| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
3601
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Boobs4ever's Poll
The only thing that matters to me is to know exactly what is offered in the trial membership. If a website charges a couple of dollars then who cares, you get to see more than what might be offered on the free section of the site, but if I have to dish out a third or more of the cost of the website then why bother. Unless of course that you only get charged the difference from your inital expense on the trial and full membership. Let's face it. Otherwise that website just cost you an extra 5, 10, 15$. Lets be honest, you can read every review for a site, at some point you want to see if truly the hype meets the expectation. I much prefer a trial membership that is based on lentgh rather than content.
|
07-30-07 08:05pm
|
Reply
3602
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Reply
I suspect that like anywhere else, there are people of varying levels of education and social skills. The fact remains is that it's nearly impossible for an actress to ever come close to our idea of her. Let's say for argument sake that one woman exist that can meet our expectation. Who would want to date a woman who's job it is to have sex with other people. I may be a weird man, but there is now way I'd want to share my girlfriend with other people be they male or female. I don't care that someone says that they are secure in their relationship, and that the sex means nothing to them. I may be old fashion, or the jealous type, but sex for me is never just that. If it doesn't mean anything then why bother with it???
|
07-29-07 10:51am
|
Reply
3603
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I'm assuming the question is based dating a performers and not someone behind the scene. Then my answer is no, I'd go so far as to say that I wouldn't want to meet them. If you watch a TV show, or a movie you aren't looking at a real person. You are looking at an actress who pretends
to be that person, well fantasy almost never equals reality. That's why it's called fantasy
|
07-28-07 06:38pm
|
Reply
3604
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Of course it is, because I can't think of a single site that was beyond my budget, and I'm the type of person who thinks that anything above 25$ is in the expensive for a membership. That said I have paid more and wasn't disapointed.
|
07-27-07 07:35pm
|
Reply
3605
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Poll
I would have said 75 if it was available. I can't think of any website that I've ever been a member with a score lower than that. That said I need a bit more than just a number before I make my mind up.
|
07-24-07 06:57pm
|
Reply
3606
|
N/A
|
Reply of
apoctom's Poll
About 30GB at any given moment, but I mostly burn my porn.
|
07-22-07 05:54pm
|
Reply
3607
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The good thing about many reviews good or bad is that you get a better idea if you'll enjoy a site.
I prefer an honest review but many details. Generic reviews don't help someone decide.
|
07-20-07 06:08pm
|
Reply
3608
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I prefer to download, convert the files to a format playable on dvd player and then enjoy it on a large screen. I appreciate websites that offer divx format in their movies. It cuts on one of my task.
|
07-19-07 06:46pm
|
Reply
3609
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
why type the url, when there is a link?? half the time you type in the wrong one anyway.
|
07-16-07 02:42pm
|
Reply
3610
|
Strapon Lesbians
(0)
|
Reply of
apoctom's Reply
Like apoctom said it does rebill at full price. Your best bet is enjoy the full month cancel membership, and then come again later on. I've been doing that for about 2 yrs, and the special offer is still active. They upload a full new episode every 2 weeks I think, so just vist once a month to see who's episode is now uploaded.
|
07-14-07 05:07pm
|
Reply
3611
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd prefer that there be no anonymous trust ratings, but at least if there were comments that I'd know why the person disagreed with my review.
As it stands right now I have 4 good and 4 bad ratings, and guess what all the bad are anonymous.
|
07-14-07 10:46am
|
Reply
3612
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
25$ should get me acess to a few trial memberships
if I like what I see then maybe think about investing more money
|
07-10-07 06:54pm
|
Reply
3613
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
There are so few sites that offer that peticular fetish. I wish there were more of them.
|
07-08-07 10:22am
|
Reply
3614
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I've yet to understand the appeal in seeing oneself on the screen performing or underperforming
To each is own I guess.
|
07-06-07 09:27am
|
Reply
3615
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I usually read the reviews of whomever gave the highest score and the lowest score on any given review. This usually gives me a good idea of what is or isn't appealling about that site.
|
07-05-07 08:06pm
|
Review
3616
|
Explicite Art
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The variety offered by this site is amazing. There are currently 255 models, most have photos and videos. Both are downloadable in low or hi res. Download options for most videos are the best I've ever seen: divx, mpeg, wmv, quicktime, and ipod. Download speed is very fast. The models are mostly newbies ranging in age from 18 to 25, and come in all types from cute to average. The sex is varied from glamour or solo to hardcore which includes anal, dp, pee, and fisting. |
| Cons: |
This is a French site, so if you don't understand the language this may be an issue for you. Some of the videos could be longer, and I would have loved to have seen more from some of the models. At 29.95 this site is somewhat expensive if you aren't satisfied. A lower cost trial might be nice. |
| Bottom Line: |
This may be the best site on the net today in regards to download options for both photos and videos. The variety and quantity of girls is great. The only sticking point is the lack of a trial membership. |
|
07-03-07 09:50am
Replies (0)
|
Comment
3617
|
Explicite Art
(0)
|
|
07-01-07 10:41am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
3618
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's a little restricting, but it forces me to refine some of my ideas. I wish more reviewers gave a more indept review of the content of sites.
too little is as bad as too much.
|
06-22-07 06:16pm
|
Review
3619
|
Hot Movies
(0)
95.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
The quantity and variety are the biggest selling
point. They boast over 70.000 movies and 1600 studios, and I for one won't argue with them. Most of the big studios are represented here, and for those who like me, want to see content from websites before signing up. Hot Movies has scenes from many popular websites. They update daily. All movies are WMV. They also offer download options. Overall movie quality is pretty good to amazing. |
| Cons: |
Because there is so much content navigating through all of it, is very time consumming. The cost per minute is based on the amount of time being purhcased, so cost varies, as well some titles are tagged premium so cost per time is also different. |
| Bottom Line: |
If like me, you prefer certain scenes, and don't want to buy a complete dvd for maybe 2 scenes than this is an amazing site, and if you also like some older porn, than this is for you. Like AEBN content is the same throught all of their banner sites, but there are certain exception, and depending on your taste, there can be some nice little treasures. Since there is no member ship cost, then you should at least take a look. |
|
06-17-07 11:26am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
3620
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I think the date is important only if the review is more than 6 months. Having been a member of many sites on and off, I've come to the conclusion that for most, the major changes are the adding of more content, and sometimes the methods of downloads. I can't think of one site, which having read an older review and a newer one That I was able to see a serious improvement/changes.
|
06-17-07 10:51am
|
Reply
3621
|
Celebrity Movie Archive
(0)
|
Reply of
DpornGuy's Reply
Hi DpornGuy. I'd say that they update at least once a week. I signed up to their newsletter, and I get an update once a week of what's been added.
|
06-11-07 06:15pm
|
Review
3622
|
Celebrity Movie Archive
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Navigation is made easy by selecting either actresses name, or the name of movie/tv show. They update regularly. The quality of the videos is pretty good. The variety is good. You even get some celebrity videos. Downlaods are quick. |
| Cons: |
Some of the celebrity videos are actually pornstars performing in softcore movies. The buying of bandwith is a small annoyance, but that's all. They could add more material from pre 1990. |
| Bottom Line: |
In a sea of nude celebrity video websites, this one still stands out. The king being MR Skins, but I find navigation a little easier on this site. Now some complain about the bandwith buying system, but the advantage with that is that whenever new stuff comes out you don't have to renew membership just keep some bandwith in the bank. |
|
06-10-07 10:12am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
3623
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
Squirting videos are acceptable, peeing videos not so much. It's not illegal, but in the mind of most porn producers why rock the boat, when there is an easy way out. This is porn, so enjoy the fantasy of a woman squirting.
|
06-06-07 06:24pm
|
Reply
3624
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
I enjoy the way TBP reviews, the variety, and the frequency of posting of all the sites offered. Thanks to Porn User we now also get many different points of view from many voices. There are far too many sites outhere, and not enough time or money to try them out.
|
06-04-07 07:09pm
|
Reply
3625
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I said 100, but if 75 had been available I'd have picked that. I think anymore than 75, and it's mostly filler anyway. If you break it down 5 pages with 15 pictures per page is plenty for a photoshoot. Like some have said more pictures is just poor or lazy editing of content by webmaster.
|
06-03-07 11:06am
|
