| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2451
|
Erotic Wifes
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
Not to mention that if the people behind this site can't be bothered to use proper grammar than what's to say that they don't apply that same mentality to the way they manage their site.
|
06-17-11 02:52pm
|
Reply
2452
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I picked email because that's what most sites offer. I would have picked instant messaging but I've only been a member of one site that had that so it's not usually available with most sites.
|
06-15-11 05:58am
|
Reply
2453
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
There wasn't really an option that fell under what I prefer but the closest is cut and fade between positions. I prefer real sexual sounds so no fake dubbing and unless the music is so much background noise that you can't tell what it is then I don't want it either.
|
06-13-11 04:08pm
|
Reply
2454
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I frankly can't understand how anyone could enjoy watching porn on a cellphone or ipod screen. I could understand watching porn on an ipad because you are able to see some action but even that's not a big screen.
|
06-11-11 07:25am
|
Reply
2455
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've seen 6 or more mainstream movies in 3D and not a single one was significantly better by the addition of 3D. Avatar was the first to get the ball rolling and is possibly the best one of the bunch. Even that one is just as fun to watch in 2D. I think 3D is more gimmick than improvement. That and a major cash grab by studios that care more for product placement than making a decent movie. Although many studios are discovering to their detriment that 3D is not such a great money maker as they thougth it would be.
|
06-09-11 01:45pm
|
Reply
2456
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I also joined her site for the same reason but her site offered all the other sites on the join page. There is no way I would rejoin without that being made clear before I press the confirm transaction button.
|
06-07-11 07:12pm
|
Reply
2457
|
Exploited College Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I agree with you that there are some really good looking girls and some of them seem to have done very little other porn than what's found on his site but he's so F..g annoying that most scenes are ruined.
|
06-07-11 07:03pm
|
Reply
2458
|
Spunky Bee
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
The reason why I joined her site was because she was the only one offering all of the other sites. I just checked some of the other sites and they have different permutations of site included with one membership. There simply isn't enough content on Spunky's site to warrant the price she charges for her site as a stand alone.
|
06-07-11 07:01pm
|
Reply
2459
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I've never seen it but then again I've also never looked for it either. It's not my thing.
|
06-05-11 10:48am
|
Reply
2460
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I assumed that the question included navigation so I picked somewhat important. There have been very few sites that have caused me a headache because their navigations was horrible but a few managed it. Those are the ones that although I enjoyed the content. I will probably never rejoin because I just don't want to spend an hour looking for one video.
|
06-03-11 05:04pm
|
Reply
2461
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Footjobs is one of those things that exist in porn but I don't understand why. Why would you like watching a girl use her feet to play with a penis or vagina? I can see where the talent can be but not where the sexual appeal is. I don't mind that it exist but I have never watched a scene because it was in it and I would never watch one if that's all there was in it.
|
05-30-11 03:45pm
|
Reply
2462
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
I think you might be right about the reasons why older women don't want to do hardcore videos. There is still over 300 HC B/G or G/G videos on the site so it might still appeal to people that are looking for that kind of content. I prefer anal and there is very little to be found and that's why I only found a couple of videos worth keeping.
|
05-30-11 05:43am
|
Reply
2463
|
All Over 30
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
It's true that you and I disagree on HC but I can see where this site would be a disapointment to you. In many ways it's the same for me but from the other point of view. I would have prefered if they had kept this site softcore to midcore and created another one that was midcore to hardcore. I only found about 4-5 videos that I want to keep and that's not much for what it cost to join this site.
At least I can now cross this site from my wish list.
|
05-29-11 05:34pm
|
Reply
2464
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I said probably not and I agree with Drooler's that your matches might not be all that you were expecting.
|
05-28-11 06:12pm
|
Reply
2465
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The biggest problem with breast implants is size. If girls picked a cup size nearer to their body shape than I suspect many of the people like me who don't like implants would not mind so much.
As it is. The girls usually go for over the top implants and it's next to impossible to overlook. I'm glad for the people that don't mind implants because so many girls these days go for them. Unlike me you still want to see what these girls will produce. I'm less forgiving. I respect the choice of any woman to get implants but in return I don't have to buy any of their movies if those women chose to get 2 giant mellons installed on their chest.
|
05-24-11 05:53am
|
Reply
2466
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
I agree and that's why I'd rather pay my 15 Euros and get access to wakeupnfuck for one month. I usually join Pierre casting site every few months. It depends on what has been updated since the last time I was a member. He's one of the few man to get certain girls to do hardcore shoots so sooner or later you have to join his sites to get those.
|
05-23-11 05:56am
|
Reply
2467
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Reply
I'll go with Rusty and ik2fireone. POV is just too limiting in what you can see.
|
05-22-11 08:44am
|
Reply
2468
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
I wanted to make a review of the site as well but since the site won't be added to the list then I did a quick one in the forum. You are correct on every point. I might have given the site a higher score than you because it has some exclusif scenes from some girls.
I think you get access to this site if you retain your woodman casting membership for 6 months or more. Seeing as Pierre site is expensive than it's not a route I'm willing to go down.
|
05-20-11 06:09am
|
Reply
2469
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I stil regularly buy DVD's. I reserve my Bluray dollars for mainstream movies only. I really have no interest in seeing porn in Blueray. Of course I buy less DVD's these days but that's beause you have less available than a few years ago. The sad reality is that the recession, file sharing sites and all the crap that passes for porn these days hasn't helped.
|
05-20-11 06:01am
|
Reply
2470
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I picked there can never be too much but that's because none of the other choices came close enough to what I had in mind. I agree with those that say that's it's a like it or hate it type of porn. I like it and I agree that it's everywhere these days or at least it used to be. There has been a significant drop in new anals ie new girls willing to do anal. Not so much in Europe but very much so in America. 5 to 10 years ago was possibly the best time to see most girls do anal. The recession and the change in porn have seen a drop in new girls willing to go down the hershey highway.
|
05-18-11 01:08pm
|
Reply
2471
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I agree with turbo's statement that it's the part about paying for it that many don't agree with. Which is too bad.
|
05-16-11 06:22pm
|
Reply
2472
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I think everyone as already touched on the point that 2 guys one girl isqa threeway. You need at least 3 or more guys to one girl fo4 a gang bang.
|
05-15-11 11:00am
|
Reply
2473
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I also always check the TBP review. For the same reasons that others have mentioned.
|
05-12-11 05:40am
|
Reply
2474
|
Jenna Haze - JenX Studios
(0)
|
Reply of
roy1485's Comment
I don't have any good news for you. Most Pornstar sites fall under the heading bad to awful. Rare are the ones that are any good and even more so those that are amazing. Jenna's site probably falls under the bad category because it doesn't really appear to be her site so much as a site where you can access some of her videos. Based on the fact that the site is owned by Jules Jordans company then I'd assume that most if not all the content is from Jules movies.
A dead giveaway for bad pornstar sites is when the preview pages offer very little personal info on her and content is not dated.
|
05-10-11 07:01pm
|
Reply
2475
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't care. I get tons of spam emails so more of the same goes to my junk pile and I delete them without reading any of them.
|
05-10-11 06:53pm
|
