| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
3126
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I had an artist rendition of the old Battlestar Galactica with some vipers flying toward me, but I deleted it by mistake and now I have one of those that comes with the OS.
|
07-27-09 06:15pm
|
Review
3127
|
Teen Core Club
(0)
87.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to a network of 14 sites.
-Over 800 scenes at the moment.
-They now post new updates as well as upcoming scenes.
-Navigation between each site is easy.
-Download speed is very good.
-The models are all in their late teens to early 20's.
-99% of the models are beautiful to gorgeous.
-The theme for most of the sites is anal and DP.
-Youg throats being the exception sice it's all about blowjobs.
-The style of sex is more gonzo and extreme.
-Movies are wmv and can be download in one file or by section(average video length is 20+ mins).
-You can stream the videos by sections and they offer speeds from dial up to broadband. |
| Cons: |
-Although they advertise 14 sites. Only 7 seem to still be updating regularly.
-They don't date their content so it is difficult
to know the amount of new content compared to the older stuff.
-The sex is mostly gonzo and that means the same sets all the time(bed, sofa, room), no talking,
no scenario and that gets rather tedious.
The names of the models are likely different then what they are on other sites.
-This network is and as always been expensive. At nearly 50US$, it may not be in everyone's budget. |
| Bottom Line: |
I join this network maybe every 18 months. They haven't really improved all that much since the last time but they also haven't really lost any ground.
They have added the following sites since my last membership: Spermantino, Little Hell Cat, Ass to mouth, Double Teamed teens, and ass to mouth. Of course that adds to the overall content within the network but many of the performers already performed similar sex scenes in another one of the site within the network.
They don't seem to be updating very often in many of these and they stpped updating at Teach my ass a while ago.
I think that their biggest selling point is that they get some truly gorgeous Russian girls who are just starting in porn to do some very nasty stuff.
In return that is also their biggest problem because girls are for the most part doing their very first scenes. That tends to make the scene look and feel amateurish.
This network should drop the price a little and copy the style of the 21 Sextury network.
I would recommend this network for anyone who doesn't mind the price and is interested in Russian models that perform gonzo sex.
This is a in and out network. You do not join for more than a month and certainly don't join more often than once a year. I'd say the samething if the price was half what it is. They simply do not update enough to warrant a long term membership. |
|
07-26-09 09:47am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
3128
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
In a perfect world I would have chosen none but since I live in this one and tattoos seem to be very popular with theyoung then as long as it's 1 or 2 very discreet ones then that's fine.
|
07-25-09 06:18am
|
Reply
3129
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I think it will come down to money. If you offer a star 20 million$ to get a full body scan. Then you offer her royalties for any and all movies that her computer generated alter-ego apppears in. She could make millions without ever having to put on or lose weight. She wouldn't have to wear full body makeup or do dangerous stunts.
|
07-24-09 06:41pm
|
Reply
3130
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Reply
I actually think the technology exists but is too expensive at the moment to make any venture worth it. Another big problem is all the copyrights that this would break. Companies get sued for just using a stars picture for advertising. Can you imagine what they would do if they appeared in a porn film? I also don't think that they are able to create proper facial expressions yet. I don't think that there is a program that can simulate laughing or crying on an animated character. They can do animals because there are tons of commercials or movies that have them. Just look at G-force. I'm pretty confident that no hamster was harmed in the film.
|
07-24-09 06:35pm
|
Reply
3131
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I think that it will be so real that we won't be able to belive it isn't. I think the technology is already here but is so expensive that no one can afford it. I've seen enough commercials with animals performing specific trick to know that they are not real.
|
07-24-09 06:25pm
|
Reply
3132
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I took the question to mean far enough into the future to have a true animated movie which looks like the real thing. Looking at what they are currently able to do with special effects. I know that it's not a very distand future. All you'd need to do is pay actors and actresses to get a full body scan.
Although many of you say the real thing will always win out. Just think of your favorite star whether from porn or mainstream. The one who's never done more than a nude scene but now appears in xxx movie. I'm not talking Beowulf animation but the next generation. The lond that is so real that you can't tell that it's actually animated material.
|
07-23-09 06:46pm
|
Reply
3133
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I check the TBP and PU review(s) and then I take a look at the preview pages. I used to visit other review sites but I found that many of them had fake/misleading reviews. I'm not saying that all of them are lying but I found enough of them to be less than honest. That was the main reason why TBP appealed to me. The reviews always seem honest.
|
07-21-09 06:33pm
|
Reply
3134
|
Lesbian Strapon
(0)
|
Reply of
tankker's Comment
Hi tankker. You might want to take a look at straponlesbian.com. They still update and it's not a bad site. Be advised that it's an all anal
strapon lesbian site so if that does not appeal to you then do not join. I have been an off and on meber for a few years. The scenes often contain a certain degree of forced sex. Not to a very high degree but then again if that is not your cup of tea then avoid. If you do decide to join then let me tell you a trick that has worked for me everytime. The site advertises a price of 29.95$ but there is a way to get it for only 18.95$. You click on the join page and when you are on the CCbill page. You simply enter part of your info, but do not click join. Instead you use you back button. Depending on which browser you use. I use Internet Explorer and when I do that I have to press the "control" button at the same time. What happens is that you get a pop-up page that offers the site for 18.95$. Clcik on that link and you then complete the purchase for 18.95$ instead.
|
07-19-09 09:45am
|
Reply
3135
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm a video mostly kind of guy but I do not see the point of a reverse strip in galleries or video. I can understand if in a feature film you have a performer appearing nude in one scene and then you see her putting all her clothes on and then in a later scene you see her performing a provocative strip with the complete outfit. Now that would make sense and might be great.
|
07-19-09 09:29am
|
Reply
3136
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Reply
If I hadn't read on other forum all the issues attached with former contract stars. Then I suppose I would think that a contract is a great idea. I think that many comnpanies take advantage of the ignorance of the performers. The company knows that when the girl signs her name on the contract that it will own that stars stage name. They will justify it by the fact that they made that star famous with all the promotion but I find that a poor excuse for stealing. Digital Playground is famous for doing that.
|
07-19-09 09:22am
|
Reply
3137
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
Of course they aren't. Therer have been a few pornstars that started doing many of these acts and then became contract stars. I think for the most part that it may be a bad business decision. Contract stars are guaranteed income and it doesn't mean that they have to do many movies. In return, the studio tends to own you and when I mean you. I mean your stage name. Whatever popularity you gain under that name can sometime remain with the studio so if you leave then the name my not follow you. In return, if the studio only releases a couple of your movies a year then your name doesn't get talked as often. This is porn and unles you are performing in porn movies then people can't see your stuff.
|
07-17-09 06:47pm
|
Reply
3138
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I'm not sure what pornsites refers to but I have 40 porn related sites. Those include PU, TBP, EBI, IAFD, CAVR, EGAD, BGAD and quite a few that aren't actual porn sites but have to do with pornography in one form or another. If the question is about actual porn sites that you join then the number is about 3.
|
07-15-09 06:39pm
|
Reply
3139
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
If the question is meant to imply that women get better as they mature then I guess that's possible.
The same could be said of men. I don't think that all women do nor do I think that all men do as well. Some don't get any better. Like some wine they turned to vinegar. They just happen to be an expensive vinegar.
|
07-13-09 06:19pm
|
Reply
3140
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Reply
That would seem right because IAFD says that Tracy's birthday is May 7 1968. That would mean she was 16 at the time. No matter how we look at it. She was underage. She didn't act or look like a 16yrs old. There have been quite a few rumors over the years that she planned her downfall. The main reason for the rumors is that she created her own production company and filmed the only legal Tracy Lord porn movie: Tracy I love you. She went to the authorites right after it's release. She made a killing with that single movie since she was still a very popular actress and the only movie anyone could own or sell was Tracy I love you. A couple of persons were sent to jail because of this and in their defense. She presented a valid drivers license. I'm glad she was able to find a career out of porn.
|
07-12-09 08:59am
|
Reply
3141
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
I did see a couple of 8 or 16 mm porn films when I was much younger. I can't remember the format and frankly it would not make any difference. The only thing these films had going for them is that the people appearing on them were having graphic sex. The quality was poor to bad. Of course it's quite possible that todays porn would not exist if not for those types of films.
|
07-11-09 05:52pm
|
Reply
3142
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I'm not sure which was the first site that I joined
but I took a look at some old ccbill transactions and I found a maxhardcore membership back in 02. Needless to say that site no longer exist. As a matter of fact. I'd say that more than a dozen sites that I joined back then are either no longer active or total pieces of crap. I had a bad habit of joining single model sites. That is why I have such a bad feeling about all single models sites.
|
07-09-09 06:14pm
|
Reply
3143
|
N/A
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Poll
I don't share with anyone.
|
07-07-09 06:16pm
|
Reply
3144
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I think that a site that offers a lot of possible tease in the form of wet t-shirts or lingerie is fine. I'd even say that it's great, but at some point I do want to see the model nude. Tease is like having someone bring you different plates of food and only letting you smell it. At some point you want to tasre that food.
|
07-06-09 06:50pm
|
Reply
3145
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Reply
I'm in my 40's so I guess that by definition I'm already considered a little creepy since I watch porn with girls that are 18 and ealy 20's. I make a difference in the fact that I have no desire to see a naked 14 yrs old. Let alone one that's having sex. At this point many studios are guilty of portraying girls as being younger than they actually are. I guess it's a question of how young they pretend, but after all is said and done. We are still talking about adults pretending to be younger. In any case. Big Brother doesn't need any excuse to go after pornographer. John Stagliano is accused of distributing obscene material and the content is a young women squirting milk like product from her ass. She isn't wearing pigtails and a short skirt while doing it but they are still going after him.
|
07-05-09 03:01pm
|
Reply
3146
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I said no and the reason is that appearance is fairly subjective. I've known quite a few models that were above 18 and still looked young. Did they look 17, 16, 15 or younger is hard to tell. The only naked 16 yrs that I have seen is Tracy Lords and that's because Im old enough to have seen her movies when they were still conmsired legal. I'm not going to debate whether that was child porn since at the time no one would have believed that she was anything but at least 18. Trust me when I say that she may have looked young. She did not look like any 16yrs old that I knew. Let alone act like one(on screen at least).
I have always prefered girls with a petite body shape and smaller breast. That tends to scue the general appearance when the model is in her late teens early 20's. The bottom line is if the model is at least 18 then that's fine.
|
07-05-09 09:12am
|
Review
3147
|
Giorgio Grandi
(0)
78.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to a network of 9 sites.
-All the models are in their teens to early 20's.
-The sex is nasty and the theme is anal.
-video can be streamed or downloaded.
-Downloads videos are wmv and either 640x480 for the regular version and 1280x720 for the hi-def.
-Although a European site the language used in the dialogue is English. |
| Cons: |
-This is another one of the sites that belongs to the "No rest for the ass" network and like the others only allow you one download at a time.
-Download speed is pretty bad at 20-30 minutes for the regular version and 50-60 minutes for the hi-def one.
-If you aren't into anal sex then avoid this site and the network since that is the main theme throught most of the network. |
| Bottom Line: |
I may be wrong but I think this is the newest addition to the network since the scenes only go as far back as January of this year.
I enjoyed the content but I wouldn't mind if the owner dropped the concept of 9 sites and instead focused on maybe half that amount. Afterall The content is very similar accross the network with only: dildo and fisting, Eurolesbo gilrs and Gags girls being different.
In return I would like to see more updates and all of them on a specific shedule as oppose to their current system which I haven't figured out.
I based my score in part because you get access to the network. |
|
07-03-09 07:22pm
Replies (0)
|
Review
3148
|
Gapes In POV
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to a network of 9 sites.
-All models in their teens to early 20's
-Navigation is easy within the site & network.
-Video can be streamed or downloaded.
-Downloads are in wmv with either regular 640x480
resolution and 1280x720 for hi-def.
-The sex is pretty intense and leans toward the nasty/extreme of the scale. |
| Cons: |
-This is another one of those sites belonging to the "No rest for the ass" network and like the others ot does not allow for more than one download at a time.
-The sex in this site like in most of the other in the network is rather nasty so not really meant for those with a preference for the romantic type of intercourse.
-The average download speed for a regular version video is 20-30 minutes and double that for the hi-def ones
-They do not update based on any visible schedule so no way of knowing exactly when the next scene will appear.
-They only have 25 scenes which breaks down to alittle more than one scene per months since they started this site. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a good adder to the network but many of the girls here appear in some of the other sites and therefore the scenes is somewhat redundent and repetitive.
Of course they still have a few that are only one this site at the moment so it's still nice to have access.
This site would not be worth bothering with if it weren't for the network access. My score is in part because of the network access.
I would rather the owners dropped half of the sites (including this one) and concentrated more updates for the rest of the sites. A proper schedule for the updates would be a nice option for guest and members. |
|
07-03-09 06:59pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
3149
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
The only person that I can think of at the moment with fame and wealth that actually did something positive is Paul Newman. He created the Newman's Own foundation that has donated millions to different charities. Of course that is a far cry from a pornstar but that's the only that came to mind.
I don't think you are too cynical. It's a fact that we are animals.
That is why when one of us rises above his or her own basic interest and does something positive. We point that person out as a good role model. I just find that many people today just don't rise very high anymore.
|
07-01-09 09:19am
|
Reply
3150
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
I picked no because I don't think that society will ever consider sex workers in a positive light.
It's a kind of double standard since many people use the services of prostitues/escorts and many more watch porn movies. Somehow I don't think we will ever consider people in those professions as good role models.
They aren't the only ones mind you. There are quite a few mainstream actors/actresses that are bad role models, but even they are somehow less so that a pornstar.
I'm open for someone to suggest one pornstar that has been a good role model or has done something positive for sociuety.
|
07-01-09 08:43am
|
