| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
826
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I have not once seen any model with an instrument other the ones God gave them so I can't have an opinion on it.
|
03-20-15 06:15pm
|
Reply
827
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm thrilled but I know many others who would have preferred she didn't are often sad of her choice. The only consolation I can give these people is that at least they will always have her softcore stuff to enjoy while the rest of us get to see more.
|
03-18-15 05:51pm
|
Reply
828
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
Answer #1: What aliens? I was watching porn when they landed.
Answer #2: I wonder what kind of porn they brought with them. I hope they aren't the stars because tentacle porn isn't my thing.
Answer #3: I might quit watching porn all together if they decide to clean up the dead wood currently working in Washington.
|
03-16-15 06:07pm
|
Reply
829
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
elephant's Reply
Although I agree 30$ is a high price. The one mitigating reason why I think they may be justified in asking for it is that they are the only other interracial site after Dog Farts. I don't know if they picked their price because DF also charges 30$ but DF has way more content so it's make sense to charge more while Blacked is still a very small site.
Let's hope you get a special offer because if you like artcore porn than you will really enjoy this site
|
03-15-15 09:57am
|
Reply
830
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Although I can see where both Drooler and gpl are coming from. I tend to think that rearadmin is describing the type of surfer we are. We are by no stretch of the imagination average porn surfers. We are ahead of most people if only because we use TBP/PU has a means to an end. We are able to offer something positive to porn discussions and we all have an innate talent for finding stuff that your average porn surfer might on a good day stumble upon.
|
03-14-15 08:16am
|
Reply
831
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
I would still have joined within a short amount of time even if I hadn't gotten the 15$ email offer but there was no way I was going to pass up the opportunity to see this site first hand with such a nice discount. I think they would be better served if they only dropped their join price to the more appealing 24.95$. I find the 29.95$ price is too reminiscent of all the scam and solo sites that charge that amount and never deliver on any decent content.
You drop the standard join price to 24.95$. This way you make it appear as though it's less than 25$(technically it is) and you then make a deal with TBP/PU to offer it's members the ability to join for 19.95$. Try this for a minimum of at least six to twelve months and if you don't see an increase in traffic and profits than go back to the old prices.
I would say the same thing if we were talking about bigger sites. I really enjoy Dog Fart because it's interracial porn and they do some really great scenes but I don't join as often I could because their join price is 29.05$. I usually re-join because I get an email offer. Otherwise I tend to join maybe once a year to the odd twice if they happen to have a model that I have to have.
|
03-14-15 08:12am
|
Reply
832
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I'll say maybe because some of them must look at what we write and try to implement changes to fix issues we have mentioned. I think PU is very different from most of the other forums because we are all paying customers. If webmasters do not pay heed to what we say than some of us will no longer join their site and that is a guaranteed sale that is lost. Worse word of mouth will quickly mean that others stop joining.
|
03-12-15 06:30pm
|
Reply
833
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I'll say all of the above because they each have something that is moderately annoying about them.
|
03-10-15 06:10pm
|
Reply
834
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It can from time to time but I so rarely have any interaction with webmasters that I can't say that their attitude affects me all that much. The only exception might be when I had issue with cancelling Scores new site Porn megaload. I had some amazing back and forth with one of the sites administrators and that is the only reason why I joined again.
|
03-08-15 09:13am
|
Reply
835
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
Although I feel that they are for the most part all accurate. That doesn't mean that they are all honest. What I mean by that is that I consider a site to be accurate when they pretend to offer in their preview section something that I know they won't in the members section simply by the fact that you can't actually view what it is that you will get with your membership. ie: if a preview section is all flash and no substance than you can be assured that the content will also be all flash and no substance.
|
03-06-15 05:19pm
|
Reply
836
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can't say that price is not an issue for me because I'd be lying if I did but I don't usually look at the price of a site so much as what I'm going to get for my investment. That's why I feel comfortable in saying that the sites that are 30$ or more are often not worth half their cost and sometimes they aren't worth joining at all.
|
03-04-15 06:59pm
|
Reply
837
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I have some dvds in a dresser drawer and the rest are digital
|
03-03-15 01:53pm
|
Reply
838
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
You can rest assured that it will not get a perfect score because there are a couple of glitches with the site that automatically mean that they can't get 100%.
|
03-01-15 05:51pm
|
Reply
839
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I can't dispute the facts that many established performers have shot for these guys but I still say that their brand of porn should not exist because it's simply too toxic for most performers (not to say all).
|
03-01-15 05:43pm
|
Reply
840
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I will post my review next week and you can then compare what you wrote in yours to mine. I hope you will comment on it and let me know how I did.
|
03-01-15 05:41pm
|
Reply
841
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I can't think of a single free or 1$ trial that was worth it. The free one for obvious reasons and the second because all the ones I foolishly paid for wound up being a scam where you got to see nothing that wasn't available in the preview section.
|
02-28-15 05:18pm
|
Reply
842
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I must disagree with you. The two sites you named are known to shoot extreme type of porn. I would say that queesnake shoots ultra extreme content so the type people interested in that are not your run of the mill porn fan. The women who choose to shoot for those sites know exactly what they will subjected to because it's just too extreme for them not to. The same can't be said for the women who get fooled into shooting for FF. I know because I read a first hand account of what happened to one of the women who shot for these guys. I'm talking about a woman who had already shot for a couple of Kink sites so she was comfortable with the more extreme part of the industry. As far as I can tell. She is the only woman to have walked out of her shoot before it got too violent. I saw some of the pictures and she didn't look good after just a few minutes of starting her scene.
I'm okay when the women who choose to shoot a certain type of scene know exactly what is going to happen and know that their safety is paramount to the people shooting the scene. that doesn't man that accidents won't happen but those are usually the exception and not the rule. You will have to point to me which FF scene you are dead certain that the woman was thrilled with what happened to her and would gladly sign up for another run. I have never seen it and I know some women have shot more than once for FF.
|
02-28-15 05:11pm
|
Reply
843
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I'm sorry but you will have to point to me where they changed the type of porn they produce because as far as I can tell. It is pretty much the same stuff it as always been. They tend to be on par with the kind of stuff Brazzer put out except that their stuff is more vanilla in nature. I know they are the one mega site that shoots the least amount of anal of all the others but that's about it.
|
02-28-15 05:00pm
|
Reply
844
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Nope. The only thing that I have found are new sources for my existing fetishes but this happens less and less these days.
|
02-27-15 05:55pm
|
Reply
845
|
Face Fucking
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
I'll grant you it's rare and there isn't a single day that I don't wish that it was extinct. Their brand of porn is what you get when you mix the most fucked up stuff Max Hardcore did toward the end of his career and add a cup of insanity. They are the poster child for misogynistic porn.
There is no current site that compares to them which is saying a lot.
They changed their name from facial abuse to face fucking because they were probably having a hard time getting any woman to shoot for them. I would be curious to know how they manage to entice any woman to actually shoot for them.
|
02-26-15 06:12pm
|
Reply
846
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Reply
I think my comment is in large part a warning to you and any other reviewer that giving any site and I mean any site a perfect score is paramount to a death blow. Not matter how well intentioned you are. Your review will always feel as though you aren't being honest. I haven't joined blacked yet but I know I will sooner than later but your review will not be a tool I can use to judge if it's really worth joining because you simply didn't write enough info to truly justify your score.
It's tough to review a site and even more so to remove oneself from the final judgement of the site. I looked at your review of Naughty America and you gave the site a score of 50. A site that scored in the 90's with TBP and normally scores pretty high with most other reviewers should never receive such a low score unless they altered their entire site since past reviews.
I think blacked has great potential and time will tell if if does but there is absolutely nothing original in their porn. It's still pure gonzo. You have one woman (sometimes two) with one male performer in a large bright room having sex on white furniture. The only thing that differentiate them from similar gonzo sites is that this is interracial porn which is sadly a niche that is sorely under represented. They automatically get a minimum 80# in my book because they offer interracial porn. I will wait until I'm a amber before I decide how much higher above 80 they get.
I hope to see more of your reviews and hopefully you add more info to them so that we can see what you truly like and don't like.
|
02-26-15 01:57pm
|
Reply
847
|
Blacked.com
(0)
|
Reply of
Pyrenees's Review
You are entitled to your score but by your own admission. It lacks certain things that you would like to see so it can't be a perfect site and therefore 100% is too high for an imperfect site.
You want to give it a high 90 than that is fine but 100% is not a score that should be used lightly. it also wouldn't hurt to have more meat on your review. A high score review should have tons of data to support the claim.
|
02-25-15 02:01pm
|
Reply
848
|
Legal Porno
(0)
|
Reply of
haagar's Comment
Did you really think anything had changed since I posted my comments last year? They have a system that works for them and that is why they are not changing it. I wished that I had gotten a full refund as I never actually used any of the sites services but I at least have the right to bitch about their bad business practice because of that. You can now do the same. If enough people feel like you and I then maybe one day they will have to change their policy. Mind you by the time they do. The damage will have been to great and it will be too late to fix the problem.
In many ways I'm not sad that I didn't get to join. I like their choice of models and some of the stuff they get these women to do is right up my alley but every time I see a trailer. All I am left with is a sick feeling because it's just not sexually stimulating. You wouldn't think that porn shot in a bright white room on bright white furniture would somehow look dark and dingy and yet that is what I usually feel about what they produce. of course it doesn't help that it feels mysoginistic in nature and filled with circus acts.
|
02-24-15 06:17pm
|
Reply
849
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I almost never do because the clowning around can get in the way of the scene.
|
02-24-15 06:05pm
|
Reply
850
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
No because the only credible source I use to know if a porn site worth joining is TBP/PU. I will from time to time check a rabbit review because he will have a more recent one than what TBP has but I take whatever he says with a grain of salt because no one will make me believe that what he writes is always accurate.
|
02-20-15 03:02pm
|
