| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
376
|
Hungarian Honeys
(0)
|
|
02-15-07 01:42pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
377
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
mudman's Reply
Thanks for the info Mudman! I have always thought it would be cool, but softcore can get a bit dull after awhile and I was concerned about the limits of what you can see. No doubt there must be some awesome clips though and the site just needs some more time to fill up the archives like you said. If they did combine the sites and provided a small discount, I'd be there in flash. Actually, I'll probably join them at some point anyway, but if you told them that they probably wouldn't think of offering that discount thing I mentioned. ;)
|
03-12-07 03:28pm
|
Reply
378
|
I Shot Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
mudman's Review
I just left a reply on another of your reviews asking for more info which I could exactly replicate here. With a score of 84, I'd really like to hear more!
|
03-09-07 09:03am
|
Review
379
|
Incredible Pass
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-The entire network has above average video quality except for the oldest clips
-There are multiple options for video streaming/downloading and can be viewed in Windows Media or Quicktime
-The site design is straightforward and very easy to navigate
-Updates are regular and consistent with at least one update per day
-The models pages are well organized, so it's easy to find the types you want on each site
-You get a good amount of bonus content which includes behind the scenes footage |
| Cons: |
-The girls are true amateurs and not professional models, but that depends largely on your tastes
-Nearly all videos across the network have very repetitive themes that can become repetitive
-Each site claims to have photos, but are really just vidcaps
-Streaming video can only be viewed in the browser, so it's either really small or really big
-Although I found the simple design a plus, it definitely could use a face lift
-The creator claims the scenarios are real, but they seemed staged |
| Bottom Line: |
I originally joined one of the sites on this network not even realizing you got full access to their entire network. It is true that you only get full network access for the first month at the single site price, but it's a good way of knowing if you want to pay for the full network rather than just one site.
The video quality is pretty consistent across the network with no blurry segments and can be downloaded in multiple formats (WMV & MOV). It's certainly not HD, but for a reality site I think it's very good. I was disappointed that the photos were really vidcaps and you can only stream in a browser.
I have criticized a number of the individual sites for having repetitive themes and what I found to be a bizarre ritual of getting the girls to brush their teeth with cum. For me it got boring after awhile, but recent episodes had different scenarios that are more creative. I think the network tried to capture a very particular niche to start and is now growing, which are both good signs for a network with real staying power.
If you like amateur latinas and don't care about scenarios, locations, or other secondary elements I think you will be very pleased and at the very least I believe it's worth the $10 to check out the network for a month. However, if repetition bothers you or you are looking for professional models this is definitely not the site for you. In my case I decided not to renew, but if you are curious about any of the sites I recommend checking it out. |
|
03-30-07 09:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
380
|
India Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Hereford's Reply
Now I can see why you gave it that rating and I just wanted to make sure you weren't giving the site a 50 if you honestly thought someone might think the pictures made the site worth it. However, with the additional negatives you mentioned along with the original review, even the greatest lover of this niche would likely leave the site unsatisifed. If anyone disagrees, bring it on! :)
Thanks for replying and for the review!
|
02-10-07 11:29pm
|
Reply
381
|
India Sex
(0)
|
Reply of
Hereford's Review
It definitely looks like a crappy site, but if there is even one positive (you mentioned a number of pictures) does it really deserve the worse possible score? Another way to put it is this: Can you imagine no site being worse than this one? If not, then I guess a 50 is about right. :)
|
02-10-07 09:24pm
|
Reply
382
|
Inside Naughty America
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Review
Great review! Was this site part of the basic membership before they added the second tier sites? If it was, I guess I'm not as observant as I thought! But this does look cool since the stars act a bit more normally.
Keep up the great reviews dude! ;)
-SD
|
06-26-07 07:20pm
|
Reply
383
|
Izzy's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
Hey King,
I was mostly just joking and giving you a hard time, but I do appreciate your response and your reviews. :)
-SD
|
04-05-07 11:23am
|
Reply
384
|
Izzy's Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
King's Reply
Hey King,
If you are only looking for so-called "young" girls, you are definitely missing out. Older women (which many classify as anyone over 22 for reasons I can't explain) are the spice of life! ;)
-SD
|
04-04-07 06:28pm
|
Reply
385
|
Jack Lawrence XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
FemCop's Reply
I absolutely see where you are coming from! And, like I said, if you really love the site in question then it's hard for me to argue with a high score. I just wanted to offer an idea about why people may be suspicious, that's all. :) If you do join another site, make sure you come back and give us your review! And thanks for replying!
|
02-23-07 09:12am
|
Reply
386
|
Jack Lawrence XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
FemCop's Reply
I think what would make users suspicious of your review is because you only have submitted one review and you give the site a near perfect score. As Khan said your opinion is just as valid as anyone else's, but until you write up some other sites it may seem like you are biased towards the site. If you like it that much then I feel great for you because you've found something that suits your needs. That's awesome! However, if you really want other people to find your reviews helpful I'd suggest rating some other sites, particularly any you have not liked to provide some balance.
|
02-22-07 08:28pm
|
Reply
387
|
Jack Lawrence XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
Reno911's Review
Ok, so you are admitting it has some negatives and you still gave it a perfect score? What pains me about reviews like this is that I would rarely score even my favorite sites ever above 95 since a site can ALWAYS improve. Unfortunately, the result is that my fav sites get lower scores while reviews like this send their reviewed site straight to the top. Yes, I could go ahead and give sites a perfect score just because they are my favorite, but does that help anyone else decide whether or not to join?
Thoughts?
|
02-20-07 02:04pm
|
Reply
388
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
jeffaz's Reply
I agree with you about sites that only offer cam stills, but to be fair to Jen's site my review is nearly a year old. I know she had some recent pictures up at Freeones which were definitely not cam stills. I'd do a search for her at Ask Jolene or other site that archives sample sets to see what the quality of her pics are now.
|
01-28-08 08:37pm
|
Reply
389
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
MikeAndJen's Reply
Hey Mike,
I appreciate the nice words on the review and it definitely sounds like I came in during a major changeover! And I certainly know what you mean about addressing lighting and other things while the art is underway! I'll drop you a line since I'd love to see how things turned out to get the full effect you both intended.
It's great to see Webmasters interacting with users on here!
-SD
|
04-04-07 05:05pm
|
Reply
390
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
heynow's Comment
I reviewed this site right in the middle of the change from MyWifeJen to JenMadison. I think she abandoned the MyWifeJen too quickly after getting everyone used to it not being JenUncut anymore. I'm sure it's left some members scratching their heads and even more confused after the second change! In her defense, I think the cam show thing that has her still listed as JenUncut is because she either hasn't thought to change it (sometimes what the cam show operator sees isn't what we see, so they don't notice) or she can't change it without opening another account. Bottom Line: It's eyebrow raising as a prospective member and curious to current members, but once you get inside the site it isn't really a big deal.
|
02-19-07 12:35pm
|
Reply
391
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
|
Reply of
marquis58401's Reply
Glad you found the review useful Marquis and I hope you enjoy the site! Regardless, make sure you come back with your review, especially if your experience differs from mine. Have fun! :)
|
01-29-07 08:17pm
|
Review
392
|
Jen Madison.com
(0)
82.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
-Well designed site that's easy to navigate.
-Easy access to Jen through an internal message system.
-Very friendly and eager to please and retain customers.
-Free access to multiple cam sites Jen uses and
weekly cam shows. |
| Cons: |
-Recent fee increase makes site a bit pricey
-A fair number of the picture sets are cam stills.
-Picture and video quality are only average.
-Update intervals aren't always consistent. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site with very high expectations and the inexpensive trial price made it an easy choice to check out. Unfortunately, Jen has recently changed the pricing on her site, eliminating the trial and increasing the month to month rate. There are options that lower the monthy price to around $16, but only if you pay for 6 months up front.
Jen is very friendly and sexy which you can see right away from the content. She's also very real and not trying to be someone she's not. I think the site would benefit from adding more picture sets that aren't stills in a greater variety of settings and themes, especially since the site has been running for awhile now. Video content was very good and all aspects of the site are interactive.
It's clearly an amateur site with low lighting in some videos and bright flash photography in the picture sets, but that's what it claims to be and makes no apologies for it. The site design is nicely done and matches the class of Jen herself.
There's always room for improvement, but Jen has more than a great start that can only get better with time. If you enjoy married women in their 30s who are very hot, horny, and eager to please then this could be up your alley. The price increase does dampen my enthusiasm a bit, but if you like real amateur MILFs you'd be pressed to do much better. |
|
01-29-07 12:22pm
Replies (5)
|
Review
393
|
Jizz On My Jugs
(0)
73.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-You get 60 episodes each including a video that can be viewed or downloaded as one file or in segments and all in MPEG format with some more recent ones available in WMV
-Most of the pics were considered hi res when they were taken (2005-06) and are still decent by '07 standards which can be viewed in browser or downloaded as zip files
-With your membership you get full access to all 18 Brazzers Pass netowrk sites for under $20 a month
-After a month if you cancel, a 50% discount is offered |
| Cons: |
-Nearly all of the videos on the site run at 500 kbps or lower and about 2/3 of them are available only in MPEG format
-Despite some real pics, most picture sets are only vidcaps and none of them come even close to being considered HD
-There isn't any consistent theme to any of the videos other than the fact that a guy comes on the girl's boobs at the end, some have hardcore, some don't
-The site hasn't been updated for over a year and even before that updates were erratic and unpredictabl |
| Bottom Line: |
I've reviewed a majority of the sites on Brazzers Pass and have found that it is largely a tale of two very different themes. Some sites offer top of the line quality in both video and picture sets with multiple formats for downloading and viewing in browser. Others, however, often include vids and pics at what was considered below average quality when they were released let alone what they are considered today. Unfortunately this site is like the latter and doesn't have a whole lot to offer.
As with all sites on this network, options are plenty and navigation is standardized and easy to use throughout. Many of those options tend to disappear though the further back you go in time, but some aspects like zip downloads and viewing or downloading in segments or full files are always there.
As for the action, in many instances the girls are only titty fucked, but in others they "get their pussy pounded" which makes them vary only slightly from other sites since many girls on the network get boob shots instead of facials. However, if your particular fetish is getting the money shot on the girls' chest, this will literally be your wet dream.
In the end it's a subpar site on an excellent network and alone isn't worth the price, only as a bonus to another full featured site. Still, I've seen much worse and you do get what the site advertises. Updates haven't been forthcoming over the last year and there's little chance you'll see any more. Check it out, but don't stay long. |
|
12-10-07 12:57pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
394
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
|
Reply of
KevinG's Reply
Thanks for the info! Much obliged!
|
12-19-07 06:53pm
|
Comment
395
|
Joanna Angel
(0)
|
|
05-13-07 11:35am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
396
|
Joy of Spex
(0)
|
Reply of
Daeron's Reply
I can't tell you how excited I am to hear that! I'll be waiting at the door to sign up, of that you can be sure! :)
|
08-21-07 06:41pm
|
Review
397
|
Joy of Spex
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The site features 33 "episodes", most including pictures (anywhere from a few dozen to over 100 shots) and videos (most have just 1 but others have 2 or 3)
-You also get about 50 bonus picture sets of "spexy" friends, many of whom have their own websites
-The videos are available to be downloaded as a zip file in both Windows Media and Quicktime formats
-The girls are actual amateurs and really wear glasses rather than other sites that put glasses on glamour models and call them "nerdy" |
| Cons: |
-If you are into glamour girls or wall to wall hardcore, please exit the site in a quick and orderly fashion
-Many of the "spexy" friends' links are either dead or merely lead to amateur supersites
-This may be a criticism that only I have: many of the girls are too skinny and could use some meat on their bones
-The reviewer enjoys this site like a pyromaniac enjoys playing in a zippo factory, so the objectivity of this review may be worse than the guy who said the Titanic was unsinkable |
| Bottom Line: |
It isn't often that I find a porn site which really fits what's probably my favorite niche: geeky girls. So, when I come upon one that's even close I am probably not the most objective person to evaluate it. However, I'll give it a try.
There are approximately 30 different "episodes" on the site, each with a different girl and most with a mix of videos and pictures. Both are of very good quality for an amateur site and while the pics aren't able to be dowloaded in a zip, the videos can be and are available in Windows Media and Quicktime formats. You also get around 50 bonus picture sets of offsite amateurs, many of whom have their own site and provide a link. Some are merely sets from amateur supersites or have dead links to sites long gone, but it ends up being a nice repository for this kind of content.
The biggest problem with the site is that nothing has been updated in about a year with no signs of anything new on the horizon. I would have to think it's because only true amateur lovers will find this site at all appealing, so big boob or glamour aficionados have little reason to visit, let alone stay.
I'll admit that some of the sets aren't even for me since I'm not into the hairy scene whatsoever, but if you fantasized about your four eyed lab partner instead of the cheerleaders, run (don't walk) to sign up for this one. However, if you went the other way then don't give this site the time of day and the only redeeming quality would be the full network access. |
|
04-18-07 10:26pm
Replies (2)
|
Review
398
|
Justine Joli
(0)
67.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-The site has a personal feel to it since most features are accessed through a blog which includes diary entries and news about her and what's she's up to
-You get over 60 picture sets which include high quality shots that are not vidcaps as well as over 25 videos in Quicktime format
-If you are a big user of Apple, chances are you'll have Quicktime Pro and can download all the site's content
-Justine is a self labeled nerd, so techies will have some brains to go along with her sexy body |
| Cons: |
-Navigation is very confusing since it's set up like a blog
-I had to keep inputing my username and password whenever I accessed photos, sometimes multiple times
-There are only a couple dozen video clips and can only be viewed in your browser in a very small format, so there are no vid downloads unless you have the Pro version of Apple's Quicktime
-The only link I found to cancel was a broken link and when I contacted support about how to cancel they didn't really address the problem |
| Bottom Line: |
I am definitely a fan of Justine Joli (aka Swan), so when I saw she had a site with a low 3 day trial price I decided to give it a try. Although I did get some good pictures out of the deal, for the majority of users this one isn't much to write home about.
The site is set up as a blog which makes it feel personal at first. However, I had to constantly re-enter my username and password to get to the pics which are of good quality but without zip options. There are over 25 videos on the site, but they are Quicktime files and small ones at that. They also aren't downloadable unless you have QT Pro and some wouldn't even stream for me at all.
One of the first things I do at a site is figure out how to cancel. When I tried a link for that purpsose it was broken and I mentioned that in an email to support. They did email back quickly, but seemingly didn't notice my comment about the broken link since they said I could cancel by email, phone, or the link on the site (which I had said was broken). Suffice it to say, I wasnt impressed.
Overall, I really can't recommend this site since the navigation is maddening and there isn't that much to find once you do get used to it. If you are a big fan of Justine's, you will probably want to join regardless of the site's quality to get the content, but for the casual fan I would refer you to any number of free sites where you can get just as much content and save yourself the money and time I spent finding my way through this site. |
|
05-01-07 03:36pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
399
|
K Package Pass
(0)
|
Reply of
Markus's Review
If you can't think of a "Con" per se, can you think of any ways the site could be improved? I think that's what folks are looking for in reviews.
|
04-17-07 05:44pm
|
Reply
400
|
Kitty Karsen
(0)
|
Reply of
troglodite's Review
Great review fellow dude! And since I see that you joined recently, welcome to the site! I think you'll like it and I look forward to your next reviews. :)
|
04-15-07 06:30pm
|
