| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
3551
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Poll
I'm with (jd1961) in that I quite happy if I can do multiple downloads at lower speeds. That means that I'll simply start my downloads just as I'm logging of the net. For streaming I expect 400 or above.
|
11-04-07 06:21pm
|
Reply
3552
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
I'm like SnowDude. I have the original Xbox, and for sure can't afford any of the new consoles. I sure wish Halo 3 would come out on the original Xbox.
|
11-02-07 06:19pm
|
Reply
3553
|
N/A
|
Reply of
williamj's Poll
I don't care if she does or doesn't. It won't prevent me from enjoying the scene either way
|
10-30-07 06:22pm
|
Reply
3554
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I can't remember exactly when I discovered TBP, but I am glad I did. There are far too many other reviews sites out there that are all identical to each other, and to make things worst, all their reviews are pure lies. If a site appeals to me I read the highest score and the lowest one and compare notes.
|
10-29-07 07:03pm
|
Review
3555
|
Playboy Plus
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
The price for a 5 day trial is amazing, and you get to see a lot. There is enough to satisfy your average Playboy fan. The quality of the pictures is excellent. Navigation is made easy. |
| Cons: |
This may just be me, but I don't want to have to call to cancel my membership. If I join online, I should be able to cancel online, but not with Playboy plus. You have to call an 800 number to cancel your membership. Although you do get access to some magazine. they only go back a few years. |
| Bottom Line: |
I joined this site because I wanted access to their archive of magazines, but since they only had a few, I was really disapointed. Then the method for cancelling membership gave me a really bad taste. The trial price of 2.95$ for 5 days is unbeatable. |
|
10-27-07 07:08am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
3556
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I usually go read Fleshbot everyday, as well I like to visit floating world, because in their news section they update regularly the main titles from many blog sites.
|
10-27-07 06:51am
|
Reply
3557
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I usually watch movies online in a streaming format, ant the player I use is mostly windows. Vlc is an amazing player that evryone should have on their system.
|
10-25-07 07:14pm
|
Reply
3558
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Jay G's Poll
I'll watch everything that I download, but I seldom keep it on my system. If I really like it, I usually burn it to dvd. I stream most of my movies from aebn, hot movies , and others.
|
10-23-07 05:54pm
|
Reply
3559
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm with SnowDude and Denner on this one. Some sites will claim something but in reality it's not true.
|
10-21-07 09:21am
|
Reply
3560
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm not a big photo guy, so I have very few photos, but the ones I have are all unzipped.
|
10-18-07 06:22pm
|
Reply
3561
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I usually look for new reviews, because I want to know which sites I might be interested in joining. From time to time I will take a quick look at top ones (in case a new ones been added).
|
10-16-07 06:12pm
|
Reply
3562
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It's like asking a child in a candy store which candy is their favorite. All of them of course.
|
10-12-07 08:09pm
|
Reply
3563
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
Full clips with multiple downloadable formats like(wmv, avi, divx...) should be the norm for anyone who offers videos on their website. If a webmaster wants to offer the option of splitted clips (for slower internet access) then fine, but
full clips should be offered.
|
10-11-07 06:46pm
|
Reply
3564
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have diablo, but i've only played once online. I'm old school computer gamer, so it's me and my computer usually.
|
10-08-07 05:58pm
|
Reply
3565
|
N/A
|
Reply of
roseman's Poll
30$ is the most I fell comfortable paying for a single site, and at that price I wouldn't use a recurring. I don't belive there is a single website worth almost 400$ for a full yr memebership. I'm more than willing to pay a little more if this give me acess to a netwaork ok sites.
|
10-07-07 10:40am
|
Reply
3566
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
I'll be honest and say that I avoid does movies like the plague. I'm willing to accept that people can have different taste, but cumm in the eye is taking it to the level of really bad taste. The gargling with sperm isn't much better. I always tought that porn was fantasy. Who fantasies about cumming in someone's eye???? Your best statement is probably "they manufacture porn". Which is probably what they now do. You can probably take scenes from 10 different movies and compare them together and not one person would see a difference in style. Old porn compared to new porn is like comparing a great painting to a paint by number kit...They don't
|
10-04-07 06:53pm
|
Reply
3567
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Pinche Kankun's Reply
I don't know if it's because less movies were being made, or that you could get arrested for some of the things you did, but frankly even if you take into consideration the fact that there is more porn released in a month then there might have been in half a year back then. Todays best stuff is not comparable to those bygone movies.
|
10-03-07 07:23pm
|
Reply
3568
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I would never watch a hardcore movie that's been made softcore, but a movie which is all softcore can be a nice change. That said the best were from the 70, and 80's. Maybe I'm dating myself, but in recent weeks I've rediscovered the appeal for older porn(soft and hard).
|
10-02-07 06:54pm
|
Reply
3569
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I've never saved large quantities of data for any one particular star. I'm sure that I've got GiGs of data saved, but only if you combine many stars
|
09-28-07 09:28pm
|
Reply
3570
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
I agree with you that the purpose of thumbs is to give you a good
overall idea of the action in the video, and the written description should help clarify it a little more. I agree that written descriptions are sometimes vague, but I've noticed that the reason is sometimes because they know they can attract more people by lying.
I don't need a major story, but a description of the different action that is inside the video ie: straight sex, anal, dp, lesbian
and so on.
|
09-27-07 07:44pm
|
Reply
3571
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jd1961's Poll
Call me an optimist, but I'd rather believe that people just want to write reviews to help other people make up their minds on which sites to join, and maybe even more importantly which websites to avoid. I know that a few of the reviews I've read have saved me some dough, because I'd been tempted to join a particular website, but after having read the review I changed my mind
|
09-26-07 07:06pm
|
Reply
3572
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
One thing that annoys me about thumbs/stills in the preview page is that they don't always show all the action in the video. I'm not asking for dozensof thumbs. I'd much prefer a mixture of written info with some thumbs. This way I can read about the action, and I
can see the performers. The websites handled by kink.com are a good example.
|
09-26-07 07:03pm
|
Reply
3573
|
N/A
|
Reply of
SnowDude's Poll
I'm in agreement with pretty much everyone. Newbies should be subject to trust rating, and I'll second "cblodq" in saying that a rating should never be annonymous. If you don't agree with someone's review then put your name to it, and say why. I'll be honest and say that I got a couple of negative ratings but all where from annonymous.
|
09-23-07 07:15pm
|
Reply
3574
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Hi Drooler sorry for not replying sooner I was visiting a friend. I'm mostly a video website guy, but when it comes to a preview. I'll be honest and say I don't mind if it's in thumbs, video trailer or even a description of the action (like handsonhardcore.com). I'm like you in that if I can't get an idea of what the videos offer. I won't join the website. I haven't passed on many websites, because most have smarten up over the years, but there are still a few that I'd join if I could get a good idea of what exactly those videos look like.
|
09-23-07 07:09pm
|
Reply
3575
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm more a video, so I don't care at all.
|
09-18-07 05:27pm
|
