| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
3026
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I don't understand why a site like this just doesn't bother to say on
the preview page that HD is reserved exclusively to their long term members. Ie those with a 6 month or meore membership or those that
have renewed for 5+ months. I don't think they will lose money and
might avoid pissing some customers off. I do not want HD in my porn.
If my faborite sites all go HD tomorrow, then I will be unable to join many of them. Those HD videos would eat my alloted download far too quickly.
I joined Naughty America not long after Brazzer. I also like that site. I have to do a review some time. I find that their content is very similar.
|
11-15-09 10:36am
|
Reply
3027
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Comment
I agree that this is one of those sites that should simply state that HD is a reward for long term members. It would take next to no place and would avoid disapinting paying memebers. I truly do not care for HD so the fact that they don't offer it upfront would not affect my review.
|
11-14-09 09:24am
|
Reply
3028
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Yes, they should and if they don't then whatever happens to them is fine with me. It may seem arsh but anything that brings legal scrutiny on the porn world puts pressure on all other that follow the rules.
|
11-14-09 09:17am
|
Reply
3029
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I agree that it's pure cheating if they say that members can get it on with pornstars. I know that Be The Mask was one of those that lied. All the males were professionals or semi-pros. In any case I for one would never want to sleep with a pornstar. My curiosity does not outweight my fear of catching a serious STD.
|
11-14-09 09:08am
|
Reply
3030
|
N/A
|
Reply of
asmith12's Reply
I suspect that most of these so called real people are mostly boyfriends of the stars. Since they aren't actual professional then I guess you could claim that they are real people. It's kind os stretching the truth but since porn is fantasy then what's another lie.
I'm far more curious about guys that pay very high prices to sleep with pornstars that escort. How many truly do that and how are the old bait and switch.
|
11-13-09 06:19pm
|
Reply
3031
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
There is nothing preventing anyone from being part of a porn shoot. The only things that are needed are a valid AIM Test, a willingness to sign a release form giving a studio or site all rights to the video and royalties that come from it. It's also possible that you will need an agent as well but that I'm not sure.
Now what's the likelyhood that any of these so called real people having sex with pornstars sites are real??
|
11-12-09 06:05pm
|
Reply
3032
|
N/A
|
Reply of
careylowell's Poll
No, why would I want to? I can watch porn pretty much anytime that I want. Afterall there is so much more to life than porn.
|
11-10-09 06:20pm
|
Reply
3033
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Reply
I'm not so sure that it's a majority that like those intense BJ that we now see in porn. Like quite a few other things that many of us have complained about. They exist because the people making these movies like them or they think we do. Regardless of the reason. They don't give a rats ass about what the customer likes.
That's why porn is in bigger trouble than the fact that there is a recession. Porn was already in the decline before the recession arrived.
I don't mind if a BJ has some intensity. I just don't want to hear the chocking and gurgling sounds. I don't want to see the performer drooling all over herself. I ceretainly don't want vomit.
There have been some amazing performers that were able to have intense BJ without any of the above gimmicks. I'm reminded of Jeanna Fine. That girl could deep throat with the best. The kind of dept where the throat stretches to allow the penis to go deeper.
|
11-09-09 06:11pm
|
Reply
3034
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I also find that most BJ in todays porn are not very good and sometimes are actually unwatchable.
The slurpingf, gagging and chocking sounds really don't help. If it's well done than it should not really last much longer than 10 to maybe 15% of the scene. My idea of foreplay requires that both parties give and receive.
I've seen some really hot BJ in my time. Most probably going to the 80's and before.
|
11-08-09 07:19pm
|
Reply
3035
|
N/A
|
Reply of
GCode's Poll
Quite often a poll question will somehow make an
appearance in the forum. If nothing else it's kind of fun.
|
11-06-09 05:51pm
|
Reply
3036
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Duante Amorculo's Poll
I'm so tired of hearing about reality shows. I do not want to know what my favorite pornstar does during her day any more than I give a rats ass about what blond #2 did with guy #6 on their on camera date or what she was thinking during this or that situation.
I wonder what people will say about all of these so amazing reality shows cropping up left and right
in the distant future?
|
11-02-09 05:55pm
|
Reply
3037
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I love EA's material. I've been a fan from their early beginnings. That's part of why I'm so frustrated with the way the network is handled. Like I said in my review. This network appears more like a marketing tool to showcase movies from EA's various directors past & present. It mey be set-up this way because they have contracts with other sites? That might be a reason.
This network could be great if the owners make an effort to fix the navigation and surfing speed.
|
11-01-09 05:25pm
|
Review
3038
|
Anal Acrobats
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Access to the Evil Angel network.
-Special price of 20$ through TBP/PU.
-Large library of material(based on newtwork).
-Early access to scenes from just released dvd's.
-Some exclusive material.(based on network).
-Good Dowload speed.
-Videos can be streamed in flash or downloaded in WMV and some in Quicktime as well.
-The videos all come in at least medium or high
quality. |
| Cons: |
-The navigation speed within the network is quite bad. Clicking on an icon and waiting 10 seconds or more for a response is quite common.
-The search engine is a mess. Good luck trying to find a specific scene or actress.
-This is mostly non-exclusive material. This is more important for members of videobox that also took the EA option. |
| Bottom Line: |
-In many ways the network feels more like an EA promotional tool than an actual stand alone site.
It makes sense since EA is possibly the top porn studio at the moment and having a site that showcases some of their material is sure to attract more buyers to their dvd's.
-The network has potential and if one day they decide to improve it then I would recommend it.
The way it stands at this moment. I would stay away. The satisfaction you may get is not worth the frustration you are sure to receive.
-I think EA should decide if they need or want a stand alone network or simply make their entire library available to sites like Videobox. It's less profitable through Videobox, but you get far more traffic.
-I debated what score to give them. I love most of EA's stuff and any site gives me acces to their content is great. That would be worth a high 90 score, but the navigation speed kills it for me. I don't have the patience needed to find what I want. |
|
11-01-09 08:53am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
3039
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
It's not with the downloads that I have a problem. Their download speed is pretty good. I use IE and I can't complain. It's the speed during navigation that's a problem. I do not want to click on an icon and have to wait 10 seconds to get a response.
|
11-01-09 07:47am
|
Reply
3040
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Reply
I agree with you that there is a large amount of content but it is such a mess that finding the content is hellish. Add the fact that the site is slow. I think I'll post a review later today.
|
10-31-09 09:21am
|
Reply
3041
|
N/A
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Poll
I haven't often been refused. When I was refused it was either because they used only Visa or they wanted me to use another credit company. I don't see that much anymore, but I do know that in the past. Some tites had more than one credit card processing company. ie: CCbill, Epoch.
|
10-31-09 09:10am
|
Reply
3042
|
Clara G
(0)
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Review
I was temped to give this site try but this will never happen after your review. This is a good example where the cost truly doesn't matter because you still can't recommend it when you can get access at a low price.
P.S: I joined Anal Acrobats this month. It's part of the buttman
network of sites. I'm preparing a review but it won't be a good review. There are some serious problems with the entire network.
I can tell you that I won't be recommending it.
|
10-30-09 06:50pm
|
Reply
3043
|
Brazzers
(0)
|
Reply of
malikstarks's Reply
I'm one of those rare surfers that dreads the arrival of HD. MY ISP provider has a 100GB download limit per month. Any downloads above that amount is very expensive. I didn't mention much in my review about the HD. I don't have an issue if a site rewards it's long term members with it. The main reason why the site didn't get a higher score is because far too many of the performers have implants.
I wouldn't mind a better balance of normal and fakes.
|
10-30-09 06:05pm
|
Review
3044
|
Brazzers
(0)
92.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Porn with actual little stories that have good camera work, some hot sex, a decent run time, and dialogue.
-A good variety of women from young to cougars. I'd say that they have an emphasis more toward milfs and large breast(quite a few implants).
-Videos can be downloaded in multiple formats as a complete scene or in multiple sections.
-Navigation is user friendly with many different methods to find a certain scene or fetish.
-The surfing inside the site and download speed is very good to excellent.
-Regular updates(about 3 per day).
-The ability to see some of the upcoming updates.
-The price is amazing for all that you get. |
| Cons: |
-too many women with fake breast and a few with some scary sizes.
-They tend to use the same actress all the time.
-The stories are hit and miss with some of the premises not being to everyone's taste
-Some of the navigation highlights don't always match the content inside the scene.
-The comments attached to each scene could use a good moderator. I found the language used in some of them to be lacking in good manners. |
| Bottom Line: |
I've been aware of this site for years but kept putting off joining. I don't know why I didn't join sooner. I was pleasantly pleased with just about everything that this network offers.
I really liked the little stories. There are some that are good and quite afew that are really bad, but not necessarily in the ses as much as the corny dialogue or storyline.
My major complain is all the fake breasts. I prefer small breast but I can enjoy women that have larger breast. It's just that some of the performers have near blimp sized implants.
The male performers seem to come from a small
pool of talent. That is problem if a particular
actor annoys you because the scene is ruined, regardless of how hot the woman is.
They offer HD videos to long term members with
6 months or more. I'm glad for those willing to take the offer but that's not me. Not too mention but HD can be a real downer on some of their performers. I suspect that HD makes your small imperfections much larger. If your main perfomers have breast implants with minor scars well HD can make those scars quite large. |
|
10-29-09 07:32pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
3045
|
N/A
|
Reply of
ControllingMind's Poll
If I ever got longer access to a site then I had signed up for then I've never noticed but I tend to cancel my membership earlier than the due date.
I got burned a few times in my beginning on the net and now I'm careful about cancellations.
If I do one day discover that my membership privilege are still available after it has run out then I would advise the site.
|
10-29-09 06:16pm
|
Reply
3046
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I have very little porn saved on my computer. I'm primarly a video guy and I butn these on dvd's. That said, I still don't give a rats ass about those.
|
10-27-09 07:18pm
|
Reply
3047
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
I picked tying shoelasses because so many people don't seem to do that anymore. How often do you see people put on or remove shoes but without untying them?
Learning to ride a bycicle is difficult but quite often it's not the riding as much as the fear of falling. Of course if anyone has an inner ear issue then riding a bycicle must be quite difficult.
|
10-26-09 05:52pm
|
Reply
3048
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Vegas Ken's Poll
I think that 2 minutes should be more than enough time to give you an idea of what you will see in the video. I have seen some trailers that were probably around that length and I couldn't even tell you which actresses are inside.
What I do not want to see in a trailer is all of the action. I trailer is suppose to tease not to tell you everything. It's worse in mainstream. Most trailers are every good parts of the movie.
|
10-23-09 02:43pm
|
Reply
3049
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nadiencendia's Poll
I had to pick other because I think that a woman wearing high heels can be really hot. My biggest problem is that if she is walking in them then all my mind can see is the damage high heels have on womens feet. I saw a TV news reports years ago and that pretty much killed my ever enjoying a woman walking in high heels.
|
10-21-09 05:56pm
|
Reply
3050
|
N/A
|
Reply of
alexmedia's Poll
I collect nude celebrities but preferably in video
format. These are scenes taken from their movies.
There are quite a few celebrities these days that have nude pictures only. Some take from an artsy fashion magazine or papparazzi and something that is quite new. Nude pictures taken by themselves.
Can you say Vanessa Hudgen, Rhianna and Ashley Green.
Of course there is also the sex tape. This has helped launch the careers of a few people. Would we really be hearing the name of Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian if it weren't for their sex tape?
What's funny with many of these sex tapes is that you can tell that all the outraged and threats of leagal action are meant to boost sales of that sex tape. How much money do the stars make with these movies? I've noticed a new kind of business making it's way in Hollywood. The intended sex tape. Quite a few of the original ones were truly from private stock but these new ones are intended to be sold. The most obvious is the one soon to be released with Shauna Sands. That woman was almost certain to have sex tapes because I rememeber a rumour from a few years ago about a celebrity making porn ans her name was a t the top of the list.
|
10-17-09 07:25am
|
