| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1326
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I have a long term membership with Brazzer and you have to add at least 5 more sites to that list so I currently have 6 active membership but 3 of those are for sites that I'm not visiting or using but since my membership is still active then I have to count them.
|
08-01-13 02:36pm
|
Reply
1327
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I was originally going to pick that I don't mind but I decided to go with the I like since I prefer to see a condom in todays porn industry. There are simply too many people getting std's and you better start to like condoms because they will be the norm
|
07-30-13 06:29pm
|
Reply
1328
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I had to pick undecided because I can't actually remember when was the last time I saw a scene where the girl had hairy armpits or legs.
|
07-28-13 09:06am
|
Reply
1329
|
First Anal Quest
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
If you check out the link then you will see that the answer is a resounding yes.
http://firstanalquest.com/scenes
|
07-27-13 05:50pm
|
Reply
1330
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I'm sure that for some it's at least a 50/50 split because you dont' see a lot of lube being used. I'm no doctor but sticking a penis in a girls ass without using any lube can't be comfortable for the girl.
Mind you that might be the plan and that's why they do it. I guess it works since the site is still producing scenes. It sadly has the opposite on me as I don't enjoy seeing pain (fake or real) on a girls face during that kind of scene.
|
07-27-13 05:49pm
|
Reply
1331
|
21 Sextury
(0)
|
Reply of
martinlongbow's Comment
They still have some gorgeous performers but the number of new girls as seriously dropped in the last couple of years but that has nothing to do with 21Sextury. It's a question of economics and one of their primary source for talent makes it really hard for girls to work in porn. The quality of the finish product is also affected by the two above reasons.
I had a long term membership that I let go last year and I haven't joined since then. I still visit at least once a week and I may join in the future but I know I won't be downloading all that many scenes since there is way too much duplication now and not that much that I care to watch over and over.
|
07-27-13 08:53am
|
Reply
1332
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
|
Reply of
jeppegutt's Comment
The days when TCC was producing all exclusive content is long gone. They've been using leased material for their Hardcore Youth site for many years now and that's been their main source for new(not really)content. It was bound to happen that they would have to find a new cheaper source to fill their network since those HY shoots are pretty expensive while buying old content from dead sites is a lot cheaper.
|
07-25-13 06:41pm
|
Reply
1333
|
Let's Try Anal
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another great review. I will only add two small things that may or may not make the site more appealing. The site is still known for having the only anal scenes from some of the more popular new girls in the industry. The sad part for me is that they are still shot as though the girls are being tortured or something. I'm not saying that the girls are enjoying the anal but the way they take a dick in their ass then most can't claim to be anal virgins so there is a lot of acting in pain during their scene.
|
07-25-13 06:35pm
|
Reply
1334
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
It's neither for me because seeing a woman pee on someone else or having someone else pee on her does absolutely nothing for me. Now I know some will argue that squirting is not pee but something quite different and maybe they are right but I have seen way too many squirting scenes where the liquid was on the yellow side of things to believe them. It's porn so if squirting turns you on and you believe that it's not pee then enjoy the ride and don't ask questions.
This is still a mostly European fetish and one the Germans seem to love making. At least they used to.
|
07-22-13 04:28am
|
Reply
1335
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
In that case then I definitely don't watch porn for more than an hour.
|
07-20-13 06:47pm
|
Reply
1336
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Randyman's Poll
The question is somewhat vague because I may surf for porn for a couple of hours but I actually only view it for less than one. Does coming on TBP and PU count as viewing porn?
|
07-20-13 08:03am
|
Reply
1337
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The real question is not if I would or wouldn't take my computer to get repaired but what is wrong with it that I have to do that and does that mean that I have lost part of my porn collection?
|
07-19-13 06:13pm
|
Reply
1338
|
Girls Do Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
MargulisAZ's Comment
Truer words were never said. It's mind blogging to think that this guy is able to hire such amazingly cute girls willing to do hardcore porn and he has been doing this for a few years and he still can't shoot the porn in any way that can be considered decent.
I tried the site twice and I think I was more pissed the second time than the first because the guy actually managed to do a worse job in the more recent shoots than he did in past ones. I know that all the shots avoid showing the male performers face(not sure why) so that really limits the possible angles but it still doesn't explain the piss poor camera work done by the camera operator.
|
07-18-13 06:41pm
|
Reply
1339
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I think the reason why Pierre mentioned the gangbang is because he thought the girl was interested in doing that. He tends to stay away from the more insane girls.
|
07-16-13 08:16pm
|
Reply
1340
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Marcus's Reply
The art of tease is one thing but how much tease can you really get out of a non-nude model doing mostly glamour shots? I can understand being attracted to a specific model because of her overall appearance
but at some point you must want more than just looking at her with clothes on. My biggest issue with non-nude or for that matter nude modeling is that it can be visually pleasing to the eyes but it's not going to sexually excite me and sooner or later I want more from that model.
|
07-16-13 03:00pm
|
Reply
1341
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I wouldn't because I don't see the point of looking at fully clothed models who are basically lounging around. If I really want to see that then there are plenty of fashion magazines with the same content and some of them even have the odd nude supermodel.
|
07-16-13 02:43pm
|
Reply
1342
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Reply
The new site design is your basic "How to screw up a site up 101". How can they hope to get new customers when anyone who's not familiar with the site is unable to see anything and worse is lied to on the only page you can see
|
07-14-13 04:26pm
|
Reply
1343
|
VideoBox
(0)
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Comment
That seems to be a fairly new thing because that was not the pages that I used to see when I visited the site and it's definitely not the ones that I still see when I use my Firefox link. I still see the original pages which do allow you to see the current info.
That page is actually a giant mess because it's full of lies and half truths. The perfect is example is if you scroll down to the section where it says "Just Added". They have two movies starring Jayden James. That part is true but these were added at least two years ago since there are comments about those movies that are that old.
I know it's VB and there are tons of reviews so anyone curious about what he or she is getting need only read those but this new marketing idea is a really bad one. If I use my Firefox link then I have to pay 15$ instead of 12$ but I will at least know exactly what I'm getting for that amount and frankly 15$ is a joke because there is just too much content for that amount.
|
07-14-13 07:32am
|
Reply
1344
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I don't remember the name of the first site that I joined but I am 100% certain that half of my very first porn sites are now quite dead and that most of the others are worse than they were.
many of my first porn sites were solo model sites and as most of you know. I usually tell people to avoid those in large part because I want them to avoid getting burned like I did.
|
07-14-13 05:13am
|
Reply
1345
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
The clue to what is on my desktop wallpaper is in the little quotation at the bottom of my posts.
|
07-12-13 03:22am
|
Reply
1346
|
Brandi Love
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
My pleasure. I'll await your review to see what you thought of the site.
|
07-12-13 03:21am
|
Reply
1347
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I don't know if you are aware but Pierre has a forum where he is an active participant. His English is not the greatest but I've never had any problems understanding what he meant to write.
I checked out what was written in the forum on Leylou. There is a lot of back and forth between him and the different poster and the most recent info is that she is a sex slave to a bunch of lesbians and that he will never work for her.
|
07-11-13 06:27pm
|
Reply
1348
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
I don't know if I try to be different and maybe that's impossible for me since I have stolen the styles of other reviewers but I do like to add a perspective that I didn't see in the other reviews
|
07-11-13 02:28pm
|
Reply
1349
|
Woodman Casting X
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Another excellent review full of pertinent information. I don't know if you noticed but Pierre has been adding scenes of his WUNF to this site. Now I don't know if this is because he wants to increase the traffic to this site and/or improve interest in wake up n fuck. I hope it's that because one of my fears is that he is slowly starting to run out of new stuff and is using the WUNF stuff as filler. I really hope that I'm wrong because it will be a sad day when Pierre stops making porn. His movies made Private the company that it once was.
|
07-10-13 06:39pm
|
Reply
1350
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It's usually the bottom line because I try to incorporate parts of the pros and cons into it but don't want to repeat myself. I also want to offer as much information as possible in as few words as possible. I find that I tend to rattle on and that doesn't make for a good review.
|
07-10-13 06:31pm
|
