fact I probably wont bother subscribing at all, even if the do answer. They will probably take my money and then I will find somehow my membership or password doesn't work, or mystically other people have used it to log in so I'm banned and forfeit my money.
Yes, it was a rude email. But if these people would care to answwer some fu**ing emails occasionally, they may get some more customers and actually divert some people away from piracy.
If they have so many customers they are oh far to busy to answer emails, then the solution is to do them a favour, and lessen their load, by not signing up in the first place.
|
01-19-09 08:46am
|
Comment
397
|
Porn Pass For All
(0)
|
|
01-19-09 08:39am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
398
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Comment
Be very very wary of this one guys. TBP refused to link to them at one point, but for some unknown reason started doing business with them again. Plenty of comments about shady practices from PU members. Take a look at their history.
|
09-01-12 06:26am
|
Reply
399
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
This is the site that used to be known for dodgy practices, then suddenly TBP starts to give it good reviews but without saying why. Pink Panther brought this up in a comment. I avoided the site even though it looks like it has good material. Once a bunch of dodgy scumbags, always a bunch of dodgy scunmags.
|
10-30-10 06:06pm
|
Reply
400
|
Porn Pros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Comment
Yes, but we're still wondering how the site goes from incredibly dodgy practises to legit? Change of management? Taken over by the mafia? Rick taken over by aliens? Answers please. Anyone?
|
07-31-10 06:46pm
|
