| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
2251
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
selphy's Comment
I think wittyguy's estimate on the percenatge of exclusif content is the more accurate one and he's also correct that Karup as the scenes first and either they lease it to other sites or whoever they buy it from sales it to other sites. I know they tag some scenes as being exclusif and those you won't find anywhere else or at least not from officlka sources.
The reality is that many Eastern Europeans sites buy content from the same studio so it's not unusual to see the same scene on more than one site. The advantage of joining a site like teenmegaworld is that they seem to buy the most content from that studio as well as have their own exclusif content.
|
10-13-11 06:34am
|
Reply
2252
|
Assassinate That Ass
(0)
|
Reply of
pornfalls's Comment
Maybe that was a blessing in disguise because I would recommend you avoid this site. This is clearly a site with leased material and all of it is rather old. Many of the models on the site retired over a year ago and some even longer. I would recommend you look at a site like videobox because I think all of the performers on this site have more than one video at videobox.
|
10-13-11 06:25am
|
Reply
2253
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
Creampie eating is just another one of those gonzo circus acts that gained popularity in the 90's. I was never into this myself because it's not one of my festishes and I saw a few anal creampie scenes where the performer ate her creampie and the color implied that it included sone anal juice. Sorry for the visual. I like creampies ovwer cum shot because that means the guy came inside the girl and that's more natural then when the guy pulls out, gets up, moves around and then shoots his load on different parts of the body.
|
10-13-11 06:16am
|
Reply
2254
|
Hot Wife Rio
(0)
|
Reply of
hiker's Review
Hi hiker.
Could you post more info on your review. I undertand you didn't like the site but your 2 complainst although annoying aren't really all that significant unless the download limit is like 2 Gig per day froma site withh 100 G of content.
How many videos? How many photo sets? What's the video resolution? What are the pic resolution? What's the download limit? Are the videos all shot using a tripod or handheld camera?
|
10-11-11 12:18pm
|
Reply
2255
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's a question of context. If what the person wrote appears to be derogatory or insulting then the caps lock just add to the insult but sometimes people don't know any better or they didn't pay attention. I'm bad for writting stuff without looking at the screen and only realksise after a couple of lines that I was in caps lock and must restart from scratch.
|
10-11-11 12:11pm
|
Reply
2256
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I think money as and will always be the biggest struggle for any porn performer. They all need a certain amount to sustain their life style and as long as they earn to satisfy that life style then they are satisfied. The problem is that porn is not the kind of job that's conducive to a healthy and happy person. Some can deal with it better than others but many of them use drug and alcohol to help them cope. These things cost money and they do more porn to earn that money which in return means they ned more drug and alcohol. This becomes a vicious circle where leaving porn is the only solution. Sadly too many of them have left it by dying at a very young age.
|
10-09-11 12:00pm
|
Reply
2257
|
N/A
|
Reply of
gggfan's Poll
I don't mind them but I also don't care for them too much either. The creampie in ganbang is more circus act than anything else. It's rarely shot to appear part of the sex scene but is rather added at the end to satisfy a certain percentage of the customers who like this type of fetish.
It's quite a different thing when it's one-one-one because that's more natural. of course they have been known to make sure that it's far from normal but then again that's modern porn for you.
The only thing that I simply can't watch but many enjoy are facials and blowbangs. I'd rather not see any cum shot then to see a facial.
|
10-07-11 11:35am
|
Reply
2258
|
Electro Films
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Comment
Did you check out TBP`s review? They did one in March of this year and they were claiming that the site had stopped updating a couple of months prior to their review. This is one of those sites that could be interesting if it wasn't so expensive. If it was undr 20$ then i would tell you to go ahead but it's 30$ and that is just too much for a site that only received a 72% rating and with less than stellar content.
|
10-05-11 10:29am
|
Reply
2259
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I currently have 2 long term memberships and they both offer the same things that are a must if they want me to remain a memeber.
1-Price. This is not important twhen joining for
one month but a lot when you keep that memberhsip.
2-Quality of the updates. This is important to me than quantity because having a lot of updates that are crappy isn't all that good.
3-Quantity. This may not be as important as quality but I do need more than one or two updates per week to warrant staying long term.
4-Selection of models is only somewhat important because almost every girl winds up working for the sites I'm a member so it's usually a question of time before she does a scene and what she does in that scene.
*The amount of content isn't something a long term meber like me cares about because I have already downloaded any older content and I'm only staying on for newer stuff.
*Watching a live show in real time does nothing for me but I do enjoy watching some of them if they are recorded. of course this can`t be a cam show. I don`t think those are worth watching in real time and even less recording.
|
10-05-11 10:16am
|
Reply
2260
|
Workin Men XXX
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Comment
Did you look at their review on TBP? TBP says thatyou get access to 9 other sites with your membership so even if none are updating then you should still be able to get a lot of content. Be advised that TBP puts the average time per video at 7 minutes.
|
10-04-11 06:37am
|
Reply
2261
|
Dare Ring
(0)
|
Reply of
AlexMercer's Review
Do you know how many videos they have? What's the resolution on the videos? Can they be downloaded as a single file or are they broken into smaller clips? TBP review is dated in 2007 so I'm curious to know if they have done any chnages.
I don't know if you have looked at fucking gamble but it has certain similarities to thi site.
|
10-03-11 09:05am
|
Reply
2262
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I've never been a huge fan of booze and I tend to limit my drug use to Aspirin for a headache and a decongestant when I feel a cold coming. I grew up in the 70's but somehow skipped all the interest in pot. I think cocaine gained in popularity in the 80's (at least that's what I got from watching Miami Vice) but I also chose to skip that band wagon. I think Ecstacy was the drug of the 90's but I had reached a quater century so rave parties wasn't really all that interesting to me.
I never felt comfortable in a strip club because I was always affraid to meet someone I knew or worse know the stripper.
Prostitutes was never something that appealled to me. I've never been able to get the idea out of my mind that I'm the 8 guy this young lady is having sex with. It's like knowing that the Big mac you are about to eat has already been chewed on by 7 other guys.
Gambling is only worth it when you know you are going to win. Therefore it's not worth it unless you own the casino.
Cow tipping is an urban myth told to city folks that don't know any better. You can always try it but you may find out that Betsy although a slow moving bovine weighs a lot and if she steps on your foot well your foot isn't going to forgive you.
That only leaves TV. I assume that I can't watch porn on my TV and that would be too bad but I caould find plenty of movies and Tv shows to keep me occupied for a very long time.
|
10-03-11 08:58am
|
Reply
2263
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
CosplayDeviants's Reply
Let me answer all your excellent point and try to give you an idea of why I'm saying these things.
1-A website tour has to be more than words written on pages but must show what is available inside the members section. How else can anyone be certain that what is written is not just BS but true. There are too many sites that claim one thing in the preview pages but never deliver on those promises. I know because I got burned quite a few times and many of the other reviewers have also been burned.
2-I understand that internet piracy is the blight for any webmaster and I really wish it didn't exist. Sadly it seems to be getting worse. I'm not sure if the recession as a lot to do with it but it as to be part of it. I don't think webmasters care too much about the reasons why someone stole their content because it's the end result that affects them and all their paying members. You have to understand that the great majority of PU members are avid collectors of porn and expect that the money they pay to access that porn includes the ability to download it in an easy manner. You simply have to read the different reviews done by senior members to see that sites receive lower scores when these options are omited or when it's harder to download the content.
3-I actually wasn't upset about the number of reviews. They kind of jumped out because they all arived at the same time and they all had very high scores. My issue is in regards to the amount of info offered in the reviews vs the score given. AlexMercer did the best review out of the 5 and he still omited very important information. two of those reviews aren't even worth looking at because they have 10 or less lines of info and very little actual data. here is a list of things that were omited and would be important to add.
-No one mentioned the number of photosets and videos available on the site.
-No one mentioned the average pic resolution per set.
-No one mentioned the video resolution.
-No one mentioned if the chat option is free with the membership or if there is an extra cost.
-Alex mentioned that there was a VIP web cast but again it doesn't say if it's free or if you have to pay extra.
Now the above things are not all essential when doing a review but I think they become quite important when according a high score to a site. I suspect that cosplay is one of those fetishes with a small but passionate following and I can appreciate that. I may not be a fan of this type of porn and frankly I don't really consider this porn. It would require that the models have sex on screen for me to say that your site is a porn site. It's more a nude or semi-nude site with a specific theme in mind.
I think it would be great to see a review that addressed many of the points I posted and where the reviewer is more objective about the content. Of course that might be harder to say that done.
|
10-03-11 08:39am
|
Reply
2264
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
CosplayDeviants's Reply
Sorry to be blunt but if this is what you call a preview then you clearly haven't visited many websites in your life. There's a total of 12 images that can be enlarged on that free tour section. The breakdown is 10 solo female models, 1 solo male model and 1 B/G. You can't even find out how many pics there are per set. You can see the model page and know how many sets she has done but you can't even preview what they look like.
In regards to not being able to download content. I just looked at a review and saw that the reviewer had put in his Cons that there was no downloads. At least now I know that this is a slight error. You can download pics individually but you can't download them as complete sets in zip or rar format. That might not be a problem for some but you will find that the majority of us prefer that sets be downloadable as a complete file.
If you take a look at some of the other reviews on the site then you may understand why I and some of the other members had major issues with 5 new reviews with very high scores and very little content in those reviews to justify the score. Many of us take pride in this site and think it's important that reviews be more than someone's obvious infatuation with a particular site VS actual what others might get out of it.
|
10-02-11 06:57pm
|
Reply
2265
|
Cosplay Deviants
(0)
|
Reply of
slutty's Comment
I have no problem with anyone posting a review of any site he enjoys and I have no problem with the score given but I do have a problem when the score doesn't match the content. The site has no previews so how exactly is anyone to know what he will get for his money? You can't download any content. It would be one thing if this was a video site where you had to pay to stream the videos but a site that claims to offer mostly pics and doesn't allow it's paying members to download those pics is to be avoided at all cost.
As far as I can gather from what I read on the site. This is more like a community posting board where models upload their pictures and get paid for those pics.
|
10-02-11 09:48am
|
Reply
2266
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I don't particulkarly like them and agree that his happens to be way too big. I know that Pierre has commented on his site that a new scene is out on a torrent/tube site almost immediately after he's updated it to his site. Making the watermark really large makes it next to impossible for anyone to edit it out of the screen by croping the video.
|
10-01-11 11:30am
|
Reply
2267
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
The majority of my European movies were from the Marc Dorcel studio.
The company is still in business today and still releases new titles but somehow none of those original movies are offdered.
|
09-30-11 06:49am
|
Reply
2268
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I may not have found all the movies I once had but at least I have found some streaming sites like hot movies that still have a few of them. of course it's not the same and it's also not cheap to stream an entire movie. My biggest problem are the European movies that I had which cannot be found anywhere. I think those are the ones that I miss the most because I simply can't find them anywhere.
I agree that it was getting hard to store all those VHS tapes but I still wish I had kept them all.
|
09-29-11 06:46pm
|
Reply
2269
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I picked lost it but that's not really the truth. I actually threw it away. That is what I reggret the most because I had some really great classic porn movies that no longer exist. Of course I also happenned to have some now illegal stuff so that not such a big loss. The illegal stuff would mostly be movies with Tracy Lords. I know she was 15 when she started doing porn but I had no idea that she was and she certainly didn't act 15 in her movies.
|
09-29-11 11:50am
|
Reply
2270
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I've been to a massage parlor many times but mine were for actual honest to goodness massages so not the kind the poster was probably asking about.
I've worked for many companies who's insurance covers up to 500$ in massages but the real kind.
I've never been to the other kind and never will.
|
09-27-11 09:23am
|
Reply
2271
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PornoPro's Reply
Sorry I meant video resolution.
|
09-26-11 12:03pm
|
Reply
2272
|
Hands on Hardcore
(0)
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Reply
I suspect that there is less content because that's what I noticed the last time I was a member. The reason why I no longer join ddf sites is because they play with their content by moving it from one site to the next and posting that as an update. I rarely see true new content except on 1byday.
|
09-26-11 11:43am
|
Reply
2273
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PornoPro's Reply
Would you happen to know is resolution is 640x480 or better?
|
09-26-11 11:38am
|
Reply
2274
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
PornoPro's Review
I didn't see any info on video resolution so could you reply to this or add the info on your review? I also don't see any info on the way the videos are split. I know that many of their videos were split into more than one file when I was a member last year.
|
09-25-11 05:48pm
|
Reply
2275
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
I picked before 1980 only because there was no option for before 1990. I'm pretty sure the stuff I saw before 1980 would have been Playboy pictures so not really what I consider porn.
|
09-25-11 09:28am
|
