Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The newest videos are at near HD quality, running as high as 2.5mbps and can be streamed or downloaded in WMV or MPEG format
-The most recent episodes feature a high res photo set as well as vidcaps that are all downloadable as zip files
-If you like pornstar action without many bothersome reality plots getting in the way you should be very pleased here
-Along with your membership you get complete access to the Brazzers Pass network's 16 other sites all for under $25 a month
Cons:
-The oldest episodes are very low quality MPEG only files with 320x240 vid size which I found nearly unwatchable because of the scratchy audio track
-Only photo sets from the last year or so have the high res pics leaving you with only vidcaps from low quality vids most times
-Quite a few of the girls repeat again and again on the site, which is good if you like them, but for me lacked variety
-The site hasn't updated since August of '07 with no new episodes in sight, so it may be abandone
Bottom Line:
Having reviewed over half of the Brazzer Pass netowrk sites now, I think I have a pretty good perspective on what they do well and do poorly. While some sites are definitely better than others, the tale of the tape here mostly indicates sites that start out poor and end up good, but not ever being fantasic or totally awful.
As with all netowrk sites, navigation is simple and barely worth mentioning since it isn't a concern. All links are easily accessible and I haven't found many dead links throughout the network. Newer content has excellent quality, but only the latest 30 episodes are so are worth your time since the older stuff is pretty dated. I did find some of the highest quality stuff here @ 2.5mbps.
There are definitely a lot of repeat performers on this site including one of my absolute favs in Gianna Michaels. That said, I wished there had been more variety of girls, so I guess the variety issue is a double edged sword. The theme changes from episode to episode, with some being reality but most just getting right to the down and dirty action.
In the final evaluation, if you like big boobs and big asses both getting screwed with ungodly large cocks, you can't really go very wrong here. I usually expect some more curvaceous real girls when it comes to ass sites, but pornstars definitely rule here so don't expect much outside the norm. The lack of new updates is a concern, however T and A folks are advised to give it a try if you haven't been scared off by now.
I am always on the lookout for any sites, especially those featuring an individual girl, that have short haired stars. Since most guys prefer long hair (so it would seem) most girls who do porn keep their hair long either for that reason alone or because they prefer it themselves. So, any time I get even a hint of a short haired girl I get extremely curious.
Such is my dilemma with this site. The girl appears to be a true amateur and to have short hair, but there are some things that give me pause. First, this site is available on Chick Pass which comes with an almost unbelievable number of sites and dozens of solo bonus sites. In fact, it comes with 67 of them!
I can't speak for others, but while I think most would agree many networks can offer too little I think they can also offer too much. With 67 sites, is any one of them of really high quality? Did the webmasters or webmistresses go for quantity over quality? I'm always more than a bit suspicious, hence my comment.
Some may say, "Dude, it's under $3. What's the deal dude?" Well, I'd just really like to get any opinions on particular sites or the entire Chick Pass network since I rarely join a site not knowing anything about it. And, in addition, it let's me once again get it out there that I love short haired chicks and if anyone comes across a good site I hope they'll let me know about it! ;)
Seriously though, any opinions on either the component sites or the network they're on would be greatly appreciated!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-All videos from each episode (21 in all) can be streamed in a browser at three different quality settings (labeled only as low, medium, and high) and downloaded at 512kbps or 1024kbps
-Each episode contains stills of the action, usually numbering well over 100 (no zip options however)
-Most scenes are around 25 minutes and the length of each video is clearly indicated in the main menu
-When purchased as part of Mega Site Pass, you get dozens of bonus sites all for under $10 a month
Cons:
-Most of the scenes have a strong focus on double pentration, but in others it isn't given any more screen time than other features like straight sex, blowjobs, oral, etc., which made the site seem "half-assed"
-Although a gallery accompanies each video, the pictures are really vidcaps which are very low resolution
-Without the additional Mega Site Pass network access, you could easily find more content for the price and I definitely can't give this site a good recommendation on its own
Bottom Line:
Like other sections of Mega Site Pass, this site allows for streaming and downloading at multiple quality settings and offers a large number of vidcaps with all 21 episodes that unfortunately have no zip options. As for the content, the quality is pretty decent and every scene includes double penetration, but personally I found the action to be lacking and just not enough of it to justify this site.
Since I am not a double pentration afficianado I could be making a mountain out of a molehill, but if you advertise a site as having a particular focus on DP then I think each scene should include that feature quite prominently. Such was the case in the majority of videos, but in some the DP is only for a minute or two and other segments, some not even including the second guy, last just as long.
In all fairness each scene does contain DP so fans of the genre may be very happy with what the site offers. However, going in I expected nearly all of the action to include DP, like having the guys switch or pentrating her at different angles in each and every video segment. To be fair some do have this, but with only 21 episodes I felt a little cheated that there wasn't more.
Regardless, there just isn't enough content here to recommend this site on its own and to me is only worth the money for the included Mega Site Pass network access. Perhaps I'm being too harsh and you can let me know if you think I am, but I wanted more creativity and just didn't get it. That's my $0.02.
Does she have short hair in all of the content? And what about any of her shoots or scenes with other girls; do they have short hair? Can you tell I'm looking for content with short hair? ;)
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-All videos on the site can be streamed in a browser at 3 quality settings and downloaded at either 512kbps and 1024kbps
-Each of the 54 episodes comes with real photos, not vidcaps, numbering over 100 hi-res pics per episode
-The girls aren't models or pornstars, but are real girls like the ones you wanted to screw when you were high school: cute and pretty, not slutty, though that depends on your taste
-When bought as part of Mega Site Pass, you get this and dozens of others for under $10
Cons:
-The photos are very good quality, but without zip options it makes them hard to download
-The episodes aren't dated, so who knows when or if the site adds new ones
-Although the girls obviously kiss during the scenes, they aren't any more prominent a feature than any other, so the title may be misleading and is cetainly not to be considered an authentic lesbian site
-Some of the older videos wouldn't play for me and it could certainly be a temporary problem, but very unusual for this network
Bottom Line:
Most times I'm not a big fan of teen video sites since you often get 90% blonde airheads who couldn't act their way out of a paper bag. However, this site caught my eye since the girls seemed to be very "real". I also knew that lesbian sites that feature kissing are often more authentic, so I had high hopes for this one.
The site design is plain, but that's not a bad thing since it makes navigation easy. There are 54 episodes each including a video that can be viewed as one clip or several segments as well as a gallery of real digital camera photos. You can view the vids in your browser at three different quality settings but more importantly you can download each one at 512kbps or 1024kbps quality which, along with the photo gallery (about 100 per episode), are all high res (though not HD).
The girls in the video are definitely hot and I thought most were genuinely into their scenes. Most are thin and very beautiful, but more in a girl next door sense and not anorexic models. There isn't much foreplay in the videos, but I found that a plus since reality scenarios get boring really fast.
The only thing that bothered me was that the title is misleading since kissing isn't really the feature activity. However, unless you are looking for actual lesbians and like your girls on the young side, I don't think you'll be dissapointed at all. Since you get all the sites of the Mega Site Pass along with this one, all for under $10, if you are still tempted I say give it a try.
Thanks Khan! I realize that it's hard to catregorize these sites and I give you guys all the credit in the world, but I'm also happy to hear that it's being looked into. True amateur sites seem to be a rarity these days and identifying them is difficult, so any help is appreciated!
I apologize if my tone sounds overly accusatory, but I've been very mindful of the categorizations being used by TBP and PU and especially their definition of amateur content. I can't think it's easy finding a concise set of descriptions that allow them to be consistent and make it easy to find similar types of material. I just wanted to preface my complaint with that statement since the folks here have done more to classify sites than any other wbsite I've ever visited.
That said, in what way can this network be classified as amateur? The tour page shows a number of established pornstars and each site has a very glamour feel. One is described as featuring "porn newcomers" and and I suppose that could qualify as amateur, but all the sites feature performers that have names like "Melissa Milano" and "Tira Banks" which don't sound like amateurs.
I give the folks here all the credit in the world for doing a spectacular job and I feel conflicted about pointing out a detail that in the big picture is pretty damn minor. One of my recent rants even focused on the fact that many sites which claim to be amateur are really not, so finding the "real" ones isn't an easy job. All I can say is that this network didn't seem to come even close to being classified as amateur and I wonder if there's something I'm just not seeing. If so, please let me know what it is!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get a ton of pictures including boy/girl and girl/girl sets that are able to be downloaded at two different resolutions, some as high as 700x1000
-The site's navigation is simplistic but easy to navigate and provides quick access the content
-Within a few hours of joining I received a reply to a message I sent her, so interaction appears to be possible through the site
-The site clearly needs some growth, but according to Regan there will be a major overhaul within the next month or two
Cons:
-The members "website" is really just a gallery lister that organizes the picture sets and videos into categories, leaving other features like her journal and biographical info accessible only through the free side of the site
-You only get 6 videos in all that run at an average speed of 700kbps in WMV format
-There isn't a set update schedule and there are only 3 posts in the news section, although the site has been active for over 6 months
-None of the site's content seems to be exclusive
Bottom Line:
Awhile ago I left a comment that sparked some spirited debate on if you should expect interaction on a solo site. I had emailed Regan using the email address on her free side and commented on my disappointment in not receiving a reply. However, afterwards I agreed with some criticism that while interaction is a nice bonus, it's probably not realistic or fair to expect it.
So, recently I decided to give the site a try with an open mind. When I entered the members section for the first time, I was greeted by a list of picture and video galleries that gave me direct access to the content. On one hand it was nice to get right to the meat of the site, but on the other I found that the list was pretty much the entire site! That left many features like a calendar and journal on the free side inaccessible from the members side.
The quality of the pics and vids is decent and average compared to other personal sites, although I'm sure that 75% or more isn't exclusive and at least one set is available on her agent's site free. There are only 6 videos and 15 pic sets, but some include hundreds of shots totalling over 3,000 pics.
Overall I wasn't very impressed, but do give it some leeway since she's relatively new on the scene and through an email was told by her directly that more was coming soon. So, for now my score will represent the site as is, but will be revised if she delivers. If you find her incredibly hot & sexy, give it a try for a month, otherwise definitely pass.
Very true and I agree. As Khan said, interaction really is a bonus and as you said can indicate a webmaster/model really cares. That isn't to say that sites without interaction aren't good, but they are the type that I look for most times. In this case, it's a new site and under contact gives a direct email so I thought I'd give it a whirl. I never thought my simple comment would generate so much buzz, but that's why this site is pretty damn cool.:)
No, you didn't sidetrack my comments at all! I just didn't want you to think I was whinning, "Poor little old me!" ;) And I agree knowing other users experiences is one reason why PU is a such great site, while you responding with thoughtful comments is another! I really appreciate it. :)
Thanks for the POV Khan and I agree with everything you said. I'm sure the example I mentioned was isolated and I think most webmistresses that didn't have any interaction would just say so when asked rather than calling me a pervert. And in most cases I would be looking for sites that specifically said interaction was part of the deal. In the case of Regan Reese, the main page gives her direct email address and seems to indicate that questions are welcome.
I think my problem is that I don't get as excited about pics or videos unless I have some level of interaction with the individual running the site even if it's very minimal (which it usually is). One girl's website I'm on refers to true interaction on adult sites as "personality porn" but ackowledges that it's pretty rare. That also makes my fetish for short haired girls pretty difficult because by the time I find pics of one they've already changed their hair.
Well, that was long winded. Thanks for the reply Khan! :)
Thanks roseman! It is a new site, so perhaps I should give her the benefit of the doubt and try again. It is a shame that it's a common issue and I'm sure on some sites it's a matter of volume. However, I get the impression at a lot of sites that it's a matter of being a jerk. ;) BTW, know any nice individual sites where the girl has short hair? Sorry to ask, but I like to make sure I've tapped every resource! LOL
I was excited when I saw this site go up a week or so ago since I am always looking for girls' individual sites that have short hair (if you happen to know any PLEASE let me know!). So, I emailed Regan (her email is provided on the site) and really hoped to hear back, but it's been over a week and nothing. :( Hopefully it's just an oversight and/or she'll still write me back, but it's not a good first sign about a strong level of interaction. She looks pretty hot though! :)
I'm glad you liked my review and I can understand why you didn't review it since there haven't been any updates. I tend to review anything I think is still worth checking out even if it's "abandoned" like this site. With it having such a different feel from most of the stuff out there I thought it was noteworthy.
I agree totally about Mason and I believe the other site that featured her behind the camera was Hell Fire Sex. It's just such a different feel to the camera work from having some jackass dude filming it and I'd love to see more women behind the camera, although I like the ones in front of the camera too...obviously. ;)
I enjoyed the Arianna Jollee scene a lot too because it's so dark and she's really into it. Is she Jewish? If so I never heard that or maybe you meant something totally different, but you've certainly peaked my curiousity.
Anyway, thanks for the praise on my review! I'm definitely bookmarking your list and I hope you find some other "offbeat" stuff!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-The site offers very unique content unlike anything I have ever seen before; some of the vids actually have a continuing storyline!
-Most of the videos are of decent video quality, with most running about 1000k accompanied by a large number of vidcaps
-The site includes a number of behind the scenes features that really brings something extra to the site and are actually worth watching
-You get full access to the Meatmembers network with your membership, all for under $30 a month
Cons:
-All videos on the site are cut into segments which really screwed up the mood and was sloppily edited, leaving out noticable amounts of footage
-Some (perhaps many) will find the scenes extremely rough, even offensive, which is saying a lot since we're already talking about hardcore porn
-The site hasn't updated in over a year with no updates in sight and has no high res photo shoots
-The price is steep when considering the site by itself with only 18 vids running an average of 30 mins each
Bottom Line:
This is the third site I've reviewed on the Meatmembers network and I can say right off the bat that it is definitely my favorite so far. It's rough, sometimes shockingly so, but if you want something unique and more than a bit extreme you should keep reading. If not, I'd suggest stopping now.
As with another site on the network, one of the first things that caught my attention was the fact that the camera operator is a woman (named Mason) which is a definite departure from most male camera guys who don't ever seem to shut up. I thought it made for a different style of camera work that I found enoyable and many of the vids are a series of episodes with an actual plot!
Although the episodes are all dated, it's clear that the site hasn't been updated in a while with no new vids in sight. On the plus side, in addition to the episodes there are a number of "behind the scenes" vids that actually add something to the site. It reveals that the women who appear in the vids actually enjoy the rough play, or at least that's what they say.
There are a lot of people that I think would be turned off if not disgusted by the vids and you have to go into the site knowing that in advance. That said, if you are looking for something radically different I'd recommend giving it a try. It's not just male domination as it switches quite often with both sexes being in control. By itself the price is definitely too steep, although as part of the larger network I think it's a good deal.
Nice review! Is it possible that there is a technical issue with the videos? Since there's no DRM it made me wonder, but I've certainly been on sites that only allow streaming and I don't know why they do it. I suppose it's to protect your product and hopefully it'll change as the site grows.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-All the videos can be streamed in your browser at three different quality settings or downloaded to your hard drive at either 512kbps or 1024kbps
-There are a large number of episodes (168) with a wide variety of women, ranging from mid 20s to 40s, both amateurs and pornstars
-Site navigation is quick and easy with the length of each episode clearly displayed
-When purchased as part of Mega Site Pass you get dozens of bonus sites and content feeds, all for under $10 a month
Cons:
-Even though there are a large number of episodes, each scene only lasts about 15 minutes so when you find a girl you like you don't get any more of her
-There are numerous photos accompanying each episode, but they are just vidcaps and the quality isn't very good
-Although each episode is set up as a couple wanting the wife to get screwed by a male pornstar some are clearly pornstars thmselves which may not appeal to amateur lovers
-The episodes aren't dated, so update frequency is unknown
Bottom Line:
The last couple sites I have reviewed on the Mega Site Pass have been basically content feeds with no video downloads, so my expectations were low heading into another of its sites. However, not only can you download the videos here at 2 different quality settings, there are a ton of episodes to watch.
The TBP review claimed there weren't any downloads, so I guess that has changed since then which makes the site much more attractive. The review is correct however that the content is not exclusive. Dave Cummings is the host for most of the episodes which come from his Screw My Wife Please video series. I didn't find this to be a problem however since I don't like to buy DVDs and prefer to burn them myself.
The womens' ages, body types, and actual amateur status vary quite widely, but almost all are very enthusiastic and it shows in their performances. Each episode lasts about 15 minutes and the action can be intense. Sometimes the husbands join in while other times they just watch. Dave himself gets a blowjob here and there, but he seem to be a voyeur most of the time.
Unless the exclusivity aspect bothers you, I'd definitely recommend this site for anyone who likes women college age and older. I'd honestly say it was worth the $10 a month all by itself, so the Mega Site Pass access makes this a real bargain overall. There isn't a whole lot of nuance to the scenes, but if you like eager hardcore and enjoy variety I would challenge you to do much better elsewhere.
If that's true about the length of the videos it would certainly damper my enthusiasm since I'm mostly a video aficionado myself. We need more info people! :)
I did a review of CarolCox.com yesterday and while I was there I checked out some of the girls who she has scenes with and more than a few have their own websites. This one caught my eye in particular and today I visited her site to take her tour. Like Carol, Seska has been operating her site for about a decade, making her among the original amateurs of the web. However, she appears to be more than just another pretty face.
Besides having her own personal website where she entertains her fans by having sex on camera with her boyfriend and numerous girlfriends, Seska operates a couples site, maintains a sex advice column, performs burlesque shows, writes sex stories, is a member of the Coalition for the Rights of Sex Workers, runs workshops on business plans for sex workers, and has climbed Mt. Everest three times!
Ok, that last one isn't true, but I think I've established that she's very active in the world of online porn and on top of all that she is a damn sexy woman. At this point you might wonder if she's paying me to say all this, but she's not. I just think she's hot and is now at the top of my list for sites I want to join. For me, there's nothing sexier than a woman with a brain that matches the level of her body.
The other good thing about her site: It's just $16.95 for a month which is a good deal if the inside matches the cover, but we all know that sometimes it really doesn't. If anyone is a member and already has some insight, I'd love to hear from you.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get 44 episodes in all, each with a video and picture set as well as numerous options for viewing and downloading content
-Vids run approximately 1.5 mbps and can viewed in browser or downloaded as one file or in segments in two different file formats (WMV & MPEG)
-Pics are all hi-res (not vidcaps) JPEG quality 600x900 in most cases and can be downloaded via a zip file
-Along with your membership you get full access to to the 18 sites of the Brazzers Pass network all for $20 a month
Cons:
-As is the case with most sites on this network, reality is a subjective term since most performers are professional pornstars
-The widespread use of girls with fake tits is a bit of a downer for me, especially with natural hotties like Gianna Michaels in the minority
-The plots are very lame and the eroticism level of the site suffers for it, although that is subject to personal taste
-The lack of variation in the type of sex offered can leave you wanting something more spicy now and again
Bottom Line:
If you've spent any time at all looking through the review sites and networks on PU, chances are you've stumbled upon the highly rated Brazzers network and this is another of their exclusive sites. Although the setups vary from site to site the action is nearly always the same, which can be good or bad depending on your view. So, while this site is up to the usual standards set by Brazzers, that doesn't mean it's for everyone.
One of the great aspects of Brazzers has always been its vast options and a recent redesign of the entire network has only expanded this feature. When you find a girl you like on a particular site, you are immediately linked to any other scenes she is featured in on the network. Each "episode" allows you to customize your viewing and downloading pleasure, so you can eliminate the stuff you don't want and get right to the meaty center so to speak.
I won't belabor my slight criticisms of the site since they are well known from my other reviews, but it seems a constant theme that a site begins with natural girls only to eventually succumb to the sad truth that the majority of performers have to get their tits enhanced. Some also very much enjoy setups like the one featured here where a "sex pro" comes to your house and teaches you how to fuck, but I could do without it.
Bottom line? Features abound, all content is of consistent quality, and you get enough bonus features to keep you busy for a year. For the value alone I recommend this site highly.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get a number of videos and pictures of "built" women who don't look like men and are just in great physical condition
-There are many feeds on various niches, with a particular focus on MILF content
-The bodybuiler content was new to me and I had not found it previously on any other site
-There were definitely some scenes that were excellent, including lesbian content, so I'd say that the trial was worth it
-You can join for 3, 7, 11, 20, or 30 days, each with an slightly higher price
Cons:
-The focus on female bodybuilders is actually very secondary to the site as most of the content focuses on MILFs
-There isn't any video content to download since everything is limted to feeds from various websites
-What pictures you do get are of pretty good quality, but without any zip options you could spend the entire trial downloading them by hand
-The quality of the content is average at best, so there's nothing that I'd call even close to high-resolution at this site
Bottom Line:
As anyone who has read my reviews knows by now, I like a variety of body types and shapes. While finding teens, matures, and larger girls is relatively easy, I often have the hardest time finding sites with "fit" females who also like to have sex on camera. While I did find some of that here, mostly I came away with not much to show for it.
The trial price through TBP for this site is pretty cheap, so while that made me go in with low expectations I was still hopeful that I find some treasure in this very small niche. The "bodybuilder" content isn't very plentiful, consisting mostly of video feeds from the "Bodybuilders in Heat" series which are available on DVD. There were some good clips and the quality is decent, but it didn't take me long to run out of content.
There are three links that lead to a couple dozen galleries with fairly good quality pics, but the rest of the site is filled with MILF feeds that have little or nothing to do with bodybuilders. There are plenty of links to other niche content, although in the end what you are getting is just a variety of feeds with very short clips.
As I said at the beginning I didn't have the greatest expectations going in, but overall I was still disappointed. I hadn't seen the videos before and what I got out of it was certainly worth the $4 I spent for access however. If this kind of thing appeals to you and you like MILF content I can recommend the trial, but there's no way I would have spent $30 to stay a member.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
