| Type | Site - Score | Feedback / Review | Date | 
                                    
    | Reply 576 |   
 VideoBox
             (0)
 | Reply of
                mr smut's Comment 
 Yes I noted this on my review of Video box. I found the speed VERY slow between the hours of about 5pm and midnight European time. It was as low as 10kb/sec on occasions. A number of downloads just timed out as well. The speed then picked up after midnight to about 200-300 kb/sec.
 
 
 | 12-08-08  05:07pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 577 |   
 Reality Kings
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Pinche Kankun's Reply 
 I think there is a big difference between the support BEFORE you join them and AFTER. I have heard a few bad things on here about their customer support. I have never joined their site and never intend to. Maybe we should all spam them and tell them what a wonderful site it is here at PU. We could give them a discount to join or something, then ignore them when they find there's nothing to download.
 
 
 | 12-07-08  04:28pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 578 |   
 Sex And Submission
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Jay G's Reply 
 Yeah it sounds like a good idea. I think you tend to like the sites I quite like. I'm not sure how much interest there would be here in such a thread. What makes me worried is that RealSpankings has its own forum. One guy that loves spanking argued that the people at Mood must be "scumbag sadists" or something similar, based on the harshness of the spankings. Myself and one other guy were basically saying - look if you love spanking the rest of the world thinks you are a sicko degenerate. If you, who are into this sort of thing, starts calling people who spank that hard, as scumbag sadists and degenerates, based purely on the strength of the spanking, what hope is there for us. I said I thought he was on very thin ice there anyway, making that sort of judgement. Basically it just shows how inflamed and moralistic supposedly open minded people can get, when they start to talk about those niche sites. But it may be worth starting a thread anyway!
 
 
 | 12-07-08  04:12pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 579 |   
 Just Teen Movie
             (0)
 | Reply of
                lk2fireone's Reply 
 Yeah I agree, the soundtracks on those things can be absolutely ridiculous at times. I think that most of the people who make these things don't actually like porn at all.
 
 
 | 12-07-08  09:08am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 580 |   
 Just Teen Movie
             (0)
 | Reply of
                lk2fireone's Review 
 Great stuff - very thorough review. This sounds like the sort of site that leaves me totally cold.
 
 
 | 12-07-08  08:30am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 581 | N/A | Reply of
                Drooler's Poll 
 Yeah I go with Messmer. I only voted "no, plain tubes are okay," because I don't really care one way or another. I find sex toys really boring.
 
 
 | 12-06-08  07:11pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 582 |   
 Sex And Submission
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Jay G's Review 
 Another good review Jay. There aren't too many of us on here interested in this sort of thing, so it's good to hear an informed opinion. Be interesting to see what the few of us consider to be the best "niche" sites. Probably we'd all go for entirely different ones. Maybe have to start a thread on that.
 
 
 | 12-06-08  07:28am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 583 |   
 Explicite Art
             (0)
 | Reply of
                mr smut's Reply 
 I thought it worth mentioning because there is a difference for some consumers between condomed and non condomed porn, in the same way there's a difference between hardcore and softcore porn. A lot of porn consumers don't mind condomed sex at all, others do. I just thought it was worth mentioning though, because some may subscribe to a site they wouldn't consider worth the money.
 
 
 | 12-04-08  12:20pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 584 |   
 Explicite Art
             (0)
 | Reply of
                mr smut's Comment 
 What puts me off this site is the same thing that puts me of John Root as a porn producer. His clips nearly always feature condomed sex. If you don't mind that, then fine, you may enjoy the clips. I just wont pay for condomed sex scenes as I find them a total turn off.
 
 
 | 12-04-08  11:41am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 585 |   
 Homemade Uncensored
             (0)
 | Reply of
                nygiants03's Review 
 Nice review. I hadn't heard of this one at all but it looks quite interesting.
 
 
 | 12-04-08  11:29am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 586 |   
 Teenrotica
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Denner's Comment 
 It seems to me this is happening more and more. I don't think it's imagination. These conversion rates are just set for rip off. If it's poor value or a relative rip off, I'm just not buying.
 
 
 | 12-02-08  03:48pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 587 |   
 Teen Sex Mania
             (0)
 | Reply of
                elephant's Reply 
 This site looks to be totally new and separate from all the other sites on the network, so I don't know what the deal is. It would be strange if this site alone, out of all the network sites, does not gain you access to all the others, but at first glance it appears that it doesn't.
 
 
 | 11-30-08  02:55pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 588 |   
 Teen Sex Mania
             (0)
 | Reply of
                elephant's Reply 
 Hmm good question. I'll check it - No it doesn't look as though you do.
 
 
 | 11-30-08  10:53am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 589 |   
 Teen Sex Mania
             (0)
 | Reply of
                elephant's Comment 
 This is part of the network which includes "Gag N Gape" that Pat362 reviewd 3 weeks ago. The network looks quite good.
 
 
 | 11-30-08  08:47am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 590 |   
 VideoBox
             (0)
 | Reply of
                exotics4me's Reply 
 Great - thanks very much for the info!
 
 
 | 11-29-08  07:33pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 591 |   
 Gag N Gape
             (0)
 | Reply of
                pat362's Reply 
 Ah yes - you're right it is quite late. It's half past midnight. But as a Baseball and American Football fan I am sometimes up to 5am! I've always been a late person. I'm now off to watch some poker for a few hours.
 
 
 | 11-29-08  04:38pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 592 |   
 Gag N Gape
             (0)
 | Reply of
                pat362's Reply 
 Cheers Pat!
 
 
 | 11-29-08  04:14pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 593 |   
 Cock For Two
             (0)
 | Reply of
                jd1961's Comment 
 Nice job of reporting JD. That's the beauty of it - you can let everyone know what a bunch of shits they are, and that this sort of behaviour will cost them customers, and so it should. They sound like a typical shady bunch of rip off artists, with customer service that is just there to con you, and once they've done that they tell you to go screw yourself. There's no way I'd touch that site with a barge pole. Hope everyone reads this and it costs the site money. This means that PU improves porn quality in the long run as it helps to send money to the better sites.
 
 
 | 11-29-08  03:20pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 594 |   
 Gag N Gape
             (0)
 | Reply of
                pat362's Review 
 Good review - I like the sound of this network.
 
 
 | 11-29-08  12:57pm 
 
 | 
    | Reply 595 |   
 Cock For Two
             (0)
 | Reply of
                jd1961's Reply 
 Very annoying. It's all supposed to be so easy, but the amount of time you spend trying to iron out all the various crap that happens on the internet is very frustrating. You give your credit card and username plus password, what could be simpler? Yeah right!
 
 
 | 11-29-08  10:33am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 596 |   
 VideoBox
             (0)
 | Reply of
                exotics4me's Reply 
 Cheers! I think I may try one. What's the best one? I think you can pick up viruses from some of them.
 
 
 | 11-29-08  06:17am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 597 |   
 Pure Cherry Girls
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Pinche Kankun's Reply 
 Yes I agree with the amateur homemade porn thing being a bit different. I quite like that, as well as the glossy sort that organisations like Pink Visual do. If you go to Video Box, so much of it looks like it's produced by the same company. Only occasionally does something really impress. On the other hand there's tons of well made run of the mill stuff which 30 years ago would have cost $100, just for one video!
 
 
 | 11-28-08  11:10am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 598 |   
 Pure Cherry Girls
             (0)
 | Reply of
                lk2fireone's Reply 
 Cheers! You ask questions, which I like. So I find you a welcome adition to the site as well.
 
 
 | 11-28-08  11:02am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 599 |   
 Pure Cherry Girls
             (0)
 | Reply of
                Pinche Kankun's Reply 
 Hmm - if it's genuine clip stealing then yes. But quite often what happens is that sites sell their clips to other sites. For instance you can see a number of Pink Visual clips on Video Box. I haven't seen that many Pink Visual clips elsewhere though.
 
 Mind you as someone who loves Pirate Bay and supports some of the anti copyright organisations and also the ones who support free speech on the internet, there is a whole lot of discussion and opinions to be found on this. There are a lot of grey areas around now due to the internet, that were not around before.
 
 
 | 11-28-08  10:40am 
 
 | 
    | Reply 600 |   
 Ass Smoothie
             (0)
 | Reply of
                littlejoe's Review 
 Great review. I don't like the sound of the negatives. They should label the real ass smoothies from the interview ones. A real waste of time and effort.
 
 I agree that when they actually do the smoothie, the video is great.
 
 
 | 11-27-08  10:01am 
 
 |