| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1101
|
Kscans
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
I get the feeling that you really want to join this site so simply go ahead. The worse that will happen is that you wasted 30$.
|
03-13-14 09:18am
|
Reply
1102
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Here is a little bit of news about ATK that may explain some of your complaints.
http://www.mikesouth.com/reader-mail/thi...ng-ugly-at-atk-9313/
|
03-13-14 09:14am
|
Reply
1103
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pinkerton's Poll
I picked on ass or back but I was looking for other because the only thing that is important to me is that the cum shot be near where the guy's penis is at the moment of ejaculation so if the performers are in missionary then the cum shot should be near the vagina or the stomach.
All of the other choices are fine except for the face because I really dislike facials.
|
03-13-14 09:10am
|
Reply
1104
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Thanks for the info but I wasn't planning on joining this site only because if I were to join an SB site then I'd only do so if it had all of his movies. I don't know if he owns this one but it's quite possible that he doesn't own all of his movies anymore. He may have sold the rights in the past so no one will be able to release them all.
|
03-11-14 06:00pm
|
Reply
1105
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The only trials I join are those that offer full access so by default there is no censoring of their content. I have joined some limiting trials but that was years ago when I first started surfing the net. They all sucked and I don't think that as changed.
|
03-11-14 09:08am
|
Reply
1106
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I don't know how much better the resolution can be on this site since all of the SB movies preceded HD so I can't see how much better they look here VS Videobox. It's possible they are better and if you can truly download all the content in a couple of days then you can get the full access trial for very little money but I don't know if I'd pay 25$.
|
03-10-14 06:15pm
|
Reply
1107
|
Seymore Butts
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Thanks for the review. I was always a big fan of SB movies but there is no way that paying good money for such a tiny site. I mean SB put out nearly 200 movies in his career so that means at the very least 600 to 800 scenes so if there are less than 200 on this site then it's not a very good deal. Even VB has 45 SB movies/191 scenes and you can get these for less than 15$.
|
03-10-14 08:54am
|
Reply
1108
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I haven't used one of those since my early days ofg surfing for porn because I quickly realised that they were a toss up between useless and a scam. I haven't seen anything since then to make me think that this has changed. I can see the appeal for sites that offer the 1$ trial because you make some money from the transaction and I guess the guys that offer either option hope that someone will forget to cancel and the rebill is usually quite high so they are sure to make a lot of money on those foolish people.
I'm trying to think of any site that I really enjoy that offer that kind of option and I can't think of one.
|
03-10-14 08:43am
|
Reply
1109
|
Kscans
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
I also remember downloading a couple of clips but we are talking stuff that I downloaded about 6-7 years ago. If the site was 10$ than that might be one thing but it's worth 30$. I don't believe their updates schedule is accurate. I believe the content which is dated 2011 and before is older than the posted date but even if it isn't then you are still talking about paying 30$ for content that is 3 years old with no possibility of getting newer stuff.
It's your money so if you want to spend it on this site than go ahead but I fear that you will be very disappointed with what you get for your investment.
|
03-10-14 08:33am
|
Reply
1110
|
Kscans
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Comment
Why would anyone want to join this network? I mean it' been dead for at least 3 years and I suspect that it's even longer. Just click on the TBP/PU link and then click on updates and check the date on the last update...2011.
They had some kinky stuff but they were already dead prior to the recession.
|
03-08-14 06:13pm
|
Reply
1111
|
WCP Club
(0)
|
Reply of
joekramer08's Reply
I've also been a big fan of WCP for a long time and I was glad to see this site. I checked their site and they have added about 8 or 9 new dvd's since I was a member. That's not bad but it's going to take years before se see a significant amount of their total library and I don't fell like waiting that long.
|
03-07-14 10:08am
|
Reply
1112
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I used to read short stories but I sort of stopped doing that but can't remember why.
|
03-07-14 09:52am
|
Reply
1113
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't know of I have ever seen one of those but then again maybe I have and I didn't pay attention to that because I already knew the price and was only going through the motion.
|
03-06-14 05:19pm
|
Reply
1114
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's a pet peeve of mine that some sites don't give members a choice when it comes to the size of their video files. I'm already not a huge fan of HD so if all I can download are those types of files then it stands to reason that I'll pick and choose even more what I do or don't download.
|
02-13-14 08:28am
|
Reply
1115
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jberryl69's Poll
The only thing that can sour me toward a performer is when they have alter their appearance to such a degree that they are literally not the same person. Implants is often the most obvious alteration but
I've seen my share of facial reconstruction that leave me perplex.
|
02-11-14 08:23am
|
Reply
1116
|
Harmony Vision
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I can't tell you if they all have the same HD resolution because I only really downloaded one full HD 1080p video and it was 1280x720. That said I have downloaded a bunch which are tagged as HD and these come in 1040x584 which too me is more than adequate and the files are fairly small. They actually offer 4 different resolutions from SD (standard) Low, SD High, HD and Full HD 1080p.
If you decide that you want to join them and you'd like to get the special 10$ price then all you need to do is use the TBP/PU link and check out a couple of pages but then try to leave and you should get a pop up offer to stay on the page and get a special offer. The join price should now be 10$. There is some decent content on the porn Xn site but the X means that is extreme.
|
02-11-14 08:16am
|
Reply
1117
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I like variety in life and that's why I say all of the above.
|
02-09-14 06:17pm
|
Reply
1118
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
I picked it depends because I'd rather both be included in the scene and I always think it's too bad when only one is but I think cunnilingus is more stimulating for me because I'd rather watch the woman get pleasured than the guy.
|
02-07-14 09:55am
|
Reply
1119
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have watched some in the past but I don't find it very sexually stimulating.
|
02-05-14 10:47am
|
Reply
1120
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Reply
If we were talking real life than you'd be correct that 80% is a high score but you have already done a review so you must know what each score means when it comes to the way TBP/PU scores things. If you didn't pay attention when you did your review than here it is. As you can see 80% is a borderline score because the reviewer would have relegated this site to a might recommend by removing one single point from his/her final score. As toy can see sites scored in the 70's a site that are 50/50 when it comes to the finish prodcut
100 Perfect Site is perfect, could do little to improve. Top recommendation.
90-99 Excellent Site is near perfect, best in it's class. Highly recommended.
80-89 Very Good Enjoyable site, but could improve in key areas. Recommended.
70-79 Average Does some things good, some things poor. Might recommend.
60-69 Needs Work Does more things wrong than right. Low recommendation.
50-59 Poor Site Offers very little, needs serious work. Not recommended.
|
02-04-14 11:48am
|
Reply
1121
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
Reply of
fiou's Comment
I don't know why the reviewer gave the site an 80% score but you can always check out his review and see where what he wrote is incorrect.
I'd say that 80% is not a high score since it's really a borderline moderate score. Upper 80 or above is a high rating but as it stands this site was only one point away from being in the 70's and those sites must be joined knowing that it does quite a few things wrong.
TBP/PU offer quite a few sites with a higher score than this one so maybe you could look at those.
|
02-03-14 04:47pm
|
Reply
1122
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No I leave that to the professionals.
|
02-03-14 09:19am
|
Reply
1123
|
Bangbros Network
(0)
|
Reply of
fackjack's Review
You are entitled to your opinion and this is your review but you lose credibility when you give a high rated site such a low score and don't put the facts to support your score. As it stands we have no idea what happened to sour you toward this site and your review is so vague that no one ever will.
|
02-01-14 09:53am
|
Reply
1124
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
Screen resolution is what I use to determine if it's HD or not.
|
02-01-14 09:43am
|
Reply
1125
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It really depends on the site but impulse buys are now rare for me because I got burned in the past and I'm more cautious. That and the fact that there are so few true new sites that it's really hard to impulse join any of them.
|
01-30-14 05:57pm
|
